Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,568 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 557,060
Pageviews Today: 724,528Threads Today: 148Posts Today: 2,952
06:48 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1377214
United States
05/10/2011 12:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
And the hits keep on comin'. I started this thread to highlight how David Wilcock's support for Obama makes no sense. That he backed Obama from the beginning and that he should perhaps not let his huge unwarranted ego get in the way of just admitting he was wrong about Obama.

Well obviously he must be getting a lot of negative feedback over his latest article. He has just updated the article with about 5 or 6 new sections defending himself over supporting Obama and telling us all we are crazy to think Obama is not good for this country.

lol. He should have not even have updated the article. By updating the article in such a defensive way he is showing his hand. And he just won't admit he is wrong.

It's so funny to see someone speak about 'ego' and that 'hating' Obama is exactly what the bad guys want you to do.


UHHH NO David Wilcock. I don't hate Obama. And it doesn't matter what the bad guys want. I can simply look at HIS actions and tell he is the worse president we ever had. Even worse than Carter.

Are these 'insiders' who 'hate' Obama the same insiders you get your information from? How can you disregard all of Obama's personal actions that are not very presidential to say the least?

David as usual does not use solid logic and only backs his claims because some guy he knows, knows some other guy, who's uncle told him Obama is cool.

It's worth scrolling to the bottom of his 'Disclosure has begun' article just to read the update that obviously shows he is rattled. And to see him call out others about their egos when his own ego won't let him admit he's wrong about Obama is just laughable.

By reading the update you can tell that he is backed into a corner and losing credibility over this. (the little that he had)


He never addresses the fraudulent birth certificate that Obama's own people put out. He never addresses all the misinformed decisions Obama has done since 08 to make him the worst president in history. The money Obama has spent that is more than all previous presidents combined! The fact he reneged on his promises to get our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan and to close Quantanimo. And also the fact he has gotten us into another war with Libya only because Qadaffi wanted to start his own gold backed currency instead of playing ball with the IMF!

It's sad really. In years past I actually looked forward to DW articles and updates. Yes I took it with a grain of salt but I think the very thing DW preaches against has ruined him. His own ego.

Pathetic. Hopefully he gets a rude awakening which will actually do him some good. Lose all support, lose his ego in the process and get back to presenting semi-cool new age concepts.

I also recommend he take a few basic college physics and math courses so that he might actually back some of his claims up with actual science instead of just saying uhhhhh 'my imaginary friend told me so, so it must be true'


Go check out his latest article, skip to the bottom if you get bored to his 'update'. And you will see what I mean.

Even if DW is a charlatan. It's surprising he would update his article in such an obvious way as to look foolish. He even misspells a few words, one misspelling in a bolded title in his update. You can tell the man is frazzled. I expected him to play the game with a bit more finesse. But I think he just did himself in and lost a lot of support.

I know he lost me with this one!


And just a note. I posted part of his article in another thread and within minutes a mod deleted it because it violated the Terms and Conditions. I just surprised how quickly an unpinned thread got censored! Wow! How many mods are working OT on GLP lol


ohappyogrrrohappy
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1377214
United States
05/10/2011 12:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
forgot to mention, DW's site is divinecosmos.com.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1185535
United States
05/10/2011 01:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
He should have lost it in 2008 when he said the financial crisis was over. Had charts and everything all over his site. Talking down to all who didn't see what he could see so clearly. *gag*
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1377247
United States
05/10/2011 01:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
Why don't you just give it up!! He has as much right to his opinions as anyone else!
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1377214
United States
05/10/2011 01:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
He should have lost it in 2008 when he said the financial crisis was over. Had charts and everything all over his site. Talking down to all who didn't see what he could see so clearly. *gag*
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1185535


Its not that I hate the guy. Maybe 15% of the ideas he presents are very interesting. But he makes too many stretches and leaps of faith in his logic. Also as you pointed out, too many mistakes.

I was hoping he matured as a researcher/presenter of esoteric knowledge. But instead of righting the ship back on course he is sadly going astray into la la land. He had potential.

I don't know who is feeding his ego or giving him all this ludicrous insider 'info' which normally turns out to be impossible to verify or never come to fruition. but i think his number is up.
Da Purple Chicken
Just a little bit batty

User ID: 1277766
United States
05/10/2011 01:08 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
LOL!

WHEN did Wilcock ever have credibility?!

scratching
“If we are peaceful, if we are happy, we can smile and blossom like a flower, and everyone in our family, our entire society, will benefit from our peace.”
Thich Nhat Hanh, Being Peace

"But ask the animals, and they will teach you,
or the birds in the sky, and they will tell you;
or speak to the earth, and it will teach you,
or let the fish in the sea inform you." - Job 12:7,8

"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." - Hunter S. Thompson

revstargazer (at) hotmail.com
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1377214
United States
05/10/2011 01:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
Why don't you just give it up!! He has as much right to his opinions as anyone else!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1377247


yes, but if I were to start a website and have a following. i'd at least be more careful about presenting fact instead of what I think is true or my imagination.

that is the whole problem. you can poke so many wholes in any of his articles or presentations that if he didn't sensor his comments section, his theories would resemble swiss cheese.

and thats another big problem I have. you only get posted to his article's comment section if you are over the top praising him and kissing his butt.

he doesn't even accept open minded debate. and when you are that close minded you can't possibly know the truth.
Tread On This

User ID: 1117918
United States
05/10/2011 01:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
Yeah I'm still waiting for Obama to show up on prime time with an alien. This guy is so full of shit.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1377214
United States
05/10/2011 01:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
lol


LOL!

WHEN did Wilcock ever have credibility?!

scratching
 Quoting: Da Purple Chicken
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1377214
United States
05/10/2011 01:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
Yeah I'm still waiting for Obama to show up on prime time with an alien. This guy is so full of shit.
 Quoting: Tread On This


Dude. I literally laughed out loud when I read this.
lol

I also love how he says 'Because I put a date for disclosure on my website, it didn't happen'

statements like this are just over the top!!!!

yeah, and when is this two hour special presenting aliens going to happen? lol good call man, i forgot about that one. so hilarious.

check his latest article... he checks his insider's bonafides, lol. the same ones who told him about the alien two hour special and the same one that was in the Dennys that worked at Montauk.

This guy will believe anybody. I'd love to get a hold of him and tell him about my 'bonafides' and then get a kick out of watching the BS I had told him when he post it word for word on his website.
Tread On This

User ID: 1117918
United States
05/10/2011 01:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
I think even Steven Quayle rolls his eyes at David Wilcock

cruise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1332558
United States
05/10/2011 01:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
oh no, this obviously has something to do with raycism......
let's lay off the guy so people don't ridicule us aNY MORE
the dems never treated bush like this
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1255539
New Zealand
05/10/2011 01:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
let me guess...even tho you think he has no credibility & his ideas are far fetched.

you have watched all his videos & continue to read his articles.

am i right?

why bother if you hate him so much.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1377214
United States
05/10/2011 01:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
I think even Steven Quayle rolls his eyes at David Wilcock

cruise
 Quoting: Tread On This


lol, you are killin me dude. i gotta go to bed because its 1:18 am on the east coast and i gotta take my gf to the airport at 3:30 am this morning. this will totally suck being a zombie taxi driver. keep the thread going man. you are lighting it up and thanks for bringing up some cogent and hilarious stuff .
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1377214
United States
05/10/2011 01:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
i don't hate him. and I admit i use to read his articles all the time. the as they say, you get three strikes and you are out. i gave him 15 strikes and he is getting worse by the article.

actually i'm starting to read his articles again out of humor because they are getting hilarious. does it matter the motivation? lol

g'nite

let me guess...even tho you think he has no credibility & his ideas are far fetched.

you have watched all his videos & continue to read his articles.

am i right?

why bother if you hate him so much.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1255539
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1254000
United States
05/10/2011 01:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
When and why would Wilcock have credibility in the first place?

Wilcock is an idiot
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1255539
New Zealand
05/10/2011 02:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
i don't hate him. and I admit i use to read his articles all the time. the as they say, you get three strikes and you are out. i gave him 15 strikes and he is getting worse by the article.

actually i'm starting to read his articles again out of humor because they are getting hilarious. does it matter the motivation? lol

g'nite

let me guess...even tho you think he has no credibility & his ideas are far fetched.

you have watched all his videos & continue to read his articles.

am i right?

why bother if you hate him so much.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1255539

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1377214


i read all his articles and take it all with a grain of salt.

some far fetched ideas: time travel, wormholes, light bodies etc etc

but i can say, i always take something positive from his words & they have helped me be a better person i reckon.

nice to have a dose of positivity after all the doom and gloom of GLP
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1238368
United States
05/10/2011 03:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
The fact that Wilcock thinks Obama is secretly a "white hat" takes the cake for brain damage. Obama's lying STRAIGHT TO OUR FACES on 60 minutes saying we just killed Bin Faken. WHAT A COMPLETE LIAR! It's so totally obvious to anyone with a pulse that this whole Bin Faken/Al-Cia-duh is a total hoax with more holes in the story than swiss fuckin' cheese. Just ask Dr. Steve Pieczenik who knows a thing or two about psyops..or this in case PATHETIC Grade F psyops done terribly. If Wilcock still drinks the Obama Kool-aid in light of this obvious Bin Laden hoax that the kenyan con-man is peddling, he's officially mentally compromised. Fire up the Cat-Scan and check for HARDCORE BRAIN DAMAGE.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1238368
United States
05/10/2011 03:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
>David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama

What credibility are you referring to?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1376063
Australia
05/10/2011 03:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
The only good thing Wilcock has done is put a bunch of interesting tidbits of information in one spot, that's the only thing you should take away from what he says.

Where he is wrong is the way he put that information together to support his theories and conclusions, when he uses those tidbits of information as proof of his theories and his overconfidence that his dreams and hunches are aligned with reality.

Oh... and his 'music'... omg...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1340942
United States
05/10/2011 03:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
And the hits keep on comin'. I started this thread to highlight how David Wilcock's support for Obama makes no sense. That he backed Obama from the beginning and that he should perhaps not let his huge unwarranted ego get in the way of just admitting he was wrong about Obama.

Well obviously he must be getting a lot of negative feedback over his latest article. He has just updated the article with about 5 or 6 new sections defending himself over supporting Obama and telling us all we are crazy to think Obama is not good for this country.

lol. He should have not even have updated the article. By updating the article in such a defensive way he is showing his hand. And he just won't admit he is wrong.

It's so funny to see someone speak about 'ego' and that 'hating' Obama is exactly what the bad guys want you to do.


UHHH NO David Wilcock. I don't hate Obama. And it doesn't matter what the bad guys want. I can simply look at HIS actions and tell he is the worse president we ever had. Even worse than Carter.

Are these 'insiders' who 'hate' Obama the same insiders you get your information from? How can you disregard all of Obama's personal actions that are not very presidential to say the least?

David as usual does not use solid logic and only backs his claims because some guy he knows, knows some other guy, who's uncle told him Obama is cool.

It's worth scrolling to the bottom of his 'Disclosure has begun' article just to read the update that obviously shows he is rattled. And to see him call out others about their egos when his own ego won't let him admit he's wrong about Obama is just laughable.

By reading the update you can tell that he is backed into a corner and losing credibility over this. (the little that he had)


He never addresses the fraudulent birth certificate that Obama's own people put out. He never addresses all the misinformed decisions Obama has done since 08 to make him the worst president in history. The money Obama has spent that is more than all previous presidents combined! The fact he reneged on his promises to get our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan and to close Quantanimo. And also the fact he has gotten us into another war with Libya only because Qadaffi wanted to start his own gold backed currency instead of playing ball with the IMF!

It's sad really. In years past I actually looked forward to DW articles and updates. Yes I took it with a grain of salt but I think the very thing DW preaches against has ruined him. His own ego.

Pathetic. Hopefully he gets a rude awakening which will actually do him some good. Lose all support, lose his ego in the process and get back to presenting semi-cool new age concepts.

I also recommend he take a few basic college physics and math courses so that he might actually back some of his claims up with actual science instead of just saying uhhhhh 'my imaginary friend told me so, so it must be true'


Go check out his latest article, skip to the bottom if you get bored to his 'update'. And you will see what I mean.

Even if DW is a charlatan. It's surprising he would update his article in such an obvious way as to look foolish. He even misspells a few words, one misspelling in a bolded title in his update. You can tell the man is frazzled. I expected him to play the game with a bit more finesse. But I think he just did himself in and lost a lot of support.

I know he lost me with this one!


And just a note. I posted part of his article in another thread and within minutes a mod deleted it because it violated the Terms and Conditions. I just surprised how quickly an unpinned thread got censored! Wow! How many mods are working OT on GLP lol


ohappyogrrrohappy
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1377214


He has a few interesting things to say. However, he really lost credibility with me when he claimed he is the reincarnated Edgar Cayce...he even thinks he looks like him. I didn't know he was also supporting Obama...he really is strange. Now he's a freakin' socialist supporter too.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 149051
United States
05/10/2011 11:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
I agree 100% with the OP. Let's hear what Wilcock has to say about Obama's shady, hidden past. How can he explain Obama traveling to Pakistan and Afghanistan when no American could travel there. He must have had an Indonesian passport or been in the CIA.

What about getting his education funded by some Saudi Sheik. How many people get their education funded this way? Of course you'll hear crickets chirp if you ask Wilcock.

What about the fact that NO ONE remembers Obama from college. Or the fact he has sealed all his records?

Wilcock is indeed going down with his ship. If he would have dropped his ego and just admitted he was wrong supporting Obama I wouldn't have minded. But the same guy who preaches that you need to lose your ego can't seem to do it himself! Wilcock's ego is so big he couldn't never just say he was wrong about something like any normal human would do. That is where I have the biggest problem with him. Not that he mistakeningly supported the wrong pony, but that he can't admit to it and just perpetuates the lie by saying this Osama Bin Laden raid was real.

Every other reputable source says Bin Laden has already died, yet we are suppose to take David's word for it because he knows a guy who knows this other guy's sister, who's brother is a super secret agent, lol

It just shows that if Wilcock is this gullible to believe the hype about Obama, what does that say about the rest of his information he presents, which even isn't backed up by science.

Hey David Wilcock. If it looks like a duck, smells like a duck, quacks like a duck. Its' a duck.


speedbanan
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 149051
United States
05/10/2011 11:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
Remember when DW said he was not only the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce but before that he was Ra!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 149051
United States
05/10/2011 11:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
Hey DW. This is a dead banana. It is not OBL, lol

dead
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1377726
Australia
05/10/2011 11:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
David as usual does not use solid logic and only backs his claims because some guy he knows, knows some other guy, who's uncle told him Obama is cool.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1377214


Even if he was blogging about information given to him directly from the experiencer, once he relays that information to his readers it is already hearsay.

In order for any person that presents information of some sort to be credible there MUST be some way for the readers to verify FIRST HAND the information.

In Wilcock's case, the names of his alleged insider friends would be a starting point.

Relaying experiences is worse too since there is often no way to verify them, especially if there were no witnesses. At best the story of some unique experience someone had can only provide a starting point for further investigation (UFO abductees for example).

Sadly I have observed that many people seem happy to avoid the investigation/verification part, blindly accepting or dismissing the information based on whatever distortions they feel are appropriate at the time.

If you can't verify some bit of information there is no logic in making a leap of faith and deciding either true or false. You may find it much more liberating to simply admit the truth: "I don't know at this time."
stillhere

User ID: 1253176
United States
05/10/2011 11:44 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
From David today:

"Hello Everyone,
I must admit that once again, a lot of the things Ben is hearing are echoed by what my own insiders are telling me."

I have to work hard to not pass along information that comes across as fear and doom. It does involve a great deal of discernment and an understanding of the significance of the influence I now have on how people think and feel about things in the world.

Bear in mind that these folks are CONSTANTLY trying to create mass doom and destruction on an epic scale. This has never changed.

For a really good history lesson in this, go back and read Peter David Beter’s website of insider reports from the 1970s: [link to www.peterdavidbeter.com.] I described how this applies to the Rothschild and Rockefeller factions, as well as a third Christian group opposing them in Russia called the “New Kremlin,”

What you realize is that these negative factions are constantly working an angle that would create anarchy, chaos, martial law, you name it. Groups like the New Kremlin have been using similar secrecy and tradecraft, for well over 200 years now, to oppose them.

The negative groups have STILL not realized that they are only able to do what they are ALLOWED to do.

In order to answer the question of “who allows them,” it is ultimately necessary to break through into at least some minimum grade of understanding regarding the fact that Earth is a laboratory for spiritual growth.

Beings with capabilities far vaster than any ETs we might normally think of are making sure that we are never offered more on Earth than what we are creating. In that sense the world becomes a perfect mirror for our own collective disharmony.

It certainly appears as if everything you’re seeing, hearing and reading about is a story that is “out there,” and has no direct significance to your own life. This is the illusion.
"You can bend it and twist it... You can misuse and abuse it... But even God cannot change the Truth.”
Michael Levy
stillhere

User ID: 1253176
United States
05/10/2011 11:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
David part two:

The reality is that the world is offering us precisely what we need to be awakened — on a mass, worldwide level. You can dislike the process, but we’re not at a level where we have any direct say in whether it works this way.

That means the greater objective is to understand the process, and understand that you, right now, reading this, have far more control over the outcome than you may have ever realized.

The real battle that is being fought is for how you think and feel each day. Not about which faction gets to win control of the financial system. Not about whether Disclosure happens (and I do believe it will.)

Once you understand this, you can become an active participant in the solution. It doesn’t require you to subscribe to anything, pay any money or even leave the house. All it requires is a positive attitude — to have love be the primary force that runs through your thoughts, emotions and actions.

That is the real challenge we are being offered. That is the gift of life on Earth at this time. To see love where others can only see hate.

Without an understanding of the real nature of the game here on Earth, the fear-oriented propaganda that is being released can seem utterly overwhelming.

I’ve been online since 1995, and from the very first day I’ve been reading people freaking out, saying that Martial Law was imminent, that we were all about to be rounded up into FEMA camps, that the US Dollar was about to collapse, that there were about to be massive earth changes that would wipe us all out, that World War III was about to begin, et cetera et cetera.

It’s helpful for ‘newbies’ to be reminded of the fact that all these terrifying things have been sitting around on the store shelves, ready and waiting for you to buy them, this entire time.
"You can bend it and twist it... You can misuse and abuse it... But even God cannot change the Truth.”
Michael Levy
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1375859
United States
05/10/2011 11:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
there are a lot of americans who really liked jimmy carter and still do jc was a very good man and was made to look like a bumbling incompetant. a man will be judged by his fruits he spoke up for what he beleived in and devoted more of his spare time than any president in history to charity. no dont blame the man, rather the less than desirables , who latched onto his administration.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 149051
United States
05/10/2011 03:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
this is the biggest pile of shit I ever read. Just because Jimmy Carter was a good man, didn't make him a good president. I know lots of good people who totally suck at their job and Jimmy Carter is a fine example.

Barry Soetoro on the other hand is a Usurper who kisses ass around the world. Recognizes and celebrates Muslims holidays but not Christian holidays. And is systematically ruining the country.

The difference between Jimmy Carter and Barry Soetoro is... Jimmy Carter has good intentions but was just dumb and fucked everything up.

Barry Soetoro is fucking the country by design.

Stop hugging so many trees
there are a lot of americans who really liked jimmy carter and still do jc was a very good man and was made to look like a bumbling incompetant. a man will be judged by his fruits he spoke up for what he beleived in and devoted more of his spare time than any president in history to charity. no dont blame the man, rather the less than desirables , who latched onto his administration.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1375859
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 149051
United States
05/10/2011 03:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
rantbump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 149051
United States
05/11/2011 11:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock Losing Credibility Over His Blind Support For Obama
Now I guess the SEALS did go into pakistan, hence the helicopter debacle. i'm wondering if bin ladin was already dead, who did they kill?

News