How To Deal With Police Officers!!!!!

This works I have tried it and have the broken bones empty bank accounts and shattered soul to prove it.

I would imagine this would not work in all cases as "peace keepers" can be very aggressive and unlawful. i feel it's still helpful for people not to give up their right's which is the officers main goal.

OP: This post is A1....people feed too much into all the hypocracy/propagander out there that was probably invented by the actually criminals themselves...

....but i totally agree with you. Police Officers are SERVANTS of the PULBIC (us). THEY know this, but they deal with alot of Idiots every single day.

Hey, I am not totally against the Officers of the Law, but I am not exactly for them either.

They should have never some to th is country by Orders of the King of Europeans Countries in the name of "Catholicism", just to rape, kill and pillage this country from the Native Americans.

What ever happened to "Turn the other cheek" concept?

All I know is that they are reaping their own Karma; unfortunately.

One of my top 10 favorite sayings goes, "The road to destruction was paved with good intenetions...."

I will help as much as i can possibly do -- without destroying my own Karma; which i have plenty of. (good karma)

**THINK**

**THINK**

strawman theory

they own us according to the strawman theory and we all obey and live there laws so when we sighn our name and vote we consent to there tyranny no?

I'm not against police either, and i'm pretty sure alot of people know that cops were not always like this. there was a time when they were friends and we could trust them. but that time is long gone unfortunately. There is a reason everyone gets a "bad" feeling when a police officer is around. very good quote btw it holds very true in alot of situations. thanks for your thoughts.

this movie was posted on here a bit back....its a little long but the guy clearly has passion for the topic.

[link to video.google.co.uk]

Very true, but imo if that is the length i have to go to protect my rights without becoming violent and taking things to extremes then so be it. "A country in which the people fear the gov't there will be tyranny. in a country where the gov't fears the people there is liberty." i feel you have to show that you aren't scared and you will not back down.



the thing about that is it holds the word theory.

Thats funny. Thanks I needed a laugh.

Dealing with police citizens that act like responsible
adults come out ahead. Not those that act like self
appointed legal scholars.

I got the same schtick from all the professors I had
the first day of college in 1978. Every student I know
of that used the tactic either got a traffic ticket or
arrested depending on how much of an irritant they were.

[link to www.youtube.com]

so you should just bend over and take it like a peasant?

in these hard times you better know your legal rights and how laws work. it's not acting like a "self appointed legal scholar." it's simply knowing what to say. you don't have to come across like a snob. be respectful and exercise your rights.

if that is what it takes to defend your right's then so be it. all in my opinion of course. this really doesn't apply to traffic stops unless they want to search your car.

If You are Facing Charges
The following is not intended to substitute for competent legal assistance, nor is it to

be
construed as specific legal advice. However, we offer some observations which may be
of general interest.
Ask to sign the relevant paperwork for a jury trial immediately upon being charged. You

can
decide not to follow through later on, but it's not always possible to regain your right

to
trial by jury once it's been lost.
The prosecutor may pressure you to accept a plea bargain, perhaps by threatening to
escalate or multiply charges if you do not accept, or by assuring you that if you go

before a
jury, and lose, the punishment will be much worse than if they make a deal.
You may wish to resist such intimidation, if you believe injustice is being done to you.
Consider that if you plead guilty to breaking an unpopular law, you lengthen the time

that
you and everyone else will be subject to it, because neither you nor a jury will have an
opportunity to express your opinion of it. And if your plea "bargain" includes a felony

count,
you're also giving up--without a fight--your right to vote, or serve on a jury, hold

public
office, or own a firearm.
The so-called "Informed Jury defense", in which activists make a deliberate attempt to
educate your trial jurors in their right to judge the law itself, and to vote on the

verdict
according to conscience, is gaining in popularity and effectiveness. We see more and more
"hung juries" and outright acquittals of individuals charged with violating unpopular

(usually
political, or victimless crime) laws, or who were subjected to unconstitutional police
procedures.
The first phase is to create an awareness in the community about the real extent of the
power that jurors wield; the next is to supply detailed information directly to the

jurors
who will actually hear your case. The first phase can be done by calling in to radio talk
shows, writing letters to the editor, leafleting, advertising--whatever your time and

money
will permit. The second is best done by getting friends, family, or fellow fully informed

jury
activists to show up at the courthouse when your jury is being selected, to hand "True or
False?" or other materials to the incoming jury pool--which usually means being there

from
about 7:30 to 9:00 am.
Occasionally, leafleters will be hassled by the authorities, but to date no one has been
convicted of anything for passing out fully informed jury brochures. In US v. Grace,

1983, it
was determined that the sidewalks around a courthouse are a "free speech zone", and it
seems that the word has gotten around to most of the nation's courts, punctuated by the
fact that in those few cases where arrests have been made, the authorities are now facing
lawsuits...or perhaps it's merely that prosecutors have reasoned (correctly) that if they
arrest fully informed jury leafleters, the leaflets will have to be given to the

leafleter's own
jury as evidence...

You can also spread information which argues that the law you're accused of breaking is a
poor one, at the same time you inform people about jury power. Fully informed juries
"combine well" with many "causes", especially those which involve reforming laws,

although
activists shouldn't take sides on any law.
You may be accused of an offense which does not invoke your right to trial by jury

itself.
There are future plans to deal with this gross violation of your individual rights, but

for the
moment there is little that can be done. If you plan to break a law of one kind or

another
and "fight for justice in the courts" on behalf of one cause or another, therefore, it

will pay
you to check ahead of time to see what kind of offense you'll have to commit in order to
get a trial by jury--and then make sure that jury is fully informed.
And don't expect it to be easy to make your argument in court. You may not even be
allowed to tell the jury why you did it, let alone what's wrong with the law or what the
Constitution says. The jury will hear and see only the evidence and testimony allowed by
the judge, and further restricted by the prosecutor. And you'll be facing jurors who have
been both told and sworn by the judge to "follow the law as given", and told they

"should"
(sometimes even "must") find you guilty if the evidence supports a conviction.
Under these circumstances, about the only way to "inform" the jury, once in court, is to

hint
at their power during voir dire (jury selection), then explain it during closing

arguments--at
least until the gavel slams down and you're threatened with contempt of court if you or
your attorney continues! Take heed: contempt of court charges do not entail a trial by

jury,
just a show-cause hearing and judgment by the bench!
You're not so likely to be stopped or threatened with contempt if you use part of your

jury
selection time, opening and especially closing remarks to remind your jurors about their
role as the "conscience of the community", how the jury is an important player in our
system of justice, that the jury stands as an important buffer between the accused person
and the power of the government, and that these are the reasons America uses jurors, not
computers, to judge a case.
In short, without hitting the nail on the head and therefore being silenced, you're

saying
things which can help the jurors gain self confidence and a sense of power and
independence--and gambling that some of them may begin considering about why they're
there. Besides, everything you're saying is not only true, it shows your respect for the

jurors
and the jury system, which is something the prosecution is not likely to do.
Finally, if in fact justice in your case means exoneration, then we wish you every

success in
your defense.

Dunno what part of the country you're from, but you'd be a "dub'l tap" or a "tune-up" at the very least.

Armchair lawyers...

Suspended license,dui,drugs in the car,wreckless driving
are few of the things that result in an arrest during a
traffic stop.

most pigs are on steroids! and they shoot them up like junkies! and thats a fact! so you cant reason with a pig on drugs all you can do is put them down..

Well please go right ahead and preach that sermon next
time you deal with a police officer. Give us a full
report on how that worked for you.

Wise sheep don't piss of the sheep dog. They bite.

Oh really? How many police officers do you know and
where did you get this priceless info on their drug
use?

I know lots of drug dealers.

I also think you will end up beaten, if the cop that is in front of you is aggressive in the first place.
I would say your best bet would be to do as you're told and keep quiet. The best time to speak is in front of a judge. Be polite and respectful to all parties. That way they have no reason to beat you. If they do, you can get them in court.

Last Edited by Blue Skies on 06/24/2011 02:00 PM

How to deal with pigs?

Well how much does it cost to rent a flame thrower these days?

WOW OP, did you take your meds today.


Seriously, the best way for non-criminals to deal with PEACE OFFICERS is to treat them with the respect they deserve for putting their life on the line day in, day out.

In the first 7 seconds of meeting a PEACE OFFICER face to face, he/she will have made a threat assessment. Assessing you and the situation for threats against both his/her personal safety and state issued authority.

If you respect the law, respect the fact that his/her job is to deal with the scum of the earth on a daily basis to enforce that law... These qualities will be broadcast in your body language, demeanor, and tone of voice.

In the first 7 seconds, the officer is either going to relax or get an adrenalin rush. The latter means that you, the situation, or both are being perceived as a threat.

BTW. All PEACE OFFICERS ARE "OFFICERS OF THE COURT".

Why they may not be attornies, their bosses are government attornies. So, 99 time out of 100 its better to keep your legal theories (right or wrong) to yourself around PEACE OFFICERS.

Issues of law should be addressed in a Court of Law.

Hope this helps.

Wisdom here.

Very well said.

Sigh.....

What a sheep.


Im not going to even bother rebuking all of the flat out garbage your pig loving ass has posted.

You in fact are the scum of the earth not the poor people you want to see dominated by pigs.