How to fix the USA then the World | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24238594 11/17/2012 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | we already have the energy technology. trust me. from cambridge sludge on... its just not legal Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21926154 So make it legal! Not gonna kill revenue at all. Greenies will love it. The entire Lefties will love it. So let the 'free energy' replace the existing power plants but leave the wires/poles as they are now. Now oil/gas production would stop for the USA unless we sold it all to other countries for $$$ - which would easily replace anything lost. So why not?? Sounds like win-win! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24238594 11/17/2012 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| 535 User ID: 1326993 11/17/2012 06:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fools. This cannot and will not be implemented worldwide. Cheap raw materials are required. The entire purpose of first world country based corporations going overseas is to skirt laws which hinder free-enterprise. However, you would succeed into turning many first world countries into third world countries - and vice versa - as these powerful corporations move and eventually corrupt entire nations. The entire system would be untenable the moment such large incentives are given to those that cheat a system such as this. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24238594 11/17/2012 07:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fools. Quoting: 535 1326993 This cannot and will not be implemented worldwide. Cheap raw materials are required. The entire purpose of first world country based corporations going overseas is to skirt laws which hinder free-enterprise. However, you would succeed into turning many first world countries into third world countries - and vice versa - as these powerful corporations move and eventually corrupt entire nations. The entire system would be untenable the moment such large incentives are given to those that cheat a system such as this. Many criticize putting the Glass-Steagall Act back in force saying it would do little. Liars! Clinton repealed it in 1999. By seperating commercial and investment money - only the gamblers would lose their money not the mom-n-pop checking/savings accounts. Bankers fear Glass-Steagall and will downplay how it kept the banking system in check for 65 years. Put that back in and the corrupt banking you have come to know the last 15 years is gone - and WHY?? Because only the investors who choose to gamble risk the losses not everyone elses. Worked for 65 years. Dodd-Frank aint got nothing on Glass-Steagall. Put that back and your concerns are gone, along with everyone elses. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24926363 11/17/2012 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| 535 User ID: 1326993 11/17/2012 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fools. Quoting: 535 1326993 This cannot and will not be implemented worldwide. Cheap raw materials are required. The entire purpose of first world country based corporations going overseas is to skirt laws which hinder free-enterprise. However, you would succeed into turning many first world countries into third world countries - and vice versa - as these powerful corporations move and eventually corrupt entire nations. The entire system would be untenable the moment such large incentives are given to those that cheat a system such as this. Many criticize putting the Glass-Steagall Act back in force saying it would do little. Liars! Clinton repealed it in 1999. By seperating commercial and investment money - only the gamblers would lose their money not the mom-n-pop checking/savings accounts. Bankers fear Glass-Steagall and will downplay how it kept the banking system in check for 65 years. Put that back in and the corrupt banking you have come to know the last 15 years is gone - and WHY?? Because only the investors who choose to gamble risk the losses not everyone elses. Worked for 65 years. Dodd-Frank aint got nothing on Glass-Steagall. Put that back and your concerns are gone, along with everyone elses. That is an American "solution". |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24238594 11/17/2012 08:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fools. Quoting: 535 1326993 This cannot and will not be implemented worldwide. Cheap raw materials are required. The entire purpose of first world country based corporations going overseas is to skirt laws which hinder free-enterprise. However, you would succeed into turning many first world countries into third world countries - and vice versa - as these powerful corporations move and eventually corrupt entire nations. The entire system would be untenable the moment such large incentives are given to those that cheat a system such as this. Many criticize putting the Glass-Steagall Act back in force saying it would do little. Liars! Clinton repealed it in 1999. By seperating commercial and investment money - only the gamblers would lose their money not the mom-n-pop checking/savings accounts. Bankers fear Glass-Steagall and will downplay how it kept the banking system in check for 65 years. Put that back in and the corrupt banking you have come to know the last 15 years is gone - and WHY?? Because only the investors who choose to gamble risk the losses not everyone elses. Worked for 65 years. Dodd-Frank aint got nothing on Glass-Steagall. Put that back and your concerns are gone, along with everyone elses. That is an American "solution". With the USA banking system under control, and the other elements presented, stability would result. With stability, other countries if they were smart would adopt the successful implimentation of the suggestions here. Since I am in the USA, I address our problems first. Then when proven successful it is up to other countries to push for similar adoption. Not promoting a world dictator here! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24238594 11/17/2012 08:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | First get rid of the tainted DNA bloodlines running the world.. Redistribute all their property and funds.. The rest will fall into place without the criminals running the show.. Nothing short of that can or will work.. Jealousy gets us nowhere. Honestly. Before the progressives destroyed the USA, if you had an issue with someone you met face to face 50 feet apart and whoever drew their gun faster usually won the argument. Today you are labeled a domestic terrorist. Still, if you are that angry and would prefer not to take the high road then as usual you are on your own. Nothing stopping you from doing something about it either. Sounds personal. Compromise means nobody gets everything they want, but do get some of what they want, though nobody has total power over the other. |