Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,311 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 421,106
Pageviews Today: 574,491Threads Today: 125Posts Today: 2,939
06:37 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA

 
citizenperth (OP)
FUKUSHIMA, GLPTARD 24/7/365

User ID: 13600040
Australia
04/15/2012 06:52 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


Well we will never know won't we since LNT is merely theory.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


If it's just a theory why are people proclaiming any exposure to any form of ionizing radiation is a threat?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


any form of irradiation is harmful.

What is q cover-up. is simply because it was always harmful... you know it, I know it .. they know it... so wherein is the question...

we have deadly shit daily over the planet... SIMPLE....

and i go to bed hating anyone that denies it....
 Quoting: citizenperth


Sorry, but you a clearly speaking bullshit.

"Any form of irradiation is harmful"

REALLY. When was the last time you ate a banana? Or flew across the country on a plane?

[link to xkcd.com]
 Quoting: I live in Perth. 14438657


so technically you agree then.... bananas are irradiated... and flying in high altitudes also causes irradiation..... you sound confused..... please correct me then
It's life as we know it, but only just.
My Fukushima Site:
[link to citizenperth.wordpress.com]
sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie

GLP's best Fuku thread: Thread: *** Fukushima *** and other nuclear-----updates and links
twitter: @citizenperth
“If I had an hour to solve a problem and my life depended on it, I would use the first 55 minutes determining the proper question to ask, for once I knew the proper question, I could solve the problem in less than five minutes.”
- Albert Einstein
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1830162
Germany
04/15/2012 06:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
Yes, it's game over for sure. I say good riddance to bad fucking rubbish. It' not like there's any point to mankind anymore. Everything great and good (and bad depending on how you view history) was achieved when the world was still unchartered and interesting. All we can do now is sit in our little corner and watch it burn.
Men can no longer be men and go out and adventure and conquer. The stock exchange, banks, malls and television are all there is and this leaves very little for us 'old souls'.
Fukushima was what we needed...a protracted yet final solution to the two legged roach problem. If you think god is going to save your ass you're in for a bit of a shock.
Fuck yeah!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14357108
Germany
04/15/2012 06:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
putin

I hate to read this bullshit. Has someone asked him-/herself why people are able to live in Nagasaki (400,000+ residents) and Hiroshima 1,100,000+ residents)? Has someone wondered why there are still survivors alive from the tschernobyl disaster? Don't be foolish. You obviously believe in a lie, if you are scared about fukushima.

so I call bsflag because of shameless fearmongering.
I live in Perth.
User ID: 14438657
Australia
04/15/2012 06:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


If it's just a theory why are people proclaiming any exposure to any form of ionizing radiation is a threat?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


any form of irradiation is harmful.

What is q cover-up. is simply because it was always harmful... you know it, I know it .. they know it... so wherein is the question...

we have deadly shit daily over the planet... SIMPLE....

and i go to bed hating anyone that denies it....
 Quoting: citizenperth


Sorry, but you a clearly speaking bullshit.

"Any form of irradiation is harmful"

REALLY. When was the last time you ate a banana? Or flew across the country on a plane?

[link to xkcd.com]
 Quoting: I live in Perth. 14438657


so technically you agree then.... bananas are irradiated... and flying in high altitudes also causes irradiation..... you sound confused..... please correct me then
 Quoting: citizenperth


Wow. First it's 6.51pm in Perth WA at the moment, so i don't think you are going to bed.

As for bananas and radiation? They contain potassium-40 AND IT'S Natural.(:

Going bananas over radiation
[link to wattsupwiththat.com]

AS for flying at high altitudes in a plane and being exposed to radiation?, perhaps do some research on your own.

It's obvious you are a bit lacking.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12785878
United States
04/15/2012 07:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
sobering.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14357108
Germany
04/15/2012 07:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
BTW: Ukrainians are not extinct (yet). Think about it, scaredy-cats.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12807134
United States
04/15/2012 07:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
putin

I hate to read this bullshit. Has someone asked him-/herself why people are able to live in Nagasaki (400,000+ residents) and Hiroshima 1,100,000+ residents)? Has someone wondered why there are still survivors alive from the tschernobyl disaster? Don't be foolish. You obviously believe in a lie, if you are scared about fukushima.

so I call bsflag because of shameless fearmongering.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14357108


wow ... well then you take your family and fucking move there.
This will not end well.
Within 10 years 90% of the population will have some sort of cancer.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14438657
Australia
04/15/2012 07:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
putin

I hate to read this bullshit. Has someone asked him-/herself why people are able to live in Nagasaki (400,000+ residents) and Hiroshima 1,100,000+ residents)? Has someone wondered why there are still survivors alive from the tschernobyl disaster? Don't be foolish. You obviously believe in a lie, if you are scared about fukushima.

so I call bsflag because of shameless fearmongering.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14357108


wow ... well then you take your family and fucking move there.
This will not end well.
Within 10 years 90% of the population will have some sort of cancer.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12807134


90% of the population will get cancer?

You are pulling this crap from your backside. Based on what level of exposure?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14357108
Germany
04/15/2012 07:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
putin

I hate to read this bullshit. Has someone asked him-/herself why people are able to live in Nagasaki (400,000+ residents) and Hiroshima 1,100,000+ residents)? Has someone wondered why there are still survivors alive from the tschernobyl disaster? Don't be foolish. You obviously believe in a lie, if you are scared about fukushima.

so I call bsflag because of shameless fearmongering.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14357108


wow ... well then you take your family and fucking move there.
This will not end well.
Within 10 years 90% of the population will have some sort of cancer.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12807134


weirdo
On whose say-so??
cruise
I live in Perth.
User ID: 14438657
Australia
04/15/2012 07:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
One for the Op the mull over.


It’s Time to Tell the Truth About the Health Benefits of Low-Dose Radiation

by James Muckerheide

Low-dose radiation is documented to be beneficial for human health but, for political reasons, radiation is assumed to be harmful at any dose. Radiation-protection scientists, and others, who cover up the data that contradict present policy should be investigated for misconduct.

Low-dose radiation has been shown to enhance biological responses for immune systems, enzymatic repair, physiological functions, and the removal of cellular damage, including prevention and removal of cancers and other diseases. Research on low-level radiation has also shown it to have no adverse effects. Yet, current radiation protection policy and practice fail to consider these valid data, instead relying on data that are poor, ambiguous, misrepresented, and manipulated.

With no regard for the cost to scientific truth, and to taxpayers, radiation policy is based on the linear no-threshold (LNT) concept, that holds that radiation at any levels above zero is deleterious. In the LNT view, the known damaging effects of high-dose radiation are linearly extrapolated down the dose scale. LNT contradicts the scientific evidence, which shows that there is a radiation threshold, below which there is no harm and, in fact, there is benefit for human health, a process known as hormesis. In defiance of this evidence, radiation-protection policy relies on falsification of the actual science research and reporting. Such malfeasance warrants scientific misconduct investigations for the results promulgated by some radiation protection-funded scientists.

[link to www.21stcenturysciencetech.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1527598
Netherlands
04/15/2012 07:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


Well we will never know won't we since LNT is merely theory.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


If it's just a theory why are people proclaiming any exposure to any form of ionizing radiation is a threat?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


any form of irradiation is harmful.

What is q cover-up. is simply because it was always harmful... you know it, I know it .. they know it... so wherein is the question...

we have deadly shit daily over the planet... SIMPLE....

and i go to bed hating anyone that denies it....
 Quoting: citizenperth


Sorry, but you a clearly speaking bullshit.

"Any form of irradiation is harmful"

REALLY. When was the last time you ate a banana? Or flew across the country on a plane?

[link to xkcd.com]
 Quoting: I live in Perth. 14438657


Please don't insult my intelligence by throwing in the banana argument.
Frequent flying gives you indeed a higher risk of getting cancer. So do X-rays at your dentist or in hospital.
Since we are on unknown territory here we simply don't know the long term effects of Fukushima.

We do however know the relatively long term effects of Chernobyl and these are still grim up to this day.

Since Fukushima is far worse than Chernobyl, Chernobyl didn't had MOX fuel and was covered with concrete and boron acid relatively quick, we can only assume that we are in deep trouble.

So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14438657
Australia
04/15/2012 07:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


If it's just a theory why are people proclaiming any exposure to any form of ionizing radiation is a threat?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


any form of irradiation is harmful.

What is q cover-up. is simply because it was always harmful... you know it, I know it .. they know it... so wherein is the question...

we have deadly shit daily over the planet... SIMPLE....

and i go to bed hating anyone that denies it....
 Quoting: citizenperth


Sorry, but you a clearly speaking bullshit.

"Any form of irradiation is harmful"

REALLY. When was the last time you ate a banana? Or flew across the country on a plane?

[link to xkcd.com]
 Quoting: I live in Perth. 14438657


Please don't insult my intelligence by throwing in the banana argument.
Frequent flying gives you indeed a higher risk of getting cancer. So do X-rays at your dentist or in hospital.
Since we are on unknown territory here we simply don't know the long term effects of Fukushima.

We do however know the relatively long term effects of Chernobyl and these are still grim up to this day.

Since Fukushima is far worse than Chernobyl, Chernobyl didn't had MOX fuel and was covered with concrete and boron acid relatively quick, we can only assume that we are in deep trouble.

So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


Ahh no, we can downplay the fear mongering simply based a exposure levels across the world. It would take an incredible amount of exposure over and above natural background radiation levels for a start to even contemplate the disaster scenarios such as the OP is suggesting.

As for the long term effects of Chernobyl, Greenpeace were preeminent in trying to scare the world in trying to blame any cancer link to the disaster. I'll follow up shortly. It in incorporates "So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie" into this line of thinking.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14357108
Germany
04/15/2012 07:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


If it's just a theory why are people proclaiming any exposure to any form of ionizing radiation is a threat?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


any form of irradiation is harmful.

What is q cover-up. is simply because it was always harmful... you know it, I know it .. they know it... so wherein is the question...

we have deadly shit daily over the planet... SIMPLE....

and i go to bed hating anyone that denies it....
 Quoting: citizenperth


Sorry, but you a clearly speaking bullshit.

"Any form of irradiation is harmful"

REALLY. When was the last time you ate a banana? Or flew across the country on a plane?

[link to xkcd.com]
 Quoting: I live in Perth. 14438657


Please don't insult my intelligence by throwing in the banana argument.
Frequent flying gives you indeed a higher risk of getting cancer. So do X-rays at your dentist or in hospital.
Since we are on unknown territory here we simply don't know the long term effects of Fukushima.

We do however know the relatively long term effects of Chernobyl and these are still grim up to this day.

Since Fukushima is far worse than Chernobyl, Chernobyl didn't had MOX fuel and was covered with concrete and boron acid relatively quick, we can only assume that we are in deep trouble.

So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


What kind of history are you talking about? This kind, that was written by Americans, to make Russians look like fools? And when in history were a meltdown of MOX fuel? Do you think, an atomic bomb is more safe than this kind of fuel?
Please don't misunterstand: I don't want to harm your comfortable and "healthy" way of live powered by fear. But in my opinion, there is nothing more harmfull for a human life than fear.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1527598
Netherlands
04/15/2012 07:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


any form of irradiation is harmful.

What is q cover-up. is simply because it was always harmful... you know it, I know it .. they know it... so wherein is the question...

we have deadly shit daily over the planet... SIMPLE....

and i go to bed hating anyone that denies it....
 Quoting: citizenperth


Sorry, but you a clearly speaking bullshit.

"Any form of irradiation is harmful"

REALLY. When was the last time you ate a banana? Or flew across the country on a plane?

[link to xkcd.com]
 Quoting: I live in Perth. 14438657


Please don't insult my intelligence by throwing in the banana argument.
Frequent flying gives you indeed a higher risk of getting cancer. So do X-rays at your dentist or in hospital.
Since we are on unknown territory here we simply don't know the long term effects of Fukushima.

We do however know the relatively long term effects of Chernobyl and these are still grim up to this day.

Since Fukushima is far worse than Chernobyl, Chernobyl didn't had MOX fuel and was covered with concrete and boron acid relatively quick, we can only assume that we are in deep trouble.

So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


Ahh no, we can downplay the fear mongering simply based a exposure levels across the world. It would take an incredible amount of exposure over and above natural background radiation levels for a start to even contemplate the disaster scenarios such as the OP is suggesting.

As for the long term effects of Chernobyl, Greenpeace were preeminent in trying to scare the world in trying to blame any cancer link to the disaster. I'll follow up shortly. It in incorporates "So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie" into this line of thinking.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


Yet it only takes 5 millisieverts for nuclear plant workers to get cancer. And we also so know that there is a higher cancer rate amongst these workers. And this is while they are operated in 'safe' mode.

You should know that we are not only talking about radiation. We are talking about MOX , plutonium into our food chain ending up in our body.

This is far more serious than you and the MSM would want us to believe.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1527598
Netherlands
04/15/2012 07:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


any form of irradiation is harmful.

What is q cover-up. is simply because it was always harmful... you know it, I know it .. they know it... so wherein is the question...

we have deadly shit daily over the planet... SIMPLE....

and i go to bed hating anyone that denies it....
 Quoting: citizenperth


Sorry, but you a clearly speaking bullshit.

"Any form of irradiation is harmful"

REALLY. When was the last time you ate a banana? Or flew across the country on a plane?

[link to xkcd.com]
 Quoting: I live in Perth. 14438657


Please don't insult my intelligence by throwing in the banana argument.
Frequent flying gives you indeed a higher risk of getting cancer. So do X-rays at your dentist or in hospital.
Since we are on unknown territory here we simply don't know the long term effects of Fukushima.

We do however know the relatively long term effects of Chernobyl and these are still grim up to this day.

Since Fukushima is far worse than Chernobyl, Chernobyl didn't had MOX fuel and was covered with concrete and boron acid relatively quick, we can only assume that we are in deep trouble.

So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


What kind of history are you talking about? This kind, that was written by Americans, to make Russians look like fools? And when in history were a meltdown of MOX fuel? Do you think, an atomic bomb is more safe than this kind of fuel?
Please don't misunterstand: I don't want to harm your comfortable and "healthy" way of live powered by fear. But in my opinion, there is nothing more harmfull for a human life than fear.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14357108


No fear here, this is all just part of our learning curve as a species. Atomic weapons are pinuts compared to a nuclear power plant out of control for more than a year now.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14438657
Australia
04/15/2012 07:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


Sorry, but you a clearly speaking bullshit.

"Any form of irradiation is harmful"

REALLY. When was the last time you ate a banana? Or flew across the country on a plane?

[link to xkcd.com]
 Quoting: I live in Perth. 14438657


Please don't insult my intelligence by throwing in the banana argument.
Frequent flying gives you indeed a higher risk of getting cancer. So do X-rays at your dentist or in hospital.
Since we are on unknown territory here we simply don't know the long term effects of Fukushima.

We do however know the relatively long term effects of Chernobyl and these are still grim up to this day.

Since Fukushima is far worse than Chernobyl, Chernobyl didn't had MOX fuel and was covered with concrete and boron acid relatively quick, we can only assume that we are in deep trouble.

So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


Ahh no, we can downplay the fear mongering simply based a exposure levels across the world. It would take an incredible amount of exposure over and above natural background radiation levels for a start to even contemplate the disaster scenarios such as the OP is suggesting.

As for the long term effects of Chernobyl, Greenpeace were preeminent in trying to scare the world in trying to blame any cancer link to the disaster. I'll follow up shortly. It in incorporates "So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie" into this line of thinking.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


Yet it only takes 5 millisieverts for nuclear plant workers to get cancer. And we also so know that there is a higher cancer rate amongst these workers. And this is while they are operated in 'safe' mode.

You should know that we are not only talking about radiation. We are talking about MOX , plutonium into our food chain ending up in our body.

This is far more serious than you and the MSM would want us to believe.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


"Yet it only takes 5 millisieverts for nuclear plant workers to get cancer."

What! Over what time frame?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7242673
United Kingdom
04/15/2012 07:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
The comparison to chest x-rays and flying high in the atmosphere is just fucking stupid. You're not inhaling hot particles into your body like with fukushima radiation.. once they get into your body that is where they will stay, constantly irradiating your body until you die.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1527598
Netherlands
04/15/2012 07:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


Please don't insult my intelligence by throwing in the banana argument.
Frequent flying gives you indeed a higher risk of getting cancer. So do X-rays at your dentist or in hospital.
Since we are on unknown territory here we simply don't know the long term effects of Fukushima.

We do however know the relatively long term effects of Chernobyl and these are still grim up to this day.

Since Fukushima is far worse than Chernobyl, Chernobyl didn't had MOX fuel and was covered with concrete and boron acid relatively quick, we can only assume that we are in deep trouble.

So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


Ahh no, we can downplay the fear mongering simply based a exposure levels across the world. It would take an incredible amount of exposure over and above natural background radiation levels for a start to even contemplate the disaster scenarios such as the OP is suggesting.

As for the long term effects of Chernobyl, Greenpeace were preeminent in trying to scare the world in trying to blame any cancer link to the disaster. I'll follow up shortly. It in incorporates "So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie" into this line of thinking.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


Yet it only takes 5 millisieverts for nuclear plant workers to get cancer. And we also so know that there is a higher cancer rate amongst these workers. And this is while they are operated in 'safe' mode.

You should know that we are not only talking about radiation. We are talking about MOX , plutonium into our food chain ending up in our body.

This is far more serious than you and the MSM would want us to believe.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


"Yet it only takes 5 millisieverts for nuclear plant workers to get cancer."

What! Over what time frame?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


per year that is.
I live in Perth.
User ID: 14438657
Australia
04/15/2012 07:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
The comparison to chest x-rays and flying high in the atmosphere is just fucking stupid. You're not inhaling hot particles into your body like with fukushima radiation.. once they get into your body that is where they will stay, constantly irradiating your body until you die.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7242673


Correction, you are stupid. You have to be close enough to the output to ingest the particles, let alone worry about being in the USA or across the world to be in a position of harm. Again, it relates to the DOSE and the particle and it's dose at the time of ingestion. So let's talk numbers. Go ahead.

People that live in places of the world with high background radiation levels such as places in Brazil, France or Iran live with the dose each year. People that live in the Rocky mountains could ingest Granite dust into their lungs and body.

But will they die?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14438657
Australia
04/15/2012 07:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


Ahh no, we can downplay the fear mongering simply based a exposure levels across the world. It would take an incredible amount of exposure over and above natural background radiation levels for a start to even contemplate the disaster scenarios such as the OP is suggesting.

As for the long term effects of Chernobyl, Greenpeace were preeminent in trying to scare the world in trying to blame any cancer link to the disaster. I'll follow up shortly. It in incorporates "So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie" into this line of thinking.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


Yet it only takes 5 millisieverts for nuclear plant workers to get cancer. And we also so know that there is a higher cancer rate amongst these workers. And this is while they are operated in 'safe' mode.

You should know that we are not only talking about radiation. We are talking about MOX , plutonium into our food chain ending up in our body.

This is far more serious than you and the MSM would want us to believe.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


"Yet it only takes 5 millisieverts for nuclear plant workers to get cancer."

What! Over what time frame?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


per year that is.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


5 millisieverts per year?

Correction, try from about 30 to 50 millisieverts over the course of ONE YEAR before any harm is caused.

Where are you getting your information from. Greenpeace, the World Wildlife Fund or related affiliates?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1527598
Netherlands
04/15/2012 07:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
The comparison to chest x-rays and flying high in the atmosphere is just fucking stupid. You're not inhaling hot particles into your body like with fukushima radiation.. once they get into your body that is where they will stay, constantly irradiating your body until you die.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7242673


Correction, you are stupid. You have to be close enough to the output to ingest the particles, let alone worry about being in the USA or across the world to be in a position of harm. Again, it relates to the DOSE and the particle and it's dose at the time of ingestion. So let's talk numbers. Go ahead.

People that live in places of the world with high background radiation levels such as places in Brazil, France or Iran live with the dose each year. People that live in the Rocky mountains could ingest Granite dust into their lungs and body.

But will they die?
 Quoting: I live in Perth. 14438657


Well mister number man care to explain why British cattle could not graze outside before 2010? When British soil was finally free of caesium-137 after 24 years after chernobyl?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3114225
United States
04/15/2012 07:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
I live on the east coast of America on cape cod . I can break out my radiation detector during rain storms and get elevated readings to this day . Radiation is cumilative and will continue to build up until they plug these reactors . I said this after the meltdown started and will repeat my thoughts on this matter once again .

You will never get the truth out of the powers that be but this is a small and probably underestimated glimpse . The radiation has been being spread via the normal wind patterns all across the northern hemispheres grain belts and poured into the ocean at devastating rates . This will effect life for thousands of years to come and on a human scale into the hundreds of millions dead do to cancers from ingesting radiation thru the various food chains .


On a more positive note Christ will be returning shortly to right all wrongs and none of this really matters .
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1527598
Netherlands
04/15/2012 07:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


Yet it only takes 5 millisieverts for nuclear plant workers to get cancer. And we also so know that there is a higher cancer rate amongst these workers. And this is while they are operated in 'safe' mode.

You should know that we are not only talking about radiation. We are talking about MOX , plutonium into our food chain ending up in our body.

This is far more serious than you and the MSM would want us to believe.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


"Yet it only takes 5 millisieverts for nuclear plant workers to get cancer."

What! Over what time frame?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


per year that is.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


5 millisieverts per year?

Correction, try from about 30 to 50 millisieverts over the course of ONE YEAR before any harm is caused.

Where are you getting your information from. Greenpeace, the World Wildlife Fund or related affiliates?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


No from the Japanese Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry statistics.
citizenperth (OP)
FUKUSHIMA, GLPTARD 24/7/365

User ID: 13600040
Australia
04/15/2012 08:01 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
The comparison to chest x-rays and flying high in the atmosphere is just fucking stupid. You're not inhaling hot particles into your body like with fukushima radiation.. once they get into your body that is where they will stay, constantly irradiating your body until you die.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7242673


Correction, you are stupid. You have to be close enough to the output to ingest the particles, let alone worry about being in the USA or across the world to be in a position of harm. Again, it relates to the DOSE and the particle and it's dose at the time of ingestion. So let's talk numbers. Go ahead.

People that live in places of the world with high background radiation levels such as places in Brazil, France or Iran live with the dose each year. People that live in the Rocky mountains could ingest Granite dust into their lungs and body.

But will they die?
 Quoting: I live in Perth. 14438657


i beg to differ.. a hot particle is a hot particle. it is as random as anything else that floats through the air... if you think otherwise... well..

Last Edited by Citizenperth on 04/15/2012 08:01 AM
It's life as we know it, but only just.
My Fukushima Site:
[link to citizenperth.wordpress.com]
sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie

GLP's best Fuku thread: Thread: *** Fukushima *** and other nuclear-----updates and links
twitter: @citizenperth
“If I had an hour to solve a problem and my life depended on it, I would use the first 55 minutes determining the proper question to ask, for once I knew the proper question, I could solve the problem in less than five minutes.”
- Albert Einstein
MoonChildChazz

User ID: 13008507
United States
04/15/2012 08:16 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
Hemp leaching will filter much fast

Tricone oil cures cancers
Chazz
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14438657
Australia
04/15/2012 08:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


"Yet it only takes 5 millisieverts for nuclear plant workers to get cancer."

What! Over what time frame?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


per year that is.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


5 millisieverts per year?

Correction, try from about 30 to 50 millisieverts over the course of ONE YEAR before any harm is caused.

Where are you getting your information from. Greenpeace, the World Wildlife Fund or related affiliates?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


No from the Japanese Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry statistics.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


Got a link.

The maximum allowable exposure for U.S. and Japan radiation workers is 50 mSv per year.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1527598
Netherlands
04/15/2012 08:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
Hemp leaching will filter much fast

Tricone oil cures cancers
 Quoting: MoonChildChazz


That's why it is illegal even in Holland.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1527598
Netherlands
04/15/2012 08:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
...


per year that is.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


5 millisieverts per year?

Correction, try from about 30 to 50 millisieverts over the course of ONE YEAR before any harm is caused.

Where are you getting your information from. Greenpeace, the World Wildlife Fund or related affiliates?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657


No from the Japanese Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry statistics.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1527598


Got a link.

The maximum allowable exposure for U.S. and Japan radiation workers is 50 mSv per year.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14438657

[link to enenews.com]
I live in Perth.
User ID: 14438657
Australia
04/15/2012 08:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
The comparison to chest x-rays and flying high in the atmosphere is just fucking stupid. You're not inhaling hot particles into your body like with fukushima radiation.. once they get into your body that is where they will stay, constantly irradiating your body until you die.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7242673


Correction, you are stupid. You have to be close enough to the output to ingest the particles, let alone worry about being in the USA or across the world to be in a position of harm. Again, it relates to the DOSE and the particle and it's dose at the time of ingestion. So let's talk numbers. Go ahead.

People that live in places of the world with high background radiation levels such as places in Brazil, France or Iran live with the dose each year. People that live in the Rocky mountains could ingest Granite dust into their lungs and body.

But will they die?
 Quoting: I live in Perth. 14438657


i beg to differ.. a hot particle is a hot particle. it is as random as anything else that floats through the air... if you think otherwise... well..
 Quoting: citizenperth


Going of your logic above and all your previous post above that, you should be advocating a ban on banana consumption. You think ALL radiation exposure is a threat. Did you forget what you posted?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13974494
United States
04/15/2012 08:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA
whateverbsflag

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob