New Chemtrail Poll: Do you believe in Chemtrails?

Thanks !!!

From other Thread. . . . . .




It is not the first time scientists have had blinders on . . . I would point to the struggle Physicians had accepting the role of germs and the need for hand washing and sterile techniques between treating patients . . .

Thread: New Chemtrail Poll: Do you believe in Chemtrails? (Page 238)

The study had painstakingly gone on for three years, compiling large amounts of data. Through the death of a friend and mentor, an insight came to him that helped him solve the riddle. It was common practice for students and doctors to go to the delivery wards just after completing autopsies for research or classroom studies.  Sanitary conditions were primitive, for this was before germ theory was developed.  Often, physicians did not wash their hands between autopsy and delivery.  As a result, they were carrying an invisible particle of infection on their hands from the cadavers to the mothers.  In other words, the doctors were inadvertently introducing into the mother’s body the infection that would kill her.  This would also explain the discrepancy between the two divisions:  midwives did not do autopsies.

Semmelweis ordered the doctors and students in his division to adopt a
hand-washing technique employing a chlorine solution before they delivered any baby.  The change had an immediate impact.  In 1848, the first full year of hand-washing techniques were applied; and deaths fell dramatically, moving in line with rates from the other division and rates reported for home births.  The mortality rate after hand washing dropped from 1 in 10 to 1 in 100.

While this was a major break-through, do you think the medical world and work immediately celebrated?  No.  In fact, Semmelweis was not reappointed to his position the next year.   Even worse, it was so divisive that his division discontinued the hand-washing practice after he was not reappointed, and the mortality rate among mothers returned to their much-higher rates.  It would be almost 20 years before it was shown how Semmelweis’ “invisible cadaver particles”—caused putrefaction in dead
bodies and hospitals began to adapt the practical strategies of minimizing infection.

[link to justpeaceumc.org]

I have never been on the "chemtrail" bandwagon, and still call them contrails, but I don't believe them to be pure clean water vapor.

Do contrails contain aluminum, aluminum oxide, and other minerals and chemicals? Of course they do, in trace amounts. You can't have an aluminum aircraft with mostly aluminum engine parts not exhausting small amounts of aluminum through engine wear. Of course, the same thing is true of modern automobiles with aluminum engine parts.

Finding aluminum in tree bark is hardly conclusive proof that it fell from the sky. It could have been blown in by a storm front from a nearby open pit mine, the nearest highway, a local factory, et cetera...

When I start hearing from a multitude of airline mechanics about unknown tanks, hoses, and external nozzles on the aircraft they work on, I'll reconsider this subject.

From the Thread above. . . .



Ask Noble why the maximum standard for sulfur compounds in jets fuel is 3,000 ppm when the fuels delivered supposedly everyday to aircraft averages 300 - 500 ppm . . Also ask why research was conducted to see how fuel as high as 5,500 ppm was tested in aircraft to test the engine performance and exhaust visibility characteristics . . .this was done around 1995. . . .by-the-way the maximum standard is still 3,000 ppm while all other standards for fuel have been lower to the double digits. . .
.

I don't need to ask about that one.

Fuel is cheaper with higher sulfur content in it. Removing the sulfur from the fuel drives up the price.
Domestic (US) crude oil can have up to 2.5% sulfur content which needs to be removed during the refining process.

(Humans do really stupid shit to save money)

They don't care...It's NOT their burden! chemtards try to MAKE it their burden, but the onus is on the chemtards to prove there are any such things as "chemtrails". So far, chemtards have failed to support their accusations. 

I also call them "delusional". Thanks for your support.

From the other Thread . . .  Thread: Chemtrails? Doubtful. Things chemtards don't (or can't) understand. (Page 45)




Feelings are mutual  . . . Chemtrail advocate think the "experts" are just too conditioned by their training, education and career restraints to think with an open mind . . . We think their inability to see common sense is delusional as well . . .

Any excuse to bump your own thread.

Like this exchange needed to be saved...

Pathetic.

The fact that you believe that chemtards have "common sense" because they connect dots that don't exist, is hilarious.

I actually thought I made a good point. . . .sorry if you disagree. . . .NOT!!!!!!

Some people might not notice. Others might not care. But even folks who can't tell a picture-postcard blue sky from its milky, geoengineered cousin might be able to detect other side effects of using sulfate to cool the planet.

We have reached another milestone. . . .over 2,500 VOTES!!!!!!!



POLL: Do you believe in Chemtrails?
Yes, and they are all over the sky . . .   36.5% (915)
No, I do not . . .   23.2% (582)
Yes, the TPTB is trying to crowd control, and other agendas   18.2% (455)
Yes, they include cloud seeding, Chaff, insecticides, etc.   10.5% (263)
Yes, but most are persistent trails from High Efficiency Jet Engines   6.1% (152)
Yes, but they are rare . . . experimental geo-engineering, etc.   5.5% (137)
Blank (View Results) (446)

Non-Blank Votes: 2504

We have reached another milestone. . . .over 2,500 VOTES!!!!!!!



POLL: Do you believe in Chemtrails?
Yes, and they are all over the sky . . .   36.5% (915)
No, I do not . . .   23.2% (582)
Yes, the TPTB is trying to crowd control, and other agendas   18.2% (455)
Yes, they include cloud seeding, Chaff, insecticides, etc.   10.5% (263)
Yes, but most are persistent trails from High Efficiency Jet Engines   6.1% (152)
Yes, but they are rare . . . experimental geo-engineering, etc.   5.5% (137)
Blank (View Results) (446)

Non-Blank Votes: 2504

How are things in Texas?
hot there!

VT, I am in SC right now visiting family. . . The weather has been great so far except for one real hot and humid day . . .it was cool and windy today . . .great Golf weather. . . How are you?

My daughter moved to Texas! I miss her!

Your daughter that lived in NC??? . . . Hope she likes Texas. . . Have you ever been here . . .Texas that is?

Yes, she graduated from Grad school last month, I went down to NC she came back a few weeks and moved to Texas. Her boyfriend is there. I have never been there.
so far she likes it, looking for job.

Texas is sooooo big that there are several places you would not have thought exist here. . . .you can find almost every type of environment here that exist except for year round snow. . . .

I live in south central Texas in the Hill Country. . . Very hilly and rather beautiful. . . .I love it here. . . Though I am from the East Tennessee Mountains. . . .

She is in that section also..

Good . . .then you should try to visit her as soon as you can and see for yourself. . .

Yes, that would be nice.