Is the lazy suburban housewife who mooches off her husband any better than the welfare mom with six kids?

Because the government doesn't take money from me to give to the housewife. That's why.

:mdfinger:

THIS!!!!!

AND IN THE 80's, LISTING ALL THOSE YOU NEED TO HIRE TO REPLACE THAT QUALITY OF CARE, YOU'D NEED 80,000 A YEAR.

The rich pay less in taxes you couldn't me anymore clueless.

This praising of sit-at-homes above is ridiculous.

And sit-at-homes DO become a burden on other people when the husband can no longer produce enough money to keep her fat butt on the couch (or dies without life insurance). They go back to parents, try to extort money out of others, and go on welfare.

And if you don't think the government ever forces the man to pay the woman, you haven't been in family court. There is still permanent, lifetime alimony, even for younger women who could work, in Florida as an example.

The welfare parasite and the parasite off a man are pretty much the same, just a different "host".

The roles of the welfare parasite and the parasite off a man are not chiseled into stone.

The welfare leech could find a sap to pay for her, and the leech off a man could lose his support and become a welfare leech. They are the same at the bottom of it.

There was a Judge Judy episode yesterday with a lazy housewife.

She said her husband supported her for 16 years, so she didn't have to work.

Now he's apparently not supporting her anymore - for whatever reason (sounds like divorce) - and she leeched off an 81-year-old woman on social security and ran up a credit card in her name. The leech said she "tried" to get a job.

Judge Judy called her a moocher. Moochers be moochers, whether on welfare or leeching off other people. I assume the husband will eventually be ordered to pay her alimony.

Some idiot men above are crowing about paying for a leech, I assume while they hike their pants up in RealMan fashion. They are embarrassing (although they are actually bragging about this), and the leeches are embarrassing.

Women remind us of equality and they're independent and strong, they take care of themselves and their gash gremlins, men are bicycles, but truth is they don't care if it's a man or big daddy gov subsidizing their vaginas, if neither is paying then it's a problem.

Because the welfare mom is collecting from everybody while the stay at home lady get's it from one person-her man.

Agreed! When I was married and a stay-at-home mom, I was far from lazy! I cooked, cleaned, gardened, mowed the lawns, painted and decorated the house, did laundry, organized and returned recyclables, washed the cars, AND took care of two boys, one of whom I homeschooled for 6th and 7th grade. So fuck you, OP!

Wifely duties are to support and nurture her husband in all things. That includes cooking and cleaning of course, but primarily it's to cater to him sexually and emotionally.

No sexual deed can be too eccentric, or too often. What makes him happy is her purpose in life, and providing for the household is his. He is the king of the castle, and she is his wife.

Children are optional, and generally more trouble than they're worth today. Some folks like them, and in less wealthy societies, were required as a retirement plan.

If the wife is performing her proper duties to her man, she's not a leech. If she fails here, she's worse than a leech, she's a total user.

Welfare is wrong, but most welfare moms are stupid and just taking what's offered. She never made a contract with the government. Ban welfare and you solve that problem.

Everyone from the outside might think I am a lazy housewife. I don't do a great job cleaning, though I cook every meal.
In reality I bring a good bit of income in, sometimes the most, and work more than 8 hours a day, in addition to helping hubby with his side business. It is never easy to know what goes on in a household unless you are in it.
Some family members used to drop over unannounced, I asked, politely I thought, for them to call first, because sometimes I have online meetings or deadlines. They really took offense.
I can make 7k a month, but if asked, my uneducated family will say I sit home and play with the computer all day. It drives me nuts.

The lazy suburban housewife is pretty much the same as the welfare mooch, except that they are using different angles to get their money.

The lazy housewife is exploiting her vagina and men's feelings of chivalry and being White Knights for the helpless damsel (when she wants something, though, she's all of a sudden not so helpless and passive). The welfare mooch is using the collective feelings of pity of people in society.

Both methods get them money. Another big difference is that lazy housewives can "hit one out of the park" by bagging the right guy. Linda Hamm just got a check for a billion from ex-hubby. She's appealing because it's not enough. Patricia Kluge got a bit under a billion, but she went through bankruptcy a few years ago. For example. Leeches be leeches.

I don't understand the mentality of men who want to pay for women to sit at home without small children, but I don't have to. Go fur' it dude. If you start to weirdly brag in my face about paying for some sit-at-home, I'm going to remove you from in front of my face. Get it?

But I draw the line when the sit-at-home orders something from my business and then ignores me about that minor payment thing. That's her husband's business, but she forgot to tell him.

I've had that happen a few times throughout the years, so I instantly find grounds to sue the husband. I don't even talk to the housewife anymore. The husband is sometimes outraged; I could care less. He is poking his meaty little finger in everyone's chest, bizarrely bragging about paying for some leech, so I just don't get it that he is made when he really has to cover for said leech.

Always go after the husband with a lawsuit. You may have to find some legal reason, but find it and sue his ass. Don't even deal with the housewife; she is like some further child. Worse than a child, she is an adult who is deliberately leeching.

What is odd about career suburban housewives is (for most of them) their displays of self-importance.

If some dope wants to pay for a sit-at-home for whatever neurotic reason, great. But these women are not their husbands, no matter how hard they want to co-opt their achievements.

These women are basically losers that society accepts. Society (probably rightly) does not accept men sitting at home, living off a woman, without any kids in the house to take care of.

If they just want to be lazy moochers, it's not my problem, but I don't want to hear from them. I could care less if they just got a trash compactor, or a bigger house (who cares if the husband had a nervous breakdown from the greater responsibility), or if they know all about today's Dr. Phil or Judge Judy show.

Just shut your mouth and get out of sight, Ms. Very Important Housewife. People hide their feelings because they may not want to tick off your husband. If he loses his position, you instantly become what you are: nothing.

I'm sure her husband does not consider it mooching since she is taking it from him regularly.

Are you suggesting the welfare moms need to start giving it up for us, the payers?

"I'm sure her husband does not consider it mooching since she is taking it from him regularly."

I have no idea what goes through the heads or motivates men like that. Maybe they have a dim awareness that they are basically paying some woman to be with them, so it's not all the White Knight chivalry Real Man (TM) stuff they present it to be.

I suspect that some men burdened with lifetime alimony (still exists in Florida, for example) with a healthy, fairly young ex-wife who will just not work ... for the rest of her life ... consider the ex-wives mooches. And they are. No clue why society still tolerates that.

This is also clear to me: Lots of sit-at-home women will loudly say that they "mutually agreed on it". While the man just kind of looks at the ground and mumbles that he agreed, kind of.

I've seen women just unilaterally quit work a couple of weeks after the wedding. No prior announcement. Now the entire life burden is on him, the mortgage for the bigger house she wants is on him, but there's not a whole lot he can do about it except divorce (where he may get reamed even worse).

Not all men "mutually agree on it", but they are afraid that society will think they are less than Real Men if they say they don't like it, nothing is going to change anyway, and many are actually afraid of their wives. If he suggests that she help out with all of the various burdens, he may have hell to pay. And nothing is going to change anyway.

"Lots of sit-at-home women will loudly say that they "mutually agreed on it"."

Yup, and some of the guys being so loud about being a Real Man and supporting the dopey sit-at-home (like it's a good thing) are in reality the weakest twits who are afraid to stand up to a woman.

I ignore them and I have always ignored permanent housewives. Just useless people.

For some reason, any topic is on point for these housewives, except for their laziness. Then I always hear that it is none of my business how she and her husband divide their finances. When she started it with her crap.

They are usually sticking their nose in other people's business, and a favorite topic of lazy housewives seems to be how lazy some man is who only works part time or who can't find a job. And then they get offended when someone points out that they themselves haven't worked for 20 years, and they also call for complete equality between men and women. Just complete morons.

Both are irritating leeches - welfare mooches and suburban housewife mooches.

Most stay at home Moms Ive seen are physicaly more attractive, due to less stress and they have time to pamper and bubblebath after loads of laundry and feeding little tots. More time for gym and workouts .


They have alpha male husbands too, which explains their higher level of attractiveness.

It sounds like youre jealous as hell. I know many professionals with degrees and scholarships who choose to stay home to raise their babies and not let some daycare do it. And they have the skills and expertise to go back to work if they have too or are ready to. You are a narrow minded fool. And you shouldnt judge

A+++ You sound lovely inside and out and your husband sounds badass Alpha, but at the same time, full of kindness and protection for you. Congrats on your happy arrangement on a thread full of jealous foaming at the mouth demons.

Never let them get to you nor effect your happiness. Were living in turbulent times where good is bad and bad is good.

Oh good lord.

"And they have the skills and expertise to go back to work if they have too or are ready to."

---------

You just have no clue about the real world. If some woman gets a college degree and then sits at home for 20 years, she not only has no skills or expertise, she has no inkling of the work world.

And my experience with long-term housewives is that they are used to being the BOSS at home, over their husbands, over any children, over any contractors (paid for by the husband) and over anyone and everyone in the neighborhood. But, as opposed to the real world, they are the boss because of their husband, not because of anything they can really offer or contribute in the real world.

There is a reason why alimony exists, buttercup.

Welfare leeches are irritating, but at least they are battling in real life. Suburban housewives are clueless idiots, living off men who don't have the cajones to tell them to get a friggin' job and quit being a mooch in life.

My, my, my. Bless your heart. You are clueless.

Imagine, a housewife, eating cheetos and watching oprah THE ONLY FUCKING TIME SHE CAN, WHEN THE KIDS ARE AT SCHOOL.

You think men just spoil and pamper lil princesses these days for nothing?

Child, I have 4 kids and last time I conservatively added it up, it would cost my husband over 8k/mo. to replace all the services I provide... and GUESS WHAT? A few weeks ago I actually dropped the kids off at school then came home and went back to sleep! The NERVE of me. Could you possibly guess why?

BECAUSE I'VE BEEN ON CALL 24/7 AT MY JOB FOR THE PAST TEN AND A HALF YEARS, MOTHERFUCKER.

No pay
No benefits (besides messy hugs :D)
No off time
No breaks
No holidays
No vacations

Motherfucker I cannot remember the last time I took a dump by myself. In one afternoon a few months ago I counted SIXTY bucklings/unbucklings while running errands (it hurt my back that day). When I have the flu and am puking/passing out, they'll fuckin laugh. I am not even free to DIE. I can't make a sandwich, I have to make FIVE.

My man had less than nothing when I met him and I raised him up, supported us all by myself for years.

If I wanna eat cheetoes on the couch for a year straight I will because I earned it.

If a man spoils a woman these days it's probably because she earned it in a way you do not understand.

Stop coveting others and get a life.

You get plenty of pay, but it's called "in kind" in accounting.

You get a free house. You get a free car. You get free money to stuff your face so that you have a fat butt. You get free vacations. You get free assets and free monthly payments ("alimony") when you finally decide to ditch the loser.

Wheeeee! Free money. And I can b!tch up a storm that I don't get anything for being a lazy sit-at-home.

Grow up. Quit being a child. Become responsible in life. You will not understand what I am saying until you take that big step.