as for the UFO:
[
link to i54.tinypic.com]
But, as always, this thread will only turn in cycles from now on because morans don´t bother to READ what has been written before.
Seriously?
You have GOT to be kidding me.
You have a VIDEO of the EXPLOSIONS in the building ...
...WITH THE SOUNDS....
and what you focus on is some, gray part in the smoke?
This is a video that is consistent with the other audible explosions, and the only one I've seen with the charges igniting visibly, but you guys want to talk about a fucking UFO.
Idiots - one and all.
Maybe you should look at the evidence provided that this video is a fake, before calling other people idiots. I "focused" on the UFO because you brought it up, claiming it to be an antenna, what is obviously not the case.
Soooo, just for you, dear moran, here is the evidence, have a look:
oooold video:
description: Explosion heard at 0:11 mark, just before east penthouse collapse.
Note: No one disputes the fact that WTC 7 got pulled.
new, imho fake video:
WTC7 from the other side: [
link to 911research.wtc7.net]
So, obviously the video was mirrored. I could live with that, if the rest of the video was authentic. But as shown by me in this screenshot [
link to imageshack.us] , when unmirrored, the two videos align perfectly and share the same perspective. So either the two cameramen were standing next to eachother or the new video was faked out of the old one. Or the old one has been tampered with. Your call, i´ll go with the new one being fake.
You don´t seem to understand how easy videos can be faked, the sound is probably taken from a controlled demolition video. Mirror the old video, zoom in on it, shake the "camera" (more like a frame controlled with the mouse) a bit, add funky explosions and you´re done, the new 9/11 hit video to be debunked by government shills.
Just saying, people should be more sceptical when new footage comes. This case shows it clearly, most people won´t research on their own.
