Two huge underground cities were destroyed on August 23rd NEW UPDATES

There is some truth to this post, although I doubt a nuclear weapon could be set off underground in Colorado without it becoming front page news around the world, but one thing that rings true about this story is that this could be the reason the worlds economy is taking a dump.

It could explain what they've been doing with all of that missing capital.

There is no doubt there is an extensive underground network of tunnels, bunkers and storage areas under North America, you'd have to be naive not to think so. I think more likely what happened is some sort of experiment or test, or maybe even an accident, but the nuclear attack on an underground bunker sounds sorcha fail to me.

You lack education. The US has detonated over 300 underground nuclear explosions, and most of those were never reported at all.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Just because you lack imagination and understanding does not make it implausible.

If they could make a huge earthquake to cover up the attack then maybe they could have planted smaller bombs to create aftershocks?

When a nuke is set off underground it produces a totally different seismic signature, and seismographs would reveal the difference. And yes, if a nuke was set off in Colorado under ground it would have been detected by now by people like myself who know the difference between an explosion and an Earthquake. There is no evidence or reason to believe some sort of nuclear attack on an undergound base has been made by some 'resistance'/

oh that was that one piece of fireworks after that that glass broke.

aah

man amazing to read.

I am really hoping that someone with better knowledge than me in the earthquake field can verify if this is true or not.

"If you look at a seismic chart, it will look like a big line all of a sudden appearing, and then a smaller line afterwards.

There is no buildup, as you would find in a natural earthquake.""

Maybe I should post it in a earthquake thread and ask some experts to look into this for me??

I am really hoping that someone with better knowledge than me in the earthquake field can verify if this is true or not.

"If you look at a seismic chart, it will look like a big line all of a sudden appearing, and then a smaller line afterwards.

There is no buildup, as you would find in a natural earthquake.""

Maybe I should post it in a earthquake thread and ask some experts to look into this for me??

Don't you think an underground nuke would cause some kind of surface displacement?

Don't you think an underground nuke would cause some kind of surface displacement?

Go to google earth and look about 10 miles sw of area 51.

You'll get your answer.

These craters were formed by underground nuke tests, varying distances below the surface

I am really hoping that someone with better knowledge than me in the earthquake field can verify if this is true or not.

"If you look at a seismic chart, it will look like a big line all of a sudden appearing, and then a smaller line afterwards.

There is no buildup, as you would find in a natural earthquake.""

Maybe I should post it in a earthquake thread and ask some experts to look into this for me??