| Users Online Now: 1,606 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 93,982 | |
| Pageviews Today: 128,955 | Threads Today: 40 | Posts Today: 561 |
| 01:06 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,606 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 93,982 | |
| Pageviews Today: 128,955 | Threads Today: 40 | Posts Today: 561 |
| 01:06 AM | ||
If the debt limit wasn't raised, would there have been a default? Yes or no? | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1465035  United States08/01/2011 08:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Coward, Anonymous Stop the inanity!  User ID: 1368354 United States08/01/2011 08:14 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | no. Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929! Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be. Restore the Republic. Thread: The Bill of Rights does NOT include age requirements! It's a flower, not something to be feared.  - Moo! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1382289 United States08/01/2011 08:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they would raise it no matter what they will do this again in 2013 and by 2015 we will have 20+ trillion congress kicked the can to the next congress GOV has cut nothing more then what amounts to a accounting error for the next two years. |
| boilerbengal User ID: 1387276 United States08/01/2011 08:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | cutting entitlements of any kind ( no-check) is not a default. thats just too bad for grandma and food stamp lady with 15 kids. the lenders ( banks, forian gov'ts) allways get theirs A Clear Choice Is Upon US. Communists VS. Capitalists |
