Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,653 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,076,488
Pageviews Today: 3,024,413Threads Today: 700Posts Today: 15,694
10:01 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject THE ECONOMY & YOU # (Daily Updated Videos & Articles)
Poster Handle RoXY
Post Content
77% of JP Morgan’s Net Income Comes from Government Subsidies
by Washington's Blog
July 1, 2012

JP Morgan Sucks at the Government Teat
JP Morgan’s credit rating would be much lower without government backing.

As Bloomberg noted last week: JPMorgan benefited from the assumption that there’s a “very high likelihood” the U.S. government would back the bank’s bondholders and creditors if it defaulted on its debt, according to the statement. Without the implied federal backing, JPMorgan’s long-term deposit rating would have been three levels lower and its senior debt would have dropped two more steps, Moody’s said.

And as the editors of Bloomberg pointed out a couple of weeks ago: JPMorgan receives a government subsidy worth about $14 billion a year, according to research published by the International Monetary Fundand our own analysis of bank balance sheets. The money helps the bank pay big salaries and bonuses. More important, it distorts markets, fueling crises such as the recent subprime-lending disaster and the sovereign-debt debacle that is now threatening to destroy the euro and sink the global economy.

With each new banking crisis, the value of the implicit subsidy grows. In a recent paper, two economists — Kenichi Ueda of the IMF and Beatrice Weder Di Mauro of the University of Mainz — estimated that as of 2009 the expectation of government support was shaving about 0.8 percentage point off large banks’ borrowing costs. That’s up from 0.6 percentage point in 2007, before the financial crisis prompted a global round of bank bailouts.

CONTINUE: [link to globalresearch.ca]
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:



News