New Chemtrail Poll: Do you believe in Chemtrails?

The difference is . . . It just hit me that we really don't need aviation (at least no where near the level we have it . . . ) . . I thought you were just putting up a strawman to be argumentative . . . you are . . or . . . you are not being sarcastic???

What you refuse to observe Guy is what aerosols do to true cloud cover. You don't look at the spray when it comes in contact with real clouds. This spray if you actually watched destroys real moisture clouds. Its a program designed to break down water molecules/CO2. Its why so many pictures show aerosol lines and no clouds among the spray.

CLOUDS DIE WHEN THE SPRAY COMES IN CONTACT WITH MOISTURE. YOU DON'T SEE THE PLANT AND INSECT LIFE STRUGGLING FOR MOISTURE. YOU DON'T SEE THIS GUY AT ALL.

TAKE SOME PICTURES OF SPRAY AND CLOUDS AND POST THE RESULTS OF WHO IS THE WINNER. TRUE MOISTURE CLOUDS OR A BROWN,BLACK,GRAY BLANKET OF AEROSOLS.

YOU REALLY HAVE NO CLUE GUY. YOU REALLY DON'T WATCH THE SKIES. YOUR LINE OF WORK IS IGNORANCE, YOUR TOLD WHAT TO THINK. YOU GET PAID TO NOT KNOW.

WHAT IS AMAZING IS YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE AIR CRAFT SPRAY THAT BLANKETS THE SKY, SHUTS OFF SUNLIGHT, DESTROYS THE TONS OF WATER IN THE AIR IS OK. ITS SAD TO KNOW YOU MISSED OUT ON SOME OF THOSE MOST BEAUTIFUL SKIES GROWING UP. YOU FORGOT AND KNOW YOU CLAIM AIR CRAFT SPRAYING BACK AND FORTH EVERY WHICH WAY HAS ALWAYS BEEN. THATS THE LIE YOU TELL GUY AND PEOPLE KNOW BETTER.

By-The-Way, Guy you need a new Avatar . . . this one sucks . . .

Explains much . . .

Here's another youtube video:

I stand by what I've said previously (anonymously) that they exist and that they're used for amplifying the radar signature of UFOs.

Some late night entertainment . . . enjoy. . .

What I meant was the conclusion that, unless you're writing fiction, you need hard data before extrapolating from a hypothesis.

What the fuck is your fixation with these two little girls???

You're almost as creepy as Tweeny...

Noble is bi-polar and becomes confused and violent at times.

Chemtrails are still formulating an hypothesis . . . Let's not get ahead of where we really are . . . Still trying to formulate a definition . . .

Another stupid opinion posted by a chemtard as fact.

Does it EVER end with you people or is ignorance just a way of life for you people?

:Rate-glp:

:Chemtrail - Pict:

:C - #1c:

So, you actually "believe" that if this thread is well received by the conspiracy nuts on this site, that it somehow validates your beliefs?! This site is 99% paranoid dumbasses.

How about you post this poll on an aviation or atmospheric science forum and see what kind of response you get.



Holy shit you are stupid!

This is exactly George's MO.

And yes, he is that fucking stupid.

Did you see his utter fail of a chemtrail debate thread about a year ago? It was painfully stupid to read through, although entertaining watching George founder through it.

Trying to figure out what something is for before you have even shown it to be intentional?

New Chemtrail Poll: Do you believe in Chemtrails?
1. No, I do not . . .
2. Yes, but they are rare . . . experimental geo-engineering, etc.
3. Yes, and they are all over the sky . . .
4. Yes, they include cloud seeding, Chaff, insecticides, etc.
5. Yes, but most are persistent trails from High Efficiency Jet Engines
6. Yes, the TPTB is trying to crowd control, and other agendas


:Chemtrail Southe:

How bout...7. Yes but they're a waste of money.

I maintain that whatever is in the mix is used to amplify radar signals in mid and lower altitudes for...um...various purposes.

I think you could be correct. . . . I also think they could also be countermeasures to an existing undeclared war using weather modification mentioned by Secretary of Defense Cohen . . . During the Clinton Administration . . .

:C - weather war: