Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,345 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 35,448
Pageviews Today: 49,751Threads Today: 11Posts Today: 259
12:21 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject New Chemtrail Poll: Do you believe in Chemtrails?
Poster Handle George B
Post Content
From another active thread. . . .
Thread: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand. (Page 33)


visibility has little to do with chemtrails. . . visibility of an aerosol is an extremely short lived characteristic. . . .that was the purpose of the cited search . . . to see if increased sulfur concentrations into geoengineering useful levels would affect engine efficiency and visibility
 Quoting: George B


And your entire premise is that 'they' are using contrails for 'geoengineering' by using sulphur 'spiked' fuel in order to make more contrails and reflect sunlight...

Using your own links, I proved that higher sulphur makes contrails dissipate faster...

Back to my recent statement:

In your fucked up mind...

"Everything that proves you wrong, 'proves' you right'"

cruise
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


You assume something has to be visible (to the unassisted human eye) to reflect sunlight and/or heat. . . far from the truth. . . most of the particulate from volcanoes for example dissipate in the jet streams and trail winds . .
. the sulfur compounds may never have been visible except in the (invisible) infrared portion of the light spectrum and only then because they form a layer of warmer air when observed with the proper equipment.
. . .see the photo below. . . .this is an infrared enhanced photo from NASA. . . .it shows persistent trails and cirrus cloud banks from space. . . because of the width and lower cloud cover these were probably not visible from the ground. . . .yet they were there and had climatic effect. . . .
Chemtrail Southe [link to earthobservatory.nasa.gov]
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:



News