Calling Ron Paul a libertarian as a means of explaining his unelectability is ridiculous.

Ron Paul and Ron Reagan were friends and shared many of the same ideas and beliefs, right up until R. Reagan got sworn in as president. Heck, some of the things Ron Reagan was best known for (cutting taxes) were directly related to his own libertarian beliefs.

I know we could do worse with another Reagan, if RP followed suit and presided as Reagan did instead of as how his record (of 20+) years in congress suggests.

The tea party arm of the republican party won in 2010, not the neo-cons. Why is it that the neo-con part of the party seems to think they should get to choose the presidental candidate in 2012? Whomever they choose, other than Ron Paul, will face losing as most of the tea-party supporters will just stay home, or vote 3rd party, as they did in 2008.

Ron Paul is only unelectable as long as the media labels him that way. The other candidates are unelectable due to the tea-party anger over being rejected once again and because of their neo-con positions.

~Chills