BREAKING - US masterminded 9/11 attack: Top Iranian General | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1357522 Ireland 09/10/2011 06:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hang this Terrorist for telling the Truth!! 'Bush lied about 9/11 terror attacks' Quoting: September 10th 2011 In a post published in his personal blog chedet on Friday, former Malaysian prime minister said that the attacks on the World Trade Center in downtown Manhattan, New York City, and the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, could not have been carried out by Muslims. The acts of violence could have rather been the work of other groups. The Malaysian politician pointed out that “for some Americans, the deaths of nearly 3,000 people was not the scariest thing about 9/11. It was realizing who carried out the attack: yes, the American Government.” “The planning [for the 9/11 attacks] must have taken a considerable length of time. The candidates had to learn to fly in tiny aircrafts…. Planning to hijack four aircraft simultaneously would require great precision in timing and logistics. One aircraft maybe. But four simultaneously!! I don't think extremists from Saudi Arabia can carry out this highly sophisticated operation with such success,” former Malaysian prime minister commented. Turning to the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers, he said, “They came down nicely upon themselves without toppling against the other buildings close by. It looks more like planned demolition of buildings than collapse consequent upon being hit by aircraft.” Mohamad stated, “A third building also collapsed in the same fashion; although it was not hit by any aircraft. What is the explanation for this untouched building, which collapsed upon itself and did not damage other buildings nearby?” presstv.ir/detail/198361.html |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1543970 United Kingdom 09/10/2011 06:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1541993 United States 09/10/2011 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1501134 United Kingdom 09/10/2011 06:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1357522 Ireland 09/10/2011 06:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1543970 United Kingdom 09/10/2011 06:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1422753 United States 09/10/2011 06:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1357522 Ireland 09/10/2011 06:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1357522 Ireland 09/10/2011 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Heavyheadfred User ID: 1543984 United Kingdom 09/10/2011 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1357522 Ireland 09/10/2011 07:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | September 10th 2011 Quoting: Press TV has conducted an interview with former US senate candidate Mark Dankof to further talk over the issue. The following is a rush transcription of the interview: Press TV: Mark Dankof, if I can put this question to you, these are the very interest that have made a lot of conspiracy theorist as they are being called, raise the question about what happened with 9/11? And was this an inside job? Now polls have been showing that a third of American believe that the US government and/or Israel were behind 9/11. What's behind this belief? Dankof: There is a lot of very disturbing information out there that feeds this belief, one is that if you look at the laundry list of American physicists with Ph.D.s, form our most famous universities, there are a number of them who signed off a petition which indicates they believe that the official story of how these towers came down is scientifically, impossible. That some sort of a controlled thermite explosion brought the towers down. Then we get into other subsidiary questions. Christopher Ketcham's recent piece that is out there on the Israeli's role in 9/11, is once again suggestive. The so-called “dancing Israelis” who were arrested in New Jersey in between the attack on the first tower and the second, the whole question of these Israeli intelligence operations, the so-called “Israeli art students”, that were centered both in New Jersey, and Hollywood, Florida, where many of those alleged 9/11hijackers were held up in the US, suggests that there is much more to this than meets the eye. Including the fact that a tremendous insurance profit was made by Larry Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center towers, who some six months before the attacks, took out a terrific amount of insurance on these towers, and he profited tremendously by them. Off course Silverstein has many links to [Israeli Prime Minister] Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli lobby. Then there is more to this than meets the eye. The short selling of airline stocks, is just one indications that this goes well beyond a handful of people who allegedly did this. And one of the other things that is quite curious is that when we look at the Boston Airport in all of this, in terms of being the central location from where these planes were launched, it was an Israeli Security company that was providing the security there at the Boston Logon Airport that day. That to me is suggestive as well. And none of this has been properly looked into or aired before the American Public for obvious reasons. presstv.com/detail/198435.html Hang Mark Dankof the Traitor!! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1357522 Ireland 09/10/2011 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Man on a Mission - 911 Quoting: August 29th 2011 my own look at what I would consider to be the "connect the dots" as to the underling motive for the event. Please share with all 911 researchers that you may know. The following points I bring forward NEED to be the focus of "connecting the dots": 1. When the NY/NJ Port Authority presented plans back in the 60's to build the WTC complex they were hit with multiple law suits from surrounding building owners to stop the project. The reason being was that they did not want the tallest building in the world at that time being built that could in the event of collapsing (falling over) take out twenty or thirty other near-by buildings. SOLUTION PRESENTED by the NY/NJ Port Authority that got the law suits dropped and the WTC complex project underway was to build a center steel core that all floors would be suspended upon and in the event of a collapse the center steel core would act as a guide post where the collapsing floors would pancake down in their own "foot print". The KEY point here is that the center steel core that was to act as the guide post would then be left standing. There is no way in hell that the center steel core would collapse simultaneously with the suspended floors except under one and only one circumstance, with that circumstance being controlled demolition. Even if for some reason a massive explosion took place that fictionally generated and maintained 20,000 degrees Fahrenheit and melted the steal core at a section on the floors, the top unaffected steel core would have toppled over and the bottom would have remained standing as it was designed to do so. (The powers that be back in the 60's, when they saw the population upon spoon fed presentation and marketing would get all hyped up and spend $10 to buy a "Pet rock", they knew then they could present any story-line and the public would buy it) This point of unique design makes it: No ands; ifs; or buts, controlled demolition is what brought the towers down. All other explanations are just fairy dust presentation to sway a naive population that is by design a masterfully conditioned controlled entertainment society.. 2. After the WTC complex was built NY/NJ Port Authority found out they had a big problem. That problem was: Asbestos was banned in the US. The WTC towers were built with potential fires in mind and the inside walls and steel columns were sprayed with a thick coating (millions of pounds) of asbestos foam fibers. This was a big mistake on Port Authority's part. SOLUTION PRESENTED: by the NY/NJ Port Authority in 1978/79 was to instal a special micro fiber filtration system in the air filtration system of the towers to filter out the asbestos fibers as they broke down and then circulated within the building. If my memory serves me correctly they spent about 131 million dollars on this special and unique filtration system. Additionally being that the asbestos problem was not going to go away, the NY/NJ Port Authority commissioned a study around the years of 1980/81 to see what the cost would be to demolish the towers. The findings of that study were disconcerting to say the least. The cost for demolition and clean up was about nine-billion dollars and that was not accounting for the thousands of law suits from people who claimed to be exposed to the asbestos fibers from the demolition that could amount to billions of dollars extra. cafr1.com/wr911.html |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1543995 United States 09/10/2011 07:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1357522 Ireland 09/10/2011 07:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nah, Iran has been fairly consistent over the years in it's observations about 9/11 Observations that are worthy of consideration, even if they are committing the terrorist act of generating electricity using Nuclear power... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1362378 09/10/2011 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |