WOULD A FOSSILIZED JESUS TURD BE CONSIDERED A HOLY RELICT?

In the shape of a cross?

There are purportedly relicts of the Buddha people have collected like fingernail trimmings and bone fragments from his cremation but of course he differs from Jesus in the sense he was a real historical person and not a mythical imaginary figure

Well Muslims worship and kiss a black meteorite so I guess it would be.

If Moses and Jesus had been real historical people instead of myths people would have collected all kinds of relics and created memorials from their homes, etc. Instead they both mysteriously disappeared from the face of the earth and left no traces of their existence.

This argument is somewhat weak because it would be true for 99.99999999999% of all the people who have ever lived.

That is SO creepy!

I think this actually a very intellectual conversation and deserves a pin. Ot speaks to the dual nature of christ in very real terms. If his supposed blood on a death cloth is why wouldnt his biodegradable waste that all animals in the world produce be?

Bust from a geologic argumet i dont think so because if its fossilzed it most likely is all menrals that have only taken the shape of a turd.

I do think this is a great question to ask though to discover ones understanding of scripture those hebrews says he was fully human in body.

All human bodies have to produce waste to be living and have to excrete it. Its only dirty to people with closed minds.

Pin this.

Holy erect?

Sorry for all the misspellings. And i meant in the book of hebrews not those hebrews this issue is addressed. Its like in the third chapter.

"This is the turd of the Lord"

heretic

Relict? A new word?

Ahhhhh


The HOLY SHIT question!

It depends if it's linked to miracles. You know, if someone eats some of it and is cured of leprosy, or something.

Yes.