Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,702 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 236,421
Pageviews Today: 355,501Threads Today: 95Posts Today: 2,016
03:17 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Police dont commit murder (according to officials)

 
F F S
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1430651
United Kingdom
09/08/2011 07:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Police dont commit murder (according to officials)
This is an absolute scandal, they kill a man in cold blood claiming they or their colleagues felt threatened, they're a fire arms unit ffs, bunch od pussies if you ask me, over pumped up 'roid freaks most of and mentally unstable, yet they're giving him his firearm licence back.

Why do i feel this is yet another attempt to get the country to kick off. I've been on the recieving end of a tactical firearms unit...bunch of mindless hyped up thugs

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]
F F S (OP)

User ID: 1430651
United Kingdom
09/08/2011 08:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Police dont commit murder (according to officials)
No one... this is news and important if your in the UK
bump
indiandave

User ID: 1507376
United States
09/08/2011 08:31 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Police dont commit murder (according to officials)
this happens way to often here in the USA. It's like the cops are a criminal gang wearing uniforms.
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 618168
United States
09/08/2011 08:36 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Police dont commit murder (according to officials)
Why did he have a starter's pistol converted to fire real ammo instead of blanks, and why was it in a sock?

Hmmmm... scratching
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
Alex A Madison

User ID: 500965
United States
09/08/2011 08:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Police dont commit murder (according to officials)
Did the man killed actually have a weapon or not? If this was a situation in which the firearm was planted, then the police are clearly at fault.

If you carry a weapon, you mark yourself as being a warrior and ready for a fight. If others act first, well, who can blame them?

The mother asked; why didn't the police just shoot him in the foot instead of the chest...

That one is fairly simple: A shot to the chest prevents the other person from shooting you far more often.

The head would be better, but most police aren't that well trained. They could hit a still target, while relaxed in the head, but under pressure it's a lot harder to manage.

In my mind, it really comes down to if the man had a gun or not at the time and if it was known by the police.

It sounds fishy to me, but no evidence was really given as to that in the article.
DON'T BE A DUMB-ASS, READ A BOOK! BOOKS HELP TO SHARPEN THE MIND AND MAKE LEARNING MORE ENJOYABLE. YAY BOOKS! Read mine for free. ABOMINATIONS by Alex Madison. (You can't beat a free gift! It would be nearly thirty dollars in the store...)

Read it for free at: [link to orangecatpublishing.com]

News