|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
New Chemtrail Poll: Do you believe in Chemtrails?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
George B |
|
Post Content
|
Gee, Whore-Hay... Thanks for the facts about contrails that absolutely no one disputes...   Pssssst . . . don't tell anyone but they (Trails) are really more than contrails . . . they are a serious climatic factor . . . and eventually will have to be dealt with . . .  Since this has been known for years. . . . Why has there not been one practical mitigation process, procedure or policy implemented. . . .?????  From another active thread. . . . Thread: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand. (Page 33) visibility has little to do with chemtrails. . . visibility of an aerosol is an extremely short lived characteristic. . . .that was the purpose of the cited search . . . to see if increased sulfur concentrations into geoengineering useful levels would affect engine efficiency and visibility
Quoting: George B And your entire premise is that 'they' are using contrails for 'geoengineering' by using sulphur 'spiked' fuel in order to make more contrails and reflect sunlight... Using your own links, I proved that higher sulphur makes contrails dissipate faster...Back to my recent statement: In your fucked up mind... "Everything that proves you wrong, 'proves' you right'"  You assume something has to be visible (to the unassisted human eye) to reflect sunlight and/or heat. . . far from the truth. . . most of the particulate from volcanoes for example dissipate in the jet streams and trail winds . . . the sulfur compounds may never have been visible except in the (invisible) infrared portion of the light spectrum and only then because they form a layer of warmer air when observed with the proper equipment. . . .see the photo below. . . .this is an infrared enhanced photo from NASA. . . .it shows persistent trails and cirrus cloud banks from space. . . because of the width and lower cloud cover these were probably not visible from the ground. . . .yet they were there and had climatic effect. . . .  [ link to earthobservatory.nasa.gov] The scientists, who advocate geoengineering methods such as spraying millions of tonnes of reflective particles of sulphur dioxide 30 miles above earth...
Quoting: FK NBL 2562242 SHILL!!! Whore-Hay sez that 'particulates' can 'reflect' light while 'invisible'... They can be visible to the human eye as well. . . it all depends on the situation. . . size of particle, concentration, altitude, humidity, temperature, dissipating winds, lower cloud cover, night time versus day time, etc.. . .each situation is different. . . if I were managing an intentional aerosol injection program that is exactly what I would count on. . . . 
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
