Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,311 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 842,662
Pageviews Today: 1,217,388Threads Today: 330Posts Today: 6,715
12:50 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!

 
S_E_T_H
User ID: 1326120
Poland
05/22/2011 12:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
WATCH IT , READ IT , SPREAD IT ....
It is lastest very interestin movie about "mysterious" Diana's death , royal family and current ruling system and how it all fits togheteher....Idol1





[/youtube]

[link to www.youtube.com]

Unlawful Killing – the film the British won't get to see


Keith Allen - Movie Director
The Guardian, Saturday 7 May 2011


The internet is a global lavatory wall, a Rabelaisian mixture of truth, lies, insanity and humour. I felt its power and madness this week, when an excerpt from my new film, Unlawful Killing, was leaked on to YouTube and seized on by US conspiracy theorists, who immediately began claiming that the CIA had murdered Princess Diana, thereby allowing others to dismiss my documentary as mad.

Deriding its critics as mad is an age-old British establishment trick. My "inquest of the inquest" film contains footage of Diana recalling how the royals wanted her consigned to a mental institution, and the inquest coroner repeatedly questioning the sanity of anyone who wondered if the crash was more than an accident. His chief target was Mohamed Al Fayed, a man I once profiled for a Channel 4 documentary. Before I met him, I'd half-believed the media caricature of him as a madman, driven nuts by the death of his son, and wildly accusing the Windsors of having planned the 1997 crash. However, I found a man who was sane and funny but frustrated that Britain wouldn't hold an inquest into his son's death. Michael Mansfield QC thought it unfair too, and fought for one to be held; which was why the longest inquest in British legal history eventually began in 2007.

Long before the inquest started, the eminently sane Mansfield had persuaded me that there were suspicious circumstances surrounding the crash, and signs of a cover-up by the authorities. Many journalists agreed, but as the inquest drew near, I noticed that British newspapers (several of which had regularly run "Was Diana Murdered?" pieces) suddenly fell into line, and started insisting that the inquest was a waste of time. They raised no protest when virtually all the key French witnesses refused to participate, nor did they find it odd that not one senior royal was ordered to appear, even though Diana had stated in a lawyer's note that the Windsors were planning an "accident" to her car. Nor did they raise the issue of possible bias when legal proceedings involving the integrity of the royal family were to be heard in the royal courts of justice before a coroner who'd sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen.

I felt the need to raise it, so I asked every major UK broadcaster (BBC, ITV, C4, Five, Sky) to commission a TV documentary about the inquest. But they refused even to contemplate such a suggestion, so Associated Rediffusion and I began filming and financing it ourselves. Shortly before the inquest began, Fayed offered to fund our project, so we could make a feature-length cinema documentary instead. We agreed, on condition that we would report events in the way we saw them, and the deal was struck.

Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are "a safe pair of hands". Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state's interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.

Consider just a fraction of what transpired. Over 100 significant witnesses were not called to the inquest, or refused to appear. Blood tests allegedly proving the drunkenness of the driver Henri Paul were deemed "biologically inexplicable" by a toxicologist. A British crash expert found that Diana's seat belt had not been working. And so on.

Strangest of all was the media coverage of the verdict. Inquest evidence showed conclusively that the crash was caused by an unidentified white Fiat Uno and several unidentified motorcycles, vehicles that were certainly not paparazzi, because uncontested police evidence confirmed that the paparazzi were nowhere near the tunnel at the time of the crash. The jury understood this, bringing in a verdict of "unlawful killing" by unidentified "following vehicles"; yet within seconds, the BBC was misreporting that the jury had blamed the paparazzi, and the rest of the media meekly followed suit. Which is why – three years on – barely anyone realises what the jury's troubling verdict really was.

Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, we're showing it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal wedding has been sending British Rrepublicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote.

Source : the guardian

bump PIN IT PLS
moonsinger

User ID: 1239170
United Kingdom
05/22/2011 12:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
she was assin-fucking-nated
I am so far down the food chain that I've got plankton bites on my butt

1984 WAS NOT MEANT TO BE AN INSTRUCTION MANUAL
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1326120
Poland
05/22/2011 01:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
[link to www.youtube.com]

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1395447
Malaysia
05/22/2011 01:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
film will also be banned in Aust, NZL?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1395018
United Kingdom
05/22/2011 01:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
she was assin-fucking-nated
 Quoting: moonsinger


Diana was murdered, with her unborn child, by vile Jew scum.

Diana was the true, Plantagenet heiress of the British throne, and the Jew-Nazi Saxe-Coburgs, had her killed.

damned
Barnacles

User ID: 1325556
Ireland
05/22/2011 01:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
Diana wrote a letter to a friend stating that her husband was planning an accident in her car, 4 years prior to her accident. Long before she was supposedly pregnant. !
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1047074
United States
05/22/2011 02:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
she was assin-fucking-nated
 Quoting: moonsinger


Diana was murdered, with her unborn child, by vile Jew scum.

Diana was the true, Plantagenet heiress of the British throne, and the Jew-Nazi Saxe-Coburgs, had her killed.

damned
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1395018




BINGO!!!! This is a direct HIT!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1004493
United States
05/22/2011 02:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
This has been posted about eight times already. Stop cluttering the board, and do a search first!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1395018
United Kingdom
05/22/2011 02:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
This has been posted about eight times already. Stop cluttering the board, and do a search first!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1004493


Die in a fire.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1395251
United Kingdom
05/22/2011 02:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
Diana wrote a letter to a friend stating that her husband was planning an accident in her car, 4 years prior to her accident. Long before she was supposedly pregnant. !
 Quoting: Barnacles

Yes. But why would Charles have wanted to remove her? After all, all he had to do was to divorce Diana (which in fact he did do!) in order to marry Camilla.

If you want to know the TRUE reason for such drastic action, which had NOTHING to do pregnancy or possible marriage to a Muslim, as this letter proves, start investigating Diana's tapes (her "insurance"). Find out whom she interviewed on those tapes and what he revealed about her husband.

If you can. The Queen hired Kroll Inc (yes, THAT private investigation company that was responsible for the security of the WTC towers before 9/11) to find the tapes, but even they came up empty-handed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 827211
United States
05/22/2011 02:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
she was assin-fucking-nated
 Quoting: moonsinger


Well yeah, poor lady.
It is obvious since how it happened. You would have to be utterly stupid not to put the pieces together. And those that executed it, had no idea what they are doing. The best death is a believable accidental death.
stillhere

User ID: 1253176
United States
05/22/2011 02:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
bump

Looking forward to seeing this-- really hope it makes it into theaters here.
"You can bend it and twist it... You can misuse and abuse it... But even God cannot change the Truth.”
Michael Levy
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1177423
United Kingdom
05/22/2011 02:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
Pretty stupid to ban it over here. We should be allowed to make up our own minds if we want to see it or not.

Besides, I am sure its only a matter of time before its available to download via a torrent, so we will get to watch it if we want to so TPTB are waisting their time.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1343725
United Kingdom
05/22/2011 02:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1395563
United Kingdom
05/22/2011 03:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
Pretty stupid to ban it over here. We should be allowed to make up our own minds if we want to see it or not.

Besides, I am sure its only a matter of time before its available to download via a torrent, so we will get to watch it if we want to so TPTB are waisting their time.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1177423



they've done the worst thing and made everyone want to watch it...

the palace are hiring chimps to do their PR for them.
wee mee
User ID: 1384830
United Kingdom
05/22/2011 03:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
keith, make your cash back on the vid - then - release on the net - for ALL to see - and us that are skint can watch it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 428210
United States
05/22/2011 04:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
keith, make your cash back on the vid - then - release on the net - for ALL to see - and us that are skint can watch it.
 Quoting: wee mee 1384830


Don't worry about that, there are MANY websites that let you watch movies online, just google it, you will surely find a link soon enough, whether the creator leaks it or someone else, it WILL be leaked
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1395419
United Kingdom
05/22/2011 04:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
she was assin-fucking-nated
 Quoting: moonsinger


Diana was murdered, with her unborn child, by vile Jew scum.

Diana was the true, Plantagenet heiress of the British throne, and the Jew-Nazi Saxe-Coburgs, had her killed.

damned
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1395018


They would NEVER allow an arab to be the brother of the future king. That's why she was killed.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1326120
Poland
05/22/2011 05:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
JUST PIN IT ... SPREAD THE WORD ...LET PEOPLE TO GET KNOW
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1326120
Poland
05/23/2011 01:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
WATCH IT , READ IT , SPREAD IT ....
It is lastest very interestin movie about "mysterious" Diana's death , royal family and current ruling system and how it all fits togheteher....Idol1





[/youtube]

[link to www.youtube.com]

Unlawful Killing – the film the British won't get to see


Keith Allen - Movie Director
The Guardian, Saturday 7 May 2011


The internet is a global lavatory wall, a Rabelaisian mixture of truth, lies, insanity and humour. I felt its power and madness this week, when an excerpt from my new film, Unlawful Killing, was leaked on to YouTube and seized on by US conspiracy theorists, who immediately began claiming that the CIA had murdered Princess Diana, thereby allowing others to dismiss my documentary as mad.

Deriding its critics as mad is an age-old British establishment trick. My "inquest of the inquest" film contains footage of Diana recalling how the royals wanted her consigned to a mental institution, and the inquest coroner repeatedly questioning the sanity of anyone who wondered if the crash was more than an accident. His chief target was Mohamed Al Fayed, a man I once profiled for a Channel 4 documentary. Before I met him, I'd half-believed the media caricature of him as a madman, driven nuts by the death of his son, and wildly accusing the Windsors of having planned the 1997 crash. However, I found a man who was sane and funny but frustrated that Britain wouldn't hold an inquest into his son's death. Michael Mansfield QC thought it unfair too, and fought for one to be held; which was why the longest inquest in British legal history eventually began in 2007.

Long before the inquest started, the eminently sane Mansfield had persuaded me that there were suspicious circumstances surrounding the crash, and signs of a cover-up by the authorities. Many journalists agreed, but as the inquest drew near, I noticed that British newspapers (several of which had regularly run "Was Diana Murdered?" pieces) suddenly fell into line, and started insisting that the inquest was a waste of time. They raised no protest when virtually all the key French witnesses refused to participate, nor did they find it odd that not one senior royal was ordered to appear, even though Diana had stated in a lawyer's note that the Windsors were planning an "accident" to her car. Nor did they raise the issue of possible bias when legal proceedings involving the integrity of the royal family were to be heard in the royal courts of justice before a coroner who'd sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen.

I felt the need to raise it, so I asked every major UK broadcaster (BBC, ITV, C4, Five, Sky) to commission a TV documentary about the inquest. But they refused even to contemplate such a suggestion, so Associated Rediffusion and I began filming and financing it ourselves. Shortly before the inquest began, Fayed offered to fund our project, so we could make a feature-length cinema documentary instead. We agreed, on condition that we would report events in the way we saw them, and the deal was struck.

Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are "a safe pair of hands". Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state's interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.

Consider just a fraction of what transpired. Over 100 significant witnesses were not called to the inquest, or refused to appear. Blood tests allegedly proving the drunkenness of the driver Henri Paul were deemed "biologically inexplicable" by a toxicologist. A British crash expert found that Diana's seat belt had not been working. And so on.

Strangest of all was the media coverage of the verdict. Inquest evidence showed conclusively that the crash was caused by an unidentified white Fiat Uno and several unidentified motorcycles, vehicles that were certainly not paparazzi, because uncontested police evidence confirmed that the paparazzi were nowhere near the tunnel at the time of the crash. The jury understood this, bringing in a verdict of "unlawful killing" by unidentified "following vehicles"; yet within seconds, the BBC was misreporting that the jury had blamed the paparazzi, and the rest of the media meekly followed suit. Which is why – three years on – barely anyone realises what the jury's troubling verdict really was.

Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, we're showing it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal wedding has been sending British Rrepublicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote.

Source : the guardian



bump PIN IT PLS
 Quoting: S_E_T_H 1326120
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 850602
Canada
05/23/2011 01:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
WATCH IT , READ IT , SPREAD IT ....
It is lastest very interestin movie about "mysterious" Diana's death , royal family and current ruling system and how it all fits togheteher....Idol1





[/youtube]

[link to www.youtube.com]

Unlawful Killing – the film the British won't get to see


Keith Allen - Movie Director
The Guardian, Saturday 7 May 2011


The internet is a global lavatory wall, a Rabelaisian mixture of truth, lies, insanity and humour. I felt its power and madness this week, when an excerpt from my new film, Unlawful Killing, was leaked on to YouTube and seized on by US conspiracy theorists, who immediately began claiming that the CIA had murdered Princess Diana, thereby allowing others to dismiss my documentary as mad.

Deriding its critics as mad is an age-old British establishment trick. My "inquest of the inquest" film contains footage of Diana recalling how the royals wanted her consigned to a mental institution, and the inquest coroner repeatedly questioning the sanity of anyone who wondered if the crash was more than an accident. His chief target was Mohamed Al Fayed, a man I once profiled for a Channel 4 documentary. Before I met him, I'd half-believed the media caricature of him as a madman, driven nuts by the death of his son, and wildly accusing the Windsors of having planned the 1997 crash. However, I found a man who was sane and funny but frustrated that Britain wouldn't hold an inquest into his son's death. Michael Mansfield QC thought it unfair too, and fought for one to be held; which was why the longest inquest in British legal history eventually began in 2007.

Long before the inquest started, the eminently sane Mansfield had persuaded me that there were suspicious circumstances surrounding the crash, and signs of a cover-up by the authorities. Many journalists agreed, but as the inquest drew near, I noticed that British newspapers (several of which had regularly run "Was Diana Murdered?" pieces) suddenly fell into line, and started insisting that the inquest was a waste of time. They raised no protest when virtually all the key French witnesses refused to participate, nor did they find it odd that not one senior royal was ordered to appear, even though Diana had stated in a lawyer's note that the Windsors were planning an "accident" to her car. Nor did they raise the issue of possible bias when legal proceedings involving the integrity of the royal family were to be heard in the royal courts of justice before a coroner who'd sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen.

I felt the need to raise it, so I asked every major UK broadcaster (BBC, ITV, C4, Five, Sky) to commission a TV documentary about the inquest. But they refused even to contemplate such a suggestion, so Associated Rediffusion and I began filming and financing it ourselves. Shortly before the inquest began, Fayed offered to fund our project, so we could make a feature-length cinema documentary instead. We agreed, on condition that we would report events in the way we saw them, and the deal was struck.

Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are "a safe pair of hands". Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state's interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.

Consider just a fraction of what transpired. Over 100 significant witnesses were not called to the inquest, or refused to appear. Blood tests allegedly proving the drunkenness of the driver Henri Paul were deemed "biologically inexplicable" by a toxicologist. A British crash expert found that Diana's seat belt had not been working. And so on.

Strangest of all was the media coverage of the verdict. Inquest evidence showed conclusively that the crash was caused by an unidentified white Fiat Uno and several unidentified motorcycles, vehicles that were certainly not paparazzi, because uncontested police evidence confirmed that the paparazzi were nowhere near the tunnel at the time of the crash. The jury understood this, bringing in a verdict of "unlawful killing" by unidentified "following vehicles"; yet within seconds, the BBC was misreporting that the jury had blamed the paparazzi, and the rest of the media meekly followed suit. Which is why – three years on – barely anyone realises what the jury's troubling verdict really was.

Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, we're showing it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal wedding has been sending British Rrepublicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote.

Source : the guardian



bump PIN IT PLS
 Quoting: S_E_T_H 1326120

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1326120


Search GLP. There is more proof here too.
stillhere

User ID: 1253176
United States
05/24/2011 08:29 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
bump

Looking forward to seeing this.
"You can bend it and twist it... You can misuse and abuse it... But even God cannot change the Truth.”
Michael Levy
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1398285
United Kingdom
05/24/2011 09:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
The white Fiat Uno WAS identified. Mohammed Al Faed's detectives tracked it down to a garage repair shop. It belonged to famous millionaire paparazzo James Andanson. Here he is in front of it with his wife:
[link to images.google.com]
Andanson was invited by Princess Diana to take photos of Dodi and she on board his yacht a couple of days before she died. He was found shot twice in the head a few years later inside his new car that was set on fire.
[link to www.express.co.uk]

The French police called it suicide, which his wife ridiculed. In fact, it was assassination by a Yugoslav freelance hitman working for a (ahem) certain intelligence agency. The proof has been for years collecting dust, unseen by anyone, in the intelligence files archive of a Begium newspaper
[link to www.investigateur.info]
Here it is (see 14th paragraph):
[link to www.investigateur.info]

Translate the paragraph with an internet translator if you don't know French.

The killer, code name "T", took as a nickname the family name of a French aristocrat who was married by Amanda Lear, the famous French singer. Join the dots and it will lead you down a dark rabbit hole....
stillhere

User ID: 1253176
United States
05/24/2011 11:50 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
bump
"You can bend it and twist it... You can misuse and abuse it... But even God cannot change the Truth.”
Michael Levy
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1326120
Poland
05/25/2011 04:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
WATCH IT , READ IT , SPREAD IT ....
It is lastest very interestin movie about "mysterious" Diana's death , royal family and current ruling system and how it all fits togheteher....Idol1





[/youtube]

[link to www.youtube.com]

Unlawful Killing – the film the British won't get to see


Keith Allen - Movie Director
The Guardian, Saturday 7 May 2011


The internet is a global lavatory wall, a Rabelaisian mixture of truth, lies, insanity and humour. I felt its power and madness this week, when an excerpt from my new film, Unlawful Killing, was leaked on to YouTube and seized on by US conspiracy theorists, who immediately began claiming that the CIA had murdered Princess Diana, thereby allowing others to dismiss my documentary as mad.

Deriding its critics as mad is an age-old British establishment trick. My "inquest of the inquest" film contains footage of Diana recalling how the royals wanted her consigned to a mental institution, and the inquest coroner repeatedly questioning the sanity of anyone who wondered if the crash was more than an accident. His chief target was Mohamed Al Fayed, a man I once profiled for a Channel 4 documentary. Before I met him, I'd half-believed the media caricature of him as a madman, driven nuts by the death of his son, and wildly accusing the Windsors of having planned the 1997 crash. However, I found a man who was sane and funny but frustrated that Britain wouldn't hold an inquest into his son's death. Michael Mansfield QC thought it unfair too, and fought for one to be held; which was why the longest inquest in British legal history eventually began in 2007.

Long before the inquest started, the eminently sane Mansfield had persuaded me that there were suspicious circumstances surrounding the crash, and signs of a cover-up by the authorities. Many journalists agreed, but as the inquest drew near, I noticed that British newspapers (several of which had regularly run "Was Diana Murdered?" pieces) suddenly fell into line, and started insisting that the inquest was a waste of time. They raised no protest when virtually all the key French witnesses refused to participate, nor did they find it odd that not one senior royal was ordered to appear, even though Diana had stated in a lawyer's note that the Windsors were planning an "accident" to her car. Nor did they raise the issue of possible bias when legal proceedings involving the integrity of the royal family were to be heard in the royal courts of justice before a coroner who'd sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen.

I felt the need to raise it, so I asked every major UK broadcaster (BBC, ITV, C4, Five, Sky) to commission a TV documentary about the inquest. But they refused even to contemplate such a suggestion, so Associated Rediffusion and I began filming and financing it ourselves. Shortly before the inquest began, Fayed offered to fund our project, so we could make a feature-length cinema documentary instead. We agreed, on condition that we would report events in the way we saw them, and the deal was struck.

Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are "a safe pair of hands". Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state's interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.

Consider just a fraction of what transpired. Over 100 significant witnesses were not called to the inquest, or refused to appear. Blood tests allegedly proving the drunkenness of the driver Henri Paul were deemed "biologically inexplicable" by a toxicologist. A British crash expert found that Diana's seat belt had not been working. And so on.

Strangest of all was the media coverage of the verdict. Inquest evidence showed conclusively that the crash was caused by an unidentified white Fiat Uno and several unidentified motorcycles, vehicles that were certainly not paparazzi, because uncontested police evidence confirmed that the paparazzi were nowhere near the tunnel at the time of the crash. The jury understood this, bringing in a verdict of "unlawful killing" by unidentified "following vehicles"; yet within seconds, the BBC was misreporting that the jury had blamed the paparazzi, and the rest of the media meekly followed suit. Which is why – three years on – barely anyone realises what the jury's troubling verdict really was.

Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, we're showing it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal wedding has been sending British Rrepublicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote.

Source : the guardian



bump PIN IT PLS
 Quoting: S_E_T_H 1326120

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1326120


Search GLP. There is more proof here too.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 850602


[link to news.yahoo.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1326120
Poland
05/25/2011 04:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1400298
United Kingdom
05/25/2011 04:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
she was assin-fucking-nated
 Quoting: moonsinger


Diana was murdered, with her unborn child, by vile Jew scum.

Diana was the true, Plantagenet heiress of the British throne, and the Jew-Nazi Saxe-Coburgs, had her killed.

damned
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1395018


They would NEVER allow an arab to be the brother of the future king. That's why she was killed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1395419

Not serious enough for the risk involved.

Try BLACKMAIL (= SECRET VIDEO TAPES).
stillhere

User ID: 1253176
United States
05/25/2011 06:08 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
bump
"You can bend it and twist it... You can misuse and abuse it... But even God cannot change the Truth.”
Michael Levy
stillhere

User ID: 1253176
United States
05/26/2011 08:09 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
bump
"You can bend it and twist it... You can misuse and abuse it... But even God cannot change the Truth.”
Michael Levy
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1393621
United Kingdom
05/26/2011 08:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
Diana wrote a letter to a friend stating that her husband was planning an accident in her car, 4 years prior to her accident. Long before she was supposedly pregnant. !
 Quoting: Barnacles

Yes. But why would Charles have wanted to remove her? After all, all he had to do was to divorce Diana (which in fact he did do!) in order to marry Camilla.

If you want to know the TRUE reason for such drastic action, which had NOTHING to do pregnancy or possible marriage to a Muslim, as this letter proves, start investigating Diana's tapes (her "insurance"). Find out whom she interviewed on those tapes and what he revealed about her husband.

If you can. The Queen hired Kroll Inc (yes, THAT private investigation company that was responsible for the security of the WTC towers before 9/11) to find the tapes, but even they came up empty-handed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1395251


SHE WASNT PREGNANT
CHARLES HAD TO KILL HER COS SHE WAS GOING TO TELL THE WORLD THAT CAMILLA WAS BORN A MAN AND THAT CHARLES LIKES MEN
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1401329
Portugal
05/26/2011 08:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PRINCES DIANA - Unlawful Killing !!! PIN !!
*** ILLUMINATI MEDIA *** continues to refer to Prince William as the "FUTURE KING" ten years later (1) and one day before his marriage

Note
Google
Prince William refused the Mark
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1398211

News