Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,438 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,005,922
Pageviews Today: 1,320,618Threads Today: 257Posts Today: 4,572
10:52 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1516030
United States
08/24/2011 05:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
it wasn't an earthquake.

i live in buffalo new york. right at the tip of Canada and I felt a 5.9 earthquake from virginia? no way.

i believe it was a nuke. a nuke used by the illuminati so they can poison us more with radiation.

for some reason they love doing this now.
Awakening101

User ID: 1313487
Netherlands
08/24/2011 05:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
iamwith
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1516030
United States
08/24/2011 05:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
also. a test simulator. basically a warning shot. there is more to come....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1518764
United Kingdom
08/24/2011 05:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
iamwith
John Everytard

User ID: 1517443
United States
08/24/2011 05:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
it wasn't an earthquake.

i live in buffalo new york. right at the tip of Canada and I felt a 5.9 earthquake from virginia? no way.

i believe it was a nuke. a nuke used by the illuminati so they can poison us more with radiation.

for some reason they love doing this now.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1516030


could you elaborate on this impossibility? have you noticed that there have been EQs on the east coast that have register even greater distances than that you're speaking of?
kisseyo
User ID: 1261872
United States
08/24/2011 05:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
hey i live in niagara falls and did not feel a thing. i do agree with your thoughts about a nuke noway it would have gone on this long
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1516030
United States
08/24/2011 05:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
well it definitely was not natural.

i feel there is more to come...
kisseyo
User ID: 1261872
United States
08/24/2011 05:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
hear ya bro
John Everytard

User ID: 1517443
United States
08/24/2011 05:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
well it definitely was not natural.

i feel there is more to come...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1516030


OK, how about caring to elaborate on that?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1515743
United States
08/24/2011 06:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
remember those missing nukes from miniot AFB?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1260881
United States
08/24/2011 06:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
remember those missing nukes from miniot AFB?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1515743
...Yea...So??......

tantrum
Taomato

User ID: 1518724
United Kingdom
08/24/2011 08:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
Pin this

remember those missing nukes from miniot AFB?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1515743
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1516729
United States
08/24/2011 08:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
NOT!
MonsterLugz

User ID: 1519047
United States
08/24/2011 08:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
To determine the seismic energy of an earthquake one would have to
integrate the energy radiated at all frequencies over the entire
focal sphere. The spectrum of the average radiation over the focal
sphere can be approximated by a constant level at low frequencies
(which is proportional to the moment, Mo) and a uniform decrease
with increasing frequency above some corner frequency (Fc), so the
seismic energy is a function of both Mo and Fc. For a given moment,
the energy will increase as Fc increases. Consider, for example,
two earthquakes with the same displacement and rupture area that
occur within rocks with the same shear modulus. They would have
the same moment, which can be computed from: Mo = u D A,
where:
u = shear modulus (3 - 6 x 1011) dyn/cm2
D = average displacement
A = area of rupture
If one event were a "slow" earthquake with "more or less creep-like
deformation" (Kanamori, H., 1972, Mechanism of Tusnami Earthquakes,
Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors, v6, p. 346-359) while the other had
a more typical rupture velocity near the shear wave velocity, much
more energy would be radiated from the latter earthquake due to its
rich high frequency radiation corresponding larger Fc than from the
"slow" event.

Having said this, however, if only an earthquake's moment is known
the energy can still be approximated because, if a large set of
earthquakes is considered, the average corner frequency varies
systematically with the moment. For the average earthquake, the
seismic wave energy (E), moment (Mo) and moment magnitude (Mw) are
related by the following equations (Kanamori, H., 1977, The Energy
Release in Great Earthquakes, JGR, v82, p. 2981- 2987):

E = Mo/(2 x 104) erg (1 erg = 1 dyn cm)

log E = 1.5 Mw + 11.8 (Gutenberg-Richter magnitude-energy
relation)

Then:
log Mo - log(2 x 104) = 1.5 Mw + 11.8

Mw = (log Mo - 16.1) / 1.5

The energy released by TNT (trinitrotoluene) and the TNT equivalent
of the Hiroshima nuclear bomb (McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science
and Technology, 1992):

Energy per ton of TNT = 4.18 x 109 Joules
= 4.18 x 1016 ergs
Energy per megaton of TNT = 4.18 x 1022 ergs

TNT equivalent of the Hiroshima nuclear bomb was 13 kilotons.


RICHTER EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE

The Richter Magnitude Scale is a measure of the amplitude of the
seismic waves produced by an earthquake. An increase of one unit
on the Richter Scale, for example from magnitude 6.0 to 7.0,
corresponds to a 10-fold increase in the amplitude of the seismic
waves that shake the ground. Magnitude is related to the energy
radiated from the earthquake source as seismic waves. An increase
of one unit on the Richter Scale corresponds to approximately a
30-fold increase in the total energy released.

A little background information:

The Richter Scale was devised by Charles F. Richter in 1935 for
local earthquakes in southern California. Today, seismologists use
a number of different magnitude scales, such as surface wave
magnitude (Ms), body wave magnitude (mb) and moment magnitude (Mw),
which are founded upon extensions of the original Richter Scale.
An earthquake's magnitude may be computed more than one way at each
seismic station that records the event. These different estimates
often vary by as much as half a magnitude unit, and the final
magnitude reported is the average of many estimates.

Magnitude Notes

-3.0 1.5 foot-pounds (18 inch-pounds)
-2.0 47 foot-pounds
-1.0 1,500 foot-pounds
2.0 Felt only nearby, if at all
4.0 Often felt up to 10's of miles away
6.9 1995 Kobe, Japan, Earthquake
7.3 1933 Salcha Earthquake
9.2 1964 Alaska Earthquake
9.5 1960 Chile - Largest Recorded Earthquake




Magnitude Energy Energy TNT TNT TNT Hiroshima
Joules ft-lbs tons megatons equiv. tons bombs
-3.0 0.200E+01 0.147E+01 0.477E-09 0.477E-15 0.318E-07 0.212E-11
-2.0 0.631E+02 0.465E+02 0.151E-07 0.151E-13 0.101E-05 0.671E-10
-1.0 0.200E+04 0.147E+04 0.477E-06 0.477E-12 0.318E-04 0.212E-08
0.0 0.631E+05 0.465E+05 0.151E-04 0.151E-10 0.101E-02 0.671E-07
1.0 0.200E+07 0.147E+07 0.477E-03 0.477E-09 0.318E-01 0.212E-05
2.0 0.631E+08 0.465E+08 0.151E-01 0.151E-07 0.101E+01 0.671E-04
3.0 0.200E+10 0.147E+10 0.477E+00 0.477E-06 0.318E+02 0.212E-02
4.0 0.631E+11 0.465E+11 0.151E+02 0.151E-04 0.101E+04 0.671E-01
5.0 0.200E+13 0.147E+13 0.477E+03 0.477E-03 0.318E+05 0.212E+01
6.0 0.631E+14 0.465E+14 0.151E+05 0.151E-01 0.101E+07 0.671E+02
6.9 0.141E+16 0.104E+16 0.338E+06 0.338E+00 0.225E+08 0.150E+04
7.0 0.200E+16 0.147E+16 0.477E+06 0.477E+00 0.318E+08 0.212E+04
8.0 0.631E+17 0.465E+17 0.151E+08 0.151E+02 0.101E+10 0.671E+05
8.5 0.355E+18 0.262E+18 0.849E+08 0.849E+02 0.566E+10 0.377E+06
8.6 0.501E+18 0.370E+18 0.120E+09 0.120E+03 0.799E+10 0.533E+06
8.7 0.708E+18 0.522E+18 0.169E+09 0.169E+03 0.113E+11 0.753E+06
8.8 0.100E+19 0.738E+18 0.239E+09 0.239E+03 0.159E+11 0.106E+07
9.0 0.200E+19 0.147E+19 0.477E+09 0.477E+03 0.318E+11 0.212E+07
9.1 0.282E+19 0.208E+19 0.674E+09 0.674E+03 0.450E+11 0.300E+07
9.2 0.398E+19 0.294E+19 0.952E+09 0.952E+03 0.635E+11 0.423E+07
9.5 0.112E+20 0.828E+19 0.268E+10 0.268E+04 0.179E+12 0.119E+08
<<FOCUS HARDER>>

User ID: 755959
United States
08/24/2011 09:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
Do you understand how crazy that sounds?
The Roaming Darkness
[link to www.amazon.com]

Life Suspended
[link to www.amazon.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1518293
United States
08/24/2011 09:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
Do you understand how crazy that sounds?
 Quoting: <<FOCUS HARDER>>


20 years ago it might have sounded crazy, but with all the whacky shit going on right now, anything's possible, I think.
aviatrix

User ID: 1519215
United States
08/24/2011 09:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
I remember the missing nukes that were supposed to be at Barksdale and never showed up. Can you explain how a nuke would look different on the earthquake display? Do you say this because of the depth and breadth? I was wondering if these nukes were kept domestically or overseas -- but I can't believe whoever had them would waste them imitating earthquakes....or....hrm....Washington DC. Interesting. How many went missing? Was it two? That was back on August 31 2007 was it?
Take a Minute to Walk in Their Shoes
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25788477
United States
03/01/2013 01:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
Explain what you felt, I live in Cali so I know what they feel like.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2890226
Canada
03/01/2013 04:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: EARTHQUAKE WASN'T AN EARTHQUAKE IT WAS A NUKE.
hey i live in niagara falls and did not feel a thing. i do agree with your thoughts about a nuke noway it would have gone on this long
 Quoting: kisseyo 1261872


Contradict yourself much?

Didnt feel a thing but no way it would've gone on that long eh?

Typical Ontario'an or whatever the proper word would be. Least your Leafs are winning.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!