RED ALERT!!! Massive cover-up underway in the White House! Natural Born Citizen Definition SCRUBBED FROM ALL ONLINE DICTIONARIES!!!

FUCCCK YOU SCUMBAG COMMIE> GET USED TO THIS: GOD IS GOING TO GIVE OBAMA CANCER AND HES GOING TO BE ONE DEAD FUCKKKER SOON OF CANCER. LIKE YOU SCUMBAG

United States Supreme Court

* Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874): In this case decided after the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Court stated (pp. 167–68):

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.

AC 1181313

I can sleep now :)

Natural born citizen refers to a person upon which citizenship is the result of being born on American soil.

There is no other definition.

A person born in another country of parents that are American
is a cit zen, but not natural born.

A person who is naturalized comes here as a citizen of another country.

Obama is a natural born citizen if he was born in Hawaii, even if his daddy was Hitler

YES! Bring it on.

then quick go here: [link to www.gpoaccess.gov]

and save and download page S3645 and S3646

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE S3645 April 30, 2008

Click on the circle for 2008, and in the Search Box enter the Senate Page Number during which the issue was addressed. That is, type in S3645 and click the “Submit” button. The page will be downloaded as a pdf."

those two pages have everything that you need to prove the natural born thing straight out of the Senators' mouths from the McCain eligibility hearing

posted these excerpts from that hearing on another GLP thread, and there is lots more from those two pages that you can use.

"excerpt from the Congressional Record on McCain's eligibility:

"Numerous legal scholars have looked
into the purpose and intent of the
‘‘natural born Citizen’’ requirement. As
far as I am aware, no one has discov-
ered any reason to think that the
Framers would have wanted to limit
the rights of children born to Ameri-
cans abroad or that such a limited view
would serve any noble purpose en-
shrined in our founding document.
Based on the understanding of the per-
tinent sources of constitutional mean-
ing, it is widely believed that if some-
one is born to American citizens any-
where in the world they are natural
born citizens. "

"MARCH 19, 2008.
We have analyzed whether Senator John
McCain is eligible for the U.S. Presidency, in
light of the requirement under Article II of
the U.S. Constitution that only ‘‘natural
born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the
Office of President.’’ U.S. Const. art. II, § 1,
cl. 5. We conclude that Senator McCain is a
‘natural born Citizen’’ by virtue of his birth
in 1936 to U.S. citizen parents who were serv-
ing their country on a U.S. military base in
the Panama Canal Zone. The circumstances
of Senator McCain’s birth satisfy the origi-
nal meaning and intent of the Natural Born
Citizen Clause, as confirmed by subsequent
legal precedent and historical practice.
The Constitution does not define the mean-
ing of ‘‘natural born Citizen.’’ The U.S. Su-
preme Court gives meaning to terms that are
not expressly defined in the Constitution by
looking to the context in which those terms
are used; to statutes enacted by the First
Congress, Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783,
790–91 (1983); and to the common law at the
time of the Founding. United States v. Wong
Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 655 (1898). These
sources all confirm that the phrase ‘‘natural
born’’ includes both birth abroad to parents
who were citizens, and birth within a na-
tion’s territory and allegiance. Thus, regard-
less of the sovereign status of the Panama
Canal Zone at the time of Senator McCain’s
birth, he is a ‘‘natural born’’ citizen because
he was born to parents who were U.S. citi-
zens. "

There you go ^^^^^

Someone has mirrored you over at:
[link to www.forumsforums.com]

I tried the first three links and yes it is not found.
Sometimes compound words are not found in dictionaries, but usually it points you to one or more of the words to help modify your search.

I found this argument at:
[link to hesnotmypresident.wordpress.com]

rather compelling:
"If a person whom is not a natural born citizen is allowed to occupy the Office of the President of the United States in usurpation, then there is no other law contained within the Constitution that must also be abided. Should this occur, then the result is anarchy and our nation no longer exists as a Constitutional Republic bound by the rule of law. Furthermore, there would be nothing to prevent someone from becoming President of the United States whom is not a natural born citizen and has ill intentions whom would do irreparable harm to our nation as a result of becoming President."

BULL SHIT> not NBC.
you phukktard
obama is going to be killed by god. and so will you. die mother fuckkcr you are dead of cancer soon,. you phukking asshole . i pray for your death

Search for "native" perhaps

I'm sorry

Normally I wouldn't even give this ridiculous idea the time it took to look it up myself.
Except that now it has been proven that this is very possible and very easy to do.
Case in point, the artist from China. China "erased" his existence from the www.
(Twitter)Brilliant sculptures by Chinese artist / Political prisoner, Ai Weiwei #ZODIACHEADS

The Zodiac Heads are on exhibit in NYC I think but the artist is missing and China has deleted his existence.

Another co-inky. This stupid 9 vs. 1 math problem debate. Look at all of the 9-tards (19+ million last time that I checked FaceBook)who are insisting that 9 is correct because Google says so. That silly argument may be an underlying message that "whoever wins the war writes the history"-(unknown), along-with the curious obvious Photo-shop disaster birth Certificate that the WH put online, AND the constantly-changing version of the events in Pakistan on May 1.

Put it all together, and something is trying very hard to tell us something? I wonder why.

you are wrong.

a person born in another ocuntry of paretns that are American ARE natural born.

read the Congressional Record pages above.

YES! The baby would be a citizen, UNDER the 14th AMENDMENT. But unless it can be verified that the child has TWO AMERICAN PARENTS, it WILL NOT be a Natural Born Citizen!

Wow... OP, have you looked at the cached pages from various search engines? You may find some of the old def's that way.

Seriously, you may have uncovered the Achilles Heel.

I spent the day today, I mean most of the day, dissecting the COLB that BHO posted at the White House website a few days ago. The original version. I have a 38-year career in digital imaging. I have the tools to do some good evaluation.

The posted document is highly modified. It is nowhere near close to a scan of an original document. As reported many places it is a composite of many smaller "layers", those layers being individual sections, sometimes overlapping, of images of signatures, dates, places, and other data.

First, consider that if one was scanning a document like a birth certificate it would be one bitmap. Not so here. Somebody went to a whole lot of trouble to single out the signatures and the dates and re-insert them separately.

Any and all of the places, signatures, and dates have been separated from the original document and then re-inserted. At this point it is not possible for me to determine which are original and which have been doctored. The only thing that is totally obvious is that someone went to a lot of trouble to doctor some of them.

I am not like 99.9% sure this is doctored. I am 200% sure.

Thing is, if it is this obvious to me then it must be to a lot of other people, too. Where are they? Where are the major news media who certainly have capable graphics professionals who have discovered this? Why are they all giving OHB a free pass?

In order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. Vattel, The Law of Nations

Wrong. Both parents have to be US citizens at the time of his birth. His father was Kenyan in a British Commonwealth.

He is not wrong!!

[link to www.wnd.com]

Yeah, and a person that criticizes jews is an antisemitic.

Not an anti-Semite, an antisemitic.

In other words, natural born can mean whatever you want it to mean, but natural born citizen is just what it sounds like.

For instance, Mexicans who give birth to a child right after they swim the Rio Grande have natural born citizens as babies. They call them anchor babies and they are natural born citizens.

ou = or, not of so "les naturales ou indigenes" would be translated as "natural or indigenous peoples".

[link to youtu.be]

Here is a copy of the ppsimmons video that shows the bill that Obama sponsored in the Senate. Good to keep this also.

"Please note that the correct title of Vattel's Book I, Chapter 19, section 212, is "Of the citizens and naturals". It is not "Of citizens and natives" as it was originally translated into English.

"According to the U.S. Constitution, an individual born after 1787 cannot legally or legitimately serve as U.S. President unless he or she is a "natural born citizen" of the United States.

Among members of Congress and the mainstream news media, the consensus of opinion is that anyone born in the United States is a "natural born citizen". However, when we researched this issue a bit more carefully, we found that the consensus opinion is not consistent with American history.

In Minor v. Happersett (1874), the Supreme Court said that, if you were born in the United States and both of your parents were U.S. citizens at the time of your birth, you are, without doubt, a natural born citizen. In the same case, the Supreme Court also said that, if you were born in the United States and one of your parents was not a U.S. citizen when you were born, your natural born citizenship is in doubt. So far, the Supreme Court has not resolved this doubt because, until now, there has never been any need to do so.

With only two exceptions, every American President, who was born after 1787, was born in the United States, to parents who were both U.S. citizens. The two exceptions were Chester Arthur and Barack Obama. When Chester Arthur ran for office, the public did not know about his eligibility question. Only recently did historians learn that, when Arthur was born, his father was not a U.S. citizen. The 2008 election was the first time in history that the United States knowingly elected a President who was born after 1787 and whose parents were not both U.S. citizens.

Barack Obama publicly admits that his father was not a U.S. citizen. According to Minor v. Happersett, there is unresolved doubt as to whether the President is a natural born citizen. This doubt is not based on the imaginings of some tin-foil-hat-wearing conspiracy theorists on the lunatic fringe of society. This doubt comes from what the Supreme Court has actually said, as well as a variety of other historical and legal sources which are presented and discussed here."

[link to opengov.ideascale.com]

Natural born citizen isn't defined in my dictionary.

Last Edited by izezi on 05/05/2011 11:57 PM

Were you insane before you became your interpretation of a 'religious' person or has your 'religion' done this to you?

I just went to [link to web.archive.org] (IE:waybackmachine)

Everything comes up empty.

Open a thread a post your proof. Get it on!

ME2

Not true at all! I had these definitions saved as bookmarks. I KNOW they were there last week, because I have been doing research into the natural born citizenship clause for a long time now, trying to come up with a valid argument to prove that Obama IS NOT eligible. Now all those links are scrubbed and we can no longer supply references online!

It's utterly amazing how gullible and outright stupid some of you people are. I have a Webster's dictionary from 1987, a Webster's New World Student Dictionary and pocket Oxford..."natural born citizen" isn't in any of them. So according to you Obama what...went back in time and changed my dictionary from 1987? Some of you are just moronic. First of all, dictionaries generally list WORDS, not a series of words as in three in a row like "natural born citizen." Wouldn't really expect it to be in a dictionary. Second, you're not correctly spelling/punctuating. Natural born looks like this: natural-born. And if it's being scrubbed, I guess "they" are being pretty sloppy about it. In addition to some of the places other people have mentioned here's another...dictionary

www.wordreference.com/definition/natural-born%20citizen

Thank you OP and above ^^ for getting this information out there. I have been doing the same!