GLPVC PRESENTS - Dr Judy Wood 11pm est 7/19/2011(EDITED)

It would be most excellent if you could detract from Wood's research through direct evidence and supported arguments. Until then, we will just have to live with the best you got; that is that you are an expert on cointelpro, she bad and we have your sincere and unsupported word on that. I'd like to buy any used cars you have sitting around.

we're not turning this thread into a fuckin manure farm.

every time someone doesnt like a theory - they cry SHILL or COINTELPRO.

i dont give a shit whether you guys agree or disagree - thats your prerogative. people here WANT to hear what she has to say, as many believe in her theory. as i posted, jesse ventura believes in her theory.

you and the other ac wouldnt know a true cointel pro operation if it were a pussy in your face that queefed atcha.

Last Edited by Phennommennonn on 07/19/2011 11:02 AM

He he talk about a flowery phrase

I want to open up Judy's links, but someone said there was a trojan or virus on one of them.

Which one had the virus. I will write it down and remember to not open it.

That is the last thing I need today.

Thank you.

:vinnyBS33:


the links and videos on her page are fine. jeeze.

oh shit, that's the support i was looking for!

First of all A. C. since you have no qualifications to show me who you are and second you have no time to teach me I will go with the one who does have credentials and second has the time to teach me.

Last Edited by NZREva on 07/19/2011 12:09 PM

Phen,
I appreciate your work, and I kinda like you, but frankly you have no idea what kind of work I do, and what I actually produce. Doesn't matter.

I also understand the need you feel to defend your choice of guests. I am not critizing you choice, I think it is salutary. I'm just stating my honest opinion about Dr. Wood. I've spent quite a lot of time investigating her and her claims a few years ago, when she collided with the 911 Truth movement along with other disingo agents like Morgan Reynolds. Imho, she doesn"t produce anything of value, just a lot of pointless mumbo-jumbo throwing Tesla tech and other fashionable supposed "suppressed/secret technologies" (not saying they don't exist) into a vaguely seductive mix that will only convince the most scientifically illiterate.

As I have stated before, I am at work right now, I don't have time to write a full exposé of the many reasons why I think she's being dishonest, either for attention seeking, or most probably because she is working as a contractor for official disinfo programs.

I'm just stating my position to fellow GLPers. I don't mind getting lambasted for that. All that is needed to prove that she's a fraud is out there. You just have to look and exercise critical thinking.

I'm renewing my warnings and my call for her to be exposed by serious and uncensored grilling on tonight's GLPVC.

To the AC asking for documentation about disinfo techniques: I'll try to find a little time tonight to give you a little headstart, maybe put up a few books for you on RS or the like. Cheers.

Whatever you thrown at me, I'll always be grateful to you for having the courage to invite a real truth-tell like Daryl Bradford Smith recently.

You can invite all the Judy Woods in the world after that, I don't really care. If she's allowed to be properly grilled tonight (as she has never been to this day), her fraud will crumble in a matter of minutes.

i could propagate that the big bad wolf huffed n puffed and blew the towers down. i could possibly believe in that theory as well as many others.

there IS technology that our military has that supports her theory.

you cant disprove that. its defacto.

You're right. I can't prove a negative, meaning I can't prove the military industrial complex hasn't used secret tech to facilitate 911. Maybe they have.

But that doesn't mean that her "work" is not ridiculous in itself, and a gross and blatant manipulation. It doesn't hold water at all. She just has no idea what she's talking about. The fact that she holds a doctorate and has taught a few courses (despite being widely disparaged by colleagues and the few elements within the scientific community who actually took the time to examine her claims).

I hope we can get a scientifically litterate GLPer on GLPVC tonight to ask a few pointed questions.

so its more plausible that 19 arabs with box cutters did this?

or out sourced via the mousaad?

or it was controlled demolition?

or did oprah eat to much fried chicken and nuke farted NYC?

cmon.....no one fucking knows HOWWWWWWWWWWW they orchestrated 911.

the general consensus be it was an inside job.

i personally am open to all theories. i will not discount a theory just bc my opinion is that its not possible.

regardless of who believes what - we cant change what happened that fateful day.

Who?

dude go comb ur fuckin hair, grab a starbucks, then check back.

We know a few things for sure: it was an inside job, and the "mousaad" was definitely involved. Her theory doesn't preclude any of these facts. It just doesn't bring anything actionable to the table, but it has been the source of many attacks against A&E911 and other prominent truthers who tend to have a fact-based approach to the issue at hand.

i for one lean to the controlled demolition theory. that makes more sense to me.

my dr is the one who turned me onto glp - via a judy wood thread. ive been here since 07.

i have read some of her work - not all. many of us want to hear her side - some of the things she has is backed up info therefore it IS quite possible that some of the things she theorizes could be possible.

each person is given information. it is up to them to choose what to do with it.

I also lean towards controlled demolition. It is a perfectly valid possibility with the known and verified parameters. The possible perpetrators had full access to material and critical structures, systems and personal tu be able to pull it. And there have been many more strange coincidences related to personel and security events @ WTC during the run-up to 911.

Also agree with the "freedom to process information" angle, even if it necessarily means having to process disinfo and shillery. Hence the critical importance of recouping and critical thinking.

Wonder why no "controlled demolition" was done the first time the WTC was bombed in 1993??

Jeez.... If you don't agree with her just move on. Why are you trying so hard to discredit her?

I've read the entire book, and I really can't see how you can say she doesn't know what she is talking about. Did you bother to read it? Or are you choosing to disagree becasuse she doesn't agree with the "truth movement?"

Honestly, her research, which is based on FACTS and scientific knowledge, clearly shows that both the 911 comission and the truth movements conclusions are wrong. It's that simple.

Just becasue she doesn't think there was molten steel, which she provided LOTS evidence to back up her claim, doesn't mean she doesn't know what she is talking about. Do you have any evidence that there was molten steel? I've never once seen any pictures or any other evidence other than verbal that shows there was molten steel.

For every big step, there's a beta test first. And look up the differences between 1993 WTC and 2001 WTC. How it magically changed hands, how its security was redesigned, etc. before 911.

I'm basing my opinion on the communication/disruption aspect of her maneuvering, and her abusive and manipulative use of rhetoric, as well as other adverse character traits. As for her book, I had a very good PhD-holding physicist friend of mine sift through me. In short, he told me, it's utter bunk. And he knows about Haarp, Tesla tech, and many other fringe topics.

I meant "sift through it", of course.

Of course Wood does anything she can to disprove molten metal because that effectively brings the demolition theory down. Well, pretty much...

But just tirelessly repeating that there was no molten steel does not make it so by itself. There are videos, photos and witnesess to it. Period.

On the other hand, there is NO PROOF of the DEW theory. No proof. Pure speculation. Period.

And in my view, this is not being done in search of truth but in order to discredit the only group (AEfor911) and a theory which so far was the only one that credibly threatened the official story.

The woman only brings damage to the truth movement. How very sad some people just won't see that.

am i gunna hafta buy CDz for ur fuckin broken record?

give it a rest already. sheesh.

the truth always has been clear as day that the media ran fake videos that day.

this is undebunkable.

knowing this, does it really matter how the towers came down?

nope. oh how they would love for you run in circles with endless destruction theories.

you don't need to watch any documentaries, or read any articles.

just look with your own eyes.



fakest shit you could ever see.

time to grow up.




here is how it was probably done

Broken record? Well, it is you guys who KEEP repeatng how backed up her research supposedly was, yet I've STILL seen NO PROOF of these claims. Do you people even know what the word PROOF means?
If you can keep spewing the same line over and over, why should I not counter it from time to time? You repeat a lie or a sheer stupidity, I try to respond with arguments.
Does that make you angry? Well, that's a bitch. Disinfo agents make me angry as well. So far she has proven not to be a truth seeker but rather the opposite.

Good luck supporting her!

arguments do not equate to proof that backs YOU up.

we will decide individually after tonights show.

Yeah, and I guess all the people on the ground who saw the planes coming had their eyes tricked by Adobe After Effects or Apple Shake, right ?

To all the ignorant holders of 'the absolute truth' on this forum, get it through your thick skulls that 9/11 was 'an operation within an operation within an operation'.. and planting whatever contradicting evidence, or planting witnesses seeing molten steel, and then having people running around in here screaming 'shill shill' because they have found a hole in someones theory...

Of ANYONE claiming to have a good case, no-one can argue with Dr. Woods theory, and some shill in here claiming ' a friend of a brother of my neighbor's mailman saw molten steel so Dr. Wood is wrong', you guys are ruining this forum! But then again, maybe that's what you are paid to do.. or you are just stuck in your ignorant little world and aren't ready to discuss with the adults yet..