Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,704 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 508,621
Pageviews Today: 725,017Threads Today: 210Posts Today: 3,546
08:24 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?

 
Patrick Bateman

User ID: 32018985
01/13/2013 11:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Lol, this again?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32110288
United States
01/13/2013 11:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
If you think the equation should = 9 then it should look like this:

(6/2)(1+2)=

3*3 =9

but we have:

6/2(1+2)=

6/6 =1

because you do the sum in the bracket first.

So the answer is 1.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26789708


Correct.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29086850


INCORRECT.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32110288
United States
01/13/2013 11:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Mensa posted this on their FB page about a week ago. I can only assume someone has answered it already but I'll give it a go.

6÷2(1+2) = ?
3(1+2) = ?
3(3) = 9

Order of operations are a grade 9 level understanding of math.
 Quoting: Person445


Sorry but you divided 6 by 2 before getting rid of the () thus violating the order of operations.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28938484


The parenthesis only applies to what is inside of them.
Patrick Bateman

User ID: 32018985
01/13/2013 11:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
If you think the equation should = 9 then it should look like this:

(6/2)(1+2)=

3*3 =9

but we have:

6/2(1+2)=

6/6 =1

because you do the sum in the bracket first.

So the answer is 1.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26789708


Correct.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29086850


INCORRECT.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32110288


It is a poorly written problem in the least needs an extra set of parentheses to get the desired answer.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32057798
Canada
01/13/2013 11:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
If you think it is NOT 1, PROVE OTHERWISE. Prove that property of distribution is WRONG. Prove that fractions as coefficients do not require ( ).
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27301486
01/13/2013 11:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
If you think it is NOT 1, PROVE OTHERWISE. Prove that property of distribution is WRONG. Prove that fractions as coefficients do not require ( ).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


The answer is 9.

6 : 2 x (1+2)

= 6 : 2 x 3

= 9
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32057798
Canada
01/13/2013 11:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
If you think it is NOT 1, PROVE OTHERWISE. Prove that property of distribution is WRONG. Prove that fractions as coefficients do not require ( ).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


The answer is 9.

6 : 2 x (1+2)

= 6 : 2 x 3

= 9

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27301486


Why are you inserting a TIMES symbol so you can ignore Distribution?
Coma Patient #7

User ID: 29804770
United States
01/13/2013 11:41 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
The answer has been stated, it can be either because it's poorly stated. Here's one of the better explanations I've read, copy/paste.

A similar debate popped up not that long ago and had people arguing non-stop. Check the reference at the bottom. The real answer is that the equation itself is ambiguous and should have been written better. This equation should have been written as...

( 6 / 2 ) * ( 1 + 2 ) =

or

6 / [ 2 ( 1 + 2 ) ] =

Using the standardized order of operations...
6 / 2 ( 1 + 2 )
6 / 2 ( 3 ) or 6 / 2 * 3
Answer = 9

Using parenthetical implications via multiplication by juxtaposition and the distributive property...
6 / 2 ( 1 + 2 )
6 / [ ( 2 * 1 ) + ( 2 * 2 ) ]
6 / 6
Answer = 1

Both of you are correct. Considering the ambiguity and poor nomenclature of the equation, you should ask whomever posed the problem to define his/her notation preferences. No self-respecting mathematician would write the equation in this manner.

Anytime you see ab/cd you will see this disagreement.

[link to answers.yahoo.com]
Through will of thought we control our emotions and thoughts are often no more difficult to control then we make them to be.
Patrick Bateman

User ID: 32018985
01/13/2013 11:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
If you think it is NOT 1, PROVE OTHERWISE. Prove that property of distribution is WRONG. Prove that fractions as coefficients do not require ( ).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


I agree, but also still believe it is a flawed problem, and could be argued each way. But from what I have been taught, the answer would be 1.

Lol, I debated many people about this about 100 pages and a year or so ago in this thread, lol.

Last Edited by Patrick Bateman on 01/13/2013 11:41 AM
Patrick Bateman

User ID: 32018985
01/13/2013 11:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
The answer has been stated, it can be either because it's poorly stated. Here's one of the better explanations I've read, copy/paste.

A similar debate popped up not that long ago and had people arguing non-stop. Check the reference at the bottom. The real answer is that the equation itself is ambiguous and should have been written better. This equation should have been written as...

( 6 / 2 ) * ( 1 + 2 ) =

or

6 / [ 2 ( 1 + 2 ) ] =

Using the standardized order of operations...
6 / 2 ( 1 + 2 )
6 / 2 ( 3 ) or 6 / 2 * 3
Answer = 9

Using parenthetical implications via multiplication by juxtaposition and the distributive property...
6 / 2 ( 1 + 2 )
6 / [ ( 2 * 1 ) + ( 2 * 2 ) ]
6 / 6
Answer = 1

Both of you are correct. Considering the ambiguity and poor nomenclature of the equation, you should ask whomever posed the problem to define his/her notation preferences. No self-respecting mathematician would write the equation in this manner.

Anytime you see ab/cd you will see this disagreement.

[link to answers.yahoo.com]
 Quoting: Coma Patient #7


Exactly!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27301486
01/13/2013 11:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
If you think it is NOT 1, PROVE OTHERWISE. Prove that property of distribution is WRONG. Prove that fractions as coefficients do not require ( ).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


The answer is 9.

6 : 2 x (1+2)

= 6 : 2 x 3

= 9

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27301486


Why are you inserting a TIMES symbol so you can ignore Distribution?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


Because that is what it means.

2(1+2) = 2 x (1+2)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32057798
Canada
01/13/2013 11:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Because that is what it means.

2(1+2) = 2 x (1+2)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27301486


That does NOT exempt you from applying distribution OR removing parentheses first.

Has NO ONE seen ANY of these references??!?!?!?

Distribute BEFORE "pedmas" used to REMOVE parentheses too: [link to www.algebra.com]

Get Rid of parentheses with Distribution:
[link to www.helpalgebra.com]

If there is some factor multiplying the parentheses, then the only way to get rid of the parentheses is to multiply using the distributive law.
[link to www.jamesbrennan.org]

"When simplifying expressions with parentheses, you will be applying the Distributive Property." -purplemath
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32057798
Canada
01/13/2013 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
If you get 9, you obviously don't know how to handle parentheses properly and have not had any higher level math education in university... "pemdas" or "dumass" or whatever it is called, and "left to right" is for elementary school children. You later learn the proper "order of operations" and know that equations are essentially collapsed using proper mathematical techniques
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27301486
01/13/2013 11:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Because that is what it means.

2(1+2) = 2 x (1+2)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27301486


That does NOT exempt you from applying distribution OR removing parentheses first.

Has NO ONE seen ANY of these references??!?!?!?

Distribute BEFORE "pedmas" used to REMOVE parentheses too: [link to www.algebra.com]

Get Rid of parentheses with Distribution:
[link to www.helpalgebra.com]

If there is some factor multiplying the parentheses, then the only way to get rid of the parentheses is to multiply using the distributive law.
[link to www.jamesbrennan.org]

"When simplifying expressions with parentheses, you will be applying the Distributive Property." -purplemath
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


The factor multiplaying the paranthesis is 3.

6 ÷ 2 x (1+2)


= 3 x (1+2)

= 3 x (1) + 3 x (2)

= 9
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1428208
United States
01/13/2013 12:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
parentheses first, then solve left to right...

9
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32057798
Canada
01/13/2013 12:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
The factor multiplaying the paranthesis is 3.

6 ÷ 2 x (1+2)


= 3 x (1+2)

= 3 x (1) + 3 x (2)

= 9
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27301486


Do you SEE any parentheses around 6/2 ?? NO ! Parentheses are FIRST in the order of operations, not DIVISION, so if you want to distribute, you do that first! Since when is 6÷2 ever factored from a set of terms?? Distribution is factoring in reverse. You to get a handle on other concepts to solve this equation properly.
(4+2) = 2(2+1)
If you want to say this:
(6 + 3) = 3(2+1) = (6/2)*(2+1) you REQUIRE parentheses. Open any book on online PDF math books... they ALL say this.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32057798
Canada
01/13/2013 12:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
parentheses first, then solve left to right...

9
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1428208


Yes, but you didn't do step 1. So before anyone else says "Wrong" you may want to actually read something and educate yourself, and then prove ALL of the following references incorrect.

See below:
---------------------------
[link to en.wikibooks.org]
"We use the distributive property to help us find a way around the order of operations while still being sure that we keep the value of the expression."

Distribute to REMOVE parentheses [link to www.algebra.com]

Get Rid of parentheses with Distribution:
[link to www.helpalgebra.com]

If there is some factor multiplying the parentheses, then the only way to get rid of the parentheses is to multiply using the distributive law.
[link to www.jamesbrennan.org]

"When simplifying expressions with parentheses, you will be applying the Distributive Property." -purplemath
These guys got it right, they use "Parentheses" in the order of operations to require Distributive Property.
Ref: Purplemath

The Distributive Property in ALgebra:
The Distributive Property is handy to help you get rid of parentheses.
a(b + c) = ab + ac
[link to math.about.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27301486
01/13/2013 12:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Parentheses are FIRST in the order of operations, not DIVISION, so if you want to distribute, you do that first!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


Then you have:

6 ÷ 2 x (1+2)

= 6 ÷ 2 x 3

= 3 x 3

= 9
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32057798
Canada
01/13/2013 12:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Parentheses are FIRST in the order of operations, not DIVISION, so if you want to distribute, you do that first!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


Then you have:

6 ÷ 2 x (1+2)

= 6 ÷ 2 x 3

= 3 x 3

= 9

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27301486

WRONG. I proved that already. Anyone else?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27301486
01/13/2013 12:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Parentheses are FIRST in the order of operations, not DIVISION, so if you want to distribute, you do that first!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


Then you have:

6 ÷ 2 x (1+2)

= 6 ÷ 2 x 3

= 3 x 3

= 9

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27301486

WRONG. I proved that already. Anyone else?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


It's correct. Where is it wrong?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27301486
01/13/2013 12:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Parentheses are FIRST in the order of operations, not DIVISION, so if you want to distribute, you do that first!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


Then you have:

6 ÷ 2 x (1+2)

= 6 ÷ 2 x 3

= 3 x 3

= 9

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27301486

WRONG. I proved that already. Anyone else?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


I just applied your own rule, can you not see that?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13045367
Netherlands
01/13/2013 12:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Casio says 1, en Texas Instruments says 9.

It is nine.

That's just 3 because 1 +2 1 +2 brackets.
So we have:

6 ÷ 2 x 3

Multiplication and division is on a par in terms of priority calculations, because a division does not actually exist: a division by two is a multiplication by 1/2. A multiplication therefore has no priority for a division, as this is the case at a summation. 2 + 3 X 5 = 17.

Given multiplication and division rank equally, they are just left to right.
So first 6/2 gives 3 times 3 is 9 and that
In order to get to 1 you should depart from that rule and that can only by EXTRA parentheses to insert:

6 ÷ (2 x 3)

as one would give.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32057798
Canada
01/13/2013 12:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Because that is what it means.

2(1+2) = 2 x (1+2)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27301486


Actually,
2(3) = 3 + 3 = [(1+1+1) + (1+1+1)]
Therefore
2(2+1), meaning 2 groups of 2+1, is exactly:
[(2+1) + (2+1)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32057798
Canada
01/13/2013 12:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Casio says 1, en Texas Instruments says 9.

It is nine.

That's just 3 because 1 +2 1 +2 brackets.
So we have:

6 ÷ 2 x 3

Multiplication and division is on a par in terms of priority calculations, because a division does not actually exist: a division by two is a multiplication by 1/2. A multiplication therefore has no priority for a division, as this is the case at a summation. 2 + 3 X 5 = 17.

Given multiplication and division rank equally, they are just left to right.
So first 6/2 gives 3 times 3 is 9 and that
In order to get to 1 you should depart from that rule and that can only by EXTRA parentheses to insert:

6 ÷ (2 x 3)

as one would give.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13045367


You didn't eliminate parentheses properly, Read the above post with 5 or so references to the proper way of doing math.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9645738
United States
01/13/2013 12:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
This is where infinity comes to die...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27301486
01/13/2013 12:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Casio says 1, en Texas Instruments says 9.

It is nine.

That's just 3 because 1 +2 1 +2 brackets.
So we have:

6 ÷ 2 x 3

Multiplication and division is on a par in terms of priority calculations, because a division does not actually exist: a division by two is a multiplication by 1/2. A multiplication therefore has no priority for a division, as this is the case at a summation. 2 + 3 X 5 = 17.

Given multiplication and division rank equally, they are just left to right.
So first 6/2 gives 3 times 3 is 9 and that
In order to get to 1 you should depart from that rule and that can only by EXTRA parentheses to insert:

6 ÷ (2 x 3)

as one would give.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13045367


You didn't eliminate parentheses properly, Read the above post with 5 or so references to the proper way of doing math.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


You do not apply your own rules properly, that is where your confusion comes from.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13045367
Netherlands
01/13/2013 12:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Casio says 1, en Texas Instruments says 9.

It is nine.

That's just 3 because 1 +2 1 +2 brackets.
So we have:

6 ÷ 2 x 3

Multiplication and division is on a par in terms of priority calculations, because a division does not actually exist: a division by two is a multiplication by 1/2. A multiplication therefore has no priority for a division, as this is the case at a summation. 2 + 3 X 5 = 17.

Given multiplication and division rank equally, they are just left to right.
So first 6/2 gives 3 times 3 is 9 and that
In order to get to 1 you should depart from that rule and that can only by EXTRA parentheses to insert:

6 ÷ (2 x 3)

as one would give.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13045367


You didn't eliminate parentheses properly, Read the above post with 5 or so references to the proper way of doing math.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


It's the answer from an einstein proffessor in math so dont act you are right.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32057798
Canada
01/13/2013 12:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
It's correct. Where is it wrong?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27301486


Are yous serious? Did you not see any of the references? Maybe if they are in BLUE, you may see them better...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32057798
Canada
01/13/2013 12:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Here you go...in BLUE.

parentheses first, then solve left to right...

9
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1428208


Yes, but you didn't do step 1. So before anyone else says "Wrong" you may want to actually read something and educate yourself, and then prove ALL of the following references incorrect.

See below:
---------------------------
[link to en.wikibooks.org]
"We use the distributive property to help us find a way around the order of operations while still being sure that we keep the value of the expression."

Distribute to REMOVE parentheses [link to www.algebra.com]

Get Rid of parentheses with Distribution:
[link to www.helpalgebra.com]

If there is some factor multiplying the parentheses, then the only way to get rid of the parentheses is to multiply using the distributive law.
[link to www.jamesbrennan.org]

"When simplifying expressions with parentheses, you will be applying the Distributive Property." -purplemath
These guys got it right, they use "Parentheses" in the order of operations to require Distributive Property.
Ref: Purplemath

The Distributive Property in ALgebra:
The Distributive Property is handy to help you get rid of parentheses.
a(b + c) = ab + ac
[link to math.about.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27301486
01/13/2013 12:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
It's correct. Where is it wrong?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27301486


Are yous serious? Did you not see any of the references? Maybe if they are in BLUE, you may see them better...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32057798


Fuck off. Troll.