World population....stunning evidence for an Earth that is no more than 10,000 years old.

The question is ignorant.

And keepin it simple stupid.

Do you know what self sufficiency is........food for everyone.

Aliens are demons.

Good research OP, don't worry about the shills. They have NO evidence while you have SOME!

Simple fact - there is no-one alive more than 120 years old to tell us what really happened...it's just all book learnin' and as a writer I know for a fact that everything that is written and published is either dressed up, embellished, or an an outright lie endorsed by those in power to further an agenda...that includes the holy books. Those who are lucky to live to a ripe old 30,000 days are too busy trying not to shit themselves or griping about the 'youth of today' to give an actual fuck about working out the mystery.

Oh please, there are no obvious records because of the great flood and the many axis shifts and pole reversals it has been thru. God does not create worlds by magic wands. The planet is about what scientists have concluded, around 4.5 billion.

It was implanted with LIFE 550 million years ago.

I know. Very amusing.

Written history only goes back around 5,200 years,with all of man's advances (only by the grace of God)his ability with a finite/fallible mind can only guess at best because he refuses to acknowledge a creator who spoke everything in existence and therefore rely's on his own understanding which is terribly flaw.

The Biblical time-line of history (From the word of God alone)declares the world is 13,023 years old.

I read Jesus, He doesnt lie.

that is because 10,000 years ago was the ice age

there was little or no growth for a long time before then

Do you not know that you are not welcome on my threads...you are crazy...now please go stalk another thread.

Do you know what history is? It's how we got here.

your "source " for "Jesus" is inadequate. You are right he doesn't lie but man does and Jesus didn't write the bible. MAN DID and he mucked it up.

Oh right....history produced us now....I think I just saw evolution in action.

Go away.

I read Shiva, whom Jesus himself read and borrowed heavily from. But I always check the publisher. Which version of Jesus' words are you reading, OP?

The real problem lays in realizing that the Creationist and the Evolutionist, are each telling half the story.

This is another example where a "false label" pits people against each other by believing they are on separate teams. This leads to an automatic dismissing of the others opposing belief despite evidence and historical data.

It isn't either/or.

Both occurred in unison and in harmony to create this wondrous and beautiful Planet, with her great diversity of flora and fauna.

As above, so below.

Jesus Himself. fugg the publisher, I go straight to the author.

You didnt read Genesis did you?

Well, your idea won't work until Jesus comes back. Right now it is akin to what the OWS protestors want - tear down everything and then...and then...and then...maybe we'll all sing kum by ya and nobody will have to work and we'll all live happily ever after.

And people call me small minded hahahahahaha

BACK SOON........STAY TUNED.

Of course! What would be a lie about a name not associated with the man in question FOR CENTURIES LATER.

The first bit of your education is the there is no J in hebrew greek or latin...


Here's the rest... [link to www.remnantofyhwh.com]

And the Son's Name?

From a study of the origin of letters that make up the word "Jesus" in our English Bibles, we can readily see that the name of the Savior underwent considerable change as it was brought from one language to another.

The name of the Redeemer of Israel, who has the only name through which man can find salvation (Acts 4:12), has been given a Latinized hybrid name that never existed in Hebrew and did not exist in English until 500 years ago.

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance shows that the word Jesus is from the Greek "Iesous," which according to Strong's Greek Dictionary, derives from the Hebrew #3091, Yehoshua; (Yahsha - correct pronunciation of the Hebrew spelling) . The vowel points that make this transliteration (sounding out) are much more recent than the actual Hebrew letters, being introduced between 600 and 900 C.E. Removing them to be consistent with the original letters, we get "Yahsha".

You should probably ease off the meds...blind faith is dangerous, especially for those on psychotropic pharmaceuticals.

Interesting because I'm watching de-evolution in action...

people, people! please stop engaging the op, he clearly shows syptoms of having his helmet on to tight waiting for his ride the short bus!

Thread title is apples and oranges...

I think it's NJR skankin

Oh they can be one and the same...but it requires violence....