*** CERN LHC - NANO-BLACKHOLES CREATION IMMINENT ***. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 944501 Australia 09/04/2011 08:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My understanding of Black Holes, no matter...pardon the pun, how small, can and will grow. By their very definition they "feed" and have an "irrestible" nature that dictates that once commenced they cannot be stopped. Can anybody offer me proof that Im wrong please? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1535308 Australia 09/04/2011 08:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
~Andariel~ (OP) User ID: 1047712 Canada 09/04/2011 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My understanding of Black Holes, no matter...pardon the pun, how small, can and will grow. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 944501 By their very definition they "feed" and have an "irrestible" nature that dictates that once commenced they cannot be stopped. Can anybody offer me proof that Im wrong please? Apparently these "nano-blackholes" are supposed to only exist for a mere tiny fraction of a second. Space, the final frontier...or is it? Knowledge is power |
Fcseven User ID: 1522725 United States 09/04/2011 08:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1522844 United States 09/04/2011 08:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My understanding of Black Holes, no matter...pardon the pun, how small, can and will grow. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 944501 By their very definition they "feed" and have an "irrestible" nature that dictates that once commenced they cannot be stopped. Can anybody offer me proof that Im wrong please? Apparently these "nano-blackholes" are supposed to only exist for a mere tiny fraction of a second. Wouldn't that be ironic if happens. We got so smart that we figured out how to start a black hole and it kills us all. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1516956 United States 09/04/2011 08:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Google: End Day a 2005 docu-drama produced by the BBC and aired on the National Geographic Channel The whole thing is awesome, but the end is similar to what this thread is suggesting. Strangelet in the documentary, but the end result wouldnt be terribly different imo |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1354672 United States 09/04/2011 08:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nexuseditor User ID: 1525377 Australia 09/04/2011 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Great thread - as usual! I notice Dr Samanta-Laughton is saying much the same thing: ------------------ Dr. Samanta-Laughton offers a new model of the universe, where consciousness generates life, where black holes exist inside our bodies as well as far out in space, and where the same science explains galaxies and planets as well as human evolution, auras and chakras. Drawing on the very latest in scientific understanding, the Black Hole principle represents the next leap forward in both human understanding and living, and gives a closer approximation to scientific reality than the macho-approach of the old-style physics. <snip> -------------------- [link to www.grahamhancock.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1535362 Croatia 09/04/2011 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My understanding of Black Holes, no matter...pardon the pun, how small, can and will grow. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 944501 By their very definition they "feed" and have an "irrestible" nature that dictates that once commenced they cannot be stopped. Can anybody offer me proof that Im wrong please? Don't worry. If anything goes terribly wrong, the doctor will make it right...again. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1516956 United States 09/04/2011 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
~Andariel~ (OP) User ID: 1047712 Canada 09/04/2011 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1493425 United States 09/04/2011 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1300421 United States 09/04/2011 08:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My understanding of Black Holes, no matter...pardon the pun, how small, can and will grow. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 944501 By their very definition they "feed" and have an "irrestible" nature that dictates that once commenced they cannot be stopped. Can anybody offer me proof that Im wrong please? If a black hole were created by this device, it would not be massive (weigh) enough to exert much gravitational pull. |
VedaTeaching User ID: 1535368 India 09/04/2011 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1107898 United States 09/04/2011 08:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My understanding of Black Holes, no matter...pardon the pun, how small, can and will grow. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 944501 By their very definition they "feed" and have an "irrestible" nature that dictates that once commenced they cannot be stopped. Can anybody offer me proof that Im wrong please? Apparently these "nano-blackholes" are supposed to only exist for a mere tiny fraction of a second. ... and just how many "fractions of a second" does a nano- black hole need to suck in the earth? |
Scytherius User ID: 1531714 United States 09/04/2011 08:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nano black holes are created ALL the time in nature. There is a greater chance of the entire universe exploding than this causing a problem. The only reason there is zero chance of this being a problem is that absolutely nothing is 100%. It is time for the utter and complete destruction of TeaBaggery and Conservatism. |
~Andariel~ (OP) User ID: 1047712 Canada 09/04/2011 08:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My understanding of Black Holes, no matter...pardon the pun, how small, can and will grow. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 944501 By their very definition they "feed" and have an "irrestible" nature that dictates that once commenced they cannot be stopped. Can anybody offer me proof that Im wrong please? Apparently these "nano-blackholes" are supposed to only exist for a mere tiny fraction of a second. ... and just how many "fractions of a second" does a nano- black hole need to suck in the earth? I have already answered this question. 1 billionth of a second or never. Space, the final frontier...or is it? Knowledge is power |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 944501 Australia 09/04/2011 08:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can anyone speculate on the time frame from nano black hole to the destruction of earth? That, to me is probably the most terrifying end of the world scenario. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1516956 It would be feasable to "assume" that the more the "hole" feeds, then the faster it can feed and the greater its gravitational pull will act on objects at distance. My take on it would be that its growth would be of an exponential nature and THAT is the core fear that I have should one be created even for a nano second. The black hole does not need a time reference point to exist, in fact because of that, by definition it is already at the "Event Horizon" where time no longer has meaning... Here's an old saying of mine... So, you're smart enough to know how to do something.. BUT are you intelligent enough to know if you SHOULD be doing it? Think atom bomb!! |
Prisoner of Technology User ID: 792783 United States 09/04/2011 08:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | CERN is not capable of producing a black hole. Quoting: VedaTeaching There is a difference between dark matter and black hole. Dark matter can be produced anywhere, not black holes. Nothing is going to happen to Earth. Earth is not exploding. It's not gonna explode it's gonna implode. No one has ever seen a perfect circle, nor a perfectly straight line, yet everyone knows what a circle and a straight line are. Perceived circles or lines are not exactly circular or straight, and true circles and lines could never be detected since by definition they are sets of infinitely small points. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1533890 United States 09/04/2011 08:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My understanding of Black Holes, no matter...pardon the pun, how small, can and will grow. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 944501 By their very definition they "feed" and have an "irrestible" nature that dictates that once commenced they cannot be stopped. Can anybody offer me proof that Im wrong please? "Can and will grow" Wrong, something like a micro black hole ( In the nano meter size) would not only require hundreds of years to become a meter, but it's near impossible for them to grow. |
GeekOfTheWeek User ID: 1383040 United States 09/04/2011 08:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My understanding of Black Holes, no matter...pardon the pun, how small, can and will grow. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 944501 By their very definition they "feed" and have an "irrestible" nature that dictates that once commenced they cannot be stopped. Can anybody offer me proof that Im wrong please? Actually they have done this already, black holes that is, but they have no mass and can only last a few microns of a second. Or else they would have sucked up the earth already. I love physics. It bonds us eternally, it's what makes our computers work, it's what's in my morning cup of coffee, it's the thing that keeps the universe from vanishing due to lack of belief... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1509366 United States 09/04/2011 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Has anyone ever thought that why we "may" not have had contact with other alien intelligences is that they advance to the level we are at now and then despite their best scientists predictions artificially create a black hole that destroys them and all evidence of their existence??? |
Blueacres User ID: 1098668 United Kingdom 09/04/2011 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Would the last one out turn the lights off.... "Two roads diverged in a wood and I, I took the one less traveled by." The Road Not Taken — Robert Frost, 1916 [link to www.bartleby.com] |
~Andariel~ (OP) User ID: 1047712 Canada 09/04/2011 08:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | CERN is not capable of producing a black hole. Quoting: VedaTeaching There is a difference between dark matter and black hole. Dark matter can be produced anywhere, not black holes. Nothing is going to happen to Earth. Earth is not exploding. It's not gonna explode it's gonna implode. Space, the final frontier...or is it? Knowledge is power |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1155690 United States 09/04/2011 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My understanding of Black Holes, no matter...pardon the pun, how small, can and will grow. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 944501 By their very definition they "feed" and have an "irrestible" nature that dictates that once commenced they cannot be stopped. Can anybody offer me proof that Im wrong please? The hope is that the nano black holes (if they create them) will evaporate. I emphasize the hope, and "it will". |
cremefraiche User ID: 1525235 United States 09/04/2011 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1155690 United States 09/04/2011 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My understanding of Black Holes, no matter...pardon the pun, how small, can and will grow. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 944501 By their very definition they "feed" and have an "irrestible" nature that dictates that once commenced they cannot be stopped. Can anybody offer me proof that Im wrong please? The hope is that the nano black holes (if they create them) will evaporate. I emphasize the hope, and NOT "it will". Fixed. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1182561 United States 09/04/2011 08:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1182561 United States 09/04/2011 08:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
alexisj9 User ID: 1376880 United Kingdom 09/04/2011 09:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nano black holes are created ALL the time in nature. There is a greater chance of the entire universe exploding than this causing a problem. The only reason there is zero chance of this being a problem is that absolutely nothing is 100%. Quoting: Scytherius This is the reason they should never have thought of this experiment in the first place, there are some things we were just never meant to know. |