I will try to put myself in your place and assume that you are really doing it all for our greater good and what you are doing is not a simple hate for the people.

Everything I say is based on - as far as I understand. Since the beginning of times in society there were much more "sheeps" than wise people. You decided to exploit it (to enhance our development) and created democracy and through manipulation you are able to put in new laws that will force people to undergo the greatest change imaginable to force them to shift their conscience since, whenever they feel good and surrounded by luxory, they don't want to change and development stops, starts degradation. That's why you are trying to push as many changes and refresh information change rates so that people wouldn't be able to sit still and they would have to do something all the time.

However, if we can believe psichologysts from "Zeitgeist" or was it "Kymatica" then human brain has 2 modes it can operate on: defense and advance. It cannot be simultaneously in both. If human is constantly in fear - he cannot expand its conscience. 1. How are we supposed to learn these things you are trying to teach us if we are being constantly in defensive mode with all these distractions you make us go through. On the other hand I see that you are trying to show us that this is not what we are by allowing us to destroy ourselves with drugs, debt and all these emotions via programming us into "wanting" these things.

But you know that the behaviour on 60-80% depens on the environment one lives in. 2. If you would try to nurture right morality, prohibit debauchery, ribaldry and platitude on television and elsewhere, wouldn't you achieve your goal alot faster? It takes about 2-3 years most to shift conscience by 180°.

3. Moreover, do you think people will allow you to change something even after the war? I'm sure that you will achieve your result, but people still will do whatever they want to. They will still eat, shit and laugh despite all the cataclisms you are going to make them go through. They still will want a leader that will take care of them and to blame for everyhing bad that happens to them. What will you do then?

How much am I correct/incorrect and where?

4. And what is the point of technological progress if it leads to moral regress, which is opposite to what you are trying to achieve? What's the point of progress at all? All it does is creates luxury and toys that weakens our senses and makes us moral nomads again.

5. Also, since you are trying to get rid of all the "useless" people in the world this way and leave only those, who deserve to stay, can't you make a law, for instance, that would allow those, who deserve to survive? Because many of those, whom you are trying to push towards the light are in the shadow of the bad environment they live in and they fall to the bottom. For instance, if you have no money but you have desire to live and prosper, you are helpless. Cancel a law on the land for example. So that those, who are capable of taking on responsibility, would be able to go and live on their own and prosper from their own land? Sheeple will still want to be taken care of and they will stay in cities with luxury, but these people... I mean, how isn't that an option?

6. Are you planning on keeping the production of weapons and maintain army after uniting the world? (If yes, why?) And what will you do with all the people that don't know anything else except for the war?

P.S. Inspired by the book: "Lord of flies".