I have been talking ish about the pseudoscientific nature of the article all day and am glad to see someone (maybe one other person) agrees. There is not one study, test or shred of peer reviewed scientific evidence mentioned in the article... You pseudoscience (I dare say anti-science) buffs are either very misinformed or clearly have disdain to the real pursuit of knowledge. If a drug works for cancer it will get out through peer reviewed science. Big Pharmaceutical companies have money yes, but they also stand to make money developing any cure whether it be easily attainable or purely synthetic. They can put patents on anything and charge outrageous prices so backing up the article with, "well we'll never know because pharmaceutical companies will never let it out" is stupid. The truth is many people are in the pursuit of developing a definitive cure for cancer, GOOD people... Quit spreading disinformation and anti-science quackery and discrediting research done by the world's top biochemists because you feel like they have something to gain from the worlds suffering. Like I said in earlier posts their would be huge incentives for the first lab, group whoever do discover such a cure. Sure pharmaceutical companies are greedy, but there are INDIVIDUALS as altruistic as can be performing research across the world, day and night. I understand that this is a conspiracy website, but all the anti-science crap has to stop.