|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
When can we expect to see NIBIRU/PLANET X with the naked eye
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
The comet thing isnt as regular as I think you are thinking. Are you talking about the hypothesis that also links the great extinctions on earth with the same cycle?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10231506 Just one of the many binary theories floating around in more mainstream science, I was speaking more about the Tyche paper, I believe you are referring to Nemesis, However am in no way trying to tie this to Nibiru as a 3600 year orbit. The conversation kinda evolved for me , because so many saying a Binary is not possible for our sun period, and that just is not true. What I was saying is a hypothetical Sedna type object that exists somewhere in between our Suns hypothetical binary and our Sun would be a more reasonable try for Nibiruheads, at least in a "mechanics" sense of the word. However it would have to be a lot longer than 3600 years in its orbit , and of course much much much smaller than a brown dwarf . Stretching my mind as open as I can basically to give some form of benefit of doubt . Tyche was the super jupiter at ~500 AU, yeah? And an object such as the one you are describing in the attempt to give them the benefit of the doubt would have to have an orbital period on the order of tens of thousands of years, as Sedna's orbit is close to 12,000 on its own. The companion would have to be at LEAST that. and, again, I think we agree that this is not something that would be dipping into the inner solar system. Also, while its POSSIBLE for there to be a binary companion, unless it is a brown dwarf, we would be able to see it, even if it were a red dwarf. And as I say a 3600 year orbit would just not work, you are agreeing with me . and once again you agree I suggest a small brown dwarf, or dead star for this three body solution . I am just playing devils advocate I would like to add once again Also yes for anything to dip into the inner solar system and not leave " footprints" it would have to be much much much much smaller than what they claim.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
