"I agree that the more ideas/ideals put out in the open are good so that others can give input and/or advice on them."

No one has ever told Grant that we´re against him. People have simply asked him to explain his theories or provide some kind of supporting evidence. He then turns around and says it was already provided when all he did was make a claim and that was all. For instance, Grant has been claiming for almost a year now that the Earth is no longer orbiting the sun and in fact halted sometime around January/February of this year. He has provided NO evidence to support this theory and the simple fact that we can observe the sun move north and then south again as the seasons change proves that the Earth is NOT halted in orbit. What I find funny about most of Grant´s theories is the fact that they´re copies of Nancy´s. Nancy was the first to claim that the "Dark Twin" would smash into us back in June. Then Grant jumped on board and said the same thing. When Nancy said the transit of Venus in front of the sun wouldn´t occur, Grant said the same thing. But he went one step further and tried to claim that the exit point wasn´t where it was predicted, and therefore didn´t happen. But Grant was proven wrong on that. Nancy was also the first to bring up the "halted in orbit" BS and then Grant jumped on board with the same thing.