Dimitri also says that when the WTC Towers AND the Sears Tower in Chicago were built, BOTH New York AND Chicago had a very strange and unprecidented ordinance, which after those buildings were built, no longer exists. He says that the ordinance said that for buildings that BIG, they would have to have "a demolition plan in place", and he said that that plan was -- FOR ALL THREE BUILDING, including the Sears Tower -- for them to have a 1.5 megaton nuclear bomb under the towers, which would pulverize the buildings and turn them to DUST.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1069180I have doubts: Would a nuclear device pulverize the building into the fine dust that was reported by Dr. Wood?
Wouldn't a nuke create a bigger flash and bang , that would be visible for miles around.
We are working on hypothesis based on the weapons and tools that WE are aware of.
What if these people have access to technology not yet disclosed, but seen for the first time on 911?
HAARP is pure Nikola Tesla. Its not acknowledged anywhere as something that exists. Yet we talk about HAARP all the time.
I could be wrong.
In #9, Dimitri describes the pulverizing effects, and in #10, he shows a diagram of where the bomb was placed. And I just noticed that I was wrong about it being a 1.5 megaton bomb. It was a 150 kiloton bomb. Back to #9, he explains that anyone who would come near the hole that it would create within 1-3 years would most likely die of leukemia, which explains why the cleanup crew are either sick with it, or dying.
I haven't read Dr. Wood's report yet, but you gave me a link, so I will. However, Dimitri explained in #9 that it would pulverize everything present and he gave graphic examples: such as a rock would look like a rock--until you touch it--and then it would turn to dust. He even said that the same thing would happen even to any people who were caught in the building. That brings the thought in MY mind of Lot's wife, in the Bible, looking back as she was told not to do, "and then she turned into a pillar of salt". I think salt is the wrong word, that DUST is the right word.
By the way, you're asking very good questions. It shows that you're thinking! :-)
In #10, Demitri explains that a nuke would not create a bigger flash and bang that would be visible for miles around, because of where it was located, and the segment opens with a diagram. They placed the bomb down in the ground 50 meters BELOW the building, but it was actually 74 meters down into the ground, because the basement of the building went 24 meters deep.
That literally means that they dug a hole 74 meters deep first, placed the bomb in the hole, and then filled it with 50 meters worth of dirt, packed it down, and then built the building on top of it.
Now with it so deep in the ground, when it is set off, it only does damage to the earth and most of the explosion is contained BY the earth, and its power extends for up to 50 meters. Therefore, if they hadn't placed the building 50 meters above it, the blast that far down in the earth would only cause the feeling of an earthquake, and people would report hearing what sounded like a subway train derailing (like the sound is coming from under the ground, because, it is). However, with the building there, most of the effects of the nuclear blast would already be absorbed by the earth, but the pulverizing effects would go to the path of least resistance FOR UP TO 50 meters (hence the building being placed at that point), and then blasting out it the foundation of the building allows it to go up into the building freely.
He does explain, however, that a 150 kiloton bomb was not enough to reach the entire building, and that the "airplanes" were the marker of how high they expected the pulverizing effect to work. Therefore, for the point above the airplanes they had to rely entirely on the bombs that were planted inside the building.
If you watch "911 Coincidences" on YouTube, you will find witnesses say that before 9/11, they were working inside the building and strange things were happening during the 2 weeks before "the attack". One man said that he was working on a Saturday to catch up, when he heard what sounded like a jackhammar on the floor directly above him. That was a vacant floor. When he rode the elevator up to that floor, he said there was a lot of white dust flying around in the air (cememt) and some man told him to get out of there and go back to his office. Someone reported a planned power outage and how they all had to scramble to back everything up so they wouldn't lose valuable information when it would knock their computers out of commission. They assert that those workcrews could have been putting in the explosives right under everyone's noses without them knowing about it--or done on the weekends while they were gone.
It sounds to ME like the technology used in 9/11, from what I've heard so far, is all technology that we know about, but I'm open to any evidence you may have, and I wouldn't be surprised. I DO believe that there is a strong possibility that aliens DO exist, AND that if so, it is entirely possible that they DO know a LOT more than we think we do. SO, I wouldn't be surprised if we were to learn that there WAS some sort of alien technology used in the collapse of the buildings.
I believe in Tesla and his HAARP device too. I have even heard that the latest Japanese earthquake WAS done by HAARP--AND satellites--AND nuclear bombs strategically placed in the ocean to cause the tsunami, and that they made a serious mistake: They only wanted to scare the hell out of the Japanese--not DESTROY them. They horribly underestimated their powers and created a tsunami far larger than they were anticipating, and they didn't mean for it to take out those nuclear reactors. John Lear said that here on GLP in his "I'm John Lear. Ask Me a Question" thread. I don't believe everything he says, but I believe that.
I also heard that Tesla created a Time Machine, and I believe that long before I knew that, way back in 1975, I met one of his time travelers. He was my grandfather's grandfather, who lived in the U.S. Civil War. It was 1975, he didn't look a day over 60, and yet he was claiming to me that he was my ancestor and I didn't believe him because he would have had to be 130-135 years old, and he wasn't, and because he was an American Indian and I'm not--or at least, I didn't know that I was. He told me that SOON, I would receive a family history and told me to read it and I would find him. I did on #1, I did on #2, and amazingly, I did on #3. Now I believe him, but it's too late for that. Oh well! He DID tell me that when I die, he'll be waiting for me and show me around heaven. I can hardly wait. At least he DID give me his message, which is very personal to me.
Anyway, now that I know about Tesla's time machine, it all makes sense. If he were 20-25 during the civil war, and Tesla started around the turn of the century, that's 35 years later, so that WOULD have made him 55-60 years old.
That's why I believe that there is more to Tesla than people want to believe. I heard that he was discredited because when he spoke, he talked about things that most people cannot comprehend and therefore, thought he was a fool. I guess that's what happens when you have such a high IQ as he did.
