Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,873 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,467,334
Pageviews Today: 2,326,124Threads Today: 692Posts Today: 15,113
07:19 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/24/2011 12:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES

( statistical mumbo jumbo crap cut out -- as Dr O never uses any statistic 1rof1 )

 Quoting: F=ma



Update Update : a 6.1 just hit today, so we got by the USGS :

5.9
6.6
6.1

Dr Omerbashich's pattern again being drawn infront of our own eyes !! 2 days of this long alignmetn to go...

History in the making: [link to seismo.info]

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


( burned statistic bullshit on the stake.... )

 Quoting: F=ma


( burned statistic bullshit on the stake ,as Good Dr Genius Omerbashich uses no statistic and he says so 1rof1 )

no discussion with you as you lost credibility after caught lying , again and again, on Dr O's patents not bein stolen when Gov says itself it stole them , on his doctoral commitee " resigning in disgust " which is something you tried to correct later but got deeper into shite you are, and so on. Cant even list all your lies here,theyre so many boring


Instead of us talking, let these fine visitors & ivy league alumni do the talking. They know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog below )

5a


read more on DR OMERBASHICH ( scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :

[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :

[link to seismo.info]

Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/24/2011 09:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
childish, idiotic statements that have no value deleted
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543



You are just demonstrating pure ignorance. Just because you do not understand statistical analysis and its purpose does not mean it isn't being used.

I am bewildered why you keep embarassing yourself with your nonsense about something you clearly do not understand.

You are a shill, nothing more, and a poor one at that. Post after post you demonstrate you do not have the mathemtical background to rationally discuss this subject.

So again, the real issue is telling everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

Last Edited by F=ma on 11/24/2011 09:34 PM
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/25/2011 01:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
( cut the crap out -- literally )

 Quoting: F=ma



Noone gives a shit about your little posts trying to bury the real issues so people think you won.


And the truth is :

- no discussion with you as you lost credibility after caught lying , again and again about Dr's patents , doctoral committee and all sorts of stupid lies proven as such boring


Instead of us talking, let these fine visitors & ivy league alumni do the talking. They know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog below )

5a


read more on DR OMERBASHICH ( scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :

[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :

[link to seismo.info]

Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/25/2011 07:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
( cut the crap out -- literally )

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


None of what I post is crap. You are ignorant and probably an idiot. You failure to recognize what I write as factual means you are really stupid. That is not my fault. This is the truth.

You are just demonstrating pure ignorance. Just because you do not understand statistical analysis and its purpose does not mean it isn't being used.

I am bewildered why you keep embarassing yourself with your nonsense about something you clearly do not understand.

You are a shill, nothing more, and a poor one at that. Post after post you demonstrate you do not have the mathemtical background to rationally discuss this subject.

So again, the real issue is telling everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1421543
United States
11/25/2011 10:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
( cut even more crap out -- literally, OP )

 Quoting: F=ma


No one gives a shit about your little posts trying to bury the real issues so people think you won.


And the truth is :

- no discussion with you as you lost credibility after caught lying , again and again about Dr's patents , doctoral committee and all sorts of stupid lies proven as such boring


Instead of us talking, let these fine visitors & ivy league alumni do the talking. They know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog below )

5a


read more on DR OMERBASHICH ( scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :

[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :

[link to seismo.info]

Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit


EQUATIONS -- Check! ( Only morons fight equations wher sides are Equal )
PREDICTIONS -- Check! ( on the money match of long aligmnents and 6+ quake patterns aka "UP-Peak-DOWN" )
THEORY -- Check! ( georesonance and hyperesonance at work as Omerbashich correlation is regularly changing from sun to neptune )

ohyeah
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/25/2011 01:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
No one gives a shit about your little posts trying to bury the real issues so people think you won.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1421543


You keep saying that but it clearly isn't true. All you are saying is you do not understand my posts. I really can't stop laughing at your stupidity. So you delete what you can't understand and don't know how to address. You have been defeated but don't want to quit. HAHA. To bad.

None of what I post is crap. You are ignorant and probably an idiot. You failure to recognize what I write as factual means you are really stupid. That is not my fault. This is the truth.

You are just demonstrating pure ignorance. Just because you do not understand statistical analysis and its purpose does not mean it isn't being used.

I am bewildered why you keep embarassing yourself with your nonsense about something you clearly do not understand.

You are a shill, nothing more, and a poor one at that. Post after post you demonstrate you do not have the mathemtical background to rationally discuss this subject.

So again, the real issue is telling everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

The good Dr needs to look at Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was available to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.

Showing the patent he is complaining about existed prior to his thesis.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

Last Edited by F=ma on 11/25/2011 01:18 PM
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1163836
United States
11/28/2011 04:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
( cut the crap by a Gov / banksters shill )

 Quoting: F=ma



Noone gives a shit about your little posts trying to bury the real issues so people think you won.


And the truth is :

- no discussion with you as you lost credibility after caught lying , again and again about Dr\'s patents , doctoral committee and all sorts of stupid lies proven as such boring


Instead of us talking, let these fine visitors & ivy league alumni do the talking. They know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor\'s blog below )

5a


read more on DR OMERBASHICH ( scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :

[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :

[link to seismo.info]

Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit


EQUATIONS -- Check! ( Only morons fight equations wher sides are Equal )
PREDICTIONS -- Check! ( on the money match of long aligmnents and 6+ quake patterns aka \"UP-Peak-DOWN\" )
THEORY -- Check! ( georesonance and hyperesonance at work as Omerbashich correlation is regularly changing from sun to neptune )

ohyeah
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1163836
United States
11/28/2011 04:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
( cut the crap by a Gov / banksters shill )

 Quoting: F=ma



Noone gives a shit about your little posts trying to bury the real issues so people think you won.


And the truth is :

- no discussion with you as you lost credibility after caught lying , again and again about Dr\'s patents , doctoral committee and all sorts of stupid lies proven as such boring


Instead of us talking, let these fine visitors & ivy league alumni do the talking. They know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor\'s blog below )

5a


read more on DR OMERBASHICH ( scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :

[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :

[link to seismo.info]

Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit


EQUATIONS -- Check! ( Only morons fight equations wher sides are Equal )
PREDICTIONS -- Check! ( on the money match of long aligmnents and 6+ quake patterns aka \"UP-Peak-DOWN\" )
THEORY -- Check! ( georesonance and hyperesonance at work as Omerbashich correlation is regularly changing from sun to neptune )

ohyeah
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
11/28/2011 05:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Noone gives a shit about your little posts trying to bury the real issues so people think you won.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1163836


You must care. In fact my post must scare the hell out of your feeble belief system that revolves around the religion you call Dr Omerbashich. If you didn't care you wouldn't be trying so hard to discredit them. But of course you can't because everything I have posted is verifiable.

You are a shill, nothing more, and a poor one at that. Post after post you demonstrate you do not have the mathemtical background to rationally discuss this subject.

So again, the real issue is telling everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

The good Dr needs to look at Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.

Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was available to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.

Showing the patent he is complaining about existed prior to his thesis.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1163836
United States
11/30/2011 10:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Trash out.

 Quoting: F=ma



Without going into your motivation for attacking scientific research, on his page [link to www.seismo.info] Dr. Omerbashich gives a table detailing how he picked M6+ tremors and why he left some out.

As a researcher, I can\'t say I\'m finding any error in his approach or method. He simply took all the available information (not only the USGS, as you did), and eliminated outliers:


Date: USGS: GFZ: EMSC: Final:
6 Oct 5.9 5.9 6.2 6.2 (cannot discard*)
7 Oct 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.1
13 Oct 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1
14 Oct 6.5 6.3 6.5 6.5
14 Oct 6.0 5.9 6.0 6.0
18 Oct 6.1 5.9 6.0 6.0
21 Oct 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1
21 Oct 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.4
23 Oct 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.1
28 Oct 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9
1 Nov 6.3 6.2 6.3 6.3
2 Nov 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.1
7 Nov 6.0 6.1 6.0 6.0
8 Nov 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9
11 Nov 6.0 5.9 6.0 6.0
14 Nov 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3
22 Nov 6.6 6.5 6.6 6.6
23 Nov 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1
24 Nov 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2
28 Nov 6.4 6.1 6.1 6.1
29 Nov 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

* Note that, under the georesonance concept criteria, only M(6.0+5%)- outliers can be excluded from considerations.



After his two months of successfully forecasting resonance magnification, this does it for me. In my humble opinion Omerbashich has contributed some fundamental physical discoveries, no question about that.
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
12/01/2011 08:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Trash out.

 Quoting: F=ma



Without going into your motivation for attacking scientific research, on his page [link to www.seismo.info] Dr. Omerbashich gives a table detailing how he picked M6+ tremors and why he left some out.

As a researcher, I can\'t say I\'m finding any error in his approach or method. He simply took all the available information (not only the USGS, as you did), and eliminated outliers:


Date: USGS: GFZ: EMSC: Final:
6 Oct 5.9 5.9 6.2 6.2 (cannot discard*)
7 Oct 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.1
13 Oct 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1
14 Oct 6.5 6.3 6.5 6.5
14 Oct 6.0 5.9 6.0 6.0
18 Oct 6.1 5.9 6.0 6.0
21 Oct 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1
21 Oct 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.4
23 Oct 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.1
28 Oct 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9
1 Nov 6.3 6.2 6.3 6.3
2 Nov 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.1
7 Nov 6.0 6.1 6.0 6.0
8 Nov 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9
11 Nov 6.0 5.9 6.0 6.0
14 Nov 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3
22 Nov 6.6 6.5 6.6 6.6
23 Nov 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1
24 Nov 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2
28 Nov 6.4 6.1 6.1 6.1
29 Nov 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

* Note that, under the georesonance concept criteria, only M(6.0+5%)- outliers can be excluded from considerations.



After his two months of successfully forecasting resonance magnification, this does it for me. In my humble opinion Omerbashich has contributed some fundamental physical discoveries, no question about that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1163836


By continuing to delete my posts you show that you aren't really serious about the subject. I provided a very important point that his work is not falsifiable. He also does not stick to the 6.0 threshold. If no 6.0 occurs, he lowers his threshold.

What Omerbashich does cannot be called predictions. He does not predict date, time, location. It is statistical based on the known frequency of earthquakes.

I again ask you, what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

Regarding the patent the good Dr needs to look at Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was available to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.

Showing the patent he is complaining about existed prior to his thesis.
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1163836
United States
12/03/2011 08:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Well your \"posts\" are piles of meaningless words. When you start writing so that everyone can understand then I will not be taking your trash out any more.

 Quoting: F=ma



I have a friend lawyer who says it would take her 10 minutes tops to win this case in court. She says the case is straightforward, like injury after slipping on banana peel in the City Hall. Ill take her expert word over your shilling paranoia any time.

As someone already told you, and I asked my friend about it, the Patent office referenced to Government\'s own patent as the reason why Omerbashich patents were denied. Catch: they protected their patent months after Omerbashich got his doctorate AND did not cite any other preceding work that might have led the Government to \"their\" discovery. So it\'s obvious that they pick peoples brains as they go and then keep lying about it, delaying (for amazing 5 years in Omerbashich case) etc.

But it seems your lying rants about genius Dr. Omerbashich committee resigning \"in disgust\", or about his patents which were obviously stolen by our Government same as Tesla\'s and others, have been answered properly already by others:


Quote.

Hey \" 150 IQ \" moron, when will that scum Soros realize hes wasting his money on your lies? Lets hear it from the source ( bolds are by me ) :

1.\" It all continued well beyond my grad school too: when you send in application for 23 positions at NASA over several months period and get a response to none (under the US law they must notify all applicants on the outcome of every application), or when you submit your sole-authorship paper on a prime physical discovery (on mechanist tectonogenesis of the Earth) to 55 English-language journals and get all rejections -- half of which display ignorance and poor manners of referees and the other half contain no explanation at all -- whereas the first (and a prominent) French journal to which you submit the same paper referees it and publishes it virtually immediately as the lead article and features it on its cover page, when you publish another lead paper again as a sole author in an IOP journal in which you kill a nine-referees-approved Nature paper and then they sack that journal\'s editor while attacking you and your paper so that Nature can continue in its role as a holy cow of Elizabeth\'s geostrategy regardless, when... you don\'t really exist, other than as a source of marvelous ideas in fundamental sciences (which their own best minds and the entire turgid \"ivy league\" are incapable of inventing on their own) for one global-terrorist society and a true Empire of Evil that imported you as it imports a piece of raw meet for general consumption -- to process, use and dispose of accordingly. \" [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]

Sounds like conspiracy to me. Did you notice that controlled media don\'t use \" conspiracy theory \" label any more? the world is changing by minute. Ask Albert Einstein LOL


2.\" the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), a US Government\'s own bureau, dragged my patent application for nearly five years, \"lost\" my filings/amendments half a dozen times, provided wrong instructions at least four times, and so on. Even prior to the theft, the final draft of my PhD thesis \"got lost\" in none other then -- the US mail, extending my oral defense for more than half a year. Two PhD committees had resigned also, while many other \"nuisances\" occurred along the way as well. Those obstacles included me being constantly harassed by Canadian & US police, the Canadian SWAT team breaking into my apartment at 4 am with dogs and automatic weapons, US immigration officers pulling guns at me and holding me captive at the US-Canada border while claiming that \"on a tip from the Canadian authorities my US Driver\'s License contained false data\", Canadian & US cops pulling me over and searching the vehicle and me more than a hundred times during the last two years of my PhD often at gunpoint with hands up and sometimes twice in a same day, as well as other forms of pressure to leave my studies such as doubling of my tuition in the middle of academic year because -- I got transferred from the Masters to PhD without oral defense (for excellence, what else)... The situation about me has become so curious over that time, that the then director of Graduate Studies in Canada noticed I was some sort of a \"trouble magnet\". Was I indeed... (And I didn\'t even mention sudden and life-threatening health issues so curious that any diagnosis was literally impossible except for possibly the deadly poisoning one). \" [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]

Sounds like a case for Amnesty International , violation of human rights , abuse, attempted murder... How do you know his committee members resigned \" in disgust \" ?! Youre full of shit ( for someone with 150 IQ LOL ) Care to provide a link to their statement? The only information I was able to find on that episode from this horror story is the above quotation ( Dr. O\'s blog ). theres no way to tell why his commitee members resigned , unless they were threatened as well . Or perhaps they just didn\'t understand a word of what this genius was saying LOL


Besides, Patent office quoted as the reason for refusal because Gov already patented his PhD idea in its name,a few months after he defended his doctoral : \"In the late Fall of 2010, the USPTO has finally admitted that my PhD thesis\'s main idea is identical to what the US Government had patented soon after my oral exam.\" You can read it: [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com] . so its disputed , moron, as the Gov issued patent 10/863970 to itself -- more precisely: filed 6/8/04 and issued 11/4/04 ( [link to sites.google.com] ) . So it was several months after our good Dr defended his doctoral thesis 11/03, see his thesis title page: [link to sites.google.com] ).
Pretty said to realize our Gov has touched such a low point as to steal ideas from worlds best minds rather than paying a price. But then, they did it to Tesla too,and many other great minds .

Good thing about all this is that our Gov seems to have ran into a tough cooky this time . Tougher than Dr Tesla thats for sure !!! Well ,all comes to an end, so do bloody empires. And thanks God for that.


So theres nothing left of your lies is there... Finally, why do you never address the list of these fine visitors who come get ther info on [link to seismo.info] regularly to make lotsof money on insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....
( this list is not final,credit: inventor\'s blog [link to sites.google.com] )

Are they undeducated, did they not go to ivy league schools , dont they represent cream de la cream of world finances ? ohyeah

Unquote


Shills never take logical answers and always keep pushing their nonsense no one really cares about.

Dr. Omerbashich discovery tells us when devastating earthquakes will NOT happen for sure, which I think is about half a year if not more. No wonder why corporate and financial elite visits his site:


Quote:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor\\\'s blog [link to sites.google.com] )

Unquote



But I guess its easy once you know how it works. I thinks this should definitely be pinned. Its probably the first GLP pin ever to precede a Nobel prize.
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
12/03/2011 06:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Well your \"posts\" are piles of meaningless words. When you start writing so that everyone can understand then I will not be taking your trash out any more.

 Quoting: F=ma



I have a friend lawyer who says it would take her 10 minutes tops to win this case in court. She says the case is straightforward, like injury after slipping on banana peel in the City Hall. Ill take her expert word over your shilling paranoia any time.

As someone already told you, and I asked my friend about it, the Patent office referenced to Government\'s own patent as the reason why Omerbashich patents were denied. Catch: they protected their patent months after Omerbashich got his doctorate AND did not cite any other preceding work that might have led the Government to \"their\" discovery. So it\'s obvious that they pick peoples brains as they go and then keep lying about it, delaying (for amazing 5 years in Omerbashich case) etc.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1163836


Not unexpectedly you are wrong again. In patent application 10/863,970 titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


So the previous patent was in fact referenced in the patent in question and precedes his doctorate by three years. It also has the same title.

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties




But it seems your lying rants about genius Dr. Omerbashich committee resigning \"in disgust\", or about his patents which were obviously stolen by our Government same as Tesla\'s and others, have been answered properly already by others:
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1163836


Your idiotic statements do not make Omserbashich right. It makes you look like an idioit



non sequiturs deleted
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1163836




So theres nothing left of your lies is there... Finally, why do you never address the list of these fine visitors who come get ther info on [link to seismo.info] regularly to make lotsof money on insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....
( this list is not final,credit: inventor\'s blog [link to sites.google.com] )

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1163836


Big fucking deal. Someone visited his site on company time using company equipment. Unless the policy bans such visits during work hours, it means nothing. So nothing more than a red herring from an idiot.


So again, the real issue is telling everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

Last Edited by F=ma on 12/03/2011 06:59 PM
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1163836
United States
12/05/2011 11:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
So the previous patent was in fact referenced in the patent in question and precedes his doctorate by three years. It also has the same title.

 Quoting: F=ma



When denying a patent application for non-novelty the Patent Office must refer to a reference that is older than the idea for which protection is sought. Instead, they referenced a later \\\"patent\\\".

So they never cited an earlier version because it\\\'s irrelevant contents-wise, not title-wise, moron. Are you a patent examiner, perhaps? I didn\\\'t think so. Thanks God for lawyer friends.

In the meantime, genius Dr. Omerbashich keeps providing his awesome discoveries to the world, free of charge. A snack for these fine sharks that smell blood and come to make money on insurance:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor\\\'s blog [link to sites.google.com] )


History in the making:

[link to seismo.info]
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
12/06/2011 01:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
So the previous patent was in fact referenced in the patent in question and precedes his doctorate by three years. It also has the same title.

 Quoting: F=ma



When denying a patent application for non-novelty the Patent Office must refer to a reference that is older than the idea for which protection is sought. Instead, they referenced a later \\\"patent\\\".

So they never cited an earlier version because it\\\'s irrelevant contents-wise, not title-wise, moron. Are you a patent examiner, perhaps? I didn\\\'t think so. Thanks God for lawyer friends.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1163836


Are you high? What the hell are you talking about? You are making less sense than usual, and that isn't saying much at all.

The patent itself references the older patent. How thick are you? The patent office didn't have to reference the older patent since the newer patent itself references the older patent:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


So you are even stupidier than I could have possibly imagined. In the meantime you continue to delete my posts for only one reason I can see, you are incapaable of understanding complex thought.

So again, the real issue is telling everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

Oh, and no one gives a fuck about who visited his site. It is meaningless information.

Last Edited by F=ma on 12/06/2011 01:41 AM
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1163836
United States
12/08/2011 01:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
The patent office didn\'t have to reference the older patent since the newer patent itself references the older patent

 Quoting: F=ma



BBBWWHWHHHHAAHHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA​HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA​HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA 1rof1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1163836
United States
12/08/2011 01:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Dr Omerbashich again on the money with his predictions relating astro alignments with 6+ earthquakes!!!!! They always go UP -- PEAK -- DOWN ,during long alginments lasting more than 3 days!

these fine visitors & ivy league alumni know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on
Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell
you about it ( Gov has threatened this mans life!!! ) :

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor\'s blog below )

5a


EQUATIONS -- Check! ( Only morons fight equations wher sides are Equal )
PREDICTIONS -- Check! ( on the money match of long aligmnents and 6+ quake patterns aka \"Up-Peak-Down\" )
THEORY -- Check! ( georesonance and hyperesonance at work as Omerbashich correlation regularly change from sun to neptune )


ohyeah


read more on Dr Omerbashich( Genius scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :
[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :
[link to seismo.info]


Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
12/09/2011 04:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Dr Omerbashich again on the money with his predictions relating astro alignments with 6+ earthquakes!!!!! They always go UP -- PEAK -- DOWN ,during long alginments lasting more than 3 days!

these fine visitors & ivy league alumni know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on
Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell
you about it ( Gov has threatened this mans life!!! ) :

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor\'s blog below )

5a


EQUATIONS -- Check! ( Only morons fight equations wher sides are Equal )
PREDICTIONS -- Check! ( on the money match of long aligmnents and 6+ quake patterns aka \"Up-Peak-Down\" )
THEORY -- Check! ( georesonance and hyperesonance at work as Omerbashich correlation regularly change from sun to neptune )


ohyeah


read more on Dr Omerbashich( Genius scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :
[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :
[link to seismo.info]


Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1163836


You are nothing but a stupid coward. You are afraid to address what you do not understand. You are too stupid to understand that no one cares who visited his web site. It doesn't mean anything. You are a closed minded little child unable to see the problen because you engage in hero worship for you god Omerbashich. You are a fucking moron and demonstrated it with every post. Deleting what I post will not stop the truth from getting out. That Omerbashich is promoting junk science.

So again, the real issue is telling everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

The good Dr needs to look at Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was available to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.

Showing the patent he is complaining about existed prior to his thesis.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1163836
United States
12/10/2011 01:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
(Took the garbage out.)

 Quoting: F=ma



Dr Omerbashich again on the money with his predictions relating astro alignments with 6+ earthquakes!!!!! They always go UP -- PEAK -- DOWN ,during long alginments lasting more than 3 days!

these fine visitors & ivy league alumni know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on
Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell
you about it ( Gov has threatened this mans life!!! ) :

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor\'s blog below )

5a


EQUATIONS -- Check! ( Only morons fight equations wher sides are Equal )
PREDICTIONS -- Check! ( on the money match of long aligmnents and 6+ quake patterns aka \"Up-Peak-Down\" )
THEORY -- Check! ( georesonance and hyperesonance at work as Omerbashich correlation regularly change from sun to neptune )


ohyeah


read more on Dr Omerbashich( Genius scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :
[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :
[link to seismo.info]


Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
12/10/2011 07:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
(Took the garbage out.)

 Quoting: F=ma



Dr Omerbashich again on the money with his predictions relating astro alignments with 6+ earthquakes!!!!! They always go UP -- PEAK -- DOWN ,during long alginments lasting more than 3 days!

these fine visitors & ivy league alumni know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on
Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell
you about it ( Gov has threatened this mans life!!! ) :

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor\'s blog below )

5a


EQUATIONS -- Check! ( Only morons fight equations wher sides are Equal )
PREDICTIONS -- Check! ( on the money match of long aligmnents and 6+ quake patterns aka \"Up-Peak-Down\" )
THEORY -- Check! ( georesonance and hyperesonance at work as Omerbashich correlation regularly change from sun to neptune )





read more on Dr Omerbashich( Genius scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :
[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :
[link to seismo.info]


Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1163836


Why are you such a stupid coward? Why do you shill for Omerbashich? Omerbashich does not make predictions. Look up the definition of the word moron. All he does is play with statistics. No one cares who visits his site on their lunch hour using company computers. Why are you so stupid to think it means anything? Why are you so fucking scared to accress the real issues? You have no integrity and fewer brains cells. Deleting what I post will not stop the truth from getting out. That Omerbashich is promoting junk science.

So again, the real issue is telling everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

The good Dr needs to look at Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was available to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.

Showing the patent he is complaining about existed prior to his thesis.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

Deleting my posts shows you are really scared of the truth and you are too fucking stupid and too big of a coward to address any real issue. Chickenshit.
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1163836
United States
12/11/2011 08:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
(Took garbage out -- already addressed it)

 Quoting: F=ma


Dr Omerbashich on the money with his predictions relating astro alignments with 6+ earthquakes!!!!! They always go UP -- PEAK -- DOWN ,during long alginments lasting more than 3 days!

these fine visitors & ivy league alumni know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on
Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell
you about it ( Gov has threatened this mans life!!! ) :

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor\'s blog below )

5a


EQUATIONS -- Check! ( Only morons fight equations wher sides are Equal )
PREDICTIONS -- Check! ( on the money match of long aligmnents and 6+ quake patterns aka \"Up-Peak-Down\" )
THEORY -- Check! ( georesonance and hyperesonance at work as Omerbashich correlation regularly change from sun to neptune )


ohyeah


read more on Dr Omerbashich( Genius scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :
[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :
[link to seismo.info]


Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit
ItsYourFault

User ID: 6343235
Canada
12/11/2011 10:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
kittens
Sheeple gonna sheep
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
12/11/2011 11:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
(Took garbage out -- already addressed it)

 Quoting: F=ma


Dr Omerbashich on the money with his predictions relating astro alignments with 6+ earthquakes!!!!! They always go UP -- PEAK -- DOWN ,during long alginments lasting more than 3 days!

these fine visitors & ivy league alumni know their stats & math , yet they come get ther info on
Dr. Omerbashich web site regularly to make tons of money in insurance markets but CNN wont tell
you about it ( Gov has threatened this mans life!!! ) :

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor\'s blog below )

5a


EQUATIONS -- Check! ( Only morons fight equations wher sides are Equal )
PREDICTIONS -- Check! ( on the money match of long aligmnents and 6+ quake patterns aka \"Up-Peak-Down\" )
THEORY -- Check! ( georesonance and hyperesonance at work as Omerbashich correlation regularly change from sun to neptune )


ohyeah


read more on Dr Omerbashich( Genius scientist who discovered what causes earthquakes but Gov stole his patents and threatened his life ) :
[link to sites.google.com]
[link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]


Latest Earthquake Predictions On The Money :
[link to seismo.info]


Spread the Word -- Fight for Truth!!! xmit
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1163836



You are fucking stupid. You DID NOT AT ANY TIME ADDRESS WHAT I HAVE POSTED. All you do is delete. Why are you such a stupid coward? Why do you shill for Omerbashich? Omerbashich does not make predictions. Look up the definition of the word moron. All he does is play with statistics. No one cares who visits his site on their lunch hour using company computers. Why are you so stupid to think it means anything? Why are you so fucking scared to accress the real issues? You have no integrity and fewer brains cells. Deleting what I post will not stop the truth from getting out. That Omerbashich is promoting junk science.

So again, the real issue is telling everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

The good Dr needs to look at Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was available to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.

Showing the patent he is complaining about existed prior to his thesis.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

Deleting my posts shows you are really scared of the truth and you are too fucking stupid and too big of a coward to address any real issue. Chickenshit.
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5727031
United States
12/12/2011 05:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
(Now I removed your nonsense -- look for me below. I think you should really chill out man. Are you nuts or something?)

 Quoting: F=ma




I don't know why you are trying to minimize a research that is so important for mankind as Omerbashichs obviously is, but here is a relevant post by an earlier poster I endorse 100%.

You should take Prozac or something.


---->

2. Nope. Patent office quoted as the reason for refusal because Gov already patented his PhD idea in its name,a few months after he defended his doctoral : "In the late Fall of 2010, the USPTO has finally admitted that my PhD thesis's main idea is identical to what the US Government had patented soon after my oral exam." You can read it: [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com] . so its disputed , moron, as the Gov issued patent 10/863970 to itself -- more precisely: filed 6/8/04 and issued 11/4/04 ( [link to sites.google.com] ) . So it was several months after our good Dr defended his doctoral thesis 11/03, see his thesis title page: [link to sites.google.com] ).
Pretty said to realize our Gov has touched such a low point as to steal ideas from worlds best minds rather than paying a price. But then, they did it to Tesla too,and many other great minds .


. BBWWHWHHHAHHHAHAHHAHAHHA this " explanation " is stupid beyond hilarious : why didnt the Patent office then refer to the older application number ,if it was the first instance ever to have contained Dr. Omerbashich idea ? Nope, they referred to exactly the one which contained the same idea , and which was filed a few months after his Thesis. which means they indeed stole it between two version of ther patent. Ha! You just strengthened Dr. O's case. I hope he reads GLP . I should email him on this . Awesome, thanks in the name of Truth and Justice !!!

God you are so stupid. crazy grinning



Heres the real issue: why do you never address the list of these fine visitors who come get ther information at [link to seismo.info] regularly to make lotsof money on insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog
[link to sites.google.com] )

Are they undeducated, did they not go to ivy league schools , didnt they learn ther statistics, dont they represent cream de la cream of world finances ? ohyeah
F=ma

User ID: 4437172
United States
12/12/2011 07:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
(Now I removed your nonsense. I think you should really chill out man. Are you nuts or something?)

 Quoting: F=ma


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5727031



You are so stupid. Nothing I have written is nonsense. You are such an idiot that you do not see the importance of what I write. You must getting paid really big bucks to promote this crap so heavily. It is complete hogwash.



I don't know why you are trying to minimize a research that is so important for mankind as Omerbashichs obviously is, but here is a relevant post by an earlier poster I endorse 100%.

You should take Prozac or something.


---->
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5727031


You should get a brain. Is your IQ 3? There is no theory. It is hogwash.



2. Nope. Patent office quoted as the reason for refusal because Gov already patented his PhD idea in its name,a few months after he defended his doctoral : "In the late Fall of 2010, the USPTO has finally admitted that my PhD thesis's main idea is identical to what the US Government had patented soon after my oral exam." You can read it: [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com] . so its disputed , moron, as the Gov issued patent 10/863970 to itself -- more precisely: filed 6/8/04 and issued 11/4/04 ( [link to sites.google.com] ) . So it was several months after our good Dr defended his doctoral thesis 11/03, see his thesis title page: [link to sites.google.com] ).
Pretty said to realize our Gov has touched such a low point as to steal ideas from worlds best minds rather than paying a price. But then, they did it to Tesla too,and many other great minds .


. BBWWHWHHHAHHHAHAHHAHAHHA this " explanation " is stupid beyond hilarious : why didnt the Patent office then refer to the older application number ,if it was the first instance ever to have contained Dr. Omerbashich idea ? Nope, they referred to exactly the one which contained the same idea , and which was filed a few months after his Thesis. which means they indeed stole it between two version of ther patent. Ha! You just strengthened Dr. O's case. I hope he reads GLP . I should email him on this . Awesome, thanks in the name of Truth and Justice !!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5727031


I have shown that the research existed prior to his oral exam by at least three years. Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was available to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.

Showing the patent he is complaining about existed prior to his thesis.

God you are so stupid.

Heres the real issue: why do you never address the list of these fine visitors who come get ther information at [link to seismo.info] regularly to make lotsof money on insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog
[link to sites.google.com] )

Are they undeducated, did they not go to ivy league schools , didnt they learn ther statistics, dont they represent cream de la cream of world finances ? ohyeah
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5727031


Amongst all the posts that prove you are a stupid moron, this is the top of the list. I have explained to you multiple times that the list of visitors to a web site is totally meaningless. A visit to a web site is not an endorsement of correctness. Are you really that big of a fool? Why did I ask that? Of course you are. Anyone at a company can visit a web site at any time.

What you are using is called a logical fallacy. It is argument from authority. Another indication of your little brain.

What you have never done is address the real issues which are, telling everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

Saying a stupid thing like "he has equations" proves absolutlely nothing. You really must be 8 years old to argue the way you do.

The second issue I have repeatidly brough up and never addressed is from 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods. Omerbashich's "model" is nothing more than a statitical averages.

The final question you have never addressed is why do you shill for Omerbashich? His theory is junk science. Why do you insist on promoting his theory, sending everyone to heavily ad ladened web sites? You have to be getting something out of this.

Last Edited by F=ma on 12/12/2011 07:40 AM
F=ma
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6848893
Romania
12/12/2011 05:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
bump
gdwk
User ID: 1405311
United States
12/13/2011 08:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Newton's Law invalidates Dr. Whoever's Theories.

Earthquake predictions without Time, Date, and
Place are worthless.

sheep
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4425332
United States
12/14/2011 08:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
( Trash out)

 Quoting: F=ma



HA HA its become fun to pick at you.... how many times must people tell you to beat it kid! Omerbashich is a genius and hes from my former country so chill!


Heres an excellent post for haters like you:

-----------


I have a friend lawyer who says it would take her 10 minutes tops to win this case in court. She says the case is straightforward, like injury after slipping on banana peel in the City Hall. Ill take her expert word over your shilling paranoia any time.

As someone already told you, and I asked my friend about it, the Patent office referenced to Government's own patent as the reason why Omerbashich patents were denied. Catch: they protected their patent months after Omerbashich got his doctorate AND did not cite any other preceding work that might have led the Government to "their" discovery. So it's obvious that they pick peoples brains as they go and then keep lying about it, delaying (for amazing 5 years in Omerbashich case) etc.

But it seems your lying rants about genius Dr. Omerbashich committee resigning "in disgust", or about his patents which were obviously stolen by our Government same as Tesla's and others, have been answered properly already by others:


Quote.

Hey " 150 IQ " moron, when will that scum Soros realize hes wasting his money on your lies? Lets hear it from the source ( bolds are by me ) :

1." It all continued well beyond my grad school too: when you send in application for 23 positions at NASA over several months period and get a response to none (under the US law they must notify all applicants on the outcome of every application), or when you submit your sole-authorship paper on a prime physical discovery (on mechanist tectonogenesis of the Earth) to 55 English-language journals and get all rejections -- half of which display ignorance and poor manners of referees and the other half contain no explanation at all -- whereas the first (and a prominent) French journal to which you submit the same paper referees it and publishes it virtually immediately as the lead article and features it on its cover page, when you publish another lead paper again as a sole author in an IOP journal in which you kill a nine-referees-approved Nature paper and then they sack that journal's editor while attacking you and your paper so that Nature can continue in its role as a holy cow of Elizabeth's geostrategy regardless, when... you don't really exist, other than as a source of marvelous ideas in fundamental sciences (which their own best minds and the entire turgid "ivy league" are incapable of inventing on their own) for one global-terrorist society and a true Empire of Evil that imported you as it imports a piece of raw meet for general consumption -- to process, use and dispose of accordingly. " [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]

Sounds like conspiracy to me. Did you notice that controlled media don't use " conspiracy theory " label any more? the world is changing by minute. Ask Albert Einstein LOL


2." the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), a US Government's own bureau, dragged my patent application for nearly five years, "lost" my filings/amendments half a dozen times, provided wrong instructions at least four times, and so on. Even prior to the theft, the final draft of my PhD thesis "got lost" in none other then -- the US mail, extending my oral defense for more than half a year. Two PhD committees had resigned also, while many other "nuisances" occurred along the way as well. Those obstacles included me being constantly harassed by Canadian & US police, the Canadian SWAT team breaking into my apartment at 4 am with dogs and automatic weapons, US immigration officers pulling guns at me and holding me captive at the US-Canada border while claiming that "on a tip from the Canadian authorities my US Driver's License contained false data", Canadian & US cops pulling me over and searching the vehicle and me more than a hundred times during the last two years of my PhD often at gunpoint with hands up and sometimes twice in a same day, as well as other forms of pressure to leave my studies such as doubling of my tuition in the middle of academic year because -- I got transferred from the Masters to PhD without oral defense (for excellence, what else)... The situation about me has become so curious over that time, that the then director of Graduate Studies in Canada noticed I was some sort of a "trouble magnet". Was I indeed... (And I didn't even mention sudden and life-threatening health issues so curious that any diagnosis was literally impossible except for possibly the deadly poisoning one). " [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com]

Sounds like a case for Amnesty International , violation of human rights , abuse, attempted murder... How do you know his committee members resigned " in disgust " ?! Youre full of shit ( for someone with 150 IQ LOL ) Care to provide a link to their statement? The only information I was able to find on that episode from this horror story is the above quotation ( Dr. O's blog ). theres no way to tell why his commitee members resigned , unless they were threatened as well . Or perhaps they just didn't understand a word of what this genius was saying LOL


Besides, Patent office quoted as the reason for refusal because Gov already patented his PhD idea in its name,a few months after he defended his doctoral : "In the late Fall of 2010, the USPTO has finally admitted that my PhD thesis's main idea is identical to what the US Government had patented soon after my oral exam." You can read it: [link to bosniafordummies.blogspot.com] . so its disputed , moron, as the Gov issued patent 10/863970 to itself -- more precisely: filed 6/8/04 and issued 11/4/04 ( [link to sites.google.com] ) . So it was several months after our good Dr defended his doctoral thesis 11/03, see his thesis title page: [link to sites.google.com] ).
Pretty said to realize our Gov has touched such a low point as to steal ideas from worlds best minds rather than paying a price. But then, they did it to Tesla too,and many other great minds .

Good thing about all this is that our Gov seems to have ran into a tough cooky this time . Tougher than Dr Tesla thats for sure !!! Well ,all comes to an end, so do bloody empires. And thanks God for that.


So theres nothing left of your lies is there... Finally, why do you never address the list of these fine visitors who come get ther info on [link to seismo.info] regularly to make lotsof money on insurance markets but CNN wont tell you about it:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES....
( this list is not final,credit: inventor's blog [link to sites.google.com] )

Are they undeducated, did they not go to ivy league schools , dont they represent cream de la cream of world finances ? ohyeah

Unquote


Shills never take logical answers and always keep pushing their nonsense no one really cares about.

Dr. Omerbashich discovery tells us when devastating earthquakes will NOT happen for sure, which I think is about half a year if not more. No wonder why corporate and financial elite visits his site:


Quote:

WELLS FARGO, NATL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORP, CITICORP, CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, METLIFE, NEWMONT GOLD CO, BANCA FIDAURAM, ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BANCO BRADESCO, INTERAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, CHEVRON CORP, PERSHING CORP, PETROBRAS,BANK OF AMERICA, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO, VISA INTERNATIONL, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP, BROWN BROS HARRIMAN, PICTET CIE, ENI, INTESA SISTEMI, FORRESTER-BRIM,SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO. ,AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, CAMBRIDGE ASSOCAITES.... ( this list is not final,credit: inventor\'s blog [link to sites.google.com] )

Unquote



But I guess its easy once you know how it works. I thinks this should definitely be pinned. Its probably the first GLP pin ever to precede a Nobel
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4425332
United States
12/14/2011 09:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
Newton's Law invalidates Dr. Whoever's Theories.

Earthquake predictions without Time, Date, and
Place are worthless.

sheep
 Quoting: gdwk 1405311


Actually no. Omerbashich tells us when there will be no quakes that collapse buildings and kill us.

when you think about it, it's like the half-full / half-empty glass, type of situation.

Omerbashich is The Beautiful Mind of 21st century.
F=ma

User ID: 1551492
United States
12/14/2011 10:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PIN THIS - explanation of the correlation between SEISMS & ELENIN - WAIT FOR COMING BIG EARTHQUAKES
( Trash out)

 Quoting: F=ma



HA HA its become fun to pick at you.... how many times must people tell you to beat it kid! Omerbashich is a genius and hes from my former country so chill!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4425332





shill

You are incapble of picking on anyone. You are a moron.



Heres an excellent post for haters like you:

-----------


I have a friend lawyer who says it would take her 10 minutes tops to win this case in court. She says the case is straightforward, like injury after slipping on banana peel in the City Hall. Ill take her expert word over your shilling paranoia any time.

As someone already told you, and I asked my friend about it, the Patent office referenced to Government's own patent as the reason why Omerbashich patents were denied. Catch: they protected their patent months after Omerbashich got his doctorate AND did not cite any other preceding work that might have led the Government to "their" discovery. So it's obvious that they pick peoples brains as they go and then keep lying about it, delaying (for amazing 5 years in Omerbashich case) etc.

But it seems your lying rants about genius Dr. Omerbashich committee resigning "in disgust", or about his patents which were obviously stolen by our Government same as Tesla's and others, have been answered properly already by others:
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4425332



More rubbish. How many times must you be told you are an idiot? And, Miller, et al. have a patent that predates his dissertation. And I don't believe you have any friends let alone a lawyer friend.

Patent No 6,898,533 issued May 24, 2005 but filed on July 31, 2000 as patent application 09/629,557

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

Same authors as his disputed patented and same title:

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

In patent application 10/863,970 also titled

Methods for predicting the biological, chemical, and physical properties of molecules from their spectral properties

it says:

Related US Application Data
(60) Division of application No. 09/629,557 filed on Jul 31, 2000 which is a continuation-in-part of application No 09/496,314 filed on Feb 1, 2000, now abandoned.


Which means 10/863,970 is a derivative work of patent No 6,898,533 which was filed before his thesis was available to the public and shows prior investigation into the topic and says in part:

63. A computer-implemented method for predicting a biological activity of a test compound, comprising: obtaining spectral data for the test compound; segmenting the spectral data for the test compound into segmented spectral data for the test compound; and predicting the biological activity of the test compound from the segmented spectral data for the test compound using a spectral data-activity relationship established between segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data and known biological activities for a training set of compounds, wherein the segmented, scaled and weighted spectral data for the training set of compounds is weighted to more heavily weight bins that are associated with the biological activity.

Showing the patent he is complaining about existed prior to his thesis.



You also lie. I never mentioned anything about his committee resigning. More proof of your complete moron status.



Quote.

Hey " 150 IQ " moron, when will that scum Soros realize hes wasting his money on your lies? Lets hear it from the source ( bolds are by me ) :

1. Omerbashich's tantrum about not getting a job

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4425332


Don't care.

2.Omberbashich's tantrum about patent

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4425332


Don't care. Already addressed


idiotic nonsense about web site visitors

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4425332


Already addressed. You are too stupid to realize that anyone from those companies can be visiting the web site. Could be the janitor and anyone who takes that as a formal endorsement is seriously disturbed and needs medication.







You are seriusly deluded and need restraint if you think his garbage is worth a Nobel prize.

Here are the real issues that you are such a fucking lying moron that you are incable of addressing. Tell everyone who reads these posts what are these equations?

In your own words, what do the equations mean?

Where do the equations come from? That is, show the derivation of the equations.

What independent verification have you done for these equations?

How do the equations fit into the earthquake predictions?

In your own words, how do you validate the predictions?

In your own words, how do these equations fit into the resontator model?

That is the only thing that matters and that is the only way you can evaluate his theory. If you do not understand the equations it is impossible to say if his theory is correct.

From 9 May 2011 (the start of his charts; use the scroll bar to go back to May) to 4 November 2011 Omerbashich posts the following dates as “no magnification”.

May 11.5 - 12.5 (1)
May 16.5 - 28.5 (12)
Jun 6.5 - 12.5 (6)
Jul 1.5 - 5.5 (4)
July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
Sept 2.9 (0)
Sept 5.5 (0)
Sept 19.5 - 21.5 (2)
Sept 23.5 - Oct 5.5 (12)
Oct 10 - 12.5 (2)
Oct 20 - 20.5 (0.5)

The number is parenthesis is the number of days in the period. Two I list as 0 because he has the magnification going down to zero for only a brief time. The expectation is then that no magnitude 6+earthquakes happen in those periods. In fact, 10 magnitude 6+ earthquakes occurred in these periods

July 17.5 - 21.5 (4)
PDE-Q 2011 07 19 193543.48 40.08 71.41 20 6.1 MwWCMT 4CM .......
PDE-Q 2011 07 20 220459.32 -10.34 162.01 21 6.0 MwWCMT .FM .......

July 26.5 - 28.5 (2)
PDE-Q 2011 07 26 174420.38 25.10 -109.53 12 6.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Aug 6.5 - 16.5 (10)
PDE-Q 2011 08 04 135134.56 48.83 154.77 36 6.1 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 10 234543.04 -7.04 -12.62 10 6.0 MwWCMT ..M .......
PDE-Q 2011 08 16 110357.70 -2.33 128.00 35 6.1 MwWCMT 3FM .......

Sept 2.9 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 02 134709.64 -28.40 -63.07 577 6.7 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 03 044857.31 -56.45 -26.85 84 6.4 MwWCMT ..M .......

Sept 5.5 (0)
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 095201.13 -15.30 -173.62 37 6.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2011 09 05 175511.22 2.96 97.89 91 6.7 MwWCMT .CM .......

So now compare to the USGS statistical average. The period represents 180 days. The USGS says that there are 150 magnitude 6+ earthquakes per year. So simple math (an equation) says:

150/365*180 = 74

There should be 74 magnitude 6+ earthquakes in that period. A search of the USGS database reveals that there were 73 earthquakes of magnitude 6+ in that period. Yes, 4 of them occurred during his notch periods but a point was made of showing the notches so they must mean something. Earthquakes occurring in the notches must be counted as misses.

So just using simple statistical averages I do better than Omerbashich. Remember, he does not predict dates or locations, only provides time periods.

Why do you shill for Omerbashich?

Last Edited by F=ma on 12/14/2011 10:54 AM
F=ma