Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,076 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,367,531
Pageviews Today: 2,264,175Threads Today: 858Posts Today: 15,404
09:59 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

CFR - APOSTLES OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

 
manowarr
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1537577
United States
09/06/2011 01:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
CFR - APOSTLES OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
Mentioning the Council on Foreign Relations in a negative sense, especially being the moving force of the New World Order, will immediately earn anyone the social ostrinization identification as a "right wing fanatic." The problem with relating the purpose of the mission of the CFR to the understanding of the average citizen is explaining just how and what the organization has done in the past 80 years, what it is doing today, and what it proposes to do tomorrow, affects his or her freedom, security, and even the pocketbook.

After the United States rejected membership in the League of Nations after World War I, some prominent Americans got together to from their own private club to discuss world problems and attempt to bring their influences to bear on solving world problems. The organization took the name of Council on Foreign Relations. Membership in the CFR is by invitation only, and although the membership is not a secret matter, deliberations and decisions are secret. Article three of the CFR's bylaws states: "If you are a member, and reveal any of the secrets of the meetings, you will be disbarred or asked to leave."

Edith Kermit Roosevelt (granddaughter of President Theodore Roosevelt) wrote in the Indianapolis News (12/23/61): ". . . the best way to fight communism is by a one world socialist state governed by 'experts' like themselves (CFR) . . . policies which favor . . . gradual surrender of United States sovereignty to the United Nations."

In July 1948, Sir Harold Butler wrote an article that appeared in the CFR's Foreign Affairs publication titled, "A New World Takes Shape." CFR coined the phrase "New World Order," and it appears throughout the organizations pronouncements, publications, and speeches of principal proponents, dating back into the 1920's. James P. Warburg, CFR member, told a U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee: "We shall have world government, whether or not we like it . . . by consent or conquest." On September 13, 1949, Senator Glen Taylor of Idaho stated: "We would have to sacrifice considerable sovereignty to the world organization to enable them to levy taxes in their own right to support themselves." To quote statements regarding the goals of the CFR in promoting a world government to eliminate war and poverty would be redundant.

In 1954, the Rockefellers anointed a rising political star, Henry Kissinger, to lead the CFR as a shepherd in international diplomacy, to lead sheep nations into the greener pastures of the NEW WORLD ORDER (see our April 1997 Prophetic Observer). Dr. Kissinger's latest book, Diplomacy (900 pages) concerns the diplomatic road that we have traveled to this international "paradise." The last chapter in Diplomacy is titled, "New World Order Reconsidered."

Mao Tse Tung once stated: "Political power comes out of the end of a gun." Was Mao right? To borrow an advertising phrase from Hertz: "Not Exactly!" Without a strong economic foundation, no empire, national or international, can get off the ground. Neither political or military purpose can survive much longer than a generation without financial resources. The Soviet Union is a good example. Augustus taxed the entire Roman empire to raise funds to sustain the Roman military forces that kept the empire together. Mao himself, when his economic policies failed, offered to resign to the Central Committee in Beijing in 1965. Only a scheme to blame China's economic woes on the counter-revolutionaries, capitalists, and religionists that had not yet been liquidated saved Mao from political disgrace. This started the most brutal decade of murder, persecution, and slavery in history—the Cultural Revolution.

However, by 1971 Mao was running out of blood to let, the nation was in chaos, so on February 27 of that year, Henry Kissinger sent his famous Shanghai Letter to President Nixon. This event was celebrated in a CFR presentation on C-Span with Henry Kissinger presiding on February 27, 1997. The Shanghai communiqué paved the way for President Nixon to visit Mao, leading the way for opening world markets for Chinese products. Dr. Kissinger, speaking for the CFR, became an apologist for China's Communist government. Dr. Kissinger stated, in reference to the Tinnamin Square massacre of students: "China remains too important for America's national security to risk the relationship on the emotions of the moment. No government in the world would have tolerated having the main square of its capital occupied for eight weeks by tens of thousands of demonstrators" (Washington Post/LA Times 8/19).

The approximate 3000 students were killed or sent to prison labor camps throughout China. The Tinnamin Square affair was not just in Beijing, it was all over the nation. Only a mild protest was sent by the United States. Students in China who had come to accept U.S. democratic idealism felt betrayed. The United States lost face.

In 1972, Dr. Kissinger saved Saddam Hussein when the CIA deserted the Kurds in exchange for a lucrative oil arrangement with Iraq. Dr. Kissinger was doubtless behind the Oslo Agreement which saved Arafat. As Joseph Alsop once observed regarding Dr. Kissinger's diplomacy: ". . . so somber that it is close to anti-American. The American view is all optimism and all morality . . . That is not the way Henry Kissinger thinks. He never expects any nation to put morality above the chance of great gain" (Daily Oklahoman 9/11/73). Being the CFR's guiding light, we would expect Kissinger's views to be those of the CFR.

However, the CFR, in order to wield political influence, must be backed with economic power. Keeping in mind that CFR membership is by invitation only, consider these CFR members who are international bankers:

Alan Greenspan: Chairman—Federal Board of Governors, Chairman—Federal Open Market Committee, former member of the Trilateral Commission

Ellen Futter: Chairman—Federal Bank, New York

Robert Forrestal: President—Federal Bank, Atlanta

E. Gerald Corrigan: President—Federal Bank, New York, former Vice Chairman—Federal Open Market Committee

William McConough: President—Federal Bank, New Vice Chairman—Federal Open Market Committee

Paul Volker: Former Chairman—Federal Reserve Board of Governors, member of the Trilateral Commission

Richard Cooper: Chairman—Federal Bank, Boston

Bobby R. Inman: Chairman—Federal Bank, Dallas

Robert F. Erburu: Chairman—Federal Bank, San Francisco

This preceding list of CFR banking membership is only a partial one, and doubtless much larger and inclusive. According to the April 30, 1989, edition of the New York Times, Kissinger and Associates represent 30 multinational companies, including American Express, H. J. Heinz, ITT, Lockheed, etc. Dr. Kissinger's role as the most powerful international business lobbyist in the world also gives him vast political power, enabling CFR to also expand its goals for the so-called New World Order. Kissinger's clients include those doing business in oil producing countries of the Middle East, manufacturing, merchandising, agriculture in South America, Central America, China, Japan, Micro-Asia, etc.

The Council on Foreign Relations keeps memberships, or associate memberships, in such international units as the Trilateral Commission, Club of Rome, and Bildebergers. CFR membership is also inclusive of West Point Superintendents, Allied Supreme Commanders, Secretaries of Defense, and Military Policy members. Media memberships include Time, New York Times, Newsweek, Washington Post, CBS, NBC, ABC, etc. Federal Government memberships include presidents, State Department, National Security Council, Ambassadors, Senate, and the House. The CFR also exerts influence on United States personnel at the various United Nations agencies, which is natural, because UN goals usually parallel CFR's goals.

from
[link to www.cephasministry.com]





GLP