Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,077 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 800,308
Pageviews Today: 1,414,230Threads Today: 597Posts Today: 10,393
04:23 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Full, Clear, Concise Answers given in the context of >>Vedic Knowledge<<. This Is Vedic Knowledge. Ask me any question?
Poster Handle SaveTheLivingEntities
Post Content
Maha Lakshmi devi who is the direct consort of Maha Vishnu is the embodiment of the Shakti energy.

The shakti energy has no creative energy without the purusa energy.

Vishnu/Lakshmi
Krishna/Radha

Vishnu impregnates Maya who is the material embodiment of Shakti.

It says Vishnu glances over the material creation and impregnates it with innumerable living entities.

Radharani is the ultimate form of the Shakti energy.


You can see how they have always depicted the Shakti energy as the servant of the Purusa energy.

[link to www.veda.harekrsna.cz]

Maha Lakshmi is serving Lord Vishnu. As you can see there has always been room for more than 1 being on the top, because they are always considered to be parts, parcels, and expansions of the one Supreme.
 Quoting: SaveTheLivingEntities


Maha Lakshmi devi is the embodiment of the Shakti energy because she is female ? That's a good approximation. If you want to keep on with this feeble line of thought be my guest.

First it's Brahma = Vishnu = Shiv. And now it's Vishnu = Lakshmi = Shakti. Who gave you this explanation ?

No wonder you've been slaves for 25000 years.
 Quoting: necromanser



Who said Brahma = Vishnu = Shiva?

They are all seperate personalities, but they are all expansions of one Origin. How hard is it to understand?

Also where did I say Vishnu = Lakshmi = Shakti?

I said Vishnu is the Purusa, and Lakshmi is the Consort of Vishnu.

No wonder you haven't understood the Vedas, you have a very hard time comprehending any knowledge.

Do you understand the Purusa and Prakriti relationship at all?
 Quoting: SaveTheLivingEntities



You don't remember saying Laxshmi is the embodiment of Shakti ?

And if you read Devi Bhagavati Purana, you'll have seen that Shakti is depicted as the supreme godhead and the creator of all the universes. I don't have to quote this to you. If you're planning on being an expert in the Veda, learn to refer all of the veda's and not just the one's that your guru pissed on.


Next,

"Beyond these two there is the Karanadakshayee Vishnu lying in the Causal Ocean. He is the Creator of all the universes."

If Vishnu is the creator of all things then who is Brahma ? Why is he shown as being born out of Vishnu's belly button ?

The inconsistency in the Vedas is your problem. You're having a hard time trying to reconcile all these things and put up a cogent argument.
 Quoting: necromanser



There is no inconsistency and I have no problem reconciling anything.

It is YOU who are having a hard time grasping it.

Brahma is in charge of CREATING within THIS one Universe.
Vishnu is the MAINTAINER of ALL the Universes.
Brahma is born out of Vishnu on a flower.
No reconciliation problems there.

Shakti IS the creative power. But Shakti has NO creation capability without Vishnu. Vishnu is the maintainer of all the Universes.
So that has no problems being reconciled either.

Vishnu is the energetic, Lakshmi is the energy or (hence the word) Shakti of Vishnu.

This is not hard to grasp, this is the elementary understanding..

Your novice level of Vedic knowledge is causing you to be confused.

I have no problems with any Puranas. All puranas are Shastric to me and I accept all statements within all Puranas.

You obviously don't know anything about A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami's work, Bhaktisiddhanta Swami's work, or Bhaktivinode Thakur's work.

Every single Puranic scripture is accepted as revealed knowledge and that is also the opinion of those Acharyas.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP