NASA CONFIRMS!!! Space Time Vortex DOES EXIST Around Earth

Exactly. As does everything, including my pen on the desk here. Just have to chuck in a few more "very"s.

Of course it could be. It's not like we've already discovered all there is to be discovered and we're just figuring out how to make sense of it all now. We'll be figureing out new shit as long as we're inventing new ways to look at the shit we can already see and we'll just keep going smaller and smaller into the way subatomic levels and the energy that makes up matter itself until we can manipulate energy to create solid substances much like the food replicators in Star Trek.

The theory of the transporters from Star Trek was based on the theory of matter being made up of energy which can be broken down into transmittable information and reassembled at a reception point being based in fact. Perhaps we are getting to the point where we understand what that really means.

i know im sorry but it's a Donnie darko...moment.....the collapse.....

Robert Kelly....has something going on....some thinking flicks...

Can you explain this picture more??

Can someone explain to me why they depict the space time vortex on one pole of the earth only (presumably the south pole) and not on both poles?

^^^THIS^^^^

That's exactly what I was thinking....ufos!

It is like they are depicting earth as being supported by space that is bent or distorted by the earth's mass.

But which side of space should be bent? the earth is more or less spherical, and it's mass is more or less equally distributed, so why should space be distorted on one side only and not equally on every side?

I demand a sexplanation!

Om you stupidfucks. enough with the NASA Bullshit. That is no fucking different than citing Wikipedia. you are just embarassing yourselves again. stick to american idol and twinkies. fuckups

each moment the universe is created anew

each moment is the big bang

HYPOCRITES.... YOU HATE NASA AND ALWAYS SAY IT MEAN NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER UNLESS IT IS SOMETHING YOU WANT TO HEAR!!!

PINNED THREAD WITH ALL 5 STARS



Not anymore!

NASA Announces Results of Epic Space-Time Experiment May 4, 2011: Einstein was right again. There is a space-time vortex around Earth, and its shape precisely matches the predictions of Einstein's theory of gravity.

Researchers confirmed these points at a press conference today at NASA headquarters where they announced the long-awaited results of Gravity Probe B (GP-B).

"The space-time around Earth appears to be distorted just as general relativity predicts," says Stanford University physicist Francis Everitt, principal investigator of the Gravity Probe B mission.


An artist's concept of GP-B measuring the curved spacetime around Earth. [more]
"This is an epic result," adds Clifford Will of Washington University in St. Louis. An expert in Einstein's theories, Will chairs an independent panel of the National Research Council set up by NASA in 1998 to monitor and review the results of Gravity Probe B. "One day," he predicts, "this will be written up in textbooks as one of the classic experiments in the history of physics."

Time and space, according to Einstein's theories of relativity, are woven together, forming a four-dimensional fabric called "space-time." The mass of Earth dimples this fabric, much like a heavy person sitting in the middle of a trampoline. Gravity, says Einstein, is simply the motion of objects following the curvaceous lines of the dimple.

If Earth were stationary, that would be the end of the story. But Earth is not stationary. Our planet spins, and the spin should twist the dimple, slightly, pulling it around into a 4-dimensional swirl. This is what GP-B went to space in 2004 to check.

The idea behind the experiment is simple:

Put a spinning gyroscope into orbit around the Earth, with the spin axis pointed toward some distant star as a fixed reference point. Free from external forces, the gyroscope's axis should continue pointing at the star--forever. But if space is twisted, the direction of the gyroscope's axis should drift over time. By noting this change in direction relative to the star, the twists of space-time could be measured.

In practice, the experiment is tremendously difficult.


One of the super-spherical gyroscopes of Gravity Probe B. [more] The four gyroscopes in GP-B are the most perfect spheres ever made by humans. These ping pong-sized balls of fused quartz and silicon are 1.5 inches across and never vary from a perfect sphere by more than 40 atomic layers. If the gyroscopes weren't so spherical, their spin axes would wobble even without the effects of relativity.

According to calculations, the twisted space-time around Earth should cause the axes of the gyros to drift merely 0.041 arcseconds over a year. An arcsecond is 1/3600th of a degree. To measure this angle reasonably well, GP-B needed a fantastic precision of 0.0005 arcseconds. It's like measuring the thickness of a sheet of paper held edge-on 100 miles away.

"GP-B researchers had to invent whole new technologies to make this possible," notes Will.

They developed a "drag free" satellite that could brush against the outer layers of Earth's atmosphere without disturbing the gyros. They figured out how to keep Earth's magnetic field from penetrating the spacecraft. And they created a device to measure the spin of a gyro--without touching the gyro. More information about these technologies may be found in the Science@NASA story "A Pocket of Near-Perfection."

Pulling off the experiment was an exceptional challenge. But after a year of data-taking and nearly five years of analysis, the GP-B scientists appear to have done it.

"We measured a geodetic precession of 6.600 plus or minus 0.017 arcseconds and a frame dragging effect of 0.039 plus or minus 0.007 arcseconds," says Everitt.

For readers who are not experts in relativity: Geodetic precession is the amount of wobble caused by the static mass of the Earth (the dimple in spacetime) and the frame dragging effect is the amount of wobble caused by the spin of the Earth (the twist in spacetime). Both values are in precise accord with Einstein's predictions.

"In the opinion of the committee that I chair, this effort was truly heroic. We were just blown away," says Will.


An artist's concept of twisted spacetime around a black hole. Credit: Joe Bergeron of Sky & Telescope magazine. The results of Gravity Probe B give physicists renewed confidence that the strange predictions of Einstein's theory are indeed correct, and that these predictions may be applied elsewhere. The type of spacetime vortex that exists around Earth is duplicated and magnified elsewhere in the cosmos--around massive neutron stars, black holes, and active galactic nuclei.

"If you tried to spin a gyroscope in the severely twisted space-time around a black hole," says Will, "it wouldn't just gently precess by a fraction of a degree. It would wobble crazily and possibly even flip over."

In binary black hole systems--that is, where one black hole orbits another black hole--the black holes themselves are spinning and thus behave like gyroscopes. Imagine a system of orbiting, spinning, wobbling, flipping black holes! That's the sort of thing general relativity predicts and which GP-B tells us can really be true.

The scientific legacy of GP-B isn't limited to general relativity. The project also touched the lives of hundreds of young scientists:

"Because it was based at a university many students were able to work on the project," says Everitt. "More than 86 PhD theses at Stanford plus 14 more at other Universities were granted to students working on GP-B. Several hundred undergraduates and 55 high-school students also participated, including astronaut Sally Ride and eventual Nobel Laureate Eric Cornell."

NASA funding for Gravity Probe B began in the fall of 1963. That means Everitt and some colleagues have been planning, promoting, building, operating, and analyzing data from the experiment for more than 47 years—truly, an epic effort.

What's next?

Everitt recalls some advice given to him by his thesis advisor and Nobel Laureate Patrick M.S. Blackett: "If you can't think of what physics to do next, invent some new technology, and it will lead to new physics."

"Well," says Everitt, "we invented 13 new technologies for Gravity Probe B. Who knows where they will take us?"

This epic might just be getting started, after all….

*********************************************************


THIS IS A TRICK BEING PROPAGTED BY THOSE AT NASA WHICH ARE ALLIED WITH CERN LHC !!

THIS THEORY OF EINSTEIN'S WAS NOT INTERPRETED LIKE THIS BEFORE THIS SPACE TIME VORTEX WAS DISCOVERED IN PAST 15 MONTHS. THEY KNOW THAT THIS SPACE TIME VORTEX IS A RESULT OF PARTICLE PHYSICS EXPERIMENTATION AT CERN LHC AND THEY ARE TWISTING THIS THEORY OF EINSTEIN'S TO MAKE THIS NEW VORTEX AROUND EARTH LOOK LIKE IT'S NATURAL AND NORMAL AND IT IS NOT HARMING OUR PLANET SO THEY CAN CLAIM IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CERN LHC WHEN THE SHIT HITS THE FAN AND THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT CERN LHC COMES TO LIGHT IN ALL PUBLIC FORUMS ACROSS THE PLANET THIS SUMMER. AND THEY KNOW IT, AND THAT'S WHY THEY ARE USING THESE DECEPTIONS AND ATTEMPTING TO CONVINCE EVERYONE OTHERWISE!
DON'T FALL FOR IT, LISTEN TO THE TRUTH THAT I HAVE BEEN REVEALING AND YOU WILL BE OK.
IT'S NO COINCEDENCE THAT THEY HAVE DISCOVERED THIS VORTEX AFTER CERN LHC WENT OPERATIONAL. BECAUSE THE VORTEX WASN'T THERE BEFORE 12/2009.

Part of the original post from an epic thread. This guy claimed the NSA was seeing into the future...

NASA and the link between Joe Stack and John Bedell
Thread: NASA and the link between Joe Stack and John Bedell

Part of the original post from an epic thread. This guy claimed the NSA was seeing into the future...

NASA and the link between Joe Stack and John Bedell
Thread: NASA and the link between Joe Stack and John Bedell

to paraphrase mark twain, it's amazing how much einstein has learned since i was young.

Its really nothing new; we are already pretty much taught this; it only gets possible complicated when you leave to the collage system or scientific community; where the theory is debated; obviously not so much to be debated now; although I'm sure some will try out of ego.

It means for sure space can be folded; we wont need light speed.

sorry this BS

I don't need to write at length to call this......

get a Brian!

Globaldisaster.spamblog.spam oh man

This story is a rehash of the same information they reported years ago. Nothing new here.
Story from 2007
[link to news.bbc.co.uk]


These are Einstein idol worshipers trying to keep the legacy of Einstein alive by constantly proclaiming “See… Einstein was right!” in any news story they can put together.
They will re-massage the data and announce it again in a couple of more years “See… Einstein is still right”.

Even though many have proven Einstein’s theories incorrect he is still idolized by his worshipers and thrown in our faces at every opportunity as a role model for us all.

I am not going to spend the time proving to you how his theories have been dis-proven, you can research that on your own.

the ETs use a gravity distortion device and the earths magnetic force to quickly displace themselves. bob lazar talked about this a while ago

it is one of the weirdest places in the whole solar system i guess.

that is why you cant get out.

maybe after some talk of that one outside of it but for the rest.

I believe this proves that light and time are bent under the influence of gravity, as was suggested by Einstein. The stars in the sky appear to be in a circle around us, but in reality are probably in a different locations as their light is being bent by the earth's gravity and by the gravity of other nearby stars, galaxies and black holes.

So what we see in our Universe is really a fantasy, with reality changing depending on the perspective of the viewer.

With time also bending, this opens up the specter of worm hole travel, where time would not pass, or would pass very slowly, as suggested by Einstein.

Of COURSE you won't.

red-shift as a measure of distance is BULLSHIT.

no research has gone into TIRED LIGHT

:)

One thing this does imply, Earth is a bit more special than most think.

Weak strong, inexact very, cold hot, dark light.

Nothing here is new or foreign to God. It is the knowledge of the cycle of the systems which is rapidly becoming clearer to us humans. Does it change anything? No, but it does give us very evidences of what many of us already know.

I wish that were true, but as this poster here noted in this link: [link to thunderbolts.info]

How much wishful thinking came into the equation then?

What can I say... Let's do the timewarp again ? already got my lingerie dry cleaned