Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,115 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,140,289
Pageviews Today: 1,272,558Threads Today: 100Posts Today: 2,060
06:07 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES

 
F=ma

User ID: 5026055
United States
11/16/2011 01:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
...



That is one of the dumbest responses ever. If it can't be falsified it isn't a theory.
 Quoting: F=ma


Oh is that what they teach these days at colleges for military shills? You are a jerkoff who questions science of a PhD scientist. Just when you think you saw it all, GLP launches another lowlife shilly bitchass LOL

THEORY -- EQUATIONS -- PREDCITIONS Check!

One Data = One Verification

Thats basics, idiot!


LOL
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



How stupid are you really? There is no theory. It is, throw some meanginless drivel up and hope the moron sheep eat it up. God you are so fucking stupid.
 Quoting: F=ma


Looks like theory to me:
[link to arxiv.org]

Peer reviewed too.

But of course, you cant expect a military shill to know a theory when it sees one.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



Again demonstrating your ignorance. That paper was a statistical analysis looking at the Moon as a forcing agent for Earthquakes. Many people have look at the very same thing. This is not the "hyperresonator" theory.

All you do is to continue demonstrate you are a moronic asshole incapable of logical thought and discussion. So fuck off.
F=ma
F=ma

User ID: 5026055
United States
11/16/2011 01:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Basically, you can't falsify experiment where there exists just one data. The data Omar's using are God given, no living soul can falsify his experiment because there's no experiment, moron! In other words, ther's no other data to check against.

It's so simple how cant you see are you really that stupid? It's just formulas ( which obviously work ),plus unique data that always checks as predicted, and bingo. Every kid can check this data as its public! EVry kid can check formulas too. But for some reason you cant check any of that!! ( Ouch, that gotta hurt LOL )

5a
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



That is one of the dumbest responses ever. If it can't be falsified it isn't a theory.
 Quoting: F=ma


Oh is that what they teach these days at colleges for military shills? You are a jerkoff who questions science of a PhD scientist. Just when you think you saw it all, GLP launches another lowlife shilly bitchass LOL

THEORY -- EQUATIONS -- PREDCITIONS Check!

One Data = One Verification

Thats basics, idiot!


LOL
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



Still showing you are a dumbshit. We all laugh at your stupidity
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/16/2011 02:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Basically, you can't falsify experiment where there exists just one data. The data Omar's using are God given, no living soul can falsify his experiment because there's no experiment, moron! In other words, ther's no other data to check against.

It's so simple how cant you see are you really that stupid? It's just formulas ( which obviously work ),plus unique data that always checks as predicted, and bingo. Every kid can check this data as its public! EVry kid can check formulas too. But for some reason you cant check any of that!! ( Ouch, that gotta hurt LOL )

5a
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



That is one of the dumbest responses ever. If it can't be falsified it isn't a theory.
 Quoting: F=ma


Oh is that what they teach these days at colleges for military shills? You are a jerkoff who questions science of a PhD scientist. Just when you think you saw it all, GLP launches another lowlife shilly bitchass LOL

THEORY -- EQUATIONS -- PREDCITIONS Check!

One Data = One Verification

Thats basics, idiot!


LOL
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



Still showing you are a dumbshit. We all laugh at your stupidity
 Quoting: F=ma


"We"? How many shills have been assigned to this mission, serge? As soon as someone posts in favor of Dr. O's work ( which is obviously correct, no question about it ), you shills Occupy the Internet LOL, like instantly. I knew you monitor certain hot topics 24/7 but had no idea more than one scumbag were assigned to more than one hot topic at a time.

Wow, I knew Dr. O is a new Tesla. Dr Tesla was also monitored 24/7 and by multiple agents at times, FBI has truckloads of intelligence reports on that you can see many of those if you google they now declassified. Gov has stolen Dr O's patents just like Dr Tesla's. staggering coincidences indeed.

The Time of The Genius is here again

5a
F=ma

User ID: 5026055
United States
11/16/2011 02:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
"We"? How many shills have been assigned to this mission, serge? As soon as someone posts in favor of Dr. O's work ( which is obviously correct, no question about it ), you shills Occupy the Internet LOL, like instantly. I knew you monitor certain hot topics 24/7 but had no idea more than one scumbag were assigned to more than one hot topic at a time.

Wow, I knew Dr. O is a new Tesla. Dr Tesla was also monitored 24/7 and by multiple agents at times, FBI has truckloads of intelligence reports on that you can see many of those if you google they now declassified. Gov has stolen Dr O's patents just like Dr Tesla's. staggering coincidences indeed.

The Time of The Genius is here again


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543




shill
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/16/2011 04:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
...


Oh is that what they teach these days at colleges for military shills? You are a jerkoff who questions science of a PhD scientist. Just when you think you saw it all, GLP launches another lowlife shilly bitchass LOL

THEORY -- EQUATIONS -- PREDCITIONS Check!

One Data = One Verification

Thats basics, idiot!


LOL
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



How stupid are you really? There is no theory. It is, throw some meanginless drivel up and hope the moron sheep eat it up. God you are so fucking stupid.
 Quoting: F=ma


Looks like theory to me:
[link to arxiv.org]

Peer reviewed too.

But of course, you cant expect a military shill to know a theory when it sees one.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



Again demonstrating your ignorance. That paper was a statistical analysis looking at the Moon as a forcing agent for Earthquakes. Many people have look at the very same thing. This is not the "hyperresonator" theory.

All you do is to continue demonstrate you are a moronic asshole incapable of logical thought and discussion. So fuck off.
 Quoting: F=ma


You call physics " a statistical analysis "? crazy

This note from DR OMERBASHICH blog: " 2011 EMPIRICAL PROOF IS JUST ONE PART IN THE 3-STEP PROOF WHERE THE 2011 PAPER TALKS ABOUT BODY RESONANCE (NOT ORBITAL) AND ABOUT TIDALLY TRIGGERED RESONANCE MAGNIFICATION (NOT TIDAL FORCES). FINALLY, THE MECHANISM FOR THE CAUSALITY IS IN THE 2007-2008 PAPERS' EQUATIONS " ( [link to sites.google.com (secure)] )

So its not " an analysis " ,moron, its one of 3 parts that make his theory. Its the theory's starting point obviously because it consideres earth and its nearest neighboring object -- the Moon! and no ,noone before this guy has ever " looked into it ", you asswipe. People only looked into tidal triggering that releases stress, I know this well I studied it myself from a different perspective. Nobody thought tides could trigger quakes by triggering vibration ,and then vibration gets so magnified that earth shakes and cracks.

THis is 2nd part ( deriving the equations of hyperresonator ) :
[link to lanl.arxiv.org]

And the famous 3rd part, which extends Moon demonstration and hyperresonator equations to show us that whole solar system works same way is his 2011 paper that included Elenin because is part of solar system together with planets: [link to lanl.arxiv.org]

history in the making, prediction for October and November On The Money: [link to seismo.info]

Think tuning forks, moron. But since you can't think you don't have to answer that

God you are so stupid they should name stupidity unit after you.

s226
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/16/2011 10:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
...



How stupid are you really? There is no theory. It is, throw some meanginless drivel up and hope the moron sheep eat it up. God you are so fucking stupid.
 Quoting: F=ma


Looks like theory to me:
[link to arxiv.org]

Peer reviewed too.

But of course, you cant expect a military shill to know a theory when it sees one.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



Again demonstrating your ignorance. That paper was a statistical analysis looking at the Moon as a forcing agent for Earthquakes. Many people have look at the very same thing. This is not the "hyperresonator" theory.

All you do is to continue demonstrate you are a moronic asshole incapable of logical thought and discussion. So fuck off.
 Quoting: F=ma


You call physics " a statistical analysis "? crazy

This note from DR OMERBASHICH blog: " 2011 EMPIRICAL PROOF IS JUST ONE PART IN THE 3-STEP PROOF WHERE THE 2011 PAPER TALKS ABOUT BODY RESONANCE (NOT ORBITAL) AND ABOUT TIDALLY TRIGGERED RESONANCE MAGNIFICATION (NOT TIDAL FORCES). FINALLY, THE MECHANISM FOR THE CAUSALITY IS IN THE 2007-2008 PAPERS' EQUATIONS " ( [link to sites.google.com (secure)] )

So its not " an analysis " ,moron, its one of 3 parts that make his theory. Its the theory's starting point obviously because it consideres earth and its nearest neighboring object -- the Moon! and no ,noone before this guy has ever " looked into it ", you asswipe. People only looked into tidal triggering that releases stress, I know this well I studied it myself from a different perspective. Nobody thought tides could trigger quakes by triggering vibration ,and then vibration gets so magnified that earth shakes and cracks.

THis is 2nd part ( deriving the equations of hyperresonator ) :
[link to lanl.arxiv.org]

And the famous 3rd part, which extends Moon demonstration and hyperresonator equations to show us that whole solar system works same way is his 2011 paper that included Elenin because is part of solar system together with planets: [link to lanl.arxiv.org]

history in the making, prediction for October and November On The Money: [link to seismo.info]

Think tuning forks, moron. But since you can't think you don't have to answer that

God you are so stupid they should name stupidity unit after you.

s226
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



Sorry, you lover is a quack and he has you by the balls

FUCK OFF
F=ma
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
Contrarian's Contrarian

User ID: 1222987
Netherlands
11/17/2011 12:36 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
You are a complete dumbass and a liar. Why do you shill for the likes of Omerbashich? How much do you get paid? Does he pay you in kisses? Fucking idiot.
 Quoting: F=ma

The figmentary Duke of Bosnia probably promised him a figmentary countship.
book
Hatred is a cancer upon the world.
It rots the mind and blackens the heart.


Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/17/2011 01:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Awesome, shills again lose argument and resort to childish insults. Thats business as usual for military operatives and CIA scumbag control freaks who must supervise everything from Wikipedia to number of needles in a haystack.

dont you get it, you jerkoffs? The more you invade every possible thread about good Dr the more you spell to everyone WARNING WARNING ARMY COMPOUND STAY AWAY

ohyeah


Heres something truly refreshing right out of the greatest mind of our time, the new Dr Tesla ( was gonna say new Einstein , but remembered that Italian scientists have just killed that ghost ) loser


"OCTOBER PREDICTION: SMASHING SUCCESS!
03.11.2011


The October prediction & monitoring of Earth resonance's M6+ magnification under long (t>3 days) astronomical alignments in our Solar system was 100% accurate, meaning the data agreed with the georesonator concept completely.

So not only did the first 5 days w/o alignments go calm in the sense of M6+ seismicity, but the only day in October w/o M5+ earthquakes at all was the day of the Full Moon. That is a 1-in-31 chance, or a mere 3%, for such a lunar effect to be a coincidence and not due to the physical principle of georesonator. On top of such revealing statistics, and again in accordance with the georesonator concept, the only interval in October with a multiple alignment not interfered by a fourth body, has indeed seen M7+ quakes. (Which was also the only M7+ magnification episode of the entire month!) Furthermore, the October's all three M6+ seismicity episodes (as distinguished by always the same pattern of increase-peaking-decrease) have corresponded one-on-one to the only three intervals with alignments of that month.

"

[link to sites.google.com]
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/17/2011 06:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Awesome, shills again lose argument and resort to childish insults. Thats business as usual for military operatives and CIA scumbag control freaks who must supervise everything from Wikipedia to number of needles in a haystack.

dont you get it, you jerkoffs? The more you invade every possible thread about good Dr the more you spell to everyone WARNING WARNING ARMY COMPOUND STAY AWAY

Heres something truly refreshing right out of the greatest mind of our time, the new Dr Tesla ( was gonna say new Einstein , but remembered that Italian scientists have just killed that ghost )

"OCTOBER PREDICTION: SMASHING SUCCESS!
03.11.2011


The October prediction & monitoring of Earth resonance's M6+ magnification under long (t>3 days) astronomical alignments in our Solar system was 100% accurate, meaning the data agreed with the georesonator concept completely.

So not only did the first 5 days w/o alignments go calm in the sense of M6+ seismicity, but the only day in October w/o M5+ earthquakes at all was the day of the Full Moon. That is a 1-in-31 chance, or a mere 3%, for such a lunar effect to be a coincidence and not due to the physical principle of georesonator. On top of such revealing statistics, and again in accordance with the georesonator concept, the only interval in October with a multiple alignment not interfered by a fourth body, has indeed seen M7+ quakes. (Which was also the only M7+ magnification episode of the entire month!) Furthermore, the October's all three M6+ seismicity episodes (as distinguished by always the same pattern of increase-peaking-decrease) have corresponded one-on-one to the only three intervals with alignments of that month.

"

[link to sites.google.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



So the one who started throwing insults starts crying when he can't handle it anymore. Poor baby.

As I have shown before the "theory" isn't falsifiable. If an earthquake happens during his magnification period that is a success. If an earthquake doesn't happen, nothing gets said. If an earthquake happens outside his magnification period, that is ignored. From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

But of course you don't understand this because you don't understand statistical analysis. I made this statement.

Karl Popper said, if a theory isn't falsifiable, it isn't a theory. There must be some piece of information that would disprove the theory. Omerbashich's theory cannot be falsified. If an earthquake occurs in the magnification period, that is a win. If an earthquake doesn't occur in a magnification period, well that is a win too. And if an earthquake does (as I have well documented) or doesn't occur outside a magnification period well that is okay too. That is all possibilities. No falsification possible, therefore it isn't a theory.

You dismissed it and went into a childish rant. Falsifiability is a big deal in science. Just because this is a level of understanding beyond you comprehension does not mean it is wrong. Omerbashich’s theory is not falsifiable making it pseudoscience at best.

His "equations" are dimensionally incorrect and he admits this but says it doesn't matter. That is BS. Of course it matters. You don't measure the amount of gasoline you put in your car in degrees Fahrenheit. His is doing the equivalent of that.

And just because he has an equation doesn't mean its assumptions are correct. I gave an example that sailed completely over your head.

Air France flight 337 left Boston on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM destination Paris. AF337 is a Boeing 747 with a speed of 570 mph. The distance between Boston and Paris is 3441 miles. Using the equation d=vt (distance equals velocity times time) we can find the time it takes to fly that distance which is 3441 miles/570 mph or 6 hours 2 minutes meaning, by using the correct equation, it arrives at 11:22 PM. The equation is absolutely correct. Can you find the assumptions and tell me if the numbers are correct? That is, is that the correct arrival time?

You of course responded with your childish insults.

If you look at his magnification charts, nowhere does he actually use the "hyperresontator" theory. All he does is put a window on alignments. He is using standard astronomical data to get those alignments. Anyone with a planetarium program can do the same thing. So his whole theory is bogus to begin with. He makes his windows so big that statistically, one of those words you don't understand, an earthquake has to occur. The USGS posts the following statistics. Magnitude 8+, 1 per year. Magnitude 7+, one every 22 days. Magnitude 6+, one every 2.4 days. Magnitude 5+, 4 a day. So the good doctor is playing with statistical averages. His windows are large enough to encompass the statistics. Again, words you have proven you don't understand.

That last bit you posted is called ad hoc reasoning. Another sign of a pseudoscientific theory.

Oh, almost forgot to mention. If no earthquake magnitude 6+ exists to fit his "theory" he simply lowers the threshold until he finds something that does. Another indication of a pseudoscientific theory-inconsistent application of the "rules".

To put it in terms you might understand:

THEORY -- fail

EQUATIONS -- fail

PREDICTIONS -- fail

So I have little tolerance for someone like you who has no science background, has difficulty understanding rudimentary arguments, is unable to evaluate Omerbashich’s work unbiased, and basically goes into a childish rant every time someone disagrees with you. I predict you will respond with more childish rants like a little baby and be unable to discuss like an adult.

Last Edited by F=ma on 11/17/2011 09:23 AM
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/17/2011 12:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Awesome, shills again lose argument and resort to childish insults. Thats business as usual for military operatives and CIA scumbag control freaks who must supervise everything from Wikipedia to number of needles in a haystack.

dont you get it, you jerkoffs? The more you invade every possible thread about good Dr the more you spell to everyone WARNING WARNING ARMY COMPOUND STAY AWAY

Heres something truly refreshing right out of the greatest mind of our time, the new Dr Tesla ( was gonna say new Einstein , but remembered that Italian scientists have just killed that ghost )

"OCTOBER PREDICTION: SMASHING SUCCESS!
03.11.2011


The October prediction & monitoring of Earth resonance's M6+ magnification under long (t>3 days) astronomical alignments in our Solar system was 100% accurate, meaning the data agreed with the georesonator concept completely.

So not only did the first 5 days w/o alignments go calm in the sense of M6+ seismicity, but the only day in October w/o M5+ earthquakes at all was the day of the Full Moon. That is a 1-in-31 chance, or a mere 3%, for such a lunar effect to be a coincidence and not due to the physical principle of georesonator. On top of such revealing statistics, and again in accordance with the georesonator concept, the only interval in October with a multiple alignment not interfered by a fourth body, has indeed seen M7+ quakes. (Which was also the only M7+ magnification episode of the entire month!) Furthermore, the October's all three M6+ seismicity episodes (as distinguished by always the same pattern of increase-peaking-decrease) have corresponded one-on-one to the only three intervals with alignments of that month.

"

[link to sites.google.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



So the one who started throwing insults starts crying when he can't handle it anymore. Poor baby.

As I have shown before the "theory" isn't falsifiable. If an earthquake happens during his magnification period that is a success. If an earthquake doesn't happen, nothing gets said. If an earthquake happens outside his magnification period, that is ignored. From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

But of course you don't understand this because you don't understand statistical analysis. I made this statement.

Karl Popper said, if a theory isn't falsifiable, it isn't a theory. There must be some piece of information that would disprove the theory. Omerbashich's theory cannot be falsified. If an earthquake occurs in the magnification period, that is a win. If an earthquake doesn't occur in a magnification period, well that is a win too. And if an earthquake does (as I have well documented) or doesn't occur outside a magnification period well that is okay too. That is all possibilities. No falsification possible, therefore it isn't a theory.

You dismissed it and went into a childish rant. Falsifiability is a big deal in science. Just because this is a level of understanding beyond you comprehension does not mean it is wrong. Omerbashich’s theory is not falsifiable making it pseudoscience at best.

His "equations" are dimensionally incorrect and he admits this but says it doesn't matter. That is BS. Of course it matters. You don't measure the amount of gasoline you put in your car in degrees Fahrenheit. His is doing the equivalent of that.

And just because he has an equation doesn't mean its assumptions are correct. I gave an example that sailed completely over your head.

Air France flight 337 left Boston on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM destination Paris. AF337 is a Boeing 747 with a speed of 570 mph. The distance between Boston and Paris is 3441 miles. Using the equation d=vt (distance equals velocity times time) we can find the time it takes to fly that distance which is 3441 miles/570 mph or 6 hours 2 minutes meaning, by using the correct equation, it arrives at 11:22 PM. The equation is absolutely correct. Can you find the assumptions and tell me if the numbers are correct? That is, is that the correct arrival time?

You of course responded with your childish insults.

If you look at his magnification charts, nowhere does he actually use the "hyperresontator" theory. All he does is put a window on alignments. He is using standard astronomical data to get those alignments. Anyone with a planetarium program can do the same thing. So his whole theory is bogus to begin with. He makes his windows so big that statistically, one of those words you don't understand, an earthquake has to occur. The USGS posts the following statistics. Magnitude 8+, 1 per year. Magnitude 7+, one every 22 days. Magnitude 6+, one every 2.4 days. Magnitude 5+, 4 a day. So the good doctor is playing with statistical averages. His windows are large enough to encompass the statistics. Again, words you have proven you don't understand.

That last bit you posted is called ad hoc reasoning. Another sign of a pseudoscientific theory.

Oh, almost forgot to mention. If no earthquake magnitude 6+ exists to fit his "theory" he simply lowers the threshold until he finds something that does. Another indication of a pseudoscientific theory-inconsistent application of the "rules".

To put it in terms you might understand:

THEORY -- fail

EQUATIONS -- fail

PREDICTIONS -- fail

So I have little tolerance for someone like you who has no science background, has difficulty understanding rudimentary arguments, is unable to evaluate Omerbashich’s work unbiased, and basically goes into a childish rant every time someone disagrees with you. I predict you will respond with more childish rants like a little baby and be unable to discuss like an adult.
 Quoting: F=ma


Boy you do monitor posts about good Dr constantly, 24/7!! HEs' such a danger to you? Excellent!!!!!

Im laughing out loud at you trying to sound scientific. you're just anonymous military shill behind a PC at some military base and associate degree in god knows what. Cooking probably LOL

Your post above is so full of bullshit its not even worth commenting. One quick point makes it all fail though : DR O does no statistics whatsoever ,yet you as any shill ( again ) try to counter his physics with nonsense statistics. ( even your statistics is misleading showing how uneducated you are ).

nowhere outside his magnification windows do i see a M 6+ eaerthquake , moron, so its better for you to stop lying because everyone can check it and see it's you shills who lie . ( for your reference, M 6+ are in red color . What are, you ,color bling? think RED tomato

If his thoery were bogus we should see red outside alignments but theres none. ever. Instead thers 7 when he says 7, thers 6 when he says 6. Theres none when he says none. Then 3 alignments happened in October, and were matched perfectly by 3 patterns of M 6+ quakes each only during those alignements. NOT before, NOT in the middle, NOT crossing the two. And NO alignments without patterns. Thats called physics, not statistics. god you shills are so illiterate and uneducated. The guys physics PhD when will you drop your statistics rex

His equations are also the most amazing formulas i ever seen ,and i had to study a few believe me. Anyway, only morons fight equations as left and right sides are by definition equaaaaaallll LOL

So:

THEORY -- Check!

EQUATIONS -- Check!

PREDICTIONS -- Check!


applause2
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/17/2011 03:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Awesome, shills again lose argument and resort to childish insults. Thats business as usual for military operatives and CIA scumbag control freaks who must supervise everything from Wikipedia to number of needles in a haystack.

dont you get it, you jerkoffs? The more you invade every possible thread about good Dr the more you spell to everyone WARNING WARNING ARMY COMPOUND STAY AWAY

Heres something truly refreshing right out of the greatest mind of our time, the new Dr Tesla ( was gonna say new Einstein , but remembered that Italian scientists have just killed that ghost )

"OCTOBER PREDICTION: SMASHING SUCCESS!
03.11.2011


The October prediction & monitoring of Earth resonance's M6+ magnification under long (t>3 days) astronomical alignments in our Solar system was 100% accurate, meaning the data agreed with the georesonator concept completely.

So not only did the first 5 days w/o alignments go calm in the sense of M6+ seismicity, but the only day in October w/o M5+ earthquakes at all was the day of the Full Moon. That is a 1-in-31 chance, or a mere 3%, for such a lunar effect to be a coincidence and not due to the physical principle of georesonator. On top of such revealing statistics, and again in accordance with the georesonator concept, the only interval in October with a multiple alignment not interfered by a fourth body, has indeed seen M7+ quakes. (Which was also the only M7+ magnification episode of the entire month!) Furthermore, the October's all three M6+ seismicity episodes (as distinguished by always the same pattern of increase-peaking-decrease) have corresponded one-on-one to the only three intervals with alignments of that month.

"

[link to sites.google.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



So the one who started throwing insults starts crying when he can't handle it anymore. Poor baby.

As I have shown before the "theory" isn't falsifiable. If an earthquake happens during his magnification period that is a success. If an earthquake doesn't happen, nothing gets said. If an earthquake happens outside his magnification period, that is ignored. From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

But of course you don't understand this because you don't understand statistical analysis. I made this statement.

Karl Popper said, if a theory isn't falsifiable, it isn't a theory. There must be some piece of information that would disprove the theory. Omerbashich's theory cannot be falsified. If an earthquake occurs in the magnification period, that is a win. If an earthquake doesn't occur in a magnification period, well that is a win too. And if an earthquake does (as I have well documented) or doesn't occur outside a magnification period well that is okay too. That is all possibilities. No falsification possible, therefore it isn't a theory.

You dismissed it and went into a childish rant. Falsifiability is a big deal in science. Just because this is a level of understanding beyond you comprehension does not mean it is wrong. Omerbashich’s theory is not falsifiable making it pseudoscience at best.

His "equations" are dimensionally incorrect and he admits this but says it doesn't matter. That is BS. Of course it matters. You don't measure the amount of gasoline you put in your car in degrees Fahrenheit. His is doing the equivalent of that.

And just because he has an equation doesn't mean its assumptions are correct. I gave an example that sailed completely over your head.

Air France flight 337 left Boston on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM destination Paris. AF337 is a Boeing 747 with a speed of 570 mph. The distance between Boston and Paris is 3441 miles. Using the equation d=vt (distance equals velocity times time) we can find the time it takes to fly that distance which is 3441 miles/570 mph or 6 hours 2 minutes meaning, by using the correct equation, it arrives at 11:22 PM. The equation is absolutely correct. Can you find the assumptions and tell me if the numbers are correct? That is, is that the correct arrival time?

You of course responded with your childish insults.

If you look at his magnification charts, nowhere does he actually use the "hyperresontator" theory. All he does is put a window on alignments. He is using standard astronomical data to get those alignments. Anyone with a planetarium program can do the same thing. So his whole theory is bogus to begin with. He makes his windows so big that statistically, one of those words you don't understand, an earthquake has to occur. The USGS posts the following statistics. Magnitude 8+, 1 per year. Magnitude 7+, one every 22 days. Magnitude 6+, one every 2.4 days. Magnitude 5+, 4 a day. So the good doctor is playing with statistical averages. His windows are large enough to encompass the statistics. Again, words you have proven you don't understand.

That last bit you posted is called ad hoc reasoning. Another sign of a pseudoscientific theory.

Oh, almost forgot to mention. If no earthquake magnitude 6+ exists to fit his "theory" he simply lowers the threshold until he finds something that does. Another indication of a pseudoscientific theory-inconsistent application of the "rules".

To put it in terms you might understand:

THEORY -- fail

EQUATIONS -- fail

PREDICTIONS -- fail

So I have little tolerance for someone like you who has no science background, has difficulty understanding rudimentary arguments, is unable to evaluate Omerbashich’s work unbiased, and basically goes into a childish rant every time someone disagrees with you. I predict you will respond with more childish rants like a little baby and be unable to discuss like an adult.
 Quoting: F=ma


Boy you do monitor posts about good Dr constantly, 24/7!! HEs' such a danger to you? Excellent!!!!!

Im laughing out loud at you trying to sound scientific. you're just anonymous military shill behind a PC at some military base and associate degree in god knows what. Cooking probably LOL

Your post above is so full of bullshit its not even worth commenting. One quick point makes it all fail though : DR O does no statistics whatsoever ,yet you as any shill ( again ) try to counter his physics with nonsense statistics. ( even your statistics is misleading showing how uneducated you are ).

nowhere outside his magnification windows do i see a M 6+ eaerthquake , moron, so its better for you to stop lying because everyone can check it and see it's you shills who lie . ( for your reference, M 6+ are in red color . What are, you ,color bling? think RED tomato

If his thoery were bogus we should see red outside alignments but theres none. ever. Instead thers 7 when he says 7, thers 6 when he says 6. Theres none when he says none. Then 3 alignments happened in October, and were matched perfectly by 3 patterns of M 6+ quakes each only during those alignements. NOT before, NOT in the middle, NOT crossing the two. And NO alignments without patterns. Thats called physics, not statistics. god you shills are so illiterate and uneducated. The guys physics PhD when will you drop your statistics rex

His equations are also the most amazing formulas i ever seen ,and i had to study a few believe me. Anyway, only morons fight equations as left and right sides are by definition equaaaaaallll LOL

So:

THEORY -- Check!

EQUATIONS -- Check!

PREDICTIONS -- Check!


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



As predicted, no content to your argument just childish rant and insults.

Tell me HOW are his equations the most amazing formulas you have ever seen.

Tell me the equations you HAVE studied.

Tell us all about your understanding of physics and statistics.

Of course YOU don't see it you rely on Omerbashich to tell you if he is right are not. I looked at the USGS data and found 10 earthquakes in the 180 days outside of his prediction windows that he completely ignored. If you are capable do the analysis yourself.

So you are telling me as long as it is colored red you believe it.

AC1421543 is a mindless troll - CHECK

AC1421543 doesn't know squat about science - CHECK

AC1421543 doesn't understand statistics - CHECK



Everything is in red, now you have to believe it.

Last Edited by F=ma on 11/17/2011 03:41 PM
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/17/2011 05:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Awesome, shills again lose argument and resort to childish insults. Thats business as usual for military operatives and CIA scumbag control freaks who must supervise everything from Wikipedia to number of needles in a haystack.

dont you get it, you jerkoffs? The more you invade every possible thread about good Dr the more you spell to everyone WARNING WARNING ARMY COMPOUND STAY AWAY

Heres something truly refreshing right out of the greatest mind of our time, the new Dr Tesla ( was gonna say new Einstein , but remembered that Italian scientists have just killed that ghost )

"OCTOBER PREDICTION: SMASHING SUCCESS!
03.11.2011


The October prediction & monitoring of Earth resonance's M6+ magnification under long (t>3 days) astronomical alignments in our Solar system was 100% accurate, meaning the data agreed with the georesonator concept completely.

So not only did the first 5 days w/o alignments go calm in the sense of M6+ seismicity, but the only day in October w/o M5+ earthquakes at all was the day of the Full Moon. That is a 1-in-31 chance, or a mere 3%, for such a lunar effect to be a coincidence and not due to the physical principle of georesonator. On top of such revealing statistics, and again in accordance with the georesonator concept, the only interval in October with a multiple alignment not interfered by a fourth body, has indeed seen M7+ quakes. (Which was also the only M7+ magnification episode of the entire month!) Furthermore, the October's all three M6+ seismicity episodes (as distinguished by always the same pattern of increase-peaking-decrease) have corresponded one-on-one to the only three intervals with alignments of that month.

"

[link to sites.google.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



So the one who started throwing insults starts crying when he can't handle it anymore. Poor baby.

As I have shown before the "theory" isn't falsifiable. If an earthquake happens during his magnification period that is a success. If an earthquake doesn't happen, nothing gets said. If an earthquake happens outside his magnification period, that is ignored. From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

But of course you don't understand this because you don't understand statistical analysis. I made this statement.

Karl Popper said, if a theory isn't falsifiable, it isn't a theory. There must be some piece of information that would disprove the theory. Omerbashich's theory cannot be falsified. If an earthquake occurs in the magnification period, that is a win. If an earthquake doesn't occur in a magnification period, well that is a win too. And if an earthquake does (as I have well documented) or doesn't occur outside a magnification period well that is okay too. That is all possibilities. No falsification possible, therefore it isn't a theory.

You dismissed it and went into a childish rant. Falsifiability is a big deal in science. Just because this is a level of understanding beyond you comprehension does not mean it is wrong. Omerbashich’s theory is not falsifiable making it pseudoscience at best.

His "equations" are dimensionally incorrect and he admits this but says it doesn't matter. That is BS. Of course it matters. You don't measure the amount of gasoline you put in your car in degrees Fahrenheit. His is doing the equivalent of that.

And just because he has an equation doesn't mean its assumptions are correct. I gave an example that sailed completely over your head.

Air France flight 337 left Boston on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM destination Paris. AF337 is a Boeing 747 with a speed of 570 mph. The distance between Boston and Paris is 3441 miles. Using the equation d=vt (distance equals velocity times time) we can find the time it takes to fly that distance which is 3441 miles/570 mph or 6 hours 2 minutes meaning, by using the correct equation, it arrives at 11:22 PM. The equation is absolutely correct. Can you find the assumptions and tell me if the numbers are correct? That is, is that the correct arrival time?

You of course responded with your childish insults.

If you look at his magnification charts, nowhere does he actually use the "hyperresontator" theory. All he does is put a window on alignments. He is using standard astronomical data to get those alignments. Anyone with a planetarium program can do the same thing. So his whole theory is bogus to begin with. He makes his windows so big that statistically, one of those words you don't understand, an earthquake has to occur. The USGS posts the following statistics. Magnitude 8+, 1 per year. Magnitude 7+, one every 22 days. Magnitude 6+, one every 2.4 days. Magnitude 5+, 4 a day. So the good doctor is playing with statistical averages. His windows are large enough to encompass the statistics. Again, words you have proven you don't understand.

That last bit you posted is called ad hoc reasoning. Another sign of a pseudoscientific theory.

Oh, almost forgot to mention. If no earthquake magnitude 6+ exists to fit his "theory" he simply lowers the threshold until he finds something that does. Another indication of a pseudoscientific theory-inconsistent application of the "rules".

To put it in terms you might understand:

THEORY -- fail

EQUATIONS -- fail

PREDICTIONS -- fail

So I have little tolerance for someone like you who has no science background, has difficulty understanding rudimentary arguments, is unable to evaluate Omerbashich’s work unbiased, and basically goes into a childish rant every time someone disagrees with you. I predict you will respond with more childish rants like a little baby and be unable to discuss like an adult.
 Quoting: F=ma


Boy you do monitor posts about good Dr constantly, 24/7!! HEs' such a danger to you? Excellent!!!!!

Im laughing out loud at you trying to sound scientific. you're just anonymous military shill behind a PC at some military base and associate degree in god knows what. Cooking probably LOL

Your post above is so full of bullshit its not even worth commenting. One quick point makes it all fail though : DR O does no statistics whatsoever ,yet you as any shill ( again ) try to counter his physics with nonsense statistics. ( even your statistics is misleading showing how uneducated you are ).

nowhere outside his magnification windows do i see a M 6+ eaerthquake , moron, so its better for you to stop lying because everyone can check it and see it's you shills who lie . ( for your reference, M 6+ are in red color . What are, you ,color bling? think RED tomato

If his thoery were bogus we should see red outside alignments but theres none. ever. Instead thers 7 when he says 7, thers 6 when he says 6. Theres none when he says none. Then 3 alignments happened in October, and were matched perfectly by 3 patterns of M 6+ quakes each only during those alignements. NOT before, NOT in the middle, NOT crossing the two. And NO alignments without patterns. Thats called physics, not statistics. god you shills are so illiterate and uneducated. The guys physics PhD when will you drop your statistics rex

His equations are also the most amazing formulas i ever seen ,and i had to study a few believe me. Anyway, only morons fight equations as left and right sides are by definition equaaaaaallll LOL

So:

THEORY -- Check!

EQUATIONS -- Check!

PREDICTIONS -- Check!


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



As predicted, no content to your argument just childish rant and insults.

Tell me HOW are his equations the most amazing formulas you have ever seen.

Tell me the equations you HAVE studied.

Tell us all about your understanding of physics and statistics.

Of course YOU don't see it you rely on Omerbashich to tell you if he is right are not. I looked at the USGS data and found 10 earthquakes in the 180 days outside of his prediction windows that he completely ignored. If you are capable do the analysis yourself.

So you are telling me as long as it is colored red you believe it.

AC1421543 is a mindless troll - CHECK

AC1421543 doesn't know squat about science - CHECK

AC1421543 doesn't understand statistics - CHECK



Everything is in red, now you have to believe it.
 Quoting: F=ma


You are again lying and manipualating : I dont see " 180 days ", everyone can see October and half November which is 45 days, and all 100% on the money predicted magnification.

go to DR's blog [link to sites.google.com] and scroll down to " COME, PRECIOUS! " article, look at the visitors that keep studying his amazing disccovery:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....

( hows that choice of color for you, idiot? LOL )

If you knew anything about economy youd this is cream de la cream of finances in the world. Im pretty sure theres no better statisticians in the world than bankers and investers and insurance markets. They are wasting ther time on this " pseudoscience " too? Not a chance -- its more like they thinking up ways how to make tons of money on markets once the earthquake prediction hits the news. scheming


So this counters your claim that satistics invalidates Omerbashich's physics. YOU, are a total moron my friend. And even if not a Gov shill you are most certainly on payroll of some of the above listed banker scum . Because no one would be spending full time shifts online countering something thats not of his personal concern, and do it all for free, half a year now. ohyeah
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/17/2011 05:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
...



So the one who started throwing insults starts crying when he can't handle it anymore. Poor baby.

As I have shown before the "theory" isn't falsifiable. If an earthquake happens during his magnification period that is a success. If an earthquake doesn't happen, nothing gets said. If an earthquake happens outside his magnification period, that is ignored. From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

But of course you don't understand this because you don't understand statistical analysis. I made this statement.

Karl Popper said, if a theory isn't falsifiable, it isn't a theory. There must be some piece of information that would disprove the theory. Omerbashich's theory cannot be falsified. If an earthquake occurs in the magnification period, that is a win. If an earthquake doesn't occur in a magnification period, well that is a win too. And if an earthquake does (as I have well documented) or doesn't occur outside a magnification period well that is okay too. That is all possibilities. No falsification possible, therefore it isn't a theory.

You dismissed it and went into a childish rant. Falsifiability is a big deal in science. Just because this is a level of understanding beyond you comprehension does not mean it is wrong. Omerbashich’s theory is not falsifiable making it pseudoscience at best.

His "equations" are dimensionally incorrect and he admits this but says it doesn't matter. That is BS. Of course it matters. You don't measure the amount of gasoline you put in your car in degrees Fahrenheit. His is doing the equivalent of that.

And just because he has an equation doesn't mean its assumptions are correct. I gave an example that sailed completely over your head.

Air France flight 337 left Boston on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM destination Paris. AF337 is a Boeing 747 with a speed of 570 mph. The distance between Boston and Paris is 3441 miles. Using the equation d=vt (distance equals velocity times time) we can find the time it takes to fly that distance which is 3441 miles/570 mph or 6 hours 2 minutes meaning, by using the correct equation, it arrives at 11:22 PM. The equation is absolutely correct. Can you find the assumptions and tell me if the numbers are correct? That is, is that the correct arrival time?

You of course responded with your childish insults.

If you look at his magnification charts, nowhere does he actually use the "hyperresontator" theory. All he does is put a window on alignments. He is using standard astronomical data to get those alignments. Anyone with a planetarium program can do the same thing. So his whole theory is bogus to begin with. He makes his windows so big that statistically, one of those words you don't understand, an earthquake has to occur. The USGS posts the following statistics. Magnitude 8+, 1 per year. Magnitude 7+, one every 22 days. Magnitude 6+, one every 2.4 days. Magnitude 5+, 4 a day. So the good doctor is playing with statistical averages. His windows are large enough to encompass the statistics. Again, words you have proven you don't understand.

That last bit you posted is called ad hoc reasoning. Another sign of a pseudoscientific theory.

Oh, almost forgot to mention. If no earthquake magnitude 6+ exists to fit his "theory" he simply lowers the threshold until he finds something that does. Another indication of a pseudoscientific theory-inconsistent application of the "rules".

To put it in terms you might understand:

THEORY -- fail

EQUATIONS -- fail

PREDICTIONS -- fail

So I have little tolerance for someone like you who has no science background, has difficulty understanding rudimentary arguments, is unable to evaluate Omerbashich’s work unbiased, and basically goes into a childish rant every time someone disagrees with you. I predict you will respond with more childish rants like a little baby and be unable to discuss like an adult.
 Quoting: F=ma


Boy you do monitor posts about good Dr constantly, 24/7!! HEs' such a danger to you? Excellent!!!!!

Im laughing out loud at you trying to sound scientific. you're just anonymous military shill behind a PC at some military base and associate degree in god knows what. Cooking probably LOL

Your post above is so full of bullshit its not even worth commenting. One quick point makes it all fail though : DR O does no statistics whatsoever ,yet you as any shill ( again ) try to counter his physics with nonsense statistics. ( even your statistics is misleading showing how uneducated you are ).

nowhere outside his magnification windows do i see a M 6+ eaerthquake , moron, so its better for you to stop lying because everyone can check it and see it's you shills who lie . ( for your reference, M 6+ are in red color . What are, you ,color bling? think RED tomato

If his thoery were bogus we should see red outside alignments but theres none. ever. Instead thers 7 when he says 7, thers 6 when he says 6. Theres none when he says none. Then 3 alignments happened in October, and were matched perfectly by 3 patterns of M 6+ quakes each only during those alignements. NOT before, NOT in the middle, NOT crossing the two. And NO alignments without patterns. Thats called physics, not statistics. god you shills are so illiterate and uneducated. The guys physics PhD when will you drop your statistics rex

His equations are also the most amazing formulas i ever seen ,and i had to study a few believe me. Anyway, only morons fight equations as left and right sides are by definition equaaaaaallll LOL

So:

THEORY -- Check!

EQUATIONS -- Check!

PREDICTIONS -- Check!


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



As predicted, no content to your argument just childish rant and insults.

Tell me HOW are his equations the most amazing formulas you have ever seen.

Tell me the equations you HAVE studied.

Tell us all about your understanding of physics and statistics.

Of course YOU don't see it you rely on Omerbashich to tell you if he is right are not. I looked at the USGS data and found 10 earthquakes in the 180 days outside of his prediction windows that he completely ignored. If you are capable do the analysis yourself.

So you are telling me as long as it is colored red you believe it.

AC1421543 is a mindless troll - CHECK

AC1421543 doesn't know squat about science - CHECK

AC1421543 doesn't understand statistics - CHECK



Everything is in red, now you have to believe it.
 Quoting: F=ma


You are again lying and manipualating : I dont see " 180 days ", everyone can see October and half November which is 45 days, and all 100% on the money predicted magnification.

go to DR's blog [link to sites.google.com] and scroll down to " COME, PRECIOUS! " article, look at the visitors that keep studying his amazing disccovery:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....

( hows that choice of color for you, idiot? LOL )

If you knew anything about economy youd this is cream de la cream of finances in the world. Im pretty sure theres no better statisticians in the world than bankers and investers and insurance markets. They are wasting ther time on this " pseudoscience " too? Not a chance -- its more like they thinking up ways how to make tons of money on markets once the earthquake prediction hits the news. scheming


So this counters your claim that satistics invalidates Omerbashich's physics. YOU, are a total moron my friend. And even if not a Gov shill you are most certainly on payroll of some of the above listed banker scum . Because no one would be spending full time shifts online countering something thats not of his personal concern, and do it all for free, half a year now. ohyeah
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



Kid. Your mon wants her computer up so go night night now. You are a complete idiot and I amd donw wasting my time with a pubnk cry baby
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/17/2011 09:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
...


Boy you do monitor posts about good Dr constantly, 24/7!! HEs' such a danger to you? Excellent!!!!!

Im laughing out loud at you trying to sound scientific. you're just anonymous military shill behind a PC at some military base and associate degree in god knows what. Cooking probably LOL

Your post above is so full of bullshit its not even worth commenting. One quick point makes it all fail though : DR O does no statistics whatsoever ,yet you as any shill ( again ) try to counter his physics with nonsense statistics. ( even your statistics is misleading showing how uneducated you are ).

nowhere outside his magnification windows do i see a M 6+ eaerthquake , moron, so its better for you to stop lying because everyone can check it and see it's you shills who lie . ( for your reference, M 6+ are in red color . What are, you ,color bling? think RED tomato

If his thoery were bogus we should see red outside alignments but theres none. ever. Instead thers 7 when he says 7, thers 6 when he says 6. Theres none when he says none. Then 3 alignments happened in October, and were matched perfectly by 3 patterns of M 6+ quakes each only during those alignements. NOT before, NOT in the middle, NOT crossing the two. And NO alignments without patterns. Thats called physics, not statistics. god you shills are so illiterate and uneducated. The guys physics PhD when will you drop your statistics rex

His equations are also the most amazing formulas i ever seen ,and i had to study a few believe me. Anyway, only morons fight equations as left and right sides are by definition equaaaaaallll LOL

So:

THEORY -- Check!

EQUATIONS -- Check!

PREDICTIONS -- Check!


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



As predicted, no content to your argument just childish rant and insults.

Tell me HOW are his equations the most amazing formulas you have ever seen.

Tell me the equations you HAVE studied.

Tell us all about your understanding of physics and statistics.

Of course YOU don't see it you rely on Omerbashich to tell you if he is right are not. I looked at the USGS data and found 10 earthquakes in the 180 days outside of his prediction windows that he completely ignored. If you are capable do the analysis yourself.

So you are telling me as long as it is colored red you believe it.

AC1421543 is a mindless troll - CHECK

AC1421543 doesn't know squat about science - CHECK

AC1421543 doesn't understand statistics - CHECK



Everything is in red, now you have to believe it.
 Quoting: F=ma


You are again lying and manipualating : I dont see " 180 days ", everyone can see October and half November which is 45 days, and all 100% on the money predicted magnification.

go to DR's blog [link to sites.google.com] and scroll down to " COME, PRECIOUS! " article, look at the visitors that keep studying his amazing disccovery:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....

( hows that choice of color for you, idiot? LOL )

If you knew anything about economy youd this is cream de la cream of finances in the world. Im pretty sure theres no better statisticians in the world than bankers and investers and insurance markets. They are wasting ther time on this " pseudoscience " too? Not a chance -- its more like they thinking up ways how to make tons of money on markets once the earthquake prediction hits the news. scheming


So this counters your claim that satistics invalidates Omerbashich's physics. YOU, are a total moron my friend. And even if not a Gov shill you are most certainly on payroll of some of the above listed banker scum . Because no one would be spending full time shifts online countering something thats not of his personal concern, and do it all for free, half a year now. ohyeah
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



Kid. Your mon wants her computer up so go night night now. You are a complete idiot and I amd donw wasting my time with a pubnk cry baby
 Quoting: F=ma



BWWHHAHAHHAHHAHHHAHHAHAH no argument, of course. the list is just too serious to fight. oh well, equations cant be fought either, but you still do it , so cmon we are waiting

But do you know how we know you are Gov/military/banksters shills who go by the Manual? Because you post within seconds whenever someone posts about good Dr, throughout the internet. We " common people " have no such capabilities!

second its a psyop way of thinking that ,if your post always appears last on the subject, random visitors who mostly dont have time to read the entire threads, will take it as if you won the argument and leave with that impression.

SHILLING -- Check!

s226
F=ma

User ID: 5026055
United States
11/18/2011 11:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
equations cant be fought either, but you still do it , so cmon we are waiting
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



So all you have to do is tell everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?


You are again lying and manipualating : I dont see " 180 days ", everyone can see October and half November which is 45 days, and all 100% on the money predicted magnification.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


There is a little scroll bar that takes you back to May in the upy-downy chart.

Last Edited by F=ma on 11/18/2011 11:55 AM
F=ma
LakeXeno

User ID: 4481615
United States
11/18/2011 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
And so it begins....
gdwk
User ID: 1405311
United States
11/18/2011 05:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
...



As predicted, no content to your argument just childish rant and insults.

Tell me HOW are his equations the most amazing formulas you have ever seen.

Tell me the equations you HAVE studied.

Tell us all about your understanding of physics and statistics.

Of course YOU don't see it you rely on Omerbashich to tell you if he is right are not. I looked at the USGS data and found 10 earthquakes in the 180 days outside of his prediction windows that he completely ignored. If you are capable do the analysis yourself.

So you are telling me as long as it is colored red you believe it.

AC1421543 is a mindless troll - CHECK

AC1421543 doesn't know squat about science - CHECK

AC1421543 doesn't understand statistics - CHECK



Everything is in red, now you have to believe it.
 Quoting: F=ma


You are again lying and manipualating : I dont see " 180 days ", everyone can see October and half November which is 45 days, and all 100% on the money predicted magnification.

go to DR's blog [link to sites.google.com] and scroll down to " COME, PRECIOUS! " article, look at the visitors that keep studying his amazing disccovery:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....

( hows that choice of color for you, idiot? LOL )

If you knew anything about economy youd this is cream de la cream of finances in the world. Im pretty sure theres no better statisticians in the world than bankers and investers and insurance markets. They are wasting ther time on this " pseudoscience " too? Not a chance -- its more like they thinking up ways how to make tons of money on markets once the earthquake prediction hits the news. scheming


So this counters your claim that satistics invalidates Omerbashich's physics. YOU, are a total moron my friend. And even if not a Gov shill you are most certainly on payroll of some of the above listed banker scum . Because no one would be spending full time shifts online countering something thats not of his personal concern, and do it all for free, half a year now. ohyeah
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



Kid. Your mon wants her computer up so go night night now. You are a complete idiot and I amd donw wasting my time with a pubnk cry baby
 Quoting: F=ma



BWWHHAHAHHAHHAHHHAHHAHAH no argument, of course. the list is just too serious to fight. oh well, equations cant be fought either, but you still do it , so cmon we are waiting

But do you know how we know you are Gov/military/banksters shills who go by the Manual? Because you post within seconds whenever someone posts about good Dr, throughout the internet. We " common people " have no such capabilities!

second its a psyop way of thinking that ,if your post always appears last on the subject, random visitors who mostly dont have time to read the entire threads, will take it as if you won the argument and leave with that impression.

SHILLING -- Check!

s226
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


Now you are over here posting your nonsense replies.

You talk about equations but don't respond when I ask
you the value of X and Y on a simple college Algebra 101
equation.

You criticize Rational Wiki but when I ask you what
specifically is wrong with their criticism of Dr. Whoever
you don't respond.

You criticize the messenger but fail to discuss the
message.

You use a great deal of profanity which indicates
a low IQ and a limited vocabulary.

Dr. Whoever is a crank scientists who is subject to
hissy fits.

Several Members of the Committee which reviewed his
theis resigned because they did not think he deserved a
PHD.

The Patent Office has refused all his requests to patent
his crackpot ideas.

His idiotic theories will not ever be accepted by his
peers.

You are someone who is stupid but does not know he is
stupid.

sheep

My sheep shakes his head in amazement that GLP permits
you to post on its forum.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/18/2011 06:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
...


You are again lying and manipualating : I dont see " 180 days ", everyone can see October and half November which is 45 days, and all 100% on the money predicted magnification.

go to DR's blog [link to sites.google.com] and scroll down to " COME, PRECIOUS! " article, look at the visitors that keep studying his amazing disccovery:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....

( hows that choice of color for you, idiot? LOL )

If you knew anything about economy youd this is cream de la cream of finances in the world. Im pretty sure theres no better statisticians in the world than bankers and investers and insurance markets. They are wasting ther time on this " pseudoscience " too? Not a chance -- its more like they thinking up ways how to make tons of money on markets once the earthquake prediction hits the news. scheming


So this counters your claim that satistics invalidates Omerbashich's physics. YOU, are a total moron my friend. And even if not a Gov shill you are most certainly on payroll of some of the above listed banker scum . Because no one would be spending full time shifts online countering something thats not of his personal concern, and do it all for free, half a year now. ohyeah
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



Kid. Your mon wants her computer up so go night night now. You are a complete idiot and I amd donw wasting my time with a pubnk cry baby
 Quoting: F=ma



BWWHHAHAHHAHHAHHHAHHAHAH no argument, of course. the list is just too serious to fight. oh well, equations cant be fought either, but you still do it , so cmon we are waiting

But do you know how we know you are Gov/military/banksters shills who go by the Manual? Because you post within seconds whenever someone posts about good Dr, throughout the internet. We " common people " have no such capabilities!

second its a psyop way of thinking that ,if your post always appears last on the subject, random visitors who mostly dont have time to read the entire threads, will take it as if you won the argument and leave with that impression.

SHILLING -- Check!

s226
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


1. Several Members of the Committee which reviewed his
theis resigned because they did not think he deserved a
PHD.

2. The Patent Office has refused all his requests to patent
his crackpot ideas.

3. His idiotic theories will not ever be accepted by his
peers.

 Quoting: gdwk 1405311


1. They told you this? Because I couldnt find it anywhere, care providing a link for us? Ther are many possibilities why they resigned, of course. Maybe they had no clue what was it that the man was saying ( no wonder, Omerbaschich is a brilliant thinker just look at hyperesonancy equations he derived after finishing school ). or maybe they were threatened by Gov too, like they threatened good Dr ? We'll never know. Luckily he writes about some of it so we dont have to take your ( Rotschild-Soros ) lying word for it: [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]

2. Nope. Patent office quoted as the reason for refusal because Gov already patented his PhD idea in its name,a few months after he defended his doctoral : "In the late Fall of 2010, the USPTO has finally admitted that my PhD thesis's main idea is identical to what the US Government had patented soon after my oral exam." You can read it: [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com] . so its disputed , moron, as the Gov issued patent 10/863970 to itself -- more precisely: filed 6/8/04 and issued 11/4/04 ( [link to sites.google.com] ) . So it was several months after our good Dr defended his doctoral thesis 11/03, see his thesis title page: [link to sites.google.com] ).
Pretty said to realize our Gov has touched such a low point as to steal ideas from worlds best minds rather than paying a price. But then, they did it to Tesla too,and many other great minds .

3. His theory and hyperesonancy equations are the most brilliant discovery in history of man. I talked to a colleague of mine who has masters in physics and he agrees 100 per cent. he also said hed never go public about it," not in a million years " given what theyve done to Dr O. Btw, do you represent all of " his peers " ? Didnt think so. LOL


Hey shill, when will you addres the main issue here : which of the above banksters mafia corporations ( in red ) is your employer? or is it Uncle Sam after all? ohyeah
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/19/2011 05:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
3. His theory and hyperesonancy equations are the most brilliant discovery in history of man. I talked to a colleague of mine who has masters in physics and he agrees 100 per cent. he also said hed never go public about it," not in a million years " given what theyve done to Dr O. Btw, do you represent all of " his peers " ? Didnt think so. LOL

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


So all you have to do is tell everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?
F=ma
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/19/2011 05:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
2. Nope. Patent office quoted as the reason for refusal because Gov already patented his PhD idea in its name,a few months after he defended his doctoral : "In the late Fall of 2010, the USPTO has finally admitted that my PhD thesis's main idea is identical to what the US Government had patented soon after my oral exam." You can read it: [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com] . so its disputed , moron, as the Gov issued patent 10/863970 to itself -- more precisely: filed 6/8/04 and issued 11/4/04 ( [link to sites.google.com] ) . So it was several months after our good Dr defended his doctoral thesis 11/03, see his thesis title page: [link to sites.google.com] ).
Pretty said to realize our Gov has touched such a low point as to steal ideas from worlds best minds rather than paying a price. But then, they did it to Tesla too,and many other great minds .

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


The good Dr needs to look at Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was avaiable to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.

Last Edited by F=ma on 11/19/2011 05:45 AM
F=ma
gdwk
User ID: 1405311
United States
11/19/2011 05:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
2. Nope. Patent office quoted as the reason for refusal because Gov already patented his PhD idea in its name,a few months after he defended his doctoral : "In the late Fall of 2010, the USPTO has finally admitted that my PhD thesis's main idea is identical to what the US Government had patented soon after my oral exam." You can read it: [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com] . so its disputed , moron, as the Gov issued patent 10/863970 to itself -- more precisely: filed 6/8/04 and issued 11/4/04 ( [link to sites.google.com] ) . So it was several months after our good Dr defended his doctoral thesis 11/03, see his thesis title page: [link to sites.google.com] ).
Pretty said to realize our Gov has touched such a low point as to steal ideas from worlds best minds rather than paying a price. But then, they did it to Tesla too,and many other great minds .

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


The good Dr needs to look at Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was avaiable to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.
 Quoting: F=ma


A great reply

sheep

My sheep agrees.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/19/2011 11:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
2. Nope. Patent office quoted as the reason for refusal because Gov already patented his PhD idea in its name,a few months after he defended his doctoral : "In the late Fall of 2010, the USPTO has finally admitted that my PhD thesis's main idea is identical to what the US Government had patented soon after my oral exam." You can read it: [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com] . so its disputed , moron, as the Gov issued patent 10/863970 to itself -- more precisely: filed 6/8/04 and issued 11/4/04 ( [link to sites.google.com] ) . So it was several months after our good Dr defended his doctoral thesis 11/03, see his thesis title page: [link to sites.google.com] ).
Pretty said to realize our Gov has touched such a low point as to steal ideas from worlds best minds rather than paying a price. But then, they did it to Tesla too,and many other great minds .

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


The good Dr needs to look at Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was avaiable to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.
 Quoting: F=ma


BBWWHWHHHAHHHAHAHHAHAHHA this " explanation " is stupid beyond hilarious : why didnt the Patent office then refer to the older application number ,if it was the first instance ever to have contained Dr. Omerbashich idea ? Nope, they referred to exactly the one which contained the same idea , and which was filed a few months after his Thesis. which means they indeed stole it between two version of ther patent. Ha! You just strengthened Dr. O's case. I hope he reads GLP . I should email him on this . Awesome, thanks in the name of Truth and Justice !!!

God you are so stupid. crazy grinning


Heres the real issue: why do you never address the list of these fine visitors who come get ther information at [link to seismo.info] regularly to make lotsof money on insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog
[link to sites.google.com] )

Are they undeducated, did they not go to ivy league schools , didnt they learn ther statistics, dont they represent cream de la cream of world finances ? ohyeah
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/19/2011 11:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
3. His theory and hyperesonancy equations are the most brilliant discovery in history of man. I talked to a colleague of mine who has masters in physics and he agrees 100 per cent. he also said hed never go public about it," not in a million years " given what theyve done to Dr O. Btw, do you represent all of " his peers " ? Didnt think so. LOL

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


So all you have to do is tell everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?
 Quoting: F=ma


No idea, because I never went to ivy league school, never studied statistics, have no clue about physics, have IQ below freezing 0. But thanks God I can read and write so Im sure these guys accomplished all the above, and they come regularly to [link to seismo.info] to get ther information and make lotsof money on insurance markets ( but CNN wont tell you about it ) :

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not
final,credit: inventor's blog [link to sites.google.com] )

Too bad they dont read GLP to learn stuff from a moron like you. Oh wait, they pay you to " teach " us the shit, while they keep the real knowledge to themselves !!!

ohyeah
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/19/2011 04:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
2. Nope. Patent office quoted as the reason for refusal because Gov already patented his PhD idea in its name,a few months after he defended his doctoral : "In the late Fall of 2010, the USPTO has finally admitted that my PhD thesis's main idea is identical to what the US Government had patented soon after my oral exam." You can read it: [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com] . so its disputed , moron, as the Gov issued patent 10/863970 to itself -- more precisely: filed 6/8/04 and issued 11/4/04 ( [link to sites.google.com] ) . So it was several months after our good Dr defended his doctoral thesis 11/03, see his thesis title page: [link to sites.google.com] ).
Pretty said to realize our Gov has touched such a low point as to steal ideas from worlds best minds rather than paying a price. But then, they did it to Tesla too,and many other great minds .

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


The good Dr needs to look at Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was avaiable to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.
 Quoting: F=ma


BBWWHWHHHAHHHAHAHHAHAHHA this " explanation " is stupid beyond hilarious : why didnt the Patent office then refer to the older application number ,if it was the first instance ever to have contained Dr. Omerbashich idea ? Nope,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543




Maybe they did. Don't know. All you are doing is relying on Omerbashich's words and those are biased.
F=ma
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/19/2011 04:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
3. His theory and hyperesonancy equations are the most brilliant discovery in history of man. I talked to a colleague of mine who has masters in physics and he agrees 100 per cent. he also said hed never go public about it," not in a million years " given what theyve done to Dr O. Btw, do you represent all of " his peers " ? Didnt think so. LOL

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


So all you have to do is tell everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?
 Quoting: F=ma


No idea, because I never went to ivy league school, never studied statistics, have no clue about physics, have IQ below freezing 0.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



So you completely rely on Omerbashich and believe he is always telling the truth. That is sad. You have no idea then that his so called equations are really a sham. They have not meaning. Just because someone writes down an equations it does not mean that it has value. Just because he claims 100% success it does not mean he is. All you are doing is being a mindless shill for Omerbashich. You don't understand a thing about his theory and the fact is is worthless. Very, very sad.
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/19/2011 05:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
3. His theory and hyperesonancy equations are the most brilliant discovery in history of man. I talked to a colleague of mine who has masters in physics and he agrees 100 per cent. he also said hed never go public about it," not in a million years " given what theyve done to Dr O. Btw, do you represent all of " his peers " ? Didnt think so. LOL

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


So all you have to do is tell everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?
 Quoting: F=ma


No idea, because I never went to ivy league school, never studied statistics, have no clue about physics, have IQ below freezing 0.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



So you completely rely on Omerbashich and believe he is always telling the truth. That is sad. You have no idea then that his so called equations are really a sham. They have not meaning. Just because someone writes down an equations it does not mean that it has value. Just because he claims 100% success it does not mean he is. All you are doing is being a mindless shill for Omerbashich. You don't understand a thing about his theory and the fact is is worthless. Very, very sad.
 Quoting: F=ma


Who else to believe if not a scientist with doctoral from Canada????? besides dude,, theres no waaaaay ( and i mean in a million years ) you could make this up ! Thats a horror story alright, scarier than anything Hollywood has ever produced. and Ive seen quite a few horrors

Just for the record ( since you tend to cut out the important parts of my posts so to make impression like you won the argument ), the above quotation of mine should be kept complete so heres the missing part you cut out purposley:


Regulars on Dr. O's web site:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....
( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog below )


Conclusion : shills have lost the argument , as Dr. O is very very real. If people dont trust me because my IQ is less than this shill sheep's thats fine. Or hey, if people dont even want to trust a Dr. who shills want us to believe " threatens to whoever ", thats fine too! But people should always trust ther own eyes and the above ivy league boys. They always knew ther shit!!

So it all comes to this :

[link to seismo.info]

EQUATIONS -- Check!!!!!!!!

PREDICTION -- Check!!!!!!!!!

THEORY -- Check !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1rof1
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/19/2011 06:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Who else to believe if not a scientist with doctoral from Canada????? besides dude,, theres no waaaaay ( and i mean in a million years ) you could make this up ! Thats a horror story alright, scarier than anything Hollywood has ever produced. and Ive seen quite a few horrors

Just for the record ( since you tend to cut out the important parts of my posts so to make impression like you won the argument ), the above quotation of mine should be kept complete so heres the missing part you cut out purposley:


Regulars on Dr. O's web site:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....
( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog below )


Conclusion : shills have lost the argument , as Dr. O is very very real. If people dont trust me because my IQ is less than this shill sheep's thats fine. Or hey, if people dont even want to trust a Dr. who shills want us to believe " threatens to whoever ", thats fine too! But people should always trust ther own eyes and the above ivy league boys. They always knew ther shit!!

So it all comes to this :

[link to seismo.info]

EQUATIONS -- Check!!!!!!!!

PREDICTION -- Check!!!!!!!!!

THEORY -- Check !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1rof1
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


Here, I left them in. All they show is your ignorance. I laugh to hard when I read them so I have to delete them.

And your checks, are just juvenile. If you can't answer my questions you have no business saying he is right.

So all you have to do is tell everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

You are just a pathetic loser and it is amusing to see the lengths you go to to defend a so called theory you don't understand.

sheep

Last Edited by F=ma on 11/19/2011 08:15 PM
F=ma
gdwk
User ID: 1405311
United States
11/19/2011 07:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Who else to believe if not a scientist with doctoral from Canada????? besides dude,, theres no waaaaay ( and i mean in a million years ) you could make this up ! Thats a horror story alright, scarier than anything Hollywood has ever produced. and Ive seen quite a few horrors

Just for the record ( since you tend to cut out the important parts of my posts so to make impression like you won the argument ), the above quotation of mine should be kept complete so heres the missing part you cut out purposley:


Regulars on Dr. O's web site:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....
( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog below )


Conclusion : shills have lost the argument , as Dr. O is very very real. If people dont trust me because my IQ is less than this shill sheep's thats fine. Or hey, if people dont even want to trust a Dr. who shills want us to believe " threatens to whoever ", thats fine too! But people should always trust ther own eyes and the above ivy league boys. They always knew ther shit!!

So it all comes to this :

[link to seismo.info]

EQUATIONS -- Check!!!!!!!!

PREDICTION -- Check!!!!!!!!!

THEORY -- Check !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1rof1
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


Here, I left them in. All they show is your ignorance. I laugh to hard when I read them so I have to delete them.

An your checks, are just juvenile. If you can't answer my questions you have not business saying he is right.

So all you have to do is tell everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

You are just a pathetic loser and it is amusing to see the lengths you go to to defend a so called theory you don't understand.

sheep
 Quoting: F=ma


A great reply.

GLP should be a forum of information.

This pathetic loser does not understand what an equation
is.

Hopefully as time passes GLP will become a composite of
rational thinkers such as you rather than patheic losers.

Again a great reply.

sheep



sheep

My sheep agrees.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/20/2011 09:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Who else to believe if not a scientist with doctoral from Canada????? besides dude,, theres no waaaaay ( and i mean in a million years ) you could make this up ! Thats a horror story alright, scarier than anything Hollywood has ever produced. and Ive seen quite a few horrors

Just for the record ( since you tend to cut out the important parts of my posts so to make impression like you won the argument ), the above quotation of mine should be kept complete so heres the missing part you cut out purposley:


Regulars on Dr. O's web site:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....
( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog below )


Conclusion : shills have lost the argument , as Dr. O is very very real. If people dont trust me because my IQ is less than this shill sheep's thats fine. Or hey, if people dont even want to trust a Dr. who shills want us to believe " threatens to whoever ", thats fine too! But people should always trust ther own eyes and the above ivy league boys. They always knew ther shit!!

So it all comes to this :

[link to seismo.info]

EQUATIONS -- Check!!!!!!!!

PREDICTION -- Check!!!!!!!!!

THEORY -- Check !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1rof1
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


Here, I left them in. All they show is your ignorance. I laugh to hard when I read them so I have to delete them.

And your checks, are just juvenile. If you can't answer my questions you have no business saying he is right.

So all you have to do is tell everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

You are just a pathetic loser and it is amusing to see the lengths you go to to defend a so called theory you don't understand.

 Quoting: F=ma


blah blah blah... no discussion as you lost credibility after caught lying , again and again boring


Instead of me talking, let these fine visitors & ivy league alumni do the talk. They know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog below )

5a


read more on DR OMERBASHICH ( scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :

[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :

[link to seismo.info]

Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/20/2011 03:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
blah blah blah... no discussion as you lost credibility after caught lying , again and again

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep

I have provide more evidence against Omerbashich then you are capable of understanding. Your checks, are just juvenile. If you can't answer my questions you have no business saying he is right.

So all you have to do is tell everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

You are just a pathetic loser and it is amusing to see the lengths you go to to defend a so called theory you don't understand.


Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


I am. Omerbashich's so called theory is rubbish. That is the truth.

sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
sheep
F=ma

News