Well, that totally explains your stubborn attitude (read: intolerance) then. You are looking at all of this strictly through the eyes of conventional science. In reality, conventional science does a great job at calibrating and aiming telescopes. As for explaining what those telescopes actually view, well, conventional science is worth fuck-all in that arena.

I could understand if you presented your "opinion" as precisely that - an opinion, an alternative view, one of many. Stating it over and over again as FACT, well, that smacks of the same blind arrogance as the rest of modern, conventional science. That same science, by the way, which keeps being proven wrong each day.

One day in the future, perhaps, you will realise how wrong conventional science has been. You will realise how much time you lost following conventional science. Time, which you could have better used to explain all what you see out there. Good luck.