New Chemtrail Poll: Do you believe in Chemtrails?

You are no longer credible to me, you have been on the other side of the fence playing a game all along.

I don't have to prove anything to anyone including you or noble.

Chemtrails, or call them what you want are out there being sprayed day and night. Where I live there is not much if any commercial air traffic at night, yet I witness chemtrails being sprayed at, sometimes lots of them.

Call them chemtrail planes/ufo's/drones, whatever, but something is going on and people like you are trying to tell us who know this other wise.

This is my independent study!!!!

Lets be honest...you feel you don't "have to" prove anything...only because you are UNABLE to prove the trails are anything more than contrails. Which is my ENTIRE position in this matter.

A complete lack of proof...yet thousands of statements of FACT from you chemtards.

Don't blame ME because you and your fellow chemtards are dishonest.

Go ahead and ban me, douche.

I don't have to identify myself. I'm one of many Anonymous Cowards who are ion this thread who you DON'T ban!

What a stupid reason for banning someone.

Besides, if one can't tell I'm "Noble" by what I have written in this thread, then they are stupid!


Try not to be such an asshole George...If you can.

:chems:

George, why don't you do me a favor and tell the people who run this paranoid lie factory that I'm back, and need to be banned. They are too stupid to know how to permanently ban me.

:chems:

they're real, but i don't think they're evil. i think they're artificial clouds/particle distributors designed to protect us from solar radiation which is penetrating more every year due to our weakening magfield.

Your opinion is as good as anyone else's . . . since that is the state of the situation . . . people find it hard or impossible to convince people that chemtrails don't exist and people who believe they exist cannot present enough acceptable evidence to prove they exist to doubters . . .

Thanks for your response George. My thoughts are if they are "possibly" increasing aircraft induced cirrus cloud banks intentionally.......that they would make dedicated flights to produce these trails in the sky. I say this because of what I observe. I've lived in my area for more than 35 years and the traffic in the sky has hugely changed in the past few years and more each day. I have both military and commercial flight paths going over my home, but those are not the planes leaving the trails. Also, I am close enough to the military base and airport that the planes are still descending or ascending. Easy to see.

There is, from what I've been seeing, "a method to their madness". The sky looks littered and trashed most days. Never used to. A lot less sun..it' mostly behind a bank of foggy clouds now. As they say......"Just Sayin'".

"doubters"?! Is that how you classify those who believe the trails that chemtards call "chemtrails" are just contrails?!

Yeah, those who accept basic principles of aviation and science are "doubters"...

Good call...

Fucking douche...

Yes . . . doubters of the Chemtrail conspiracy . . .

Wicked bunch of chemtrails in Northern Vermont this afternoon!

:144:

Hi!! Vt, how are things going . . . have you decided to move to Texas yet?????

My point about "ascending and descending" aircraft was the lack of trails. I should have made that clear....I suppose.

I understand your 2 and 3.

I have to agree with a couple of the A/C posters and
Mortier. I've followed your thread for quite sometime and your content has changed.

I appreciate your responses and posts, mostly your capacity to discuss the topic rationally.

Your "quote" The only guarantee in life is deception.....everyting else is optional......is appropriate.

Not writing you off. Will continue to follow your thread. Trying to keep an open mind.

Thanks for your honest Post . . . in May 2013 this particular Thread will be two years old and I will have been posting about chemtrails since 2009 on other Threads . . . it is not illogical for there to be an evolution of thought and drift of emphasis over such a time period . . . nothing is static . . .

The only thing I have been trying to maintain is presenting what IMO I have honestly discovered and tried to present no matter where it took me . . . I tried hard not to keep preconceived ideas but flowed where the evidence took me . . . so I am sorry if I have upset some of you with what I have presented . . . but it is honest . . .