THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2499431 Netherlands 10/02/2011 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2499431 Netherlands 10/02/2011 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit JOHN LENNON BRILLIANT ON HIS OWN HARRISIN BRILLIANT ON HIS OWN PAUL MCARTNEY MOEMENTS OF BRILLIANCE ON HIS OWN BUT THE MOST MANUFACTURE FREINDLY OF THE LOT Thats what they were a manufactured boy band managed by a homeosexual and groomed and orchestrated by a classical musicion producer who arranged most of their best work they leant along the way but they were manufacxtured Queen is a different animal alltogether 100 pure musical genious and artistic talent all contained within the band nothing owed to any other players |
Gabejedmo User ID: 1557671 United States 10/02/2011 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MONSTER User ID: 2122560 United States 10/02/2011 03:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit I grew up with there music, and never liked them, couldnt dance to it, and it just kept saying the same words over and over. Rolling Stones were the good band. KINGDOMS, NATIONS AND KINGS HAVE BEEN BROUGHT DOWN TO THEIR KNEES WITH ONE GLANCE FROM A WOMAN. I WEAR MY SKIN OF ARMOR SO NO ONE CAN GET IN AND NO ONE CAN GET OUT. HOW CAN I MOURN YOU, WHEN I HAVE NEVER LET YOU GO, monster 1991-2008 RIP |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2499431 Netherlands 10/02/2011 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit as i said they learnt along the way they were trapped as the beatles by managmenent in the beatles shit boy band until they were released to do thier own thing |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2499431 Netherlands 10/02/2011 03:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1240798 United States 10/02/2011 03:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1435822 United States 10/02/2011 03:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit I grew up with there music, and never liked them, couldnt dance to it, and it just kept saying the same words over and over. Rolling Stones were the good band. Quoting: MONSTER Everybody is entitled to their opinion. I liked Queen, the Beatles and the Rolling Stones. They were all talented in their own ways. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2499431 Netherlands 10/02/2011 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2499431 Netherlands 10/02/2011 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit they were very talented but they were manufactured and forced to churn out money making records for their mafia owners firced to churn out piles of shit lots of shit in seven years granted they were talented and as they honed their natural talents by the end they made some callis and good albums but most of it was straned shit forced out of them by their mafia owners |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2211045 United Kingdom 10/02/2011 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit I grew up with there music, and never liked them, couldnt dance to it, and it just kept saying the same words over and over. Rolling Stones were the good band. Quoting: MONSTER Everybody is entitled to their opinion. I liked Queen, the Beatles and the Rolling Stones. They were all talented in their own ways. Yes, but this is the internet, so thats not how it works. Beetles vs Queen... Who will win this time.. Another endless pointless argument brought to you by the "Internet|... Next round... red vs blue... who will win... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2490895 France 10/02/2011 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit most great bands are great for less than 7 years at the most. there are exceptions of course but most of the really important bands burn fast and hard and dont need 25 years to melt faces, blow minds and fuck shit up. they do it in three album and tour cycles normally. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2499431 Netherlands 10/02/2011 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2499431 Netherlands 10/02/2011 03:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit most great bands are great for less than 7 years at the most. there are exceptions of course but most of the really important bands burn fast and hard and dont need 25 years to melt faces, blow minds and fuck shit up. they do it in three album and tour cycles normally. LOL yes your right most common garden variety Bands do that whereas Queen released their best album Innuendo just before they had to end it all, and not because they wanted to. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1972588 United States 10/02/2011 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2499431 Netherlands 10/02/2011 03:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2499431 Netherlands 10/02/2011 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit people used to think the marx brothers were funny back in fetzers day people always have new fads the beatles were just another fad but its like showbiz itself if your forced to grow up in it eventually you might just produce some goodd material its slavery but in the end it might end up making you a living. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2499431 Netherlands 10/02/2011 03:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2427199 South Africa 10/02/2011 03:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Captain Spaulding User ID: 1543488 United States 10/02/2011 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit How old are you, OP?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1972588 Were you even alive at the time the Beatles hit the Ed Sullivan show in 1964...??? I'm 53 and The Beatles always annoyed me. They copied a lot from other bands and people. The Stones put cello's in their music, then the Beatles followed. Ken Kesey did his psychedelic trip across the country in his bus "Further". Then the Beatles came up with the Magical Mystery Tour doing the same exact thing across Britain. But hey, a lot of people liked them. I just happen to like music that has teeth and that's more original, not aimed at the simple minded pre-pubescent teen market. Zappa, who was friends with John, ate them alive with originality and creative dedication. But individually they were cool. Except Paul. Geek!!! The Who blew their doors off also... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 590335 United States 10/02/2011 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2464988 United States 10/02/2011 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit into a small time frame Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2499431 milking the fans for every penny making sure they made some money out of the small tiny miniscule lifespan of the most overrated ban of all time the first manufactured teenage group the foreunner of the monkeys, THE BEATLES! 1963 TO 1970 THANK GOD THEY DID NOT LAST LONGER! Forget you man The Beatles are the most talented artist in history, you obviously don't know your music. Im guessing your a metal head, well one day you'll get sick of the head banging and the solely untalented energy music complicated by speedy guitar solo's that sound exactly the same as all the ones that came before them. Grow your mind just name one song writer better than John Lennon you cant because their isn't, they still today hold the record for most albums ever sold and most number one songs they still sell over 100, 000 albums a year to present day, you cant name another band that has accomplished that period. Try listening to their music for one instead of just hating it because you never understood it. and you want to talk about their seven year rain in those seven years they released 13 albums with each containing at least three number one hits todays artist reales 13 albums in 20 years and they average on to two at the most hits. Beatles are the best band of all time and all you haters can suck it while us Beatlmaniacs spend our time pursuing love and happiness and freedom, while you spend your time hating and putting down others, well guess what hate and jealously doesn't accomplish anything, Love and peace can change the world. |
YOUCITY23abE User ID: 1554286 United States 10/02/2011 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2464988 United States 10/02/2011 03:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit How old are you, OP?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1972588 Were you even alive at the time the Beatles hit the Ed Sullivan show in 1964...??? I'm 53 and The Beatles always annoyed me. They copied a lot from other bands and people. The Stones put cello's in their music, then the Beatles followed. Ken Kesey did his psychedelic trip across the country in his bus "Further". Then the Beatles came up with the Magical Mystery Tour doing the same exact thing across Britain. But hey, a lot of people liked them. I just happen to like music that has teeth and that's more original, not aimed at the simple minded pre-pubescent teen market. Zappa, who was friends with John, ate them alive with originality and creative dedication. But individually they were cool. Except Paul. Geek!!! The Who blew their doors off also... Im sorry mr. ignorant but the stone would have never made it ot of england if the beatles hadnt given them the song i want to be your man wich became the stones first number one Jeferson airplane and others bands like that started in 67 the beatles started sphicadelic in 66 now your facts, if anything other artist leached of of the beatles to gain fame such as the rolling stones the animals the beach boys and the monkeys. |
YOUCITY23abE User ID: 1554286 United States 10/02/2011 03:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit most great bands are great for less than 7 years at the most. there are exceptions of course but most of the really important bands burn fast and hard and dont need 25 years to melt faces, blow minds and fuck shit up. they do it in three album and tour cycles normally. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2499431 LOL yes your right most common garden variety Bands do that whereas Queen released their best album Innuendo just before they had to end it all, and not because they wanted to. Interesting OP. Tell us more. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2464988 United States 10/02/2011 03:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit How old are you, OP?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1972588 Were you even alive at the time the Beatles hit the Ed Sullivan show in 1964...??? I'm 53 and The Beatles always annoyed me. They copied a lot from other bands and people. The Stones put cello's in their music, then the Beatles followed. Ken Kesey did his psychedelic trip across the country in his bus "Further". Then the Beatles came up with the Magical Mystery Tour doing the same exact thing across Britain. But hey, a lot of people liked them. I just happen to like music that has teeth and that's more original, not aimed at the simple minded pre-pubescent teen market. Zappa, who was friends with John, ate them alive with originality and creative dedication. But individually they were cool. Except Paul. Geek!!! The Who blew their doors off also... Im sorry mr. ignorant but the stone would have never made it ot of england if the beatles hadnt given them the song i want to be your man wich became the stones first number one Jeferson airplane and others bands like that started in 67 the beatles started sphicadelic in 66 now your facts, if anything other artist leached of of the beatles to gain fame such as the rolling stones the animals the beach boys and the monkeys. The Beatles started the british invasion if it wasnt for them no one would have ever herd of The Who |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2464988 United States 10/02/2011 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit How old are you, OP?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1972588 Were you even alive at the time the Beatles hit the Ed Sullivan show in 1964...??? I'm 53 and The Beatles always annoyed me. They copied a lot from other bands and people. The Stones put cello's in their music, then the Beatles followed. Ken Kesey did his psychedelic trip across the country in his bus "Further". Then the Beatles came up with the Magical Mystery Tour doing the same exact thing across Britain. But hey, a lot of people liked them. I just happen to like music that has teeth and that's more original, not aimed at the simple minded pre-pubescent teen market. Zappa, who was friends with John, ate them alive with originality and creative dedication. But individually they were cool. Except Paul. Geek!!! The Who blew their doors off also... Im sorry mr. ignorant but the stone would have never made it ot of england if the beatles hadnt given them the song i want to be your man wich became the stones first number one Jeferson airplane and others bands like that started in 67 the beatles started sphicadelic in 66 now your facts, if anything other artist leached of of the beatles to gain fame such as the rolling stones the animals the beach boys and the monkeys. The Beatles started the british invasion if it wasnt for them no one would have ever herd of The Who Here is some news for you too the beatles are the only band that help cause the collapse of communist countries including U.S.S.R and The Philippines dont believe me look it up |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1210277 United States 10/02/2011 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit Yep Agree, and Also Queen (f----- up name), doesn't even come near to the genius of the 70's bands...Led Zeppelin being one of them. And why do homos want to use anything to add credence to their lifestyles... Their whole life revolves around their sexual identity and agenda. Never did like queeeen, just for that reason...Gay bands are just that....."GAY" |
olaf User ID: 2492700 Netherlands 10/02/2011 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2503458 United States 10/02/2011 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: THE BEATLES 7 YEARS QUEEN 20 YEARS thats why the beatles put out lots of SHIT AND QUEEN REALEASED ONLY QUALITY but beatles 7 years cramming shit dude, Queen was totally fake! bohemiean rhapsody? hundreds of takes! they didn't even play much live at stadium concerts, it was all just recordingsd of their fake studio shit, just watch some live queen, the singing goes on when freddie turns from the mic! the Beatles, on the other hand, were real, and got that way performing. |