Mid Atlantic Ridge - Expanding Earth - Thoughts and Theories

And this was taught by initiates throughout the ages. Rudolf Steiner as well describes the moon as having separated from the earth at some point. I think this is called "syzygy" in astronomy but I may be wrong. You have to visualize an old "earth" body (before the moon was separate from it) as being less dense than earth today, and very slowly (you could compare it to an amoeba I suppose), the moon kind of "budding off" until it took up a fixed orbit around our planet. I don't think we would have to think of this as a "catastrophy" either, it woujd have taken ages.

does anyone remember, during the beginning of the GOM disaster, a poster was here, who explained to us how the warming effect, of Earth, could cause a new Ice Age?

There is an asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter which is supposed to be the debris of a once planetary body.

God damn this video is bogus as hell. It does not take into account all of the land mass under the oceans and seas. This video is complete and utter bullshit. Anyone that believes it is a moron.

Spot ON!!!

It is debri of something, it never got fully formed, the collison that created the moon happened in the beginning stages of planetary formation, whatever happeded to cause the forming oxy/hydro giant to spiral into earths orbit I have yet to look into.

But in any case, both equations and some mysteries are solved by this scenario, Earths water, the creation of the moon, the missing planeary body between mars and Jupitor.

this! ^^^
not saying expanding earth theory is bunk, but I dont see what was wrong with the old theory. The earth can't be growing that much, because then it would stall as the core began to run out of material. There is a balance needed. And how many billions of years old is the earth? Granted we do get minute amounts of new material every year that has to go into the mix from outerspace, but that light dusting would not cause the earth to double in size. We have long known how this works: new material at one point, and at another point old material working its way back to the core. The ultimate and original recycling program. It is a beautiful system, and it works. Expanding earth theory has holes in it, and is just a theory.

you call it an old theory, but it hasn't even been accepted mainstream science for 100 years yet

what IF they were wrong?

Mars lost its atmosphere because it has too little gravity to hold it. The earth grows according to current estimates, about 40,000 tons of extraterrestrial matter hit the Earth every year.

Read more: [link to www.universetoday.com]

[link to earthexpansion.blogspot.co.uk]

[link to www.platetectonicsbiglie.blogspot.co.uk]

I hope this helps someone....but if the Earth is expanding surely that would just mean that the Oceans will become shallower?

Unfortunately this figure of 250 million years is a lie propagated by the high priests of the cult of Plate Tectonics.
I say cult because once evidence is suppressed and ignored and arguments are based on little more than faith and obedience to the prevailing dogma then we are no longer in the realm of science.

New research and theories have been ignored and suppressed ever since Plate Tectonics was conceived in the 1960's, to the point where scientists that wish to get alternative theories published have been forced to create their own publication;

New concepts in global tectonics newsletter [link to www.ncgt.org]

For theories of Earth Expansion, Contraction, Wrench and Surge tectonics, True Polar Wander and much else besides I highly recommend it because unfortunately there is simply nowhere else where you'll find all of this information.

yes, but 40,000 tons is too small an amount to account for several inches in circumference expansion per year. That amount would "weigh" considerably more. It figures out to around 7,875 Billion tons per year. This added mass would ultimately be in the form of hydrogen, but much of that could remain locked in a solid metallic hydrogen core, and all the calculations show that if hydrogen were to "appear" in the core (created from neutrinos), then it would form a solid metallic mass which by coincidence would have a similar density to iron.

But the conversion of neutrinos into hydrogen explains that amount of gain in mass very well.

The posts in this thread are 90% shills, and that is because this is a fundamental piece of the structure of lies that TPTB depend on to keep people corralled the way they have for several hundred years now.

My previous post on the last page explains that, but here is another interesting page that speaks more of the long and highly financed conspiracy throughout modern history, in order to keep secret the true source of hydrocarbons on earth. [link to eearthk.com]

Last Edited by ehecatl on 10/28/2012 01:13 PM

What happens in fusion or fission reactions or even through heating or cooling of molecules?

Exactly, new substances are formed and then decompose. Think of it as breathing more than growing.

This conspiracy, the conspiracy to deny the Expanding Earth knowledge and evidence, and the great world-wide effort to fund it, has been the pet project of the Rockefeller's going back for over a hundred years now, of fairly continuous manipulation of academia.

Bingo!

We have a winner.

There is a tremendous amount of cosmic energy hitting the planet continuously in addition to the ups and downs of crossing the energy radiating from the accretion disk of the galaxy. A small change for the Earth is a huge change for it's inhabitants (i.e. biosphere).

Yes... EVERYTHING grows... crystals grow, plants grow, etc. etc. etc.

thanks for that -interesting

E = Mc squared.

no reason it would not work BOTH WAYS.

The dinosaurs were so big because there was a much higher concentration of oxygen in the atmosphere back then !


high enough to support their weight ???

the same way that whales are supported by the ocean ???

Neutrinos are very difficult to detect, but only half go out one side of the earth, that come in from the other side.

I don't think this is correct. The dinosaurs were too big if gravity was the same. The Earth expanded by gaining more mass and therefore increasing gravity.

Hell, somebody calculated that something like 10,000 tons of space dust and rocks hits the atmosphere every day. Multiply that by a few billion years.

This

Of course, it must work both ways. Matter and energy are interchangeable.

Throughout the last hundred years there has been a strong effort to hide the fact that petroleum is abiotic, not from living origins, and furthermore it was apparent to geologists even a hundred years ago, and that the earth was expanding and that petroleum is self replenishing to a great extent.

Nicola Tesla explained elegantly and perfectly how this is happening, and got ignored of course, and although he did not coin the word "neutrino", which happened decades later, nicely separated from the issue of self renewing petroleum, he did describe the process accurately.

That effort is in the form not only threats to withhold Rockefeller academic grants that suggest expanding earth and abiotic oil, but obviously money spent constantly over the decades on those goals as well.

You will notice that most of the posts on this thread of those who are either trying to deny expanding earth with empty arguments, or who are struggling furiously to deny that neutrinos could be turning into hydrogen, and thus expanding the circumference of the earth by around an inch per year and and in that extra inch slice of earth thereby gaining the planet about 8000 billion tons (of hydrogen), per year,

you will notice that all these shills and disinfo agents are not the regular GLP posters, but at most are only regular GLP shill posters.

(diary of a paid shill)
[link to fromthetrenchesworldreport.com]

Last Edited by ehecatl on 10/28/2012 06:39 PM

An expanding earth theory would require a tremendous addition to the earth's mass in order to work. I don't see it.

Wouldn't it be better to say that mass within the earth & its crust doesn't grow, but merely shifts? If the entire mass of the earth was disturbed in the recent past, there would be unconformities left within it. These would be lead to following mass shifts within the earth over the years as the planet seeks to equalize the mass to the lowest gravitational point.

No, sorry shill bot.

I know your directors REAAALLLY want you to explain this away. Remember it is only an inch or two of added circumference per year. Why does that seem so "tremendous"?

It is in fact explainable when one considers the quantity of neutrinos that are entering one side and not coming out the other side. The hydrogen would be created rather uniformly within the interior of the planet, with greater production taking place within the core, where the hydrogen would remain trapped in solid metallic form.

As I understand it various things happen to the hydrogen that gets produced. Most gets locked into a solid metallic hydrogen core. That hydrogen which does not get incorporated into the solid core precipitates upwards and sometimes meets up with carbon, to produce hydrocarbons, and sometimes meets up with oxygen, to produce water, and ect ect, many compounds are formed.

I don't personally understand the physics involved in neutrinos becomming hydrogen, but other obviously do.

You might wonder why I have so much confidence in Expanding Earth theory, which involves the production of hydrogen.

My adoptive father in the US is a senior director and geologist for USGS. As far back as the 70's he would explain to me this whole conspiracy which is set up to promote ideas contrary to scientific facts, scientific facts which he and his colleagues know to be undeniable truths. He is a very pragmatic no bullshit person, and combined with my personal knowledge I have no problem believing that neutrinos can become hydrogen, and that petroleum reserves are self-renewing.

I also had a good friend who was a private geologist for the oil industry in the 1980s who knew these things too. I have also known a number of other high-level professional geologists that have also known these facts.

2nd post.

GLP Servers Suck!!!

Last Edited by ehecatl on 10/28/2012 10:32 PM