Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,081 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 795,262
Pageviews Today: 1,311,275Threads Today: 520Posts Today: 9,102
01:25 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Full, Clear, Concise Answers given in the context of >>Vedic Knowledge<<. This Is Vedic Knowledge. Ask me any question?
Poster Handle Advaita Vedantist
Post Content
I am on a higher level than you

According to the Vedas, Sri Yukteswar is a FOOL, a RASCAL.
 Quoting: SaveTheLivingEntities


you are not very wise

good bye
 Quoting: a 1429937


Silly egos. Cease your quibbling. It does not dawn any jnana in your minds. You will be eaten by the Destroyer.

This thread does not deserve to be polluted by debate and bickering!
 Quoting: Advaita Vedantist


It is not false ego When you are arguing about your real identity, which is spiritual, it is called real ego, and real ego is worth fighting for.


There is a point to the vedas, it is not all speculation and interpretate this, interpretate that.


I am not worried about the destroyer. The destroyer is Time, and Time is the weapon of the Lord. I am a servant of the Lord and thus I am not under any illusion that I am a controller.

It is not quibbling or bickering when you are stating on absolutely authority from the Lord, the imparter of the Vedas.
 Quoting: SaveTheLivingEntities


You were hardly arguing about your real identity. You were arguing for the false ego. "I am on a higher level than you" no enlightened being says this.
 Quoting: Advaita Vedantist




Here is an example how you two are so used to distorting word meanings.


You are taking my quote out of context.

I said

"I am on a higher level than you because I do not try to distort the meanings of the Vedas."

This is authorized and verified. I am not speaking from Ego but I am speaking from Shastric Evidence.

Do you know what Shastra is? Shastra is quoted Scripture.


Shastra must be correct always, not sometimes correct and sometimes incorrect. In the Vedic scriptures, the cow is described as a mother. Therefore she is a mother for all time; it is not, as some rascals say, that in the Vedic age she was a mother but she is not in this age. If Shastra is an authority, the cow is a mother always; she was a mother in the Vedic age, and she is a mother in this age also.


That is how Acharyas quote references, they do not manufacture.

You can attack me all you want, but that is the nature of taking the stance that the Vedas are absolute.

I challenge you to challenge the absoluteness of the Vedas, you will not win.
 Quoting: SaveTheLivingEntities


Doesn't matter how you condition your claim of superiority over something. I'm not attacking you. I follow Sankara's tradition more or less but you have not seen me on here attacking your vaishnav perspective at all.

In Sankara's Vivekachudamani he says the study of the scriptures is useless so long as the highest Truth is unknown, and it is equally useless when the highest Truth has already been known. The scriptures consisting of many words are a dense forest which merely causes the mind to ramble.

But *I* don't say that as I have no interest in attacking any perspectives and I have no attachment to any perspective except Atma-bhava. But it would be unfortunate if this thread degraded from expounding the Vedic jnana into a personal argument about who is right, who is wrong, who is higher and who is lower, etc.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP