Time to secede mentally. | |
PhoenixMatthias (OP) User ID: 1455772 United States 07/30/2011 10:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Any agent of the Foreign US Government is an invader. They have de-legitimized themselves. They can claim to be legitimate all they want. These claims do not change facts. The fact is they are foreign. All claims and actions to the contrary do not change this fact. How would you treat a foreign invader? Notice I said USA GOV. State and local authorities are NOT representing the USA gov. therefore they are legitimate. Last Edited by PhoenixMatthias on 07/30/2011 10:18 PM |
CY User ID: 1486614 Federated States of Micronesia 07/30/2011 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Personally, I long for the day when my U.S. passport has all the veracity of a Soviet passport. I would love to return to a sovereign state of New York: no more guns (except, of course, for squirrel and wild turkey hunting upstate); no standing army to squander the wealth of the nation and antagonize everyone on earth; religion in the church and synagogue and not in the ballot box; a nation based upon true common cause (not endlessly squabbling 'states'), dedicated to knowledge, prosperity, and order - not ignorance, violence, and persecution. |
PhoenixMatthias (OP) User ID: 1455772 United States 07/30/2011 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
PhoenixMatthias (OP) User ID: 1455772 United States 07/30/2011 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You can be tied to the Foreign DC Gov. and still be mentally free. How so? Teach yourself to view yourself as independent. When taxes and federal authorities bug you, view them as inconveniences. Let them play their games. You are no longer part of their system. It is a charade that must be followed to keep yourself safe, for now. Once free mentally takes steps towards establishing your own communities. Ones where the Federal Foreign DC. Gov. has no authority. Communities that no longer welcome their laws or agents. Since it is your own territory, deal with them as you would any invader into your home. |
PhoenixMatthias (OP) User ID: 1455772 United States 07/30/2011 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Spread this word! Take what I wrote about mentally freeing ourselves. Take what I wrote about setting up free communities! Take all of it and spread it around. Tell as many people as possible. Only by declaring ourselves liberated can we save ourselves. Not simply declaring it, but acting it. Truly establishing sovereign communities. Treating Foreign DC Gov. laws and agents as illegal inside these new borders. Any attempt to enforce their Foreign ways on us will be acts of war. How did the states and Gov. become established? Through written words in a document people agreed to. They came into existence that way. If they could do so, then we too can create our own sovereign communities. Last Edited by PhoenixMatthias on 07/30/2011 10:53 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1082682 United States 07/30/2011 11:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is a rather bizarre but interesting how-to rant on how to drop out of society. Some of it's crazy, but some is useful: [link to www.skeptictank.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1488845 United States 07/30/2011 11:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seceding: Where does one logically stop? "It is all the more curious, incidentally, that while laissez-faireists should by the logic of their position, be ardent believers in a single, unified world government, so that no one will live in a state of 'anarchy' in relation to anyone else, they almost never are. And once one concedes that a single world government is not necessary, then where does one logically stop at the permissibility of separate states? If Canada and the United States can be separate nations without being denounced as being in a state of impermissible 'anarchy,' why may not the South secede from the United States? New York State from the Union? New York City from the state? Why may not Manhattan secede? Each neighborhood? Each block? Each house? Each person? But, of course, if each person may secede from government, we have virtually arrived at the purely free society, where defense is supplied along with all other services by the free market and where the invasive State has ceased to exist." [link to www.lewrockwell.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1485560 United States 07/30/2011 11:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I fear not death, nor torture, nor imprisonment. I am a Sovereign King on the land, and as such, I will never bow to any supposed authority. Be they politician, king, queen, police, judge, or the POPE in ROME. I have only one master, that being my creator, the author of my existence, my only true authority. I am the spirit of freedom, a ghost of the republic. |
PhoenixMatthias (OP) User ID: 1455772 United States 07/30/2011 11:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seceding: Where does one logically stop? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1488845"It is all the more curious, incidentally, that while laissez-faireists should by the logic of their position, be ardent believers in a single, unified world government, so that no one will live in a state of 'anarchy' in relation to anyone else, they almost never are. And once one concedes that a single world government is not necessary, then where does one logically stop at the permissibility of separate states? If Canada and the United States can be separate nations without being denounced as being in a state of impermissible 'anarchy,' why may not the South secede from the United States? New York State from the Union? New York City from the state? Why may not Manhattan secede? Each neighborhood? Each block? Each house? Each person? But, of course, if each person may secede from government, we have virtually arrived at the purely free society, where defense is supplied along with all other services by the free market and where the invasive State has ceased to exist." [link to www.lewrockwell.com] Where does it stop? Until it gets to a size too small to be sustainable. It need not be carried out to the extreme you described. Individuals need a government. Secession stops when the sense of "community" goes away. It stops when the government cares for is people. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1488845 United States 07/31/2011 01:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seceding: Where does one logically stop? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1488845"It is all the more curious, incidentally, that while laissez-faireists should by the logic of their position, be ardent believers in a single, unified world government, so that no one will live in a state of 'anarchy' in relation to anyone else, they almost never are. And once one concedes that a single world government is not necessary, then where does one logically stop at the permissibility of separate states? If Canada and the United States can be separate nations without being denounced as being in a state of impermissible 'anarchy,' why may not the South secede from the United States? New York State from the Union? New York City from the state? Why may not Manhattan secede? Each neighborhood? Each block? Each house? Each person? But, of course, if each person may secede from government, we have virtually arrived at the purely free society, where defense is supplied along with all other services by the free market and where the invasive State has ceased to exist." [link to www.lewrockwell.com] Where does it stop? Until it gets to a size too small to be sustainable. Which is where? You didn't really address the question. It need not be carried out to the extreme you described. Quoting: PhoenixMatthiasYou believe it is extreme to be opposed to tyranny? And you are willing to use violence against peaceful/innocent people to prevent them from leaving an abusive relationship? Individuals need a government. Quoting: PhoenixMatthiasSeceding doesn't prevent governance. Secession stops when the sense of "community" goes away. It stops when the government cares for is people. Quoting: PhoenixMatthiasHow do you determine that? And when has that ever happened? Wouldn't any government that 'cares for its people' be against imposing tyranny upon them? Again, if you want a government that uses violence against peaceful/innocent people to prevent them from leaving, then you don't actually want a government that 'cares for its people'. |