Social Control: WARNING, long read.

The control of information, ideas, and responses is extremely well orchestrated and finely
tuned. Where there is the possibility of serious dissent, this is readily co-opted through various
means, resulting in leading “critics of the system” actually becoming gatekeepers for the very
system they purportedly oppose. This is seen in the main and alternative news media as well
as academia and consultancies. The term “manufactured dissent”, coined in the 1960’s and
70’s, is very apt today.

The global elite operate under two major assumptions: one is that they recognize only their
own authority and to some extent that of their higher dimensional counterparts; two, they also
know that their time is limited and their options are becoming thin. Their arrogance is largely
based on their historically proven ability to succeed at their goals in nearly every way
imaginable. They regard themselves as having the innate right to rule over all humanity and
earth. They have become most effective at developing increasingly sophisticated ways for
humanity to be tricked into enforcing the “matrix world”, This is done through endless
variations on themes, spun out for the primary and fundamental purpose of engaging their
prisoners (humanity) to act as their own jailors and even feel “right” about it.

With complex societies and economies involving several billion people, this would ordinarily
leave a great deal of latitude for success. However, a “glitch in the matrix” has emerged as a
combination of severe and growing economic crisis, military crises, changes in the planetary
and space environments. There are hints that the top circles of TPTB are anticipating
fundamental change that they can do little about. This latter point is important to bear in mind
since, among the top echelons, there is an attitude of “we cannot lose” and if losing, inflict as
much damage on the planet and society as possible. Fortunately there are other forces at work
that favor spiritual awakening and the removal of the dark overlords and their earthly partners.

In the late 1950’s and through the 1960’s the catchword for what is now termed “the-powers-
that-be” (TPTB) was “military-industrial-complex” and “power elite”. In the 1970’s it was
“imperialism” or its variants as a political-economic concept. Not surprisingly, no examination
of interlocking directorates and high level financiers demonstrated the true locus of control.
Like the story of the three blind men, some thought it was all about who was president or king
or queen or prime minister or political party leader or corporate director. Some maintained it
was a class issue with the top-most wealthy the most readily identified “public enemy”. Some
thought it was purely a few very “influential” families whose names were known. The closest
anyone came was eventually identifying the very top echelon of families whose multi-trillion
dollar wealth far exceeds that of the usual top billionaire profiles published in magazine for
public entertainment. But even there things weren’t clear as some of those families seemed to
have competing positions with one another.

At the very highest levels of global influence, it matters not what religious, political,
organization, or belief, TPTB has a clear influence. Nearly anyone could be corrupted or at
least manipulated in overt or subtle ways. If a person of influence could not be co-opted or
otherwise won over, there were always more direct methods of control, regardless of their
apparent position of authority.

As long as people foolishly debate political parties and major national political candidates –or
debate the latest movie/television trivia, then there is little threat to the TPTB who are focused.

on global domination and more. Remember, they prefer to rule with as little violent upset t
themselves as possible. So as long as everyone is distracted by falsehoods such as global
warming, presidential candidates, the latest lies and idiocy promulgated over the mass med
or the personal lives of entertainment celebrities.

It is amazing, the extent to which society can be enthralled into expending energy on the la
banalities of the national candidates, all of whom represent facets of the same control matr
The way the presidential “races” work is that there are a number of individuals who are
designated front-runners by political handlers for the TPTB. Some, but not all, are put in fro
of the public at the starting line. Some come in mid-way. None of the top designees know w
is really the one to win until near the end of the whole charade. The minor candidates who
appear to have some support are used to help test or otherwise flush out certain tendencies
the population. Remember that the matrix world is complex with many of variations. Thus
“system controllers” need to find out what may be new and emerging and determine its
potential for utilization, co-optation, or threat. All the major candidates know is that they ha
to cart themselves across the country saying the various combinations of scripted verbiage
they need to the whole show to be convincing. After all, none of them know in advance wh
will finally “get the nod” from the top – people whose identities they do not know.

Less visible would be the example of the thoughtful control of revision of history. In the USA
this can be readily traced to the start of the “great” philanthropic foundations and the
establishment of control over educational content for schools and key professorships. Throu
the funding (or withholding of same) it became a simple matter to control the knowledge b
of society.

High-level individuals have on occasion bragged that they are so powerful and conscious of
their destiny and role that they really have little concern over any ‘-ism’ – political, religious
economic, or any other difference within the matrix societies of earth and they will direct o
movement to attack another. The world “amoral” does not come anywhere close in describ
how TPTB really view the world.

In terms of mass society, we refer you to the December issue of Global Awakening News,
where we explained some of the concept of “Social Inertial Ballast” that represented about
21.5% of the adult population as measured several years ago in a major social science stud
These social tendencies serve as a good negative example of how social memes can severe
restrict personal and group behavior and maintain conflicts to proscribed social arenas.

Not sure who wrote this one, was either John Crawford or Alex Kochkin.


Full pdf

[link to www.pfcn.net]