The "fit" in the Atlantic is the easy part for Earth Expansion Theory. It is the Pacific that causes the greater difficulty. There have been about 24 small earth recreations, and it is worthwhile analyzing what they do and don't agree on. I don't know anywhere this has been done and thus did so in Article 9 at [link to eearthk.com]
That article shows the inconsistencies and also shows how a past "Impact" was a cause and left its clearly visible footprints (unrecognized, before). Article 2 shows how anyone can physically recreate the Atlantic fit on a moveable globe showing continental movement can be Vertical and not Horizontal. Article 8 shows that the Moon orbits far different than we all were taught, and the teaching never gets corrected. So for those who want to laugh about Flatearthers (that likely never really were significant), they can wonder why they are so ill educated about our own continually visible Moon