HOLY SHIT ***LEAKED FOOTAGE OF MISSLE HITTING THE PENTAGON ON 911

Strange anyone else noticing something strange with the view counter? on youtube

this guy posted another video that was apparently a recent release. i actually find it a little more interesting than the missle video. although the missle theory seems valid this video seems fake.

this is a wtc 7 video that shows what appears to be controlled det explosions. maybe i am late to the party but i have never seen this footage before. check it out...

[link to www.youtube.com]

then you can compare it to the official NIST report on wtc 7 here... [link to www.nist.gov]

i am not any kind of engineer or fire inspector. but these 2 dont seem to add up. i understand that load displacement could cause the concussive sounds heard from the windows but the controlled timing sound from them coupled with the flashes seems ominous. not to mention this report starts by saying that all debris was removed prior to inspection so this entire official report is hypothetical based on news video and first person eyewitness. it does mention in the blast scenario that no blasts were heard (that would hint to controlled det)but i recall seeing plenty of eyewitness accounts that counter that claim.

keep in mind that they said fuel tanks were not involved and even if they were they were on the ground floor. the highest a fuel oil line ran was to the seventh and would only be triggered in the event of a fuel shortage. these blasts seem to come from floor 25 and higher. look at the occupant list. who was on 25? this could be a shot in the dark. it is my first post here. but then again it could have also just landed me in a fusion center haha.

The missile painted like an AA plane is a proven fake. Otherwise, interesting documentary.

hey i just caught something. the picture at 1:44 in the OP's vid is a picture that is shown in a lot of 911 truther vids. it is to show how small the actual entry hole is in the pentagon. but that pic couldnt be the wall of the pentagon. not only does it lack the same facade as the pentagon (including windows) but there is a "no parking" sign on the wall. the actual impact spot at the pentagon had a grass field and helipad in front of it. there would be no need for such a sign anywhere on that entire wall. i am not saying i buy the official story. but i believe there are enough anomalies in the story without manufacturing anything.

I believe that shot is from the inner ring, looking back out towards where the impact/bomb was. They show that picture quite often, and it is looking at the hole that was left inside the pentagon.

ah ok. thanks for clearing that up. i wondered about that also but i never noticed damage to the inside of the pentagon.

looks fake to me.Why did the film stop as soon as the missile hit? Where is the big fireball that was on the cctv footage? On the frame of the missile coming in from screen right why didnt the smoke from the first explosion move on the lefthand side?

Fake fake fake

utter shite quality footage imo, quite ironic no other footage around,

so when do we line these fucks up for execution? give me a calico, and we'll call it a day. Then we'll have steak, my treat.

Compare the fireball size (height) of the CCTV camera view to this bad fake aerial shot by time sequence. And why it cuts at this point.

Ask yourself WHY someone is faking what *actually* happened.....

To later be discredited on purpose maybe?

What's done is done you say? I would like to focus on gathering evidence to execute these punks. I didn't realize the UK was asleep too

...Tjhe government will say it's a goose or pigeon.

I believe "the goose is being cooked"

Interesting. Notice the white dot on the pentagon that the object flies into. I think this is infrared footage with an infrared targeting system. Is this a missile flying into the Pentagon? Absolutely.

Dam right......