NASA EXPOSED japanese moon lander sends back high def photos of apollo 15 Hoax landing site | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1492433 United States 08/03/2011 05:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Japanese SELENE (Kaguya) Lunar Mission Spots Apollo 15 Landing Site (Images) by Ian O'Neill on July 16, 2008 [link to www.universetoday.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1492433 United States 08/03/2011 05:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Safia User ID: 1341264 United States 08/03/2011 05:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1492433 United States 08/03/2011 05:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1492433 United States 08/03/2011 05:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1439733 United States 08/03/2011 05:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492433 Them aliens are no different than humans, they policed up everything and sold it for scrap to get some quick cash (or credits or whatever they use). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492463 Germany 08/03/2011 05:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MY GOODNESS You might consider reading the text instead of just looking at the pictures. "The TC instrument has been instrumental in creating 3D visualizations of the lunar surface. In the example left, a comparison of the TC reconstruction and an actual Apollo 15 photograph are compared." [link to www.universetoday.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1486396 United States 08/03/2011 05:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1491697 United States 08/03/2011 05:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmm, from what I just read in the article, everything that was 'supposed' to be at the apollo site was and the pictures matched exactly. Where's the hoax stuff? Quoting: SafiaYOU HAVE EYES DONT YOU? yes.. we have eyes. do you have a mouth? if so then why are you talking out of your ass? you CLEARLY have no idea what the hell you are talking about. you need to go into the bathroom, look deep DEEP into the mirror.. and remind yourself.. "I AM NOT A SCIENTIST" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492463 Germany 08/03/2011 05:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmm, from what I just read in the article, everything that was 'supposed' to be at the apollo site was and the pictures matched exactly. Where's the hoax stuff? Quoting: SafiaYOU HAVE EYES DONT YOU? Yes we do. And you can use them to read! They aren´t just for pictures. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492463 Germany 08/03/2011 05:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmm, from what I just read in the article, everything that was 'supposed' to be at the apollo site was and the pictures matched exactly. Where's the hoax stuff? Quoting: SafiaYOU HAVE EYES DONT YOU? yes.. we have eyes. do you have a mouth? if so then why are you talking out of your ass? you CLEARLY have no idea what the hell you are talking about. you need to go into the bathroom, look deep DEEP into the mirror.. and remind yourself.. "I AM NOT A SCIENTIST" |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1492433 United States 08/03/2011 05:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MY GOODNESS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492463You might consider reading the text instead of just looking at the pictures. "The TC instrument has been instrumental in creating 3D visualizations of the lunar surface. In the example left, a comparison of the TC reconstruction and an actual Apollo 15 photograph are compared." [link to www.universetoday.com] THE 3D REPRESENTATIONS WERE BASED UPON PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN BY SELENE YOU IDIOT! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1491697 United States 08/03/2011 05:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MY GOODNESS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492463You might consider reading the text instead of just looking at the pictures. "The TC instrument has been instrumental in creating 3D visualizations of the lunar surface. In the example left, a comparison of the TC reconstruction and an actual Apollo 15 photograph are compared." [link to www.universetoday.com] THE 3D REPRESENTATIONS WERE BASED UPON PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN BY SELENE YOU IDIOT! YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT |
Safia User ID: 1341264 United States 08/03/2011 05:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MY GOODNESS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492463You might consider reading the text instead of just looking at the pictures. "The TC instrument has been instrumental in creating 3D visualizations of the lunar surface. In the example left, a comparison of the TC reconstruction and an actual Apollo 15 photograph are compared." [link to www.universetoday.com] I did read the text. And you are quoting something that supports what I'm saying, although you oddly left off the next sentence...the one that says, "The scenes are identical." What is it you feel is in that article that points in any way to a hoax. If anything, this is the first confirmation we've had that it WASN'T a hoax. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1492433 United States 08/03/2011 05:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492463 Germany 08/03/2011 05:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MY GOODNESS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492463You might consider reading the text instead of just looking at the pictures. "The TC instrument has been instrumental in creating 3D visualizations of the lunar surface. In the example left, a comparison of the TC reconstruction and an actual Apollo 15 photograph are compared." [link to www.universetoday.com] THE 3D REPRESENTATIONS WERE BASED UPON PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN BY SELENE YOU IDIOT! these are the magic words, maybe you don´t understand them now who´s the idiot? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1492433 United States 08/03/2011 05:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MY GOODNESS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492463You might consider reading the text instead of just looking at the pictures. "The TC instrument has been instrumental in creating 3D visualizations of the lunar surface. In the example left, a comparison of the TC reconstruction and an actual Apollo 15 photograph are compared." [link to www.universetoday.com] I did read the text. And you are quoting something that supports what I'm saying, although you oddly left off the next sentence...the one that says, "The scenes are identical." What is it you feel is in that article that points in any way to a hoax. If anything, this is the first confirmation we've had that it WASN'T a hoax. BECAUSE, LIARS IN ORDER TO CONTINUE IN LIES, WHEN THEY CANNOT STOP EVIDENCE FROM COMING OUT THAT PROVES THE LIE IS A LIE, ONLY HAVE EVASION AND CONTINUATION OF THE LIE AS AN OPTION SO THOUGH THE NEW EVIDENCE EXPOSES THEM, THEY HAVE TO ACT AS THOUGH EVERYTHING IS OK BY EVADING WHAT THE 3D PHOTOGRAPH PLAINLY SHOWS, AND THEY DO THIS BY SAYING ITS THE SAME AS THE APOLLO 15 PHOTO OF THE SITE, WHEN PLAINLY IT ISNT, FOR THERE IS NOTHING EXCEPT THE LANDING SITE ITSELF, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE AT ALL OF THE NAZZI DEBRIS OF POLUTION THAT WAS NOT LEFT ON THE MOON BECAUSE THEY -NASA- NEVER WENT TO THE MOON. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1492433 United States 08/03/2011 06:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MY GOODNESS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492463You might consider reading the text instead of just looking at the pictures. "The TC instrument has been instrumental in creating 3D visualizations of the lunar surface. In the example left, a comparison of the TC reconstruction and an actual Apollo 15 photograph are compared." [link to www.universetoday.com] THE 3D REPRESENTATIONS WERE BASED UPON PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN BY SELENE YOU IDIOT! these are the magic words, maybe you don´t understand them now who´s the idiot? SO YOUR SAYING THEY WENT TO THE TROUBLE OF ERASING NASAS FAKE LUNER LANDER AND VARIOUS RELICS THEY WERE MEANT TO HAVE LEFT AT THE LUNER LANDING SITE BEFORE THEY PROCESSED THE SELENE PHOTOS IN 3D? NOW WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY DO THAT ? EAT THIS NAZI! MoonFaker: Clementine, SELENE & Telescopes. PART 1 [link to www.youtube.com] CONTINUE THE SERIES BY YOURSELF IF THAT'S NOT TO MUCH TROUBLE FOR YOU YOU CAN FIND VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE CANT YOU? NAZI IDIOTS |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492463 Germany 08/03/2011 06:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just for you, maybe you get it this way... "Although some of the detail is missing (as the individual rocks are below the 10 meter resolving power of the orbiting camera), the scenes are identical." [link to www.universetoday.com] And now: "The Lunar Roving Vehicle had a mass of 463 lbs (210 kg)[6] and was designed to hold a payload of an additional 1,080 lbs (490 kg) on the lunar surface. The frame was 10 feet (3 m) long with a wheelbase of 7.5 feet (2.3 m). The height of the vehicle was 3.6 ft (1.1 m). [link to en.wikipedia.org] GOT IT? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1420905 United States 08/03/2011 06:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492496 United States 08/03/2011 06:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1267485 United Kingdom 08/03/2011 06:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1485266 United States 08/03/2011 08:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1246639 United States 08/03/2011 08:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Japanese SELENE (Kaguya) Lunar Mission Spots Apollo 15 Landing Site (Images) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492433by Ian O'Neill on July 16, 2008 [link to www.universetoday.com] I read somewhere the they had to edit/modify the Japs images to match. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1353340 United States 08/03/2011 08:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BoxerLvr User ID: 884837 Puerto Rico 08/03/2011 08:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MY GOODNESS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492463You might consider reading the text instead of just looking at the pictures. "The TC instrument has been instrumental in creating 3D visualizations of the lunar surface. In the example left, a comparison of the TC reconstruction and an actual Apollo 15 photograph are compared." [link to www.universetoday.com] I did read the text. And you are quoting something that supports what I'm saying, although you oddly left off the next sentence...the one that says, "The scenes are identical." What is it you feel is in that article that points in any way to a hoax. If anything, this is the first confirmation we've had that it WASN'T a hoax. Exactly! This is proof positive the landings were real. Last Edited by BoxerLvr on 08/03/2011 08:22 AM It is precisely because it is fashionable for Americans to know no science, even though they may be well educated otherwise, that they so easily fall prey to nonsense. They thus become part of the armies of the night, the purveyors of nitwittery, the retailers of intellectual junk food, the feeders on mental cardboard, for their ignorance keeps them from distinguishing nectar from sewage. — Isaac Asimov |
SnakeAirlines User ID: 1492481 United States 08/03/2011 08:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1463795 United States 08/03/2011 08:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP How do you feed yourself? The Apollo phot is taken at the site. The SELENE photo is a 3D extrapolation of photos taken from orbit. The camera has a ten meter resolution. Thats 33 feet, give or take. The rover in the Apollo photo is approximately 16 long or half that. It will result in a pixel with a slightly different tone in the SELENE photos. As a result, it will not be discernible. Put down your crack pipe and step away from the keyboard. |
BoxerLvr User ID: 884837 Puerto Rico 08/03/2011 08:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1463795How do you feed yourself? The Apollo phot is taken at the site. The SELENE photo is a 3D extrapolation of photos taken from orbit. The camera has a ten meter resolution. Thats 33 feet, give or take. The rover in the Apollo photo is approximately 16 long or half that. It will result in a pixel with a slightly different tone in the SELENE photos. As a result, it will not be discernible. Put down your crack pipe and step away from the keyboard. Actually, the rover was even smaller than that. Dimensions: 3.1 m long, 1.83 m wide, 1.14 m high; 2.3 m wheelbase. It is precisely because it is fashionable for Americans to know no science, even though they may be well educated otherwise, that they so easily fall prey to nonsense. They thus become part of the armies of the night, the purveyors of nitwittery, the retailers of intellectual junk food, the feeders on mental cardboard, for their ignorance keeps them from distinguishing nectar from sewage. — Isaac Asimov |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1463795 United States 08/03/2011 08:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1463795How do you feed yourself? The Apollo phot is taken at the site. The SELENE photo is a 3D extrapolation of photos taken from orbit. The camera has a ten meter resolution. Thats 33 feet, give or take. The rover in the Apollo photo is approximately 16 long or half that. It will result in a pixel with a slightly different tone in the SELENE photos. As a result, it will not be discernible. Put down your crack pipe and step away from the keyboard. Actually, the rover was even smaller than that. Dimensions: 3.1 m long, 1.83 m wide, 1.14 m high; 2.3 m wheelbase. That makes it even less likely to affect the tone of a single pixel. I took a swag based upon photos I had seen in the past. |