Read between the lines: Solar Cycle 24 will be INTENSE, so intense that it will completely change how we view our sun.

Hmmmm....

how i felt about half a year ago

the sky is like blue yellow sick now and i have been looking for awhile

obvious to me, cancerous horrors and corpses and flies and then tidals waves - hoipefully- to clear the %$%$^**( out

the evidence is clear- Welcome, to Planet Holocaust

Bumpitty

"Cycle 24 started out late and slow and may not be strong enough to create a rush to the poles, indicating we'll see a very weak solar maximum in 2013, if at all."

I'm not sure where you are getting that 24 will be more intense than a normal cycle. Where does it say that?

says 24 may not happen at all actually.

That has been said for years. It is thought that it will rival the Carrington Storm. at Least

Those new articles released today are now saying the maximum may be greatly reduced or not happen at all.

Let's not forget the biblical warning that men would hide themselves from the sun in the latter days.

Here we are.

Truth is.

agree -- I also read between the lines that the monkeys are
very scared now... because the pace has increase greatly
it's coming sooner then they predicted and the pace will continue to increase wait till they get a hold of September.

Anyhow, like I stated in the other thread. The change is a complete change in this side of the Universe ---
It is not just the earth or the near by planets this whole side of the Universe is and will continue to vibrate/shake/move release magnetic-particles causing major
changes... If tptb want to continue their games they need to move their asses out of this side of the Universe (good luck with that) your mars and stations will not prevail... just the opposite it will help squeeze the parasites out quicker with all the crap they keep putting on it.
It's like when a airplane is to heavy and you start dumping stuff out so it can manuver and get through well --that's what is happening --dumping dumping dumping ---
ribbon in the sky is cleaning house -everywhere --
I think of it as a big tornado but with more control over it's force and release

clearly no one read that article closely. I don't know if I believe them, but they are stating this current max cycle 24 may not even happen.

Jan. 10, 2008: Hang on to your cell phone, a new solar cycle has just begun.
"On January 4, 2008, a reversed-polarity sunspot appeared—and this signals the start of Solar Cycle 24," says David Hathaway of the Marshall Space Flight Center.

[link to science.nasa.gov]


May 8, 2009 -- Solar Cycle 24 Prediction Update The Solar Cycle 24 Prediction Panel has reached a consensus decision on the prediction of the next solar cycle (Cycle 24). First, the panel has agreed that solar minimum occurred in December, 2008. This still qualifies as a prediction since the smoothed sunspot number is only valid through September, 2008. The panel has decided that the next solar cycle will be below average in intensity, with a maximum sunspot number of 90. Given the predicted date of solar minimum and the predicted maximum intensity, solar maximum is now expected to occur in May, 2013. Note, this is a consensus opinion, not a unanimous decision. A supermajority of the panel did agree to this prediction.

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

I feel like I'm in the twilight zone. The announcement today does NOT say cycle 24 will be particularly intense, but some of you are saying, "Oh, but that's what they MEAN." If you are just going to apply your own reality to anything you see or hear, what's the point in even reading these articles or listening to what any of the "experts" say about anything?

because this is GLP

I agree, no ones getting it. Whether it is disinfo or not is still up for debate, but the articles are clearly stating that that cycle 24 could have a reduced or non existent maximum. They are definitely NOT stating it will be more intense.

Also just read it here. Seems they made their final conclusions on consensus on the 1st.

[link to solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov]

Solar Cycle Prediction

(Updated 2011/06/01)

The smoothed aa index reached its minimum (a record low) of 8.4 in September of 2009. Using Ohl's method now indicates a maximum sunspot number of 70 ± 18 for cycle 24. We then use the shape of the sunspot cycle as described by Hathaway, Wilson, and Reichmann [Solar Physics 151, 177 (1994)] and determine a starting time for the cycle by fitting the data to produce a prediction of the monthly sunspot numbers through the next cycle. We find a starting time of May 2008 with minimum occurring in December 2008 and maximum of about 59 in June/July of 2013. The predicted numbers are available in a text file, as a GIF image, and as a pdf-file. As the cycle progresses, the prediction process switches over to giving more weight to the fitting of the monthly values to the cycle shape function. At this phase of cycle 24 we now give 40% weight to the curve-fitting technique of Hathaway, Wilson, and Reichmann Solar Physics 151, 177 (1994). That technique currently gives highly uncertain (but smaller) values.
[link to solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov]

The Carrington event happened in a weak cycle like the one they now are predicting. What is unaccounted for is the effect of the fluff, so there might be plenty of opportunity for flaring in combination with general global cooling.

A plausible scenario is that our power systems get knocked out while heading for significantly colder climate.

This was announced yesterday. Heard any announcements like this there?

Energy Secretary Chu Announces Five Million Smart Meters Installed Nationwide as Part of Grid Modernization Effort

[link to www.smartgrid.gov]

That is for Solar Cycle 25, I thought...

That is an ugly thought :-( :damned:

Yeah it is.

:sunexplode:

and 24.

OOPS wrong thread

all. the talk of 24 being a bit damp

23 was not exactly normal