IS THE SUPER CONGRESS EVEN CONSTITUTIONAL?

it sounds pretty illegitimate to me, dude.

I am sorry but the above Articles only give instructions and defintions of what POTUS and the House can do. None of these articles or anywhere in the Const. does it say that a creation of a Super Congress (body) can created by 6 Repubs and 6 Dems. This is not what our forefathers invisioned it to be.

What "Super Congress"? As it's proposed, and has been for days but now is at the forefront of this new tentative "agreement" is for a Congressional Committee made up of 6 members from each party and house to come up with the additional spending cut targets by November, and at that time those recommendations go before a simple up or down vote by the full Congress.

If they fail to agree to the required cuts, then automatic cuts across the board go into effect that would total the amount of the required total cuts.

How is this going above or beyond their given parameters?

Granted, I think the entire process is chicken-shit, and this just provides them a cowards way out in the end so that one side can blame the other for not reaching or agreeing on targeted cuts and then "oops" the automatic ones on all programs kicked in. Then they can blame each other for hurting their own sacred cows.

Lack of leadership, yes. Lack of responsibility, definitely. Complete failure to look out for the overall welfare of the nation as a hole, not even a doubt about it. But creating some super congress that terminates or ignores constitutional guidelines and in itself threatens to bring about the end of America? This ain't it.

Please cite where in the CONstitution the "right to move about freely" is enumerated.

I must disagree with you OP, the above Articles do provide the authority especially in
Article I, Section 2, para 5
Article I, Section 3, para 5
which read
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
The Senate shall chuse their other Officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the Office of President of the United States.

Committee Members count as officers and that in lays they possible constitutional validity.

Also, the "sections" I mentioned did not talk about the POTUS.

If your going to argue the constitution please at least have the decency to read it and show basic comprehension of the American-English language.

Also for clarification I do not support the Super committee as Article I, Section 7, para 1 seems to preclude it for being legit.

Sorry dude, but I disagree with you. I highlighted the important parts of your argument. When it says shall choose (not chuse like you wrote) their officers does not imply they choose themselves. Who are they going to choose other than themselves? Trust me I looked it up very thoroughly and Article I of the Const. simply outlines powers and delegations. You just did that for me. Nothing states the ability to create another legislative body. I implore you to show where it says it.

The original spelling used at the time of the consitution was chuse.

So please assist me in understanding your argument better please.
I will ask some questions for clarifications.

Can the House and Senate constitutionally create committees and sub-committees?

Can the House and Senate constitutionally create bodies which communicate to both sides?

Can the House and Senate constitutionally create rules and laws which govern the procedures of said bodies as they may interpret from the constitution in order to execute the powers vested by the constitution as they are understood?

Question #1 Yes.
Question #2 Yes.
Question #3 Yes.

What's your point. There is nothing in the Const. that says both bodies have the ability to create another body over-seeing both bodies to create legislation. Committees and sub-comittees is one thing but creating an all out Super Congress is ridiculous.