This place (GLP) must be excruciating for warmongers, money lovers and environmentalist haters. | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20515 09/25/2005 05:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 12 09/25/2005 05:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 2005 September 25 ....Resolves the Universe.... ´....all-sky image indicate that the universe is 13.7 billion years old (accurate to 1 percent), composed of 73 percent dark energy, 23 percent cold dark matter, and only 4 percent atoms, is currently expanding at the rate of 71 km/sec/Mpc (accurate to 5 percent).... ´ [link to antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 12 09/25/2005 05:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to csep10.phys.utk.edu] The image shows hot gas (which produces X-rays) highlighted in false red color (Ref).... ----------------------------------- The adjacent image exhibits one recent piece of evidence for undetected matter: the hot gas seen in the X-ray spectrum would have dispersed if it were held in place only the by gravity of the mass that is producing light in this image (the so-called "luminous mass"). The nature of this dark matter, and the associated "missing mass problem", is one of the fundamental cosmological issues ... Hot Dark Matter and Cold Dark Matter two extremes Hot Dark Matter Cold Dark Matter Hot dark matter is composed of particles that have zero or near-zero mass (the neutrinos are a prime example). The Special Theory of Relativity requires that massless particles move at the speed of light and that nearly massless particles move at nearly the speed of light. Thus, such very low mass particles must move at very high velocities and thus form (by the kinetic theory of gases) very hot gases. On the other hand, cold dark matter is composed of objects sufficiently massive that they move at sub-relativistic velocities. They thus form much colder gases. The difference between cold dark matter and hot dark matter is significant in the formation of structure, because the high velocities of hot dark matter cause it to wipe out structure on small scales. [link to csep10.phys.utk.edu] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 982 09/25/2005 06:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 581 09/25/2005 06:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 982 09/25/2005 06:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 6740 09/25/2005 07:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 982 09/25/2005 07:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 6740 09/25/2005 07:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 982 09/25/2005 07:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4977 09/25/2005 07:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ´....all-sky image indicate that the universe is 13.7 billion years old (accurate to 1 percent), composed of 73 percent dark energy, 23 percent cold dark matter, and only 4 percent atoms, is currently expanding at the rate of 71 km/sec/Mpc (accurate to 5 percent).... ´ [link to antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov] wrong. Pre-electric view of universe. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 982 09/25/2005 07:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 12 09/25/2005 09:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| zazzman User ID: 427 09/25/2005 09:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, I actually love this site and have been on here for over 2 years. Actually its the only site I really go too. I love spinning up and pissing off the bunch of liberal red diaper doper babies on here!!! |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 642 09/25/2005 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | zazzman you fell right into that one ...i went out of my way not to use the word conservative ......so what is so wrong with being a peace lover instead of a warmonger and what is so wrong with being sharing instead of a money lover and what is so wrong with being an environmentalist instead of a polluter and destroyer ? I dont get it ...are you saying conservatives dont care about anything but money, greed, war, hate and destruction and pollution ? LOL>.....oh boy you just spoke more harm to your political party than i ever could zazzman. Satan has got a nice warm bed for you in the lake of fire. |