Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,316 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,446,785
Pageviews Today: 2,094,709Threads Today: 443Posts Today: 11,440
07:40 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject RED ALERT!!! Massive cover-up underway in the White House! Natural Born Citizen Definition SCRUBBED FROM ALL ONLINE DICTIONARIES!!!
Poster Handle MinutemanCDC_SC
Post Content
NEVER MIND THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE:
WHERE'S THE U.S. CITIZEN FATHER?

"A natural born Citizen is
a citizen
born in the country
to parents who are citizens."


(N.B.: "parents" is plural, meaning the biological father and mother, not adopting parents, not the mother and her legal husband, and plainly, not a citizen parent and an alien parent.)

This definition was:

the norm in Western Civilization dating back to Plato and Herodotus (4th and 5th c. BC);

used in correspondence among the Framers of the U.S. Constitution;

quoted by U.S. Rep. John A. Bingham and U.S. Sen. Jacob Howard, authors of Amendment XIV, which concerns only citizens and never mentions natural born Citizens; and

characteristic of every duly-elected President born since the Constitution was ratified in 1787... except Chester A. Arthur, who even burned his Presidential papers to hide his father's Canadian citizenship, which status was only discovered in 2008 by Atty. Leo Donofrio's researchers; and

quoted nearly verbatim in at least six U.S. Supreme Court cases: The Venus, Shanks v. DuPont, Minor v. Happersett, Ex parte Reynolds, U.S. v. Ward, and Perkins v. Elg.

Although the lower courts were confused, the "birth on soil to citizen parents" definition of nbC has never been contradicted in any U.S. Supreme Court decision - except for the 5-4 decision in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark. Chief Justice Fuller, opining for the four Justice minority, held to the traditional and historically correct definition of nbC. But Justice Gray went rogue against precedent and went Tory to boot, appealing to British Common Law and the (mid-18th c.) Crown's aberrant definition of Natural Born Subject as "born on soil," overreaching even to foreign citizen parents' offspring.

On the other hand, Mr. Obama was not only born in Kenya, but his mother was not yet 19, the age the INA of 1952 required in 1961 to confer her U.S. citizenship to her foreign-born child. His father of record was a Kenyan, a British Protected Subject, which status passed to all his offspring. How could a newborn Barack Obama II, whose birth status was governed by British law, be a natural born Citizen of the United States? He was not even a U.S. citizen at birth.

UNLESS he has been NATURALIZED (which is mutually exclusive of "natural born" and which would exclude him from being a natural born Citizen),
HE IS NOT NOW, NOR HAS HE EVER BEEN, A U.S. CITIZEN!!!

HE WAS BORN A BRIT, HE'S ALWAYS A BRIT, AND HE'S NOT LEGIT!
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:



News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob