Two huge underground cities were destroyed on August 23rd NEW UPDATES | |
disclosure_2011 (OP) User ID: 1544142 United States 09/17/2011 04:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | More things that really, make you wonder... [link to www.rense.com] Quoting: Arcturus 1553128 WOW!! "There is speculation that the order may have come via an alternate chain of command. Vice President Dick Cheney is known to be pressing within the administration for a war with Iran, to be launched before the end President Bush's second term of office. According to some reports, Cheney has even, on his own authority (or lack thereof), urged Israel to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, in hopes that Iran might retaliate, thus drawing the US into a war. Could the nation's war-mongering VP have used his neo-con contacts in the Defense Department or some of the Armageddon-believers in the Air Force to bypass the official chain of command and spring those nukes from their bunker?" |
disclosure_2011 (OP) User ID: 1544142 United States 09/17/2011 04:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Exactly. Remember the people that used these nukes were trying to do good. They would not want to cause any surface damage at all. Quoting: disclosure_2011 Oh they were happy do good nukes that you can predict. No surface venting from the explosion, it just blew up a city, didn't cave in or anything. Sorry but your reply is not research. It's just a , yeah that will shore up that gaping hole in the theory without excessive research. You are correct. I will not pretend to know if this is possible or not. I will not however be so quick to say it is not possible. |
antikythera User ID: 1030102 United States 09/17/2011 04:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: antikythera Don't you think an underground nuke would cause some kind of surface displacement? Yeah, wouldn't the Denver airport collapse? They intended to destroy the underground bunker only. Maybe it is possible to not cause damage at the surface. They could have just set off a dirty bomb and contaminated the place. If that were the case they could have just released a contagion into the ventilation. The wolves among you will devour the sheep. :orbsig: :ninjalapirate: Art Homepage, [link to pondcypress.deviantart.com] Hand carved skull and cross available for purchase, [link to www.artfire.com] |
disclosure_2011 (OP) User ID: 1544142 United States 09/17/2011 04:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: antikythera Don't you think an underground nuke would cause some kind of surface displacement? Yeah, wouldn't the Denver airport collapse? They intended to destroy the underground bunker only. Maybe it is possible to not cause damage at the surface. They could have just set off a dirty bomb and contaminated the place. Also a good theory. |
Arcturus User ID: 1553128 United States 09/17/2011 04:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1180511 United States 09/17/2011 04:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have no doubt this has been done, probably in several countries. The extreme heat and pressure under right conditions would result in the cheap excavation of large voids in strong rock formations. Hard to believe military's with access to these devices would overlook this capability. Monolithic rock layers are the way to go if you want to avoid geological effects as much as possible, too. That's why NORAD is in a mountain made practically of solid granite, although it wast excavated with nukes. (at least i have no information to that effect) This guy that is being quoted in the interview is a known charlatan, BTW. He's the Sorcha Fail of the conspiracy talk radio scene, and he makes us all look like morons. |
disclosure_2011 (OP) User ID: 1544142 United States 09/17/2011 04:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
disclosure_2011 (OP) User ID: 1544142 United States 09/17/2011 04:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was proposed shortly after the development of the bomb by one of it's main contributors (Oppenheimer) that if you were to set off a nuclear weapon of a carefully calculated yield within a structurally monolithic igneous rock layer of sufficient thickness, the result would be a chamber in the solid rock, with compressed silica of extremely strong characteristics, in other words underground 'cities' or complexes could be made with the use of nuclear devices. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1180511 I have no doubt this has been done, probably in several countries. The extreme heat and pressure under right conditions would result in the cheap excavation of large voids in strong rock formations. Hard to believe military's with access to these devices would overlook this capability. Monolithic rock layers are the way to go if you want to avoid geological effects as much as possible, too. That's why NORAD is in a mountain made practically of solid granite, although it wast excavated with nukes. (at least i have no information to that effect) This guy that is being quoted in the interview is a known charlatan, BTW. He's the Sorcha Fail of the conspiracy talk radio scene, and he makes us all look like morons. Yes he makes me feel stupid indeed!! LOL.. |
disclosure_2011 (OP) User ID: 1544142 United States 09/17/2011 04:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was proposed shortly after the development of the bomb by one of it's main contributors (Oppenheimer) that if you were to set off a nuclear weapon of a carefully calculated yield within a structurally monolithic igneous rock layer of sufficient thickness, the result would be a chamber in the solid rock, with compressed silica of extremely strong characteristics, in other words underground 'cities' or complexes could be made with the use of nuclear devices. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1180511 I have no doubt this has been done, probably in several countries. The extreme heat and pressure under right conditions would result in the cheap excavation of large voids in strong rock formations. Hard to believe military's with access to these devices would overlook this capability. Monolithic rock layers are the way to go if you want to avoid geological effects as much as possible, too. That's why NORAD is in a mountain made practically of solid granite, although it wast excavated with nukes. (at least i have no information to that effect) This guy that is being quoted in the interview is a known charlatan, BTW. He's the Sorcha Fail of the conspiracy talk radio scene, and he makes us all look like morons. Awesome info. Thanks! I will look into this further and post some info on that. |
ninja G User ID: 1552949 United States 09/17/2011 04:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's about friggin time, Ben's been saying for years that ninjas were gonna be all over this mess. I've been saying where and when?! "From where you're kneeling, it must seem like an 18-carat string of bad luck. But the truth is... the game was rigged from the start." - Benny |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1246800 Australia 09/17/2011 04:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | DW: That’s it? You’re saying ALL the other countries in the world they don’t control anymore? ============ b.s. they control Japan, Aust., EU, Canada, and all the small arab emirates |
sea User ID: 1217065 Netherlands 09/17/2011 04:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am really hoping that someone with better knowledge than me in the earthquake field can verify if this is true or not. Quoting: disclosure_2011 "If you look at a seismic chart, it will look like a big line all of a sudden appearing, and then a smaller line afterwards. There is no buildup, as you would find in a natural earthquake."" Maybe I should post it in a earthquake thread and ask some experts to look into this for me?? Don't you think an underground nuke would cause some kind of surface displacement? Yeah, wouldn't the Denver airport collapse? They intended to destroy the underground bunker only. Maybe it is possible to not cause damage at the surface. Empty space will be filled up, moving the empty space upward which will cause the surface to drop. Yes the airport would collapse, if not it will be unstable. Look at an island somewhere in indonesia, these people extracted so much water from their soil that the island is sinking. No foreshocks / tremors is what they use to set it apart from other quakes but do we have a seismic monitor on that same seabed ? Those shocks could have been further in the ocean instead and i doubt that we got seismic monitors that far from shore on the seabed. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1541191 United States 09/17/2011 05:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still sorting through the entire interview myself. It is very long and even more interesting. Hoping others will listen and read the interview so we can discuss. [link to www.divinecosmos.com] while there are small elements of truth in these things, both of the folks are TOOLS and do not think for themselves and report propaganda. You would not believe a word out of ben fulfords mouth if you knew who he serves. but there is a massive game on for money and china won, and the fed is done for. |
mike User ID: 1305865 United States 09/17/2011 05:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1553764 New Zealand 09/17/2011 06:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can someone with more knowledge of earthquake buildup confirm this? Quoting: disclosure_2011 "If you look at a seismic chart, it will look like a big line all of a sudden appearing, and then a smaller line afterwards. There is no buildup, as you would find in a natural earthquake." Hello, I have in front of me, an extensive 12 page article with mind boggling evidence that 'japan' was a nuclear attack. It includes the seismographs u want to see. It is in the nz conspiracy magazine called 'Uncensored' You may be able to read the article at their site, uncensored.co.nz And yes i can see clearly that the seismos dont show a natural earthquake. Whats more they also show readings in the 6.8 mag range, and the epicentre wasnt at sea |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1553214 United States 09/17/2011 06:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1553785 New Zealand 09/17/2011 06:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to jimstonefreelance.com] Sorry i dont know why that link wont work. That is the author of the article and the link quoted. |
olaf User ID: 1553803 Netherlands 09/17/2011 07:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: olaf 1553661 oh that was that one piece of fireworks after that that glass broke. aah man amazing to read. I really recommend reading or listening to the entire interview. I have only posted parts of it. It really does make sense to me though. yeah chinese before ww1 and 2 and chinese after in the us or something ? like plan 9 from outerspace. and it makes no sense. Hey Olaf! How are ya man? Still eggin the cloud people? Go to the store and buy some. oh ehm i hope you stay alive long enough also. was the explosion dry enough ? |
abhie User ID: 1553633 India 09/17/2011 07:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This needs to either debunked, or elevated to truth status. Nice post OP. (I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.) :laotszungb: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1493562 United States 09/17/2011 08:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1524615 United States 09/17/2011 08:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | David Wilcock Interview with Benjamin Fulford. Quoting: disclosure_2011 "NUCLEAR STRIKES AGAINST UNDERGROUND BASES Recently, these sources informed him that the earthquakes that occurred in Colorado and the Washington DC area, surrounding August 22nd and 23rd, were, in fact, apparently nuclear strikes against underground military facilities. [These underground bases] have been built by the US government, ostensibly since the early 1960s, at the cost of trillions of dollars of undocumented taxpayer money that is going into these “black projects.” The reason why I contacted Benjamin Fulford is I had [first] read this on his blog [and was amazed.] Then I started to contact my own sources, which have been built up over being a public figure on the Internet since 1999 – and gaining the trust of many people in various classified programs. I was absolutely astonished when I started to ask around and found out that everyone I know, with one exception who probably wasn’t on a need-to-know basis, confirmed that this attack did happen." Source: [link to www.divinecosmos.com] Read or listen to this interview!! lol funny how i made a thread that day saying exactly this and the people that responded told me I was full of it. Typical know it alls talking out of their beehind. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1341176 United States 09/17/2011 08:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Peak User ID: 1367572 Australia 09/17/2011 08:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1183343 United States 09/17/2011 08:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1552682 United Kingdom 09/17/2011 09:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you are a very interesting poster OP. Thank you so much for this info. I believe what you say btw. Following geo-politics for a few years now, cgnao, reinhardt, fullford etc Last Edited by Account Deleted by User on 09/19/2011 04:08 AM |
G3 User ID: 1531577 United States 09/17/2011 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.iris.edu] Enlarged U.S. map. . . [link to www.iris.edu] Last Edited by Account Deleted by User on 09/19/2011 04:10 AM |
Dissonant cog User ID: 1502364 United Kingdom 09/17/2011 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Firstly - the link to Jim Stone is at [link to jimstonefreelance.com] It didn't work because Fukushima is not Fukyshima. He was the proponent of the Dimona dozen being responsible for Fukushima. It is a great read. Secondly, if what these guys say is true - then why when; My intelligence suggests it is possible that as many as 30,000 people were in each of these two underground cities at the time that [the explosions] went off. So we’re talking about the potential of 60,000 deaths. Don't any of those peple have relatives? Is no one asking ' what happened, where is my kid/brother/son etc? (should be at least 60,000 questions) I have been told that the situation is now considered Code Red. However, it is also being withheld from most of the people in these [classified] programs. It’s on a need-to-know basis. These people like their secrecy – and I am a spokesperson. if 'they' like their secrecy - why is there a spokesperson ? Isn't secrecy where you don't tell anyone? Surely a code red means you don't tell anyone, never mind post it on the internet ! Or am I missing something? |
HI.Lander User ID: 1308596 United States 09/17/2011 10:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
KAITIAKI User ID: 1116636 New Zealand 09/17/2011 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1553968 Italy 09/17/2011 10:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |