Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,885 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,318,430
Pageviews Today: 1,988,302Threads Today: 645Posts Today: 12,702
04:36 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

AREA 51 BOOK EXPOSED: SOURCE FOR ROSWELL STORY NAMED AND INTERVIEWED!

 
butlincat
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1403738
United Kingdom
05/30/2011 07:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
AREA 51 BOOK EXPOSED: SOURCE FOR ROSWELL STORY NAMED AND INTERVIEWED!
[link to bragalia.blogspot.com]

The Bragalia Files


Friday, May 27, 2011

AREA 51 BOOK EXPOSED: SOURCE FOR ROSWELL STORY NAMED AND INTERVIEWED! by Anthony Bragalia



Annie Jacobsen’s recently released bestseller Area 51 has stirred global interest. She has been featured numerous times on many networks and websites. Her book was reviewed last week by the New York Times. Jacobsen’s biggest “scoop” concerns the Roswell crash. She learned from an early executive of one of our nation’s largest defense contractors that the Roswell crash of 1947 was resultant from a scheme by Russia’s Josef Stalin and escaped Nazi mad-scientist Josef Mengele to “hoax” the Americans by staging UFO sightings. The plan was to induce panic and psychological warfare in the manner of the Orson Welles War of the World broadcast aftermath. They would launch unusually-designed craft from a “mothership” (located near Alaska.) These were single-wing, remote-controlled “UFOs” with “alien-like” children on board. The craft were of Nazi German design (captured by the Soviets at the close of the War) and the “aliens” were actually 13 year olds. The grotesque child aviators were biologically engineered by Mengele with strange large heads and oddly spaced eyes. The craft and pilots had crashed near Roswell in July of 1947 and were flown to Wright Field. In 1951, Jacobsen’s source maintains, the crashed vehicle and the two still-surviving deformed children were taken to Area 51 and to the facilities of defense contractor EG&G (now URS Corporation)



This author has identified and located Annie Jacobsen’s anonymous source. I have also decided, after much consideration, to “out” him. In this article I will openly name him. I have also contacted him very recently. He reluctantly spoke with me for some time. I believe that the source was indeed told this bizarre story by officials. But just why this is so will stun readers, and is not for the reasons that you may think.



JACOBSEN’S SOURCE NAMED





EG&G’s Scientist Alfred O’Donnell in 1955



Ms. Jacobsen’s source about this Roswell story is unnamed by her in the blockbuster book. He wanted to remain anonymous. Annie Jacobsen kept her promise. I did not learn her source from her or from anyone associated with her publishing company. His identity and his background is revealed here and now:



Alfred O’Donnell is nearly 89 years old and he is one of Annie Jacobsen’s key sources about this Roswell crash story “interpretation.” O’Donnell is indeed exactly who he claims to have been. In the early 1950’s he was at the “Nevada Test Site” where atomic bombs were tested regularly. O’Donnell was indeed part of the nucleus of top management and engineers for EG&G- one of our nation’s top defense contractors. Founded as Edgerton, Germeshausen and Grier (EG&G) the company was acquired by URS Corporation some years ago. URS employs over 50,000 and is the leading designer and builder of federal classified facilities in the United States. They work with military as well as with the Intelligence Community (particularly the NSA) in constructing and operating some of our nation’s most sensitive and secret facilities.



O’Donnell joined EG&G in 1947 when the company employed only 15 people. He worked alongside the company’s founders and obtained Top Secret Clearance to work on our nation’s nuclear arsenal. He helped to develop explosives research protocols and optimized the firing systems of bomb devices. O’Donnell – a Bostonian - is a brilliant man who made significant contributions to EG&G and to our nation’s defense for many years. EG&G – and O’Donnell - had specialized expertise in electronically capturing and measuring the energy that was emitted from DOE nuclear blasts in the remote Nevada desert.



THE SOURCE SPEAKS





TRANSCRIBED INTERVIEW WITH ALFRED O’DONNELL, FORMERLY OF EG&G



MAY 26, 2011 (AFTERNOON)



(Bolded text that follows indicates Alfred O’Donnell speaking;

Light text indicates this author speaking to O’Donnell)



Hello…



Hi Mr. O’Donnell, my name is Tony Bragalia, a freelance journalist in Florida..How are you doing?



Fine, and who are you again? (I repeat above)



I’m a researcher, including of things like military history and the history of science. I happened to see an online article about an ‘Alfred O’Donnell’ that was from the Review-Journal. It’s called “100 Men Who Shaped Southern Nevada” It discusses your early work at EG&G in the 50s in nuclear blast testing and measurement.



Oh, oh, yes… I do remember that. I recall that very well.



It was written by a “ K.J. Evans”…



Yes, he’s dead now. That article was written some time ago. Some years ago.



It’s found its way onto the Internet so the story is everywhere now, forever…So I do have the right Alfred O’Donnell who was with EG&G in the ‘40s and 1950s?



Yes, that’s me.



Well, of course you must be aware then of the recent bestseller by Annie Jacobsen that is entitled Area 51?



I am. (silence/pause)



You know Annie?



I do know Annie.



Well you said something to Annie Jacobsen about the subject that I’d like to talk with you about…



I don’t talk about my work at Area 51.



Well, EG&G does not seem to be the kind of place that would be reverse engineering a Soviet craft and also doing biological experiments and analysis, there were better places….



Well, you really need to speak with the Publicity Director at Little Brown.



Why them?



They published the book.



What do they know more about all of this than you do?



They don’t. But I’m not saying anything…



Tony, how…how did you find me?



I am a researcher of some of these things. I think sort of like a computer when I am investigating. I googled key words. I happened across the article on you. I knew intuitively that you are Annie’s source, Alfred. And of course you are, so…



Alfred, you must realize that you have an obligation to truth and to history to come forward publicly. This is a much larger issue. It is about having people understand what really happened -if this is what really did- and to not believe in fantasies..things that aren’t scientific or historical truth…



I know…I understand… what you’re saying, Tony.



You know Alfred, I communicated with Dr. Stirling Colgate at Los Alamos recently and he made a recent confession about a UFO hoax that he was aware of from many, many years ago.



Oh…



Colgate is in his 90s and he’s still at Los Alamos. He confirmed to me that the famous Socorro, NM case involving a policeman in 1964 was a hoax by some of his students from New Mexico Tech. But it took him over 40 years to really say something! Colgate took to a real long time to tell the truth. And he still is reluctant…but his allegiance was in the wrong place for too long. It was to his kids at the college!…



(Laughs) So how did you find out about him?



Through a letter that I had found in some archives from Stirling Colgate to his friend Linus Pauling, who had an interest in UFOs I found out. In his reply, Colgate told Pauling the truth that it was a hoax.



Who is that he wrote to?



Linus Pauling.



Oh! Yes…



So my point is that we will all pass. And because of this we all have larger obligations as we get older. As a scientist you must understand this, truth is it. It’s really all that we want have in the end.



Will you leave anything - a document in writing to benefit history and science on all of this before you pass, including your name?



I don’t know. I don’t think so.



I think you must forget about your oaths and clearances. The Soviet threat is no longer. It is more than six decades on Alfred! I sometimes almost get emotional about all of this…doesn’t, does not truth mean anything? Why have our children’s children believe in fantasy, if this is what it was?



I will think about it. I will give it some consideration…



Alfred, have other people called you about this?



I’m not going to say anything at all about that.



Well, people come to very different conclusions that you do on all of this. The Air Force says that it is a Mogul balloon, others say it was a terrestrial secret experiment by German Paperclip scientists…



Yes, I have heard about that one.



Well, I will level with you Alfred. I come down on the side of truth - it was an extraterrestrial vehicle that crashed. And frankly I think that you know this and that you were “played with.”



I am certain that the craft was constructed of materials that were not known to science in 1947. I based this on many things including on my study of the history of Shape Recovery Alloys. They had reported they found “memory metal” at Roswell that was tough and would return back to its original shape. I found that in the months immediately following the crash that Wright Patterson contracted Battelle Memorial Institute to begin work on what we now know as Nitinol. I traced the scientific documents on Shape Memory metals to the incident. When you are reverse engineering, it is always easiest to begin with the ‘materials of construction’ –what is it made of- not the propulsion or navigation systems…



Yes..I follow.



And, Alfred, I will be candid with you: you must come forward. You are a man of science. You have lived for the discovery of truth. Why do you care now? Say what needs to be said. I mean I know you have. But openly. You know Annie is taking a beating on this. I frankly would like to know, as someone who believes in truth and accurate history…you are a man who honors science…you must know what I mean…



Tony, look, I will say this to you: if the Federal Government really wanted to have all of this released, why would they not have already done it themselves?



I don’t know. But you do Alfred. And I do respect your respect for your oath and your security clearances.



If we could get you a release from the Department of Defense to speak of this- of the truth of Roswell- would you then be open to speaking openly?



No. I would not. I just…I just cannot get involved like that.



Oh, one more last thing…



Yes.



Do you think that when URS acquired EG&G a few years back that they also got all of the early scientific and historical records from EG&G? I mean would they even know now? Many of the people there at URS now weren’t yet even born when this happened…



I don’t know. I really have no idea.



Again, Alfred, I have an understanding of the Intelligence Community –IC- and of the Defense communities, so I do understand where you are coming from. Thanks for all of your time, I really do appreciate it very much…



OK, Tony, Goodbye.



Goodbye.



THE STRANGE STORY HE TELLS – AND WHY HE WAS TOLD IT







I found Alfred O’Donnell to be telling the truth as he remembers it – and likely as he himself claims to have witnessed it. He was extremely lucid, deliberate and controlled in his responses to me. Frankly he seemed years and years younger on the phone. Like author Annie Jacobsen, I find O’Donnell to remain a bright and believable person.



However, I do not believe that the “essence” of what he was told was true. O’Donnell says that he viewed a hoaxed UFO by Stalin that was used to scare us - and that used a former Nazi’s eugenics skills to create the aviators. O’Donnell told Jacobsen that they were “grotesque.” O’Donnell also told Jacobsen that he and his other scientist cohorts at EG&G were “prepared” for the sight of them. They were told in advance that “seeing the bodies would be a shocking and disturbing experience.”



But the truth is this: It was all “staged.” O’Donnell was indeed “exposed” to what he says he was- but this “exposure” was planned, it was for a reason - and the accompanying story that he was told was not genuine.



He was told that it was of Soviet origin. But “exotic technology” that has been recovered by military are often studied by using the “subterfuge” or “cover” of being told that they are of “Russian origin.” And this holds especially true for the Roswell crash. There are numerous times when the “Soviets” or the “Russians” were used to describe where such artifacts came from. They were a convenient and ideal “excuse” or reason for the study of such things:



1) When Elroy John Center (the Battelle scientist who confessed to analysis of ET metal debris and who co-authored the first “memory metal report” for Wright Patterson) was told to analyze the unusual “piece”- he was told by his Battelle supervisor that it was recovered in a crash from “the Soviets.” Center knew this not to be true and he believed the material could not have been made by man. (See prior articles on the Battelle-Roswell connection archived on the Iconoclasts site to learn more.)



2) General George Schulgen, in a 1947 secret memo, instructed his officers to be aware of UFO’s and their “Items of Construction.” He indicated that the discs could be of possible Soviet origin. Schulgen was of course using this as a cover. Forthcoming information on Schulgen will show that this top Pentagon Intelligence official of the time knew that the material of which the discs were comprised was not known to science- and were engineered by those from another world.



3) When RAAF Base Commander Butch Blanchard told his wife and daughter Dale of the crash, he kept on repeating to them: “those Russians have some amazing things.” New information from researcher Tom Carey indicates that the exact opposite was true: Blanchard actually believed that it was an ET craft at Roswell, something he related to his second wife and others later in life.



The deepest recesses of Government were testing key personnel at emerging EG&G to see if they could be entrusted with such “remarkable secrets.” Would they say anything to anyone about this made-up Russian-Roswell scenario? They did not (at least not until a half-century later, and then only anonymously.) They could be entrusted with anything. And today the company is rewarded as the largest infrastructure firm to Federal government in the nation.



More importantly this author maintains that:



- Those in Government who knew about Roswell wanted to confuse the ET truth of the event to others with whom they may work by alluding to things “Russian.” It may have even been used as a “code word” of sorts.



- They felt that it was also a perfect way to have studies performed on actual ET crashed disc material by private contractors. Tell them these strange things were Russian. Fold the research into existing defense related technology research.



- They wanted to see if organizations that they would bring into the fold would keep such a pretend ‘Secret.’ And point to the Russians, feared and hated.



- They would occasionally and selectively “test” individuals within government (and its contractor community) to measure the “reactions” and coping skills of learned men when exposed to such bizarre things



- They “orchestrated” cover stories on Roswell to purposely confuse and obfuscate the issue. They sought to blur the ET truth of Roswell with layers of plausible deniability. They officially issued (and in other ways spread) many possible “real reasons” for the Roswell crash. In this way the actual extraterrestrial nature of the Roswell event will become “muddled.”



O’Donnell was shown an American-hoaxed UFO and “aliens” for one (or some) these reasons. But it was not a “Soviet” thing that he saw. That he saw these things is likely true… but the associated story that he was told about their origin was not.



The most telling reason that this is so is this: The story told to O’Donnell those many years ago –in historical hindsight- is ludicrous on the face of it. I will not detail those reasons. Many others (including the New York Times) have pointed out the many “holes” found like Swiss cheese within the story. These include fundamental logistical, technological and historical issues associated with the cover tale told O’Donnell.



And there is this clue: O’Donnell told Jacobsen that “Cyrillic writing” found around a rim area in the craft had led he and his EG&G associates to confirm that the craft was of Soviet origin, so that the story that they were told by their superiors made complete sense.



However, the fact is that the Russians would never have made such alleged “hoax overflights” of the US using anything like “Cyrillic writing” that would reveal the craft’s true Soviet origin. It would defeat the entire purpose of having our people believe that we were being invaded by “aliens” as O’Donnell maintains, like “Orson Welles’ War of the Worlds”- and so O’Donnell should never have found such writing.



It was, rather, placed there by US military intelligence to encourage the belief that it was Russian. And O’Donnell was just 29 in 1951 when he states that he saw all of this at EG&G at Area 51. He was impressionably young, as were his EG&G colleagues. They would go on in their defense contracting careers believing all the while (and repeating late in life) the lie that they had been made to believe that these things were “Russian.” How very “Cold War-ish.”



But given the context of the timeframe of the late 1940s and early 1950s (and the fear of Russians, with “War of the Worlds” having aired only 10 years prior) it is easy to understand why O’Donnell and his EG&G colleagues “bought in” to this scenario fed them. Given the “tenor of the times” and the initiation of the Cold War, anything related to the devious Soviets could be believed at that time.



And, tellingly, the “Russian” explanation that had been told by these EG&G retirees reminds one of the famous Kecksburg, PA UFO case of 1965. Some in Government offered the (now discredited) explanation that this crash incident was resultant from a Russian launch as well. That one though was explained away as the crash of an advanced Soviet satellite. Always the Russians…



The story is strange. And the reasons that I have offered that I “believe” the old scientist may seem even stranger to some. I have more to report on this and I hope to release other findings soon…



Roswell is an onion. We continue to peel away at its layers. But it still stinks and dizzies with the stench of disinformation, even after decades.



Posted by The Reynolds Group at 10:09 AM

Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz







18 comments:



Frank Stalter said...

Nice job on this. The Area 51 book is selling well and getting plenty of media attention. Hopefully, there is some trickle effect.

May 27, 2011 1:30 PM



David Rudiak said...

For O'Donnell to believe the Stalin/Mengele/ genetic engineering story, he would have to be as big a dummy as Jacobsen. A more likely explanation is what he told ABC Nightline, that he was trying to help "Annie sell books."

May 27, 2011 6:15 PM



Anonymous said...

Bragalia responds:



Thanks for the comment to my post David.



But, David..that isn't at all what was said on Nightline...listen again very closely to the video (on the Iconoclast website.)



The host actually quotes O'Donnell as having said that he is there "to help Annie's book" not, as you said, to "help Annie sell books."



This is a a very, very big difference. He wants to assist Jacobsen to get the word out. He talked with the newsman (off-camera) to lend his support to her and show that he exists and that he is who he says he is...but he was not to help her make bucks.



And when the reporter characterizes O'Donnell as "confused and conflicted"- he was! But not out of some problem with with his mental capacity, but because O'Donnell is just not sure just how to deal with all of this.



When I spoke with O'Donnell he was somewhat guarded and cautious as I mentioned in the article. He wants to get the information that he believes to be true out, but he also wants minimize disruption to his few years remaining.



I also agree it is hard to fathom how such learned men at EG&G would actually believe something that we can now see clearly is a preposterous story...



But in the context of Cold War 1951, at a place like Area 51, we can easily see how even smart guys would "buy in" to such a dumb scenario that was fed to them: Their paranoia of the Soviets ran exceptionally high. And their acceptance of whatever their superiors told them as true was blind.



And if O'Donnell did not actually touch, but only viewed it from a distance, these "creatures" (as implied in the news video of Jacobsen that is at the Iconoclasts site) it becomes easier to see how he may have been fooled.



AJB

Anthony Bragalia

May 27, 2011 8:17 PM



Lance said...

Hi Tony,



Much praise for finding the source!



I don't agree with the reasoning behind your conclusions at all but I very much admire your investigative skills.



Lance Moody

May 27, 2011 10:27 PM



cda said...

I shall try and summarise the story as I see it:



1. O'Donnell tells Ms Jacobsen (requesting anonymity) about the Soviet/Nazi Roswell saucer that was brought to Area51.

2. Jacobsen reveals this startling news in her book on Area 51

3. Tony Bragalia, who is dedicated to the ET Roswell saucer, traces O'Donnell and speaks to him by phone.

4. Tony gently 'persuades' O'Donnell that his information to Jacobsen about the Soviet/Nazi saucer was wrong.

5. O'Donnell says virtually nothing to either confirm or deny Tony's suggestion.

6. Tony then decides O'Donnell was the victim of a deception by his superiors (names unknown). They fooled O'Donnell, somehow, into believing it was a Russian/Nazi saucer with genetically engineered children as pilots; whereas they knew it was actually a crashed craft from another planet but had to cover up this fact.

7. Roswell ET believers and ET skeptics alike agree that Jacobsen's story is garbage.

8. Jacobsen insists her story is true.

9. Everyone maintains their own previously held stance on the Roswell case.

10. The UFO 'community' has not advanced one iota in their resolution of the case, and the crucial hardware (whether ET or Russian/Nazi) is nowhere to be found.



I rest my summary, unless someone wishes to add to it (or subtract from it).

May 28, 2011 7:14 AM



Anonymous said...

This preposterous story sounds like a leftover from the McCarthy era.

May 28, 2011 11:23 AM



Anonymous said...

I knew instantly that the Russian/Nazi scenario was just the latest cover-up/weather balloon type of fabrication. It convinced me beyond a shadow of a doubt it was a UFO even more, especially when I heard about the ridiculous discovered deformed children bit, which would make sense when you realize they're trying to cover-up aliens. Their desperation to conceal the truth is so obvious. Thank you, Tony.

May 28, 2011 11:44 AM



Anonymous said...

Thanks Lance- I appreciate your comment about my investigative prowess. We can agree to disagree about the interpretation of all of this of course...



You may be interested that I have just located a few more of her sources...More to come!



AJB

Anthony Bragalia

May 28, 2011 12:17 PM



Anonymous said...

Anthony, I admire your research skills and persistence also, and your creativity in deciding what to look for and in which direction to look.



As far as O'Donnell being fooled, you said:



"But in the context of Cold War 1951, at a place like Area 51, we can easily see how even smart guys would "buy in" to such a dumb scenario that was fed to them: Their paranoia of the Soviets ran exceptionally high. And their acceptance of whatever their superiors told them as true was blind."



Not only this, but in 1951 there were very few people who had heard of the Roswell incident (and of course fewer still who knew the real story). Flying saucers were frequently thought to be fairy tales, and I'm sure most scientists who weren't "in the know" believed them to be fairy tales more than the general population. If the general population were officially told today that aliens exist, it would definitely be easier for us to "wrap our heads" around the notion due to all the exposure we've had through various media over the years, however, the human psyche being what it is would still leave many vulnerable to flat-out denial and disbelief even if an alien knocked their door and introduced itself--the human mind wants and often needs to "take the path of least resistance" and explain away extraordinary, disturbing events. In the '50s, there was much less media exposure to UFOs, aliens, etc., and in combination with disinformation to the public, the minds of young scientists such as O'Donnell were fertile ground for planting seeds of disinformation such as the remote-controlled Russian UFOs manned with genetically altered children. What were the odds that he would've been able to realize he had been deceived? Very little, probably. And even if he did see some quirky, unexplainable holes in the story he was told, I'm sure his psyche smoothed things over so that he could continue to perform his duties without the disruption that would have occurred had he realized what the truth was.



CDA, I hope you have your evidence and "crucial hardware" soon. I see Anthony going in different, thoughtful directions in trying to gain this evidence, as opposed to many popular UFO "experts" who sit and spin their wheels for decades before they burn out.



DF

May 28, 2011 2:32 PM



Anonymous said...

It looks like what we have here is someone finally admitting to a crash, strange bodies and a highly-advanced, foreign craft. I'm happy with this progress although the book is a disgrace to journalism. The Soviet explanation is counterlogical from every conceivable angle.

May 28, 2011 2:34 PM



David Rudiak said...

First of all, you are to be congratulated for figuring out Jacobsen's source and interviewing him, even though he told you bupkiss.



Tony, I indeed didn't get the Nightline quote exactly right (didn't want to go back through the video), but "to help Annie's book" sounds like he meant "to help Annie sell books," and that's the way the Nightline reporter took it as well. Of course, we're all engaged in mind reading here as to what O'Donnell really meant or what his motives might be in telling his story at all.



Nightline did indicate O'Donnell was sticking to some parts of his Roswell story. O'Donnell didn't really tell you anything, other than he wouldn't talk about it and it was up to the government to release what they knew about Roswell. So O'Donnell does hint the full Roswell story has not been told, thus I seriously doubt he believes it was explained by a balloon or his own little fable, much of it being impossible.



Another line of _pure speculation_, much like your own, is that he does know something about Roswell (such as maybe seeing a craft and bodies), but deliberately disguised the truth with his ridiculous Nazi/Stalin story, perhaps in an effort to get people interested again in what really happened.

May 28, 2011 3:56 PM



Anonymous said...

Why would the government want to spread panic?

May 28, 2011 4:47 PM



Anonymous said...

Hi David-



"O'Donnell does hint the full Roswell story has not been told, thus I seriously doubt he believes it was explained ..buy his little fable."



You point is well-taken, and exactly how I took it when he said it.



AJB

Anthony Bragalia

May 28, 2011 6:14 PM



Anonymous said...

If you have read the numerous books about Roswell, especially by Stanton friedman (Crash at Corona) and Carey and Schmitt (Witness to Roswell) then you would be able to logically see that the ET angle is the correct one. The government themselves got it right the first time when the lid had not come down when they announced the the "RAFF Captures Flying Saucer on Roswell Ranch" only to later be followed by no less than 3 ridiculous explanations over the next 60 years. If the government was trying to hide a secret experiment, Russian or any other terrestial event,then surely they would not announce that they had a "Flying Disc" in their possesion, that is a ludicrous way to try and bury a story. They just screwed up the first time with the truth and have been trying to bury it ever since with hilarious lies. RE: That the bodies seen were burnt up monkeys or crash test dummies, all launced for the first time in the 1950's, not 1947. Also there have been a few pieces of the wreckage that were mailed to Linda Moulton Howel, and after she took it to at least 3 labs for testing nobody could figure out who made it, how it was made, or what purpose it served except that it made sense as the shielding for a flying object as the combination of magneseum and bismith could block cosmic radiation and when it was placed on a million volt generator it 'shot across the room' when the device was turned on. Nobody who was ever at Roswell at the time has come forward and said "I confess it was a Mogel Baloon", at least %95 have said it was 'not of this world'. The government can fool some of the people some of the time...

PS: I am a State Investigator For MUFON and most UFO reports are mis identifications of normal things, but if you do some homework on Roswell the only answer is ET had some bad driving combined with new radar, a probable direct lightning strike, and some bad luck.

May 29, 2011 6:33 PM



Anonymous said...

If you have read the numerous books about Roswell, especially by Stanton friedman (Crash at Corona) and Carey and Schmitt (Witness to Roswell) then you would be able to logically see that the ET angle is the correct one. The government themselves got it right the first time when the lid had not come down when they announced the the "RAFF Captures Flying Saucer on Roswell Ranch" only to later be followed by no less than 3 ridiculous explanations over the next 60 years. If the government was trying to hide a secret experiment, Russian or any other terrestial event,then surely they would not announce that they had a "Flying Disc" in their possesion, that is a ludicrous way to try and bury a story. They just screwed up the first time with the truth and have been trying to bury it ever since with hilarious lies. RE: That the bodies seen were burnt up monkeys or crash test dummies, all launced for the first time in the 1950's, not 1947. Also there have been a few pieces of the wreckage that were mailed to Linda Moulton Howel, and after she took it to at least 3 labs for testing nobody could figure out who made it, how it was made, or what purpose it served except that it made sense as the shielding for a flying object as the combination of magneseum and bismith could block cosmic radiation and when it was placed on a million volt generator it 'shot across the room' when the device was turned on. Nobody who was ever at Roswell at the time has come forward and said "I confess it was a Mogel Baloon", at least %95 have said it was 'not of this world'. The government can fool some of the people some of the time...

PS: I am a State Investigator For MUFON and most UFO reports are mis identifications of normal things, but if you do some homework on Roswell the only answer is ET had some bad driving combined with new radar, a probable direct lightning strike, and some bad luck.

May 29, 2011 8:15 PM



Anonymous said...

i think its possible that what crashed was kind of how odonnel described...but id sooner believe that the craft and its crew were made in america...and the russian angle would be like a scape goat if the truth ever got out about the eugenics and project paperclip scientists hanging out with americas scientists. [link to www.tr-3b.com]

May 30, 2011 5:30 PM



Anonymous said...

Tomorrow the media receives an expose of Annie Jacobsen's book and also names this man. Mengele's whereabouts are proven, he was never in custody of the Soviet Union.



I wouldn't trust what Rudiak says, not only does he endorse nearly every Roswell "witness" (even frauds) but he rorschachs the Ramey memo. Brad Sparks nailed him years ago.



The fact is there is not a single defector from the cold war from other intelligence agencies who either saw or talks or offered the secret Roswell files. This is because the event was not ET, but it DID cause the U.S. Govt to re-think its safeguarding of nukes. It's too bad Rudiak and others ignore the testimonies of the other Mogul scientists. It's because they have an agenda to push, ET.

May 30, 2011 5:38 PM



cda said...

Linda Moulton Howe took a piece of Roswell hardware to 3 labs for testing??



How did she ever get hold of it? The whole affair is supposed to be highly secret. So how on earth did she manage to procure any of it?



Where did you learn this story?

Where are the published results of the lab investigation of this wreckage?



Or is this just another tall tale?

May 30, 2011 5:45 PM


...namaste...b.
STOP THE CORRUPTION!!..the Musa case - 6 children stolen by a London council using LIES = [link to www.butlincat.wordpress.com] - [link to www.facebook.com] Cat - [link to www.myspace.com] - [link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 945958
United States
05/30/2011 07:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AREA 51 BOOK EXPOSED: SOURCE FOR ROSWELL STORY NAMED AND INTERVIEWED!
I believe that the author, Anthony Bragalia, is correct in his conclusions. How the hell did he find the name of her source?

Roswell gets curiouser and curiouser.
Bean There
User ID: 1359029
United States
05/30/2011 08:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AREA 51 BOOK EXPOSED: SOURCE FOR ROSWELL STORY NAMED AND INTERVIEWED!
whew long read but verrrrry interesting .
Bean There
User ID: 1359029
United States
05/30/2011 08:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AREA 51 BOOK EXPOSED: SOURCE FOR ROSWELL STORY NAMED AND INTERVIEWED!
I believe that the author, Anthony Bragalia, is correct in his conclusions. How the hell did he find the name of her source?

Roswell gets curiouser and curiouser.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 945958


Expected more replys in the time it took to read. Haven't followed these latest Roswell stuff beyond quick scan to find if anything interesting has surfaced. This got my attention.

So, just from this post, the author has been at this Roswell stuff a long time, the new book in question about Soviet stuff must surely have given background on the secret source to give a convincing rendition.

Active interest and knowledge of the subject and players led to gut feeling he had found the source. So it all boils down to intuition woo-woo in the finest GLP style.
Bean There
User ID: 1359029
United States
05/31/2011 09:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AREA 51 BOOK EXPOSED: SOURCE FOR ROSWELL STORY NAMED AND INTERVIEWED!
huh. no readers in the world anymore. least not around here. thanks op for the trouble.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1408455
United States
05/31/2011 09:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AREA 51 BOOK EXPOSED: SOURCE FOR ROSWELL STORY NAMED AND INTERVIEWED!
if it was the russians and they were trying to scare us about an alien invasion, why would the air force play into their hand and say it was a flying saucer?

or

maybe this was the fake alien invasion plan that von braun
spoke of